Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  1. Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996) 0.02
    0.018972851 = product of:
      0.066404976 = sum of:
        0.045511093 = weight(_text_:computer in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045511093 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14089422 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038553525 = queryNorm
            0.32301605 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
        0.020893881 = product of:
          0.041787762 = sum of:
            0.041787762 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041787762 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13500787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038553525 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  2. Jiang, Y.; Meng, R.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.: Generating keyphrases for readers : a controllable keyphrase generation framework (2023) 0.01
    0.011858032 = product of:
      0.04150311 = sum of:
        0.028444434 = weight(_text_:computer in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028444434 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14089422 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038553525 = queryNorm
            0.20188503 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
        0.013058676 = product of:
          0.026117353 = sum of:
            0.026117353 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026117353 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13500787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038553525 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    With the wide application of keyphrases in many Information Retrieval (IR) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, automatic keyphrase prediction has been emerging. However, these statistically important phrases are contributing increasingly less to the related tasks because the end-to-end learning mechanism enables models to learn the important semantic information of the text directly. Similarly, keyphrases are of little help for readers to quickly grasp the paper's main idea because the relationship between the keyphrase and the paper is not explicit to readers. Therefore, we propose to generate keyphrases with specific functions for readers to bridge the semantic gap between them and the information producers, and verify the effectiveness of the keyphrase function for assisting users' comprehension with a user experiment. A controllable keyphrase generation framework (the CKPG) that uses the keyphrase function as a control code to generate categorized keyphrases is proposed and implemented based on Transformer, BART, and T5, respectively. For the Computer Science domain, the Macro-avgs of , , and on the Paper with Code dataset are up to 0.680, 0.535, and 0.558, respectively. Our experimental results indicate the effectiveness of the CKPG models.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 14:55:20
  3. Craven, T.C.: Presentation of repeated phrases in a computer-assisted abstracting tool kit (2001) 0.01
    0.011377773 = product of:
      0.07964441 = sum of:
        0.07964441 = weight(_text_:computer in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07964441 = score(doc=3667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14089422 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038553525 = queryNorm
            0.56527805 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  4. Craven, T.C.: ¬A computer-aided abstracting tool kit (1993) 0.01
    0.006501585 = product of:
      0.045511093 = sum of:
        0.045511093 = weight(_text_:computer in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045511093 = score(doc=6506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14089422 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038553525 = queryNorm
            0.32301605 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  5. Craven, T.C.: ¬A phrase flipper for the assistance of writers of abstracts and other text (1995) 0.01
    0.006501585 = product of:
      0.045511093 = sum of:
        0.045511093 = weight(_text_:computer in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045511093 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14089422 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038553525 = queryNorm
            0.32301605 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes computerized tools for computer assisted abstracting. FlipPhr is a Microsoft Windows application program that rearranges (flips) phrases or other expressions in accordance with rules in a grammar. The flipping may be invoked with a single keystroke from within various Windows application programs that allow cutting and pasting of text. The user may modify the grammar to provide for different kinds of flipping
  6. Saggion, H.; Lapalme, G.: Selective analysis for the automatic generation of summaries (2000) 0.01
    0.0056888866 = product of:
      0.039822206 = sum of:
        0.039822206 = weight(_text_:computer in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039822206 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14089422 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038553525 = queryNorm
            0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Selective Analysis is a new method for text summarization of technical articles whose design is based on the study of a corpus of professional abstracts and technical documents The method emphasizes the selection of particular types of information and its elaboration exploring the issue of dynamical summarization. A computer prototype was developed to demonstrate the viability of the approach and the automatic abstracts were evaluated using human informants. The results so far obtained indicate that the summaries are acceptable in content and text quality
  7. Craven, T.C.: ¬An experiment in the use of tools for computer-assisted abstracting (1996) 0.00
    0.0048761885 = product of:
      0.03413332 = sum of:
        0.03413332 = weight(_text_:computer in 7426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03413332 = score(doc=7426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14089422 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038553525 = queryNorm
            0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 7426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7426)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  8. Craven, T.C.: Abstracts produced using computer assistance (2000) 0.00
    0.0048761885 = product of:
      0.03413332 = sum of:
        0.03413332 = weight(_text_:computer in 4809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03413332 = score(doc=4809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14089422 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038553525 = queryNorm
            0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 4809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4809)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  9. Abdi, A.; Idris, N.; Alguliev, R.M.; Aliguliyev, R.M.: Automatic summarization assessment through a combination of semantic and syntactic information for intelligent educational systems (2015) 0.00
    0.0048761885 = product of:
      0.03413332 = sum of:
        0.03413332 = weight(_text_:computer in 2681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03413332 = score(doc=2681,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14089422 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038553525 = queryNorm
            0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 2681, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2681)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Summary writing is a process for creating a short version of a source text. It can be used as a measure of understanding. As grading students' summaries is a very time-consuming task, computer-assisted assessment can help teachers perform the grading more effectively. Several techniques, such as BLEU, ROUGE, N-gram co-occurrence, Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), LSA_Ngram and LSA_ERB, have been proposed to support the automatic assessment of students' summaries. Since these techniques are more suitable for long texts, their performance is not satisfactory for the evaluation of short summaries. This paper proposes a specialized method that works well in assessing short summaries. Our proposed method integrates the semantic relations between words, and their syntactic composition. As a result, the proposed method is able to obtain high accuracy and improve the performance compared with the current techniques. Experiments have displayed that it is to be preferred over the existing techniques. A summary evaluation system based on the proposed method has also been developed.
  10. Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996) 0.00
    0.0029848402 = product of:
      0.020893881 = sum of:
        0.020893881 = product of:
          0.041787762 = sum of:
            0.041787762 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041787762 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13500787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038553525 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    26. 2.1997 10:22:43
  11. Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996) 0.00
    0.0029848402 = product of:
      0.020893881 = sum of:
        0.020893881 = product of:
          0.041787762 = sum of:
            0.041787762 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041787762 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13500787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038553525 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  12. Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007) 0.00
    0.0022386303 = product of:
      0.015670411 = sum of:
        0.015670411 = product of:
          0.031340823 = sum of:
            0.031340823 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031340823 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13500787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038553525 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
  13. Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006) 0.00
    0.0018655253 = product of:
      0.013058676 = sum of:
        0.013058676 = product of:
          0.026117353 = sum of:
            0.026117353 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026117353 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13500787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038553525 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:25:48
  14. Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016) 0.00
    0.0018655253 = product of:
      0.013058676 = sum of:
        0.013058676 = product of:
          0.026117353 = sum of:
            0.026117353 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026117353 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13500787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038553525 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:29:41
  15. Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023) 0.00
    0.0018655253 = product of:
      0.013058676 = sum of:
        0.013058676 = product of:
          0.026117353 = sum of:
            0.026117353 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026117353 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13500787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038553525 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:57:12