Search (492 results, page 1 of 25)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. RAK-Mitteilung Nr.16 : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung von Nichtbuchmaterialien (RAK-NBM). Entwurf (1995) 0.01
    0.00978818 = product of:
      0.07830544 = sum of:
        0.07830544 = product of:
          0.11745816 = sum of:
            0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058994424 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
            0.058463734 = weight(_text_:22 in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058463734 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Pages
    22 S
    Source
    Beilage zu: Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.10
  2. Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997) 0.01
    0.008568173 = product of:
      0.034272693 = sum of:
        0.023136742 = product of:
          0.06941023 = sum of:
            0.06941023 = weight(_text_:problem in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06941023 = score(doc=695,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.5305606 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.01113595 = product of:
          0.03340785 = sum of:
            0.03340785 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03340785 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    One of the most common errors in cataloguing library materials involves miscoding of the nonfiling indicator of title fields. Notes the extent of the problem and its negative effect on searching in the library's online catalogue and surveys how librarians have approached solutions to the problems. Describes how the major library automation system address this problem
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  3. Parent, I.: International and national cataloguing rules : current situation and future trends, Moscow, 20-24 April 1999 (2000) 0.01
    0.008389869 = product of:
      0.06711895 = sum of:
        0.06711895 = product of:
          0.10067842 = sum of:
            0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05056665 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
            0.05011177 = weight(_text_:22 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05011177 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 17:22:42
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.1, S.9-12
  4. Byrd, J.: ¬A cooperative cataloguing proposal for Slavic and East European languages and the languages of the former Soviet Union (1993) 0.01
    0.0074971514 = product of:
      0.029988606 = sum of:
        0.02024465 = product of:
          0.06073395 = sum of:
            0.06073395 = weight(_text_:problem in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06073395 = score(doc=564,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.46424055 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009743956 = product of:
          0.029231867 = sum of:
            0.029231867 = weight(_text_:22 in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029231867 = score(doc=564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes, as a backlog reduction strategy, a national cooperative cataloging program among libraries with major collections in the Slavic and East European languages and in the languages of the former Soviet Union. The long-standing problem of cataloging backlogs is discussed, including a brief discussion of some of the other ways that have been used to address the problem. The proposal for a cooperative effort is outlined and some of the cataloging issues to be considered are discussed.
    Date
    12. 1.2007 13:22:35
  5. Eversberg, B.: Zukunft der Regelwerksarbeit und des Katalogisierens (2003) 0.01
    0.007478413 = product of:
      0.029913653 = sum of:
        0.024295136 = product of:
          0.07288541 = sum of:
            0.07288541 = weight(_text_:seele in 1552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07288541 = score(doc=1552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22546001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.32327422 = fieldWeight in 1552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1552)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0056185164 = product of:
          0.016855549 = sum of:
            0.016855549 = weight(_text_:29 in 1552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016855549 = score(doc=1552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1552)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch die Kommentierung von E. Plassmann in einer Rezension in ZfBB 52(2005) H.2, S.99: Vieles wirkt erfrischend. Um das heftig umstrittene Thema RAK und AACR herauszugreifen,das imTagungsband ganz vorne steht: Auf die knappe, gleichwohl qualifizierte und nachdenkliche Einführung von Ulrich Hohoff folgen kurze, unbefangen kritische Statements von der Art, die man sich in der Fachdiskussion öfter wünschte - ohne die verbreitete, nicht selten pharisäische correctness. Bernhard Eversberg wird vielen Kolleginnen und Kollegen aus der Seele gesprochen haben, wenn er sagt: »Das Katalogisierungspersonal sollte frühzeitig die Möglichkeit zum Einblick in neue Texte und Entwürfe haben. Engagierte Mitarbeiterinnen wünschen sich Möglichkeiten, eigene Erfahrungen, Meinungen und Fragen einzubringen.« Oder, wenn er feststellt: »Technische Verbesserungen sind aber kein Ziel an sich. Wichtig ist zuallererst, die eigentlichen Ziele des Katalogisierens neu zu überdenken, zu erweitern oder zu modifizieren. Dies kann eine neue technische Grundlage nur unterstützen, nicht ersetzen. Zu den neuen Herausforderungen gehören vernetzte, internationalisierte Normdateien.« (beide Zitate S.75) - In eine etwas andere Richtung pointiert Heidrun Wiesenmüller das Thema: »Der Plan eines Umstiegs auf AACR2/MARC stellt nicht zuletzt den anachronistischen Versuch dar, eine heterogene Datenwelt durch Verordnung eines Standards von oben zu vereinheitlichen. Eine zeitgemäße Lösung kann jedoch nur darin bestehen, Tools und Informationssysteme auf Meta-Ebene zu entwickeln.« (S. 79) Dem ist zu diesem Thema nichts hinzuzufügen.
