Search (140 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.02 
    0.018065898 = product of:
  0.06323064 = sum of:
    0.015508666 = weight(_text_:information in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015508666 = score(doc=3494,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
    0.04772198 = product of:
      0.071582966 = sum of:
        0.035953194 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035953194 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
        0.03562977 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03562977 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  2. Beghtol, C.: ¬The facet concept as a universal principle of subdivision (2006) 0.01 
    0.008540647 = product of:
  0.029892262 = sum of:
    0.017907863 = weight(_text_:information in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017907863 = score(doc=1483,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
    0.011984399 = product of:
      0.035953194 = sum of:
        0.035953194 = weight(_text_:29 in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035953194 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Facet analysis has been one of the foremost contenders as a design principle for information retrieval classifications, both manual and electronic in the last fifty years. Evidence is presented that the facet concept has a claim to be considered as a method of subdivision that is cognitively available to human beings, regardless of language, culture, or academic discipline. The possibility that faceting is a universal method of subdivision enhances the claim that facet analysis as an unusually useful design principle for information retrieval classifications in any field. This possibility needs further investigation in an age when information access across boundaries is both necessary and possible.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 19:19:30
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
  3. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01 
    0.007791344 = product of:
  0.054539405 = sum of:
    0.054539405 = product of:
      0.0818091 = sum of:
        0.041089363 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041089363 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.040719736 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040719736 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  4. Frické, M.: Logic and the organization of information (2012) 0.01 
    0.0072876685 = product of:
  0.02550684 = sum of:
    0.019514639 = weight(_text_:information in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019514639 = score(doc=1782,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.29590017 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
    0.0059921993 = product of:
      0.017976597 = sum of:
        0.017976597 = weight(_text_:29 in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017976597 = score(doc=1782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Logic and the Organization of Information closely examines the historical and contemporary methodologies used to catalogue information objects-books, ebooks, journals, articles, web pages, images, emails, podcasts and more-in the digital era. This book provides an in-depth technical background for digital librarianship, and covers a broad range of theoretical and practical topics including: classification theory, topic annotation, automatic clustering, generalized synonymy and concept indexing, distributed libraries, semantic web ontologies and Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). It also analyzes the challenges facing today's information architects, and outlines a series of techniques for overcoming them. Logic and the Organization of Information is intended for practitioners and professionals working at a design level as a reference book for digital librarianship. Advanced-level students, researchers and academics studying information science, library science, digital libraries and computer science will also find this book invaluable.
    Date
    16. 3.2012 11:26:29
    Footnote
    Rez. in: J. Doc. 70(2014) no.4: "Books on the organization of information and knowledge, aimed at a library/information audience, tend to fall into two clear categories. Most are practical and pragmatic, explaining the "how" as much or more than the "why". Some are theoretical, in part or in whole, showing how the practice of classification, indexing, resource description and the like relates to philosophy, logic, and other foundational bases; the books by Langridge (1992) and by Svenonious (2000) are well-known examples this latter kind. To this category certainly belongs a recent book by Martin Frické (2012). The author takes the reader for an extended tour through a variety of aspects of information organization, including classification and taxonomy, alphabetical vocabularies and indexing, cataloguing and FRBR, and aspects of the semantic web. The emphasis throughout is on showing how practice is, or should be, underpinned by formal structures; there is a particular emphasis on first order predicate calculus. The advantages of a greater, and more explicit, use of symbolic logic is a recurring theme of the book. There is a particularly commendable historical dimension, often omitted in texts on this subject. It cannot be said that this book is entirely an easy read, although it is well written with a helpful index, and its arguments are generally well supported by clear and relevant examples. It is thorough and detailed, but thereby seems better geared to the needs of advanced students and researchers than to the practitioners who are suggested as a main market. For graduate students in library/information science and related disciplines, in particular, this will be a valuable resource. I would place it alongside Svenonious' book as the best insight into the theoretical "why" of information organization. It has evoked a good deal of interest, including a set of essay commentaries in Journal of Information Science (Gilchrist et al., 2013). Introducing these, Alan Gilchrist rightly says that Frické deserves a salute for making explicit the fundamental relationship between the ancient discipline of logic and modern information organization. If information science is to continue to develop, and make a contribution to the organization of the information environments of the future, then this book sets the groundwork for the kind of studies which will be needed." (D. Bawden)
    LCSH
    Information Systems
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Subject
    Information Systems
    Information storage and retrieval systems
  5. Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996) 0.01 
    0.0068370057 = product of:
  0.02392952 = sum of:
    0.010233065 = weight(_text_:information in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010233065 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
    0.013696454 = product of:
      0.041089363 = sum of:
        0.041089363 = weight(_text_:29 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041089363 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    In relation to indexing, one of the chief implications of cognitive epistemology is the necessity for redefining knowledge representation concepts for information filing and retrieval purposes. Such a redefinition involves abandoning the traditional, hierarchical, closed-structure classification model. Considers the following in detail: a semiotic critique of classification principles; Ranganathan's classification theory; Ranganathan and cognitive epistemology; and some reflections on the DDC and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification
    Date
    14. 7.1996 13:29:45
  6. Poli, R.: Framing information (2003) 0.01 
    0.0068370057 = product of:
  0.02392952 = sum of:
    0.010233065 = weight(_text_:information in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010233065 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
    0.013696454 = product of:
      0.041089363 = sum of:
        0.041089363 = weight(_text_:29 in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041089363 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    11. 9.2004 15:29:04
  7. Maple, A.: Faceted access : a review of the literature (1995) 0.01 
    0.0068370057 = product of:
  0.02392952 = sum of:
    0.010233065 = weight(_text_:information in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010233065 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
    0.013696454 = product of:
      0.041089363 = sum of:
        0.041089363 = weight(_text_:29 in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041089363 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to define what is meant by facet analysis, and to review briefly the history of facet analysis within the context of other types of subject analysis in libraries and within the context of information retrieval research
    Date
    20. 8.2006 12:29:16
  8. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01 
    0.0068018036 = product of:
  0.023806311 = sum of:
    0.010233065 = weight(_text_:information in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010233065 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
    0.013573246 = product of:
      0.040719736 = sum of:
        0.040719736 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040719736 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  9. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01 
    0.0067065936 = product of:
  0.023473077 = sum of:
    0.0132931415 = weight(_text_:information in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0132931415 = score(doc=2945,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
    0.010179935 = product of:
      0.030539803 = sum of:
        0.030539803 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030539803 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  10. Loehrlein, A.J.; Lemieux, V.L.; Bennett, M.: ¬The classification of financial products (2014) 0.01 
    0.0063434527 = product of:
  0.022202084 = sum of:
    0.0076747984 = weight(_text_:information in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0076747984 = score(doc=1196,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
    0.0145272855 = product of:
      0.043581855 = sum of:
        0.043581855 = weight(_text_:29 in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043581855 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:29:52
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.263-280
  11. Campbell, G.: ¬A queer eye for the faceted guy : how a universal classification principle can be applied to a distinct subculture (2004) 0.01 
    0.0063422355 = product of:
  0.022197824 = sum of:
    0.015349596 = weight(_text_:information in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015349596 = score(doc=2639,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
    0.006848227 = product of:
      0.020544682 = sum of:
        0.020544682 = weight(_text_:29 in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020544682 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The results of a small qualitative study of gay and lesbian information users suggest that facet analysis as it is increasingly practised in the field of information architecture provides a promising avenue for improving information access to gay and lesbian information resources. Findings indicated that gay and lesbian information users have an acute sense of categorization grounded in the need to identify gay-positive physical and social spaces, and in their finely-honed practices of detecting gay "facets" to general information themes. They are also, however, very flexible and adaptable in their application of gay-related facet values, which suggests that browsing systems will have to be designed with considerable care.
    Content
    1. Introduction The title of this paper is taken from a TV show which has gained considerable popularity in North America: A Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, in which a group of gay men subject a helpless straight male to a complete fashion makeover. In facet analysis, this would probably be seen as an "operation upon" something, and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification would place it roughly two-thirds of the way along its facet order, after "types" and "materials," but before "space" and "time." But the link between gay communities and facet analysis extends beyond the facetious title. As Web-based information resources for gay and lesbian users continue to grow, Web sites that cater to, or at least refrain from discriminating against gay and lesbian users are faced with a daunting challenge when trying to organize these diverse resources in a way that facilitates congenial browsing. And principles of faceted classification, with their emphasis an clear and consistent principles of subdivision and their care in defining the order of subdivisions, offer an important opportunity to use time-honoured classification principles to serve the growing needs of these communities. If faceted organization schemes are to work, however, we need to know more about gay and lesbian users, and how they categorize themselves and their information sources. This paper presents the results of an effort to learn more.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 10:25:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  12. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.01 
    0.0060784607 = product of:
  0.021274611 = sum of:
    0.012791331 = weight(_text_:information in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012791331 = score(doc=3483,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
    0.0084832795 = product of:
      0.025449837 = sum of:
        0.025449837 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025449837 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Classification is an activity that transcends time and space and that bridges the divisions between different languages and cultures, including the divisions between academic disciplines. Classificatory activity, however, serves different purposes in different situations. Classifications for infonnation retrieval can be called "professional" classifications and classifications in other fields can be called "naïve" classifications because they are developed by people who have no particular interest in classificatory issues. The general purpose of naïve classification systems is to discover new knowledge. In contrast, the general purpose of information retrieval classifications is to classify pre-existing knowledge. Different classificatory purposes may thus inform systems that are intended to span the cultural specifics of the globalized information society. This paper builds an previous research into the purposes and characteristics of naïve classifications. It describes some of the relationships between the purpose and context of a naive classification, the units of analysis used in it, and the theory that the context and the units of analysis imply.
