-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.49
0.489538 = product of:
0.979076 = sum of:
0.0979076 = product of:
0.2937228 = sum of:
0.2937228 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2937228 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2937228 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2937228 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.2937228 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2937228 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.2937228 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2937228 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.22
0.22446808 = product of:
0.44893616 = sum of:
0.1468614 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1468614 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.1468614 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1468614 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.1468614 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1468614 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.008351962 = product of:
0.025055885 = sum of:
0.025055885 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025055885 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Content
- A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.22
0.22401133 = product of:
0.44802266 = sum of:
0.03263587 = product of:
0.09790761 = sum of:
0.09790761 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09790761 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.13846226 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13846226 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.13846226 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13846226 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.13846226 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13846226 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.21
0.20908675 = product of:
0.3345388 = sum of:
0.03263587 = product of:
0.09790761 = sum of:
0.09790761 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09790761 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.09790761 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09790761 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.09790761 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09790761 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.09790761 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09790761 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.008180073 = product of:
0.02454022 = sum of:
0.02454022 = weight(_text_:problem in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02454022 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.625 = coord(5/8)
- Abstract
- By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.20
0.20397419 = product of:
0.40794837 = sum of:
0.04079484 = product of:
0.12238451 = sum of:
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
-
Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014)
0.20
0.20397419 = product of:
0.40794837 = sum of:
0.04079484 = product of:
0.12238451 = sum of:
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Footnote
- Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
-
Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018)
0.20
0.20397419 = product of:
0.40794837 = sum of:
0.04079484 = product of:
0.12238451 = sum of:
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
-
Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021)
0.20
0.20397419 = product of:
0.40794837 = sum of:
0.04079484 = product of:
0.12238451 = sum of:
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.12238451 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12238451 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26131085 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Content
- Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
-
Heinz, A.: ¬Diie Lösung des Leib-Seele-Problems bei John R. Searle (2002)
0.05
0.050578803 = product of:
0.40463042 = sum of:
0.40463042 = sum of:
0.19914877 = weight(_text_:leib in 4299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19914877 = score(doc=4299,freq=10.0), product of:
0.24922726 = queryWeight, product of:
8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.799065 = fieldWeight in 4299, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4299)
0.16297673 = weight(_text_:seele in 4299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16297673 = score(doc=4299,freq=10.0), product of:
0.22546001 = queryWeight, product of:
7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.72286314 = fieldWeight in 4299, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4299)
0.042504914 = weight(_text_:problem in 4299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042504914 = score(doc=4299,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.32490072 = fieldWeight in 4299, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4299)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Das Verhältnis von Leib und Seele, oder, um es zeitgemäßer auszudrücken, von Physischem und Mentalem, ist "eine der zentralen und hartnäckigsten Fragestellungen der Philosophie" . Wenn es darum geht, wie unser Gehirn Bewußtsein hervorbringen kann, ist auch in neuesten Beiträgen von einem "Rätsel" oder einem "Geheimnis" die Rede. Trotzdem werden immer mehr optimistische Stimmen laut, die diesem Rätsel auf der Spur zu sein scheinen oder es bereits als gelöst betrachten. Dabei spielt die Erforschung der neurobiologischen Grundlage des Bewußtseins, des Gehirns, eine entscheidende Rolle. John R. Searle gehört zu den zeitgenössischen Philosophen, für die das Leib -Seele - Problem eine "ganz einfache Lösung" gefunden hat: "Und das ist sie: Geistige Phänomene werden von neurophysiologischen Vorgängen im Hirn verursacht und sind selbst Merkmale des Hirns." Daß die (biologische) Tatsache des Bewußtseins von Vielen immer noch als ein geheimnisvolles Phänomen aufgefaßt wird, wurzelt seiner Meinung nach darin, "daß wir mit einem überholten Vokabular des 17. Jahrhunderts über ein Problem des 20. Jahrhunderts sprechen". Sein Ausgangspunkt ist somit die Kritik an den traditionellen Lösungsmodellen des Leib -Seele -Problems, die allesamt auf die cartesische Unterscheidung von res cogitans und res extensa zurückgreifen. An drei solcher Positionen soll im ersten Kapitel dieser Arbeit exemplarisch verdeutlicht werden, warum Searle deren Untauglichkeit konstatieren kann. Im zweiten Kapitel wird es um die sog. Intentionalität gehen, die als Kern der Funktionsweise des Bewußtseins (grob gesprochen) das Vermögen bezeichnet, mit der Welt in Beziehung zu treten. Sie ist für Searle der Schlüssel, der die Tür zum Verständnis des Bewußtseins öffnen kann, ohne auf mißverständliche mystifizierende Kategorien rekurrieren zu müssen. Die Entfaltung seines Neuansatzes zur Struktur des Bewußtseins, den er den "biologischen Naturalismus" nennt, bildet den dritten Schwerpunkt. Dort wird gezeigt, daß Mentales und Physisches nicht dem Wesen nach unterschieden sind, sondern eine biologische Einheit bilden.
- Content
- Eine Hausarbeit JOHANNES GUTENBERG-UNIVERSITÄT FACHBEREICH KATHOLISCHE THEOLOGIE SEMINAR FÜR FUNDAMENTALTHEOLOGIE UND RELIGIONSWISSENSCHAFT, Hauptseminar: "Das Leib-Seele -Problem" (SS 2002), Leitung: Prof. Dr. Arnim Kreiner
-
Riebe, U.: John R. Searles Position zum Leib-Seele-Problem (2008)
0.02
0.023310957 = product of:
0.18648766 = sum of:
0.18648766 = sum of:
0.089062035 = weight(_text_:leib in 4567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089062035 = score(doc=4567,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24922726 = queryWeight, product of:
8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.3573527 = fieldWeight in 4567, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4567)
0.07288541 = weight(_text_:seele in 4567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07288541 = score(doc=4567,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22546001 = queryWeight, product of:
7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.32327422 = fieldWeight in 4567, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4567)
0.02454022 = weight(_text_:problem in 4567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02454022 = score(doc=4567,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 4567, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4567)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Stanz, G.: Medienarchive: Analyse einer unterschätzten Ressource : Archivierung, Dokumentation, und Informationsvermittlung in Medien bei besonderer Berücksichtigung von Pressearchiven (1994)
0.01
0.008389869 = product of:
0.06711895 = sum of:
0.06711895 = product of:
0.10067842 = sum of:
0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05056665 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
0.05011177 = weight(_text_:22 in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05011177 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 22. 2.1997 19:50:29
-
Thielemann, A.: Sacherschließung für die Kunstgeschichte : Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von DDC 700: The Arts (2007)
0.01
0.0055932454 = product of:
0.044745963 = sum of:
0.044745963 = product of:
0.06711894 = sum of:
0.033711098 = weight(_text_:29 in 1409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033711098 = score(doc=1409,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1409, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1409)
0.03340785 = weight(_text_:22 in 1409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03340785 = score(doc=1409,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1409, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1409)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Nach der Veröffentlichung einer deutschen Übersetzung der Dewey Decimal Classification 22 im Oktober 2005 und ihrer Nutzung zur Inhaltserschließung in der Deutschen Nationalbibliographie seit Januar 2006 stellt sich aus Sicht der deutschen kunsthistorischen Spezialbibliotheken die Frage nach einer möglichen Verwendung der DDC und ihrer generellen Eignung zur Inhalterschließung kunsthistorischer Publikationen. Diese Frage wird vor dem Hintergrund der bestehenden bibliothekarischen Strukturen für die Kunstgeschichte sowie mit Blick auf die inhaltlichen Besonderheiten, die Forschungsmethodik und die publizistischen Traditionen dieses Faches erörtert.
- Date
- 14. 2.2008 19:56:29
-
Köbler, J.; Niederklapfer, T.: Kreuzkonkordanzen zwischen RVK-BK-MSC-PACS der Fachbereiche Mathematik un Physik (2010)
0.01
0.005067659 = product of:
0.040541273 = sum of:
0.040541273 = product of:
0.060811907 = sum of:
0.03575602 = weight(_text_:29 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03575602 = score(doc=4408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
0.025055885 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025055885 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 29. 3.2011 10:47:10
29. 3.2011 10:57:42
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Kiren, T.: ¬A clustering based indexing technique of modularized ontologies for information retrieval (2017)
0.00
0.0042840866 = product of:
0.017136347 = sum of:
0.011568371 = product of:
0.034705114 = sum of:
0.034705114 = weight(_text_:problem in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034705114 = score(doc=4399,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.2652803 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.005567975 = product of:
0.016703924 = sum of:
0.016703924 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016703924 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Indexing plays a vital role in Information Retrieval. With the availability of huge volume of information, it has become necessary to index the information in such a way to make easier for the end users to find the information they want efficiently and accurately. Keyword-based indexing uses words as indexing terms. It is not capable of capturing the implicit relation among terms or the semantics of the words in the document. To eliminate this limitation, ontology-based indexing came into existence, which allows semantic based indexing to solve complex and indirect user queries. Ontologies are used for document indexing which allows semantic based information retrieval. Existing ontologies or the ones constructed from scratch are used presently for indexing. Constructing ontologies from scratch is a labor-intensive task and requires extensive domain knowledge whereas use of an existing ontology may leave some important concepts in documents un-annotated. Using multiple ontologies can overcome the problem of missing out concepts to a great extent, but it is difficult to manage (changes in ontologies over time by their developers) multiple ontologies and ontology heterogeneity also arises due to ontologies constructed by different ontology developers. One possible solution to managing multiple ontologies and build from scratch is to use modular ontologies for indexing.