    Source
    Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen - Aufgaben, Strukturen, Ziele: 29. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB / Sektion 5 im DBV in Zusammenarbeit mit der BDB, BIB, DBV, DGI und VDB, zugleich DBV-Jahrestagung, 8.-11.4.2003 in Stuttgart. Red.: Margit Bauer
  6. Hohoff, U.: Versuch einer Zusammenfassung der Diskussion (2003) 0.01
    0.007478413 = product of:
      0.029913653 = sum of:
        0.024295136 = product of:
          0.07288541 = sum of:
            0.07288541 = weight(_text_:seele in 2120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07288541 = score(doc=2120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22546001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.32327422 = fieldWeight in 2120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2120)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0056185164 = product of:
          0.016855549 = sum of:
            0.016855549 = weight(_text_:29 in 2120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016855549 = score(doc=2120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2120)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch die Kommentierung von E. Plassmann in einer Rezension in ZfBB 52(2005) H.2, S.99: Vieles wirkt erfrischend. Um das heftig umstrittene Thema RAK und AACR herauszugreifen,das imTagungsband ganz vorne steht: Auf die knappe, gleichwohl qualifizierte und nachdenkliche Einführung von Ulrich Hohoff folgen kurze, unbefangen kritische Statements von der Art, die man sich in der Fachdiskussion öfter wünschte - ohne die verbreitete, nicht selten pharisäische correctness. Bernhard Eversberg wird vielen Kolleginnen und Kollegen aus der Seele gesprochen haben, wenn er sagt: »Das Katalogisierungspersonal sollte frühzeitig die Möglichkeit zum Einblick in neue Texte und Entwürfe haben. Engagierte Mitarbeiterinnen wünschen sich Möglichkeiten, eigene Erfahrungen, Meinungen und Fragen einzubringen.« Oder, wenn er feststellt: »Technische Verbesserungen sind aber kein Ziel an sich. Wichtig ist zuallererst, die eigentlichen Ziele des Katalogisierens neu zu überdenken, zu erweitern oder zu modifizieren. Dies kann eine neue technische Grundlage nur unterstützen, nicht ersetzen. Zu den neuen Herausforderungen gehören vernetzte, internationalisierte Normdateien.« (beide Zitate S.75) - In eine etwas andere Richtung pointiert Heidrun Wiesenmüller das Thema: »Der Plan eines Umstiegs auf AACR2/MARC stellt nicht zuletzt den anachronistischen Versuch dar, eine heterogene Datenwelt durch Verordnung eines Standards von oben zu vereinheitlichen. Eine zeitgemäße Lösung kann jedoch nur darin bestehen, Tools und Informationssysteme auf Meta-Ebene zu entwickeln.« (S. 79) Dem ist zu diesem Thema nichts hinzuzufügen.
    Source
    Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen - Aufgaben, Strukturen, Ziele: 29. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB / Sektion 5 im DBV in Zusammenarbeit mit der BDB, BIB, DBV, DGI und VDB, zugleich DBV-Jahrestagung, 8.-11.4.2003 in Stuttgart. Red.: Margit Bauer
  7. Hohoff, U.: ¬Die Zukunft der formalen und inhaltlichen Erschließung : Ein Blick über die Grenzen der RAK / AACR - Diskussion. Eine gemeinsame Veranstaltung der Bibliotheksverbände VDB, GBV und BIB (2003) 0.01
    0.007478413 = product of:
      0.029913653 = sum of:
        0.024295136 = product of:
          0.07288541 = sum of:
            0.07288541 = weight(_text_:seele in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07288541 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22546001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.32327422 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0056185164 = product of:
          0.016855549 = sum of:
            0.016855549 = weight(_text_:29 in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016855549 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch die Kommentierung von E. Plassmann in einer Rezension in ZfBB 52(2005) H.2, S.99: Vieles wirkt erfrischend. Um das heftig umstrittene Thema RAK und AACR herauszugreifen,das imTagungsband ganz vorne steht: Auf die knappe, gleichwohl qualifizierte und nachdenkliche Einführung von Ulrich Hohoff folgen kurze, unbefangen kritische Statements von der Art, die man sich in der Fachdiskussion öfter wünschte - ohne die verbreitete, nicht selten pharisäische correctness. Bernhard Eversberg wird vielen Kolleginnen und Kollegen aus der Seele gesprochen haben, wenn er sagt: »Das Katalogisierungspersonal sollte frühzeitig die Möglichkeit zum Einblick in neue Texte und Entwürfe haben. Engagierte Mitarbeiterinnen wünschen sich Möglichkeiten, eigene Erfahrungen, Meinungen und Fragen einzubringen.« Oder, wenn er feststellt: »Technische Verbesserungen sind aber kein Ziel an sich. Wichtig ist zuallererst, die eigentlichen Ziele des Katalogisierens neu zu überdenken, zu erweitern oder zu modifizieren. Dies kann eine neue technische Grundlage nur unterstützen, nicht ersetzen. Zu den neuen Herausforderungen gehören vernetzte, internationalisierte Normdateien.« (beide Zitate S.75) - In eine etwas andere Richtung pointiert Heidrun Wiesenmüller das Thema: »Der Plan eines Umstiegs auf AACR2/MARC stellt nicht zuletzt den anachronistischen Versuch dar, eine heterogene Datenwelt durch Verordnung eines Standards von oben zu vereinheitlichen. Eine zeitgemäße Lösung kann jedoch nur darin bestehen, Tools und Informationssysteme auf Meta-Ebene zu entwickeln.« (S. 79) Dem ist zu diesem Thema nichts hinzuzufügen.