    Pages
    S.19-22
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  13. Zhang, J.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬A new similarity measure for subject hierarchical structures (2014) 0.01 
    0.0060784607 = product of:
  0.021274611 = sum of:
    0.012791331 = weight(_text_:information in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012791331 = score(doc=1778,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
    0.0084832795 = product of:
      0.025449837 = sum of:
        0.025449837 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025449837 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new similarity method to gauge the differences between two subject hierarchical structures. Design/methodology/approach - In the proposed similarity measure, nodes on two hierarchical structures are projected onto a two-dimensional space, respectively, and both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes are considered in the similarity between the two hierarchical structures. The extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be controlled by adjusting a parameter. An experiment was conducted to evaluate soundness of the measure. Eight experts whose research interests were information retrieval and information organization participated in the study. Results from the new measure were compared with results from the experts. Findings - The evaluation shows strong correlations between the results from the new method and the results from the experts. It suggests that the similarity method achieved satisfactory results. Practical implications - Hierarchical structures that are found in subject directories, taxonomies, classification systems, and other classificatory structures play an extremely important role in information organization and information representation. Measuring the similarity between two subject hierarchical structures allows an accurate overarching understanding of the degree to which the two hierarchical structures are similar. Originality/value - Both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes were considered in the proposed similarity method, and the extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be adjusted. In addition, a new evaluation method for a hierarchical structure similarity was presented.
    Date
    8. 4.2015 16:22:13
  14. Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004) 0.01 
    0.006036042 = product of:
  0.021126145 = sum of:
    0.010853804 = weight(_text_:information in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010853804 = score(doc=2651,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
    0.010272342 = product of:
      0.030817024 = sum of:
        0.030817024 = weight(_text_:29 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030817024 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
    Date
    29. 8.2004 14:20:40
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  15. Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004) 0.01 
    0.006036042 = product of:
  0.021126145 = sum of:
    0.010853804 = weight(_text_:information in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010853804 = score(doc=2663,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
    0.010272342 = product of:
      0.030817024 = sum of:
        0.030817024 = weight(_text_:29 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030817024 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 17:33:13
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  16. Furner, J.; Dunbar, A.W.: ¬The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes : a critical race-theoretic approach (2004) 0.01 
    0.00598238 = product of:
  0.02093833 = sum of:
    0.008953932 = weight(_text_:information in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008953932 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
    0.011984399 = product of:
      0.035953194 = sum of:
        0.035953194 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035953194 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 10:38:42
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  17. Zhonghong, W.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.: Potential and prospects of taxonomies for content organization (2006) 0.01 
    0.00598238 = product of:
  0.02093833 = sum of:
    0.008953932 = weight(_text_:information in 169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008953932 = score(doc=169,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 169, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=169)
    0.011984399 = product of:
      0.035953194 = sum of:
        0.035953194 = weight(_text_:29 in 169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035953194 = score(doc=169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=169)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    While taxonomies are being increasingly discussed in published and grey literature, the term taxonomy still seems to be stated quite loosely and obscurely. This paper aims at explaining and clarifying the concept of taxonomy in the context of information organization. To this end, the salient features of taxonomies are identified and their scope, nature, and role are further elaborated based on an extensive literature review. In the meantime, the connection and distinctions between taxonomies and classification schemes and thesauri are also identified, and the rationale that taxonomies are chosen as a viable knowledge organization system used in organization-wide websites to support browsing and aid navigation is clarified.
    Date
    11. 3.2007 14:20:29
  18. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.01 
    0.0058067706 = product of:
  0.020323696 = sum of:
    0.013537073 = weight(_text_:information in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013537073 = score(doc=2346,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.20526241 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
    0.006786623 = product of:
      0.020359868 = sum of:
        0.020359868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020359868 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  19. Kublik, A.; Clevette, V.; Ward, D.; Olson, H.A.: Adapting dominant classifications to particular contexts (2003) 0.01 
    0.005127755 = product of:
  0.017947141 = sum of:
    0.0076747984 = weight(_text_:information in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0076747984 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
    0.010272342 = product of:
      0.030817024 = sum of:
        0.030817024 = weight(_text_:29 in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030817024 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization and classification in international information retrieval"
    Date
    30. 7.2006 16:38:29
  20. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01 
    0.0051013525 = product of:
  0.017854733 = sum of:
    0.0076747984 = weight(_text_:information in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0076747984 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06595008 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037568163 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
    0.010179935 = product of:
      0.030539803 = sum of:
        0.030539803 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030539803 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1315573 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037568163 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 128
  • m 9
  • el 6
  • s 4
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications