Search (108 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.29
    0.29060683 = product of:
      0.52309227 = sum of:
        0.051431756 = product of:
          0.15429527 = sum of:
            0.15429527 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15429527 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03238235 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15429527 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15429527 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15429527 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.008774723 = product of:
          0.026324168 = sum of:
            0.026324168 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026324168 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03238235 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.23
    0.22858559 = product of:
      0.5143176 = sum of:
        0.051431756 = product of:
          0.15429527 = sum of:
            0.15429527 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15429527 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03238235 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15429527 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15429527 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15429527 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  3. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.21
    0.2096269 = product of:
      0.47166052 = sum of:
        0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15429527 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15429527 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.15429527 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15429527 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27453792 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.008774723 = product of:
          0.026324168 = sum of:
            0.026324168 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026324168 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03238235 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  4. Linguistik und neue Medien (1998) 0.04
    0.038265526 = product of:
      0.34438974 = sum of:
        0.34438974 = weight(_text_:kongress in 5770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34438974 = score(doc=5770,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21246347 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            1.6209363 = fieldWeight in 5770, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5770)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Footnote
    Publikation zu einem Kongress 1997 in Leipzig
    RSWK
    Lexikographie / Neue Medien / Kongress / Leipzig <1997> (2134)
    Syntaktische Analyse / Neue Medien / Kongress / Leipzig <1997> (2134)
    Subject
    Lexikographie / Neue Medien / Kongress / Leipzig <1997> (2134)
    Syntaktische Analyse / Neue Medien / Kongress / Leipzig <1997> (2134)
  5. Semantik, Lexikographie und Computeranwendungen : Workshop ... (Bonn) : 1995.01.27-28 (1996) 0.03
    0.025826193 = product of:
      0.11621787 = sum of:
        0.1089056 = weight(_text_:kongress in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1089056 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21246347 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.51258504 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.0073122694 = product of:
          0.021936808 = sum of:
            0.021936808 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021936808 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03238235 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    14. 4.2007 10:04:22
    RSWK
    Lexikographie / Semantik / Kongress / Bonn <1995>
    Subject
    Lexikographie / Semantik / Kongress / Bonn <1995>
  6. Doszkocs, T.E.; Zamora, A.: Dictionary services and spelling aids for Web searching (2004) 0.02
    0.02238961 = product of:
      0.067168824 = sum of:
        0.036276564 = weight(_text_:open in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036276564 = score(doc=2541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.24876907 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
        0.020551153 = weight(_text_:access in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020551153 = score(doc=2541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
        0.01034111 = product of:
          0.03102333 = sum of:
            0.03102333 = weight(_text_:22 in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03102333 = score(doc=2541,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03238235 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The Specialized Information Services Division (SIS) of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) provides Web access to more than a dozen scientific databases on toxicology and the environment on TOXNET . Search queries on TOXNET often include misspelled or variant English words, medical and scientific jargon and chemical names. Following the example of search engines like Google and ClinicalTrials.gov, we set out to develop a spelling "suggestion" system for increased recall and precision in TOXNET searching. This paper describes development of dictionary technology that can be used in a variety of applications such as orthographic verification, writing aid, natural language processing, and information storage and retrieval. The design of the technology allows building complex applications using the components developed in the earlier phases of the work in a modular fashion without extensive rewriting of computer code. Since many of the potential applications envisioned for this work have on-line or web-based interfaces, the dictionaries and other computer components must have fast response, and must be adaptable to open-ended database vocabularies, including chemical nomenclature. The dictionary vocabulary for this work was derived from SIS and other databases and specialized resources, such as NLM's Unified Medical Language Systems (UMLS) . The resulting technology, A-Z Dictionary (AZdict), has three major constituents: 1) the vocabulary list, 2) the word attributes that define part of speech and morphological relationships between words in the list, and 3) a set of programs that implements the retrieval of words and their attributes, and determines similarity between words (ChemSpell). These three components can be used in various applications such as spelling verification, spelling aid, part-of-speech tagging, paraphrasing, and many other natural language processing functions.
    Date
    14. 8.2004 17:22:56
    Source
    Online. 28(2004) no.3, S.22-29
  7. Sonnenberger, G.: Automatische Wissensakquisition aus Texten : Textparsing (1990) 0.02
    0.021442771 = product of:
      0.19298494 = sum of:
        0.19298494 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 8428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19298494 = score(doc=8428,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            1.0570807 = fieldWeight in 8428, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8428)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Imprint
    Konstanz : Universitätsverlag
    Source
    Pragmatische Aspekte beim Entwurf und Betrieb von Informationssystemen: Proc. 1. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft, Universität Konstanz, 17.-19.10.1990. Hrsg.: J. Herget u. R. Kuhlen
  8. Natürlichsprachlicher Entwurf von Informationssystemen (1996) 0.02
    0.020216439 = product of:
      0.18194795 = sum of:
        0.18194795 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18194795 = score(doc=722,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.99662524 = fieldWeight in 722, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=722)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Imprint
    Konstanz : Universitätsverlag
  9. Hammwöhner, R.: TransRouter revisited : Decision support in the routing of translation projects (2000) 0.02
    0.019964311 = product of:
      0.0898394 = sum of:
        0.07960222 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07960222 = score(doc=5483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.43602353 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
        0.010237177 = product of:
          0.03071153 = sum of:
            0.03071153 = weight(_text_:22 in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03071153 = score(doc=5483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03238235 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    10.12.2000 18:22:35
    Imprint
    Konstanz : UVK, Universitätsverlag
  10. Way, E.C.: Knowledge representation and metaphor (oder: meaning) (1994) 0.02
    0.015498253 = product of:
      0.069742136 = sum of:
        0.058042504 = weight(_text_:open in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058042504 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.39803052 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
        0.011699631 = product of:
          0.03509889 = sum of:
            0.03509889 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03509889 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03238235 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Content
    Enthält folgende 9 Kapitel: The literal and the metaphoric; Views of metaphor; Knowledge representation; Representation schemes and conceptual graphs; The dynamic type hierarchy theory of metaphor; Computational approaches to metaphor; Thenature and structure of semantic hierarchies; Language games, open texture and family resemblance; Programming the dynamic type hierarchy; Subject index
    Footnote
    Bereits 1991 bei Kluwer publiziert // Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.48-49 (O. Sechser)
  11. Vichot, F.; Wolinksi, F.; Tomeh, J.; Guennou, S.; Dillet, B.; Aydjian, S.: High precision hypertext navigation based on NLP automation extractions (1997) 0.02
    0.015162329 = product of:
      0.13646096 = sum of:
        0.13646096 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13646096 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.74746895 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Imprint
    Konstanz : Universitätsverlag
  12. Galitsky, B.: Can many agents answer questions better than one? (2005) 0.02
    0.015154057 = product of:
      0.06819326 = sum of:
        0.043531876 = weight(_text_:open in 3094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043531876 = score(doc=3094,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 3094, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3094)
        0.024661385 = weight(_text_:access in 3094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024661385 = score(doc=3094,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 3094, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3094)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The paper addresses the issue of how online natural language question answering, based on deep semantic analysis, may compete with currently popular keyword search, open domain information retrieval systems, covering a horizontal domain. We suggest the multiagent question answering approach, where each domain is represented by an agent which tries to answer questions taking into account its specific knowledge. The meta-agent controls the cooperation between question answering agents and chooses the most relevant answer(s). We argue that multiagent question answering is optimal in terms of access to business and financial knowledge, flexibility in query phrasing, and efficiency and usability of advice. The knowledge and advice encoded in the system are initially prepared by domain experts. We analyze the commercial application of multiagent question answering and the robustness of the meta-agent. The paper suggests that a multiagent architecture is optimal when a real world question answering domain combines a number of vertical ones to form a horizontal domain.
  13. Rahmstorf, G.: Rückkehr von Ordnung in die Informationstechnik? (2000) 0.01
    0.014520747 = product of:
      0.13068672 = sum of:
        0.13068672 = weight(_text_:kongress in 5504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13068672 = score(doc=5504,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21246347 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.61510205 = fieldWeight in 5504, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5504)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Series
    Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI); Bd.1)(Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V.; Bd.3
    Source
    Information und Öffentlichkeit: 1. Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI), Leipzig, 20.-23.3.2000. Zugleich 90. Deutscher Bibliothekartag, 52. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI). Hrsg.: G. Ruppelt u. H. Neißer
  14. Wright, S.E.: Leveraging terminology resources across application boundaries : accessing resources in future integrated environments (2000) 0.01
    0.012628381 = product of:
      0.056827717 = sum of:
        0.036276564 = weight(_text_:open in 5528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036276564 = score(doc=5528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.24876907 = fieldWeight in 5528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5528)
        0.020551153 = weight(_text_:access in 5528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020551153 = score(doc=5528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 5528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5528)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The title for this conference, stated in English, is Language Technology for a Dynamic Economy - y in the Media Age - The question arises as to what the media are we are dealing with and to what extent we are moving away from tile reality of different media to a world in which all sub-categories flow together into a unified stream of information that is constantly resealed to appear in different hardware configurations. A few years ago, people who were interested in sharing data or getting different electronic "boxes" to talk to each other were focused on two major aspects: I ) developing data conversion technology, and 2) convincing potential users that sharing information was an even remotely interesting option. Although some content "owners" are still reticent about releasing their data, it has become dramatically apparent in the Web environment that a broad range of users does indeed want this technology. Even as researchers struggle with the remaining technical, legal, and ethical impediments that stand in the way of unlimited information access to existing multi-platform resources, the future view of the world will no longer be as obsessed with conversion capability as it will be with creating content, with ,in eye to morphing technologies that will enable the delivery of that content from ail open-standards-based format such as XML (eXtensibic Markup Language), MPEG (Moving Picture Experts Group), or WAP (Wireless Application Protocol) to a rich variety of display Options
  15. Reyes Ayala, B.; Knudson, R.; Chen, J.; Cao, G.; Wang, X.: Metadata records machine translation combining multi-engine outputs with limited parallel data (2018) 0.01
    0.012628381 = product of:
      0.056827717 = sum of:
        0.036276564 = weight(_text_:open in 4010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036276564 = score(doc=4010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14582425 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.24876907 = fieldWeight in 4010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4010)
        0.020551153 = weight(_text_:access in 4010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020551153 = score(doc=4010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 4010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4010)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    One way to facilitate Multilingual Information Access (MLIA) for digital libraries is to generate multilingual metadata records by applying Machine Translation (MT) techniques. Current online MT services are available and affordable, but are not always effective for creating multilingual metadata records. In this study, we implemented 3 different MT strategies and evaluated their performance when translating English metadata records to Chinese and Spanish. These strategies included combining MT results from 3 online MT systems (Google, Bing, and Yahoo!) with and without additional linguistic resources, such as manually-generated parallel corpora, and metadata records in the two target languages obtained from international partners. The open-source statistical MT platform Moses was applied to design and implement the three translation strategies. Human evaluation of the MT results using adequacy and fluency demonstrated that two of the strategies produced higher quality translations than individual online MT systems for both languages. Especially, adding small, manually-generated parallel corpora of metadata records significantly improved translation performance. Our study suggested an effective and efficient MT approach for providing multilingual services for digital collections.
  16. Hahn, U.: Informationslinguistik : I: Einführung in das linguistische Information Retrieval (1985) 0.01
    0.011301333 = product of:
      0.101711996 = sum of:
        0.101711996 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101711996 = score(doc=3115,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.55713046 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Als Bestandteil des Ausbildungsprogramms im Aufbaustudiun Informationswissenschaft an der Universitaet Konstanz (vgl. VOGEL 1984) ist ein Veranstaltungszyklus zur Informationslinguistik entwickelt worden. Die curriculare Planung zu diesem informationswissenschaftlichen Teilgebiet war stark eingebunden in die gesamte Organisation des Aufbaustudiums bzw. Diplomstudiengangs Informationswissenschaft, wobei insbesondere zwei Faktoren einen bestimmenden Einfluss auf die Definition der Lehrinhalte hatten: - die inhaltlichen Anforderungen des entwickelten Berufsbilds Informationsvermittlung und Informationsmanagemsnt - der zulaessige Zeitrahmen des Diplom-Studiengangs Informationswissenschaft (2 Jahre) und die nicht geringen Aufwaende fuer das uebrige Ausbildungsprogramm Die Informationslinguistik ist somit aus einer stark funktionalen Sicht heraus definiert worden, die den Leistungsbeitrag zur umfassenden informationswissenschaftlichen Ausbildung letztlich mehr betont als dis ziplinaere Eigendynamik. Die jetzt realisierte Verbindung aus obligatorischen und fakultativen Veranstaltungen zur Informationslinguistik erlaubt jedoch den an entsprechenden Fachfragen interessierten Studenten durchaus eine qualitativ ausreichende Vertiefung im Rahmen des informationswissenschaftlichen Lehrangebots, das ggf. noch durch Veranstaltungen der unterschiedlichen linguistischen Abteilungen an der Universitaet Konstanz ergaenzt werden kann. Schliesslich ist einer der Forschungsschwerpunkte des Lehrstuhls fuer Informationswissenschaft, das automatische Abstracting-Projekt TOPIC (HAHN/REIMER 1985), eindeutig dem Bereich Informationslinguistik zuzuordnen, der engagierten Studenten weitere Optionen fuer eine spezialisierte Ausbildung und - im Rahmen von durch Studien- und Diplomarbeiten klar abgesteckten Aufgaben - eigenstaendige Forschungs- und Entwicklungstaetigkeit eroeffnet. Informationslinguistik wird am Lehrstuhl fuer Informationswissenschaft der Universitaet Konstanz nun in folgender Konstellation gelehrt:
    Footnote
    Kurs-Skript der gleichnamigen Lehrveranstaltung im WS 1982/83 am Lehrstuhl für Informationswissenschaft der Universität Konstanz
    Imprint
    Konstanz : Universität / Fachgruppe Politik-/ Verwaltungswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft
  17. Experimentelles und praktisches Information Retrieval : Festschrift für Gerhard Lustig (1992) 0.01
    0.0107213855 = product of:
      0.09649247 = sum of:
        0.09649247 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09649247 = score(doc=4,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.5285404 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Imprint
    Konstanz : Univ.-Verlag Konstanz
  18. Kummer, N.: Indexierungstechniken für das japanische Retrieval (2006) 0.01
    0.010108219 = product of:
      0.09097397 = sum of:
        0.09097397 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 5979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09097397 = score(doc=5979,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.49831262 = fieldWeight in 5979, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5979)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Imprint
    Konstanz : UVK Verlagsgesellschaft
  19. Nhongkai, S.N.; Bentz, H.-J.: Bilinguale Suche mittels Konzeptnetzen (2006) 0.01
    0.010108219 = product of:
      0.09097397 = sum of:
        0.09097397 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 3914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09097397 = score(doc=3914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.49831262 = fieldWeight in 3914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3914)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Imprint
    Konstanz : UVK Verlagsgesellschaft
  20. Hahn, U.: Informationslinguistik : II: Einführung in das linguistische Information Retrieval (1985) 0.01
    0.009888667 = product of:
      0.088998 = sum of:
        0.088998 = weight(_text_:konstanz in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088998 = score(doc=3116,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18256405 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.48748916 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.637764 = idf(docFreq=427, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Als Bestandteil des Ausbildungsprogramms im Aufbaustudiun Informationswissenschaft an der Universitaet Konstanz (vgl. VOGEL 1984) ist ein Veranstaltungszyklus zur Informationslinguistik entwickelt worden. Die curriculare Planung zu diesem informationswissenschaftlichen Teilgebiet war stark eingebunden in die gesamte Organisation des Aufbaustudiums bzw. Diplomstudiengangs Informationswissenschaft, wobei insbesondere zwei Faktoren einen bestimmenden Einfluss auf die Definition der Lehrinhalte hatten: - die inhaltlichen Anforderungen des entwickelten Berufsbilds Informationsvermittlung und Informationsmanagemsnt - der zulaessige Zeitrahmen des Diplom-Studiengangs Informationswissenschaft (2 Jahre) und die nicht geringen Aufwaende fuer das uebrige Ausbildungsprogramm Die Informationslinguistik ist somit aus einer stark funktionalen Sicht heraus definiert worden, die den Leistungsbeitrag zur umfassenden informationswissenschaftlichen Ausbildung letztlich mehr betont als dis ziplinaere Eigendynamik. Die jetzt realisierte Verbindung aus obligatorischen und fakultativen Veranstaltungen zur Informationslinguistik erlaubt jedoch den an entsprechenden Fachfragen interessierten Studenten durchaus eine qualitativ ausreichende Vertiefung im Rahmen des informationswissenschaftlichen Lehrangebots, das ggf. noch durch Veranstaltungen der unterschiedlichen linguistischen Abteilungen an der Universitaet Konstanz ergaenzt werden kann. Schliesslich ist einer der Forschungsschwerpunkte des Lehrstuhls fuer Informationswissenschaft, das automatische Abstracting-Projekt TOPIC (HAHN/REIMER 1985), eindeutig dem Bereich Informationslinguistik zuzuordnen, der engagierten Studenten weitere Optionen fuer eine spezialisierte Ausbildung und - im Rahmen von durch Studien- und Diplomarbeiten klar abgesteckten Aufgaben - eigenstaendige Forschungs- und Entwicklungstaetigkeit eroeffnet. Informationslinguistik wird am Lehrstuhl fuer Informationswissenschaft der Universitaet Konstanz nun in folgender Konstellation gelehrt:
    Footnote
    Kurs-Skript der gleichnamigen Lehrveranstaltung im WS 1982/83 am Lehrstuhl für Informationswissenschaft der Universität Konstanz
    Imprint
    Konstanz : Universität / Fachgruppe Politik-/ Verwaltungswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft

Years

Languages

  • e 74
  • d 33
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 83
  • m 13
  • el 12
  • s 8
  • p 3
  • x 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…