    Source
    Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen - Aufgaben, Strukturen, Ziele: 29. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB / Sektion 5 im DBV in Zusammenarbeit mit der BDB, BIB, DBV, DGI und VDB, zugleich DBV-Jahrestagung, 8.-11.4.2003 in Stuttgart. Red.: Margit Bauer
  8. Wiesenmüller, H.: Vier Thesen (2003) 0.01
    0.007478413 = product of:
      0.029913653 = sum of:
        0.024295136 = product of:
          0.07288541 = sum of:
            0.07288541 = weight(_text_:seele in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07288541 = score(doc=3362,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22546001 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.32327422 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0056185164 = product of:
          0.016855549 = sum of:
            0.016855549 = weight(_text_:29 in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016855549 = score(doc=3362,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die Kommentierung von E. Plassmann in einer Rezension in ZfBB 52(2005) H.2, S.99: Vieles wirkt erfrischend. Um das heftig umstrittene Thema RAK und AACR herauszugreifen,das imTagungsband ganz vorne steht: Auf die knappe, gleichwohl qualifizierte und nachdenkliche Einführung von Ulrich Hohoff folgen kurze, unbefangen kritische Statements von der Art, die man sich in der Fachdiskussion öfter wünschte - ohne die verbreitete, nicht selten pharisäische correctness. Bernhard Eversberg wird vielen Kolleginnen und Kollegen aus der Seele gesprochen haben, wenn er sagt: »Das Katalogisierungspersonal sollte frühzeitig die Möglichkeit zum Einblick in neue Texte und Entwürfe haben. Engagierte Mitarbeiterinnen wünschen sich Möglichkeiten, eigene Erfahrungen, Meinungen und Fragen einzubringen.« Oder, wenn er feststellt: »Technische Verbesserungen sind aber kein Ziel an sich. Wichtig ist zuallererst, die eigentlichen Ziele des Katalogisierens neu zu überdenken, zu erweitern oder zu modifizieren. Dies kann eine neue technische Grundlage nur unterstützen, nicht ersetzen. Zu den neuen Herausforderungen gehören vernetzte, internationalisierte Normdateien.« (beide Zitate S.75) - In eine etwas andere Richtung pointiert Heidrun Wiesenmüller das Thema: »Der Plan eines Umstiegs auf AACR2/MARC stellt nicht zuletzt den anachronistischen Versuch dar, eine heterogene Datenwelt durch Verordnung eines Standards von oben zu vereinheitlichen. Eine zeitgemäße Lösung kann jedoch nur darin bestehen, Tools und Informationssysteme auf Meta-Ebene zu entwickeln.« (S. 79) Dem ist zu diesem Thema nichts hinzuzufügen.
    Source
    Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen - Aufgaben, Strukturen, Ziele: 29. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB / Sektion 5 im DBV in Zusammenarbeit mit der BDB, BIB, DBV, DGI und VDB, zugleich DBV-Jahrestagung, 8.-11.4.2003 in Stuttgart. Red.: Margit Bauer
  9. Briot, D.; Creff, J.A.: Enfin une norme francaise de description des resources électroniques (Z44-082) (2000) 0.01
    0.0069915573 = product of:
      0.05593246 = sum of:
        0.05593246 = product of:
          0.083898686 = sum of:
            0.042138875 = weight(_text_:29 in 4634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042138875 = score(doc=4634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4634)
            0.04175981 = weight(_text_:22 in 4634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04175981 = score(doc=4634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4634)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 2000, no.186, S.20-22
  10. Seminario FRBR : Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: reguisiti funzionali per record bibliografici, Florence, 27-28 January 2000, Proceedings (2000) 0.01
    0.0069915573 = product of:
      0.05593246 = sum of:
        0.05593246 = product of:
          0.083898686 = sum of:
            0.042138875 = weight(_text_:29 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042138875 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
            0.04175981 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04175981 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2005 12:54:22
  11. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.01
    0.0069915573 = product of:
      0.05593246 = sum of:
        0.05593246 = product of:
          0.083898686 = sum of:
            0.042138875 = weight(_text_:29 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042138875 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
            0.04175981 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04175981 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2006 20:05:15
    Pages
    S.3-22
  12. Weitz, J.: Cataloger's judgment : music cataloging questions and answers from the music OCLC users group newsletter (2003) 0.01
    0.0069915573 = product of:
      0.05593246 = sum of:
        0.05593246 = product of:
          0.083898686 = sum of:
            0.042138875 = weight(_text_:29 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042138875 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
            0.04175981 = weight(_text_:22 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04175981 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:22:29
  13. Garrett, J.: Wandel und Kontinuität im Ethos des Katalogisierens in den USA (2006) 0.01
    0.0069915573 = product of:
      0.05593246 = sum of:
        0.05593246 = product of:
          0.083898686 = sum of:
            0.042138875 = weight(_text_:29 in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042138875 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
            0.04175981 = weight(_text_:22 in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04175981 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    4. 3.2006 16:29:22
  14. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.01
    0.006874024 = product of:
      0.027496096 = sum of:
        0.016360147 = product of:
          0.04908044 = sum of:
            0.04908044 = weight(_text_:problem in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04908044 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.375163 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.01113595 = product of:
          0.03340785 = sum of:
            0.03340785 = weight(_text_:22 in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03340785 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the problem of applying standard concepts of cataloguing and bibliographic control to electronic media by studying the degree of fit between the Standford Integrated Digital Library Project (SDLP) and both the USMARC format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). Notes the lack of fit of both USMARC and TEI but stresses the advantages of the latter due its lack of dependency on 3 digit tags and its use of SGML conventions
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  15. Moir, S.; Wells, A.: Descriptive cataloguing and the Internet : recent research (1996) 0.01
    0.006874024 = product of:
      0.027496096 = sum of:
        0.016360147 = product of:
          0.04908044 = sum of:
            0.04908044 = weight(_text_:problem in 7230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04908044 = score(doc=7230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.375163 = fieldWeight in 7230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.01113595 = product of:
          0.03340785 = sum of:
            0.03340785 = weight(_text_:22 in 7230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03340785 = score(doc=7230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the Coalition for Networked Information's (CNI) analysis of the networked electronic environment where the chief problem for the users appears to be finding resources on the Internet. Presents the CNI's arguments for surrogates and describes one approach to the identification and description of resources on the Internet: the OCLC Internet Cataloguing Project
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.8-16
  16. Crocetti, L.: AACR2 in edizione italiana (1997) 0.01
    0.006756879 = product of:
      0.05405503 = sum of:
        0.05405503 = product of:
          0.081082545 = sum of:
            0.047674697 = weight(_text_:29 in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047674697 = score(doc=1623,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
            0.03340785 = weight(_text_:22 in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03340785 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
    29. 7.1998 10:22:48
  17. Mayo, D.; Bowers, K.: ¬The devil's shoehorn : a case study of EAD to ArchivesSpace migration at a large university (2017) 0.01
    0.0061833817 = product of:
      0.024733527 = sum of:
        0.01771038 = product of:
          0.05313114 = sum of:
            0.05313114 = weight(_text_:problem in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05313114 = score(doc=3373,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.4061259 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.007023146 = product of:
          0.021069437 = sum of:
            0.021069437 = weight(_text_:29 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021069437 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    A band of archivists and IT professionals at Harvard took on a project to convert nearly two million descriptions of archival collection components from marked-up text into the ArchivesSpace archival metadata management system. Starting in the mid-1990s, Harvard was an alpha implementer of EAD, an SGML (later XML) text markup language for electronic inventories, indexes, and finding aids that archivists use to wend their way through the sometimes quirky filing systems that bureaucracies establish for their records or the utter chaos in which some individuals keep their personal archives. These pathfinder documents, designed to cope with messy reality, can themselves be difficult to classify. Portions of them are rigorously structured, while other parts are narrative. Early documents predate the establishment of the standard; many feature idiosyncratic encoding that had been through several machine conversions, while others were freshly encoded and fairly consistent. In this paper, we will cover the practical and technical challenges involved in preparing a large (900MiB) corpus of XML for ingest into an open-source archival information system (ArchivesSpace). This case study will give an overview of the project, discuss problem discovery and problem solving, and address the technical challenges, analysis, solutions, and decisions and provide information on the tools produced and lessons learned. The authors of this piece are Kate Bowers, Collections Services Archivist for Metadata, Systems, and Standards at the Harvard University Archive, and Dave Mayo, a Digital Library Software Engineer for Harvard's Library and Technology Services. Kate was heavily involved in both metadata analysis and later problem solving, while Dave was the sole full-time developer assigned to the migration project.
    Date
    31. 1.2017 13:29:56
  18. Geißelmann, F.: ¬Die Zukunft der formalen und inhaltlichen Erschließung : Thesen (2003) 0.01
    0.006036883 = product of:
      0.024147533 = sum of:
        0.014315128 = product of:
          0.042945385 = sum of:
            0.042945385 = weight(_text_:problem in 1900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042945385 = score(doc=1900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 1900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1900)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009832405 = product of:
          0.029497212 = sum of:
            0.029497212 = weight(_text_:29 in 1900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029497212 = score(doc=1900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1900)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Content
    "1. These: Die Systeme der inhaltlichen Erschließung sind bei der gegenwärtigen RAK/AACR-Diskussion fast ganz ausgeklammert. Dies ist so, obwohl AACR Regelungen für einen Kreuzkatalog enthält. Auch im Rahmen der Migrationsstudie wurde dies ausdrücklich so entschieden. 2. These: Welche Anforderungen ergeben sich an die Sacherschließung auf mittlere Sicht? 3. These: RSWK oder LCSH 4. These: RVK gegen DDC 5. These: Wege zur Bewältigung der Heterogenität sind das eigentliche Problem der Zukunft"
    Source
    Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen - Aufgaben, Strukturen, Ziele: 29. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB / Sektion 5 im DBV in Zusammenarbeit mit der BDB, BIB, DBV, DGI und VDB, zugleich DBV-Jahrestagung, 8.-11.4.2003 in Stuttgart. Red.: Margit Bauer
  19. Teal, W.: Alma enumerator : automating repetitive cataloging tasks with Python (2018) 0.01
    0.006036883 = product of:
      0.024147533 = sum of:
        0.014315128 = product of:
          0.042945385 = sum of:
            0.042945385 = weight(_text_:problem in 5348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042945385 = score(doc=5348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 5348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5348)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009832405 = product of:
          0.029497212 = sum of:
            0.029497212 = weight(_text_:29 in 5348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029497212 = score(doc=5348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5348)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    In June 2016, the Warburg College library migrated to a new integrated library system, Alma. In the process, we lost the enumeration and chronology data for roughly 79,000 print serial item records. Re-entering all this data by hand seemed an unthinkable task. Fortunately, the information was recorded as free text in each item's description field. By using Python, Alma's API and much trial and error, the Wartburg College library was able to parse the serial item descriptions into enumeration and chronology data that was uploaded back into Alma. This paper discusses the design and feasibility considerations addressed in trying to solve this problem, the complications encountered during development, and the highlights and shortcomings of the collection of Python scripts that became Alma Enumerator.
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:29:37
  20. Rankin, K.L.: Video cataloguing : reducing backlogs (1996) 0.01
    0.006014771 = product of:
      0.024059083 = sum of:
        0.014315128 = product of:
          0.042945385 = sum of:
            0.042945385 = weight(_text_:problem in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042945385 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.3282676 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009743956 = product of:
          0.029231867 = sum of:
            0.029231867 = weight(_text_:22 in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029231867 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030822188 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    At the University of Nevada, Las Vergas (UNLV), increases in student population and the creation of new academic programmes resulted in the recruitment of additional teaching faculty. This growth increased acquisitions budgets and collections. Library staff then faced a cataloguing backlog of hundreds of video titles. Describes how the library solved the backlog problem by implementing 'cataloguing shortcuts'. Outlines the previous cataloguing process and the elements which were streamlined by implementing shortcuts. The number of videos catalogued went from 604 in the 1991/2 academic year (prior to the shortcuts) to 804 titles in 1992/3 and 883 titles in 1993/4. The Special Formats Cataloguer now has time to work on formats other than video
    Date
    27.11.1995 17:07:22

Authors

Languages

  • e 402
  • d 71
  • f 5
  • i 5
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • ru 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 453
  • m 27
  • b 15
  • s 15
  • el 8
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • l 1
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…