Modular ontologies are built in modular manner by combining modules from multiple relevant ontologies. Ontology heterogeneity also arises during modular ontology construction because multiple ontologies are being dealt with, during this process. Ontologies need to be aligned before using them for modular ontology construction. The existing approaches for ontology alignment compare all the concepts of each ontology to be aligned, hence not optimized in terms of time and search space utilization. A new indexing technique is proposed based on modular ontology. An efficient ontology alignment technique is proposed to solve the heterogeneity problem during the construction of modular ontology. Results are satisfactory as Precision and Recall are improved by (8%) and (10%) respectively. The value of Pearsons Correlation Coefficient for degree of similarity, time, search space requirement, precision and recall are close to 1 which shows that the results are significant. Further research can be carried out for using modular ontology based indexing technique for Multimedia Information Retrieval and Bio-Medical information retrieval.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Bertram, J.: Informationen verzweifelt gesucht : Enterprise Search in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2011)
0.00
0.004216507 = product of:
0.033732057 = sum of:
0.033732057 = product of:
0.05059808 = sum of:
0.021069437 = weight(_text_:29 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021069437 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.029528644 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029528644 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 20:40:31
-
Trucks, A.: Grenzfälle zwischen schöner Literatur und Sachliteratur als Problem der inhaltlichen Erschließung in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1988)
0.00
0.003578782 = product of:
0.028630257 = sum of:
0.028630257 = product of:
0.08589077 = sum of:
0.08589077 = weight(_text_:problem in 1133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08589077 = score(doc=1133,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.6565352 = fieldWeight in 1133, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1133)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Rösener, C.: ¬Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen : Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Volltextdatenbanken (2005)
0.00
0.0034496475 = product of:
0.01379859 = sum of:
0.008180073 = product of:
0.02454022 = sum of:
0.02454022 = weight(_text_:problem in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02454022 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.1875815 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0056185164 = product of:
0.016855549 = sum of:
0.016855549 = weight(_text_:29 in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016855549 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Die Möglichkeiten, die der heutigen Informations- und Wissensgesellschaft für die Beschaffung und den Austausch von Information zur Verfügung stehen, haben kurioserweise gleichzeitig ein immer akuter werdendes, neues Problem geschaffen: Es wird für jeden Einzelnen immer schwieriger, aus der gewaltigen Fülle der angebotenen Informationen die tatsächlich relevanten zu selektieren. Diese Arbeit untersucht die Möglichkeit, mit Hilfe von natürlichsprachlichen Schnittstellen den Zugang des Informationssuchenden zu Volltextdatenbanken zu verbessern. Dabei werden zunächst die wissenschaftlichen Fragestellungen ausführlich behandelt. Anschließend beschreibt der Autor verschiedene Lösungsansätze und stellt anhand einer natürlichsprachlichen Schnittstelle für den Brockhaus Multimedial 2004 deren erfolgreiche Implementierung vor
- Date
- 29. 3.2009 11:11:45
-
Senkbeil, T.: ¬Das Problem der Kategorienbildung und der Begriff des "Gegenstandes" in der inhaltlichen Erschließung Schöner Literatur : Analyse bestehender Erschließungssysteme und Diskussion möglicher Ansätze aus der Literaturwissenschaft (1988)
0.00
0.0030675277 = product of:
0.024540221 = sum of:
0.024540221 = product of:
0.07362066 = sum of:
0.07362066 = weight(_text_:problem in 5822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07362066 = score(doc=5822,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.5627445 = fieldWeight in 5822, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5822)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Wunderlich, B.: ¬Die wissenschaftliche Erschließung von Bekleidung mit systematischen Ordnungssystemen im musealen Kontext : Wie bekommt man Hemd und Hose in die Datenbank? (2005)
0.00
0.0029796686 = product of:
0.023837348 = sum of:
0.023837348 = product of:
0.07151204 = sum of:
0.07151204 = weight(_text_:29 in 4173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07151204 = score(doc=4173,freq=4.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 4173, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4173)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 28.11.1999 13:32:29
27. 9.2005 14:29:52
-
Stünkel, M.: Neuere Methoden der inhaltlichen Erschließung schöner Literatur in öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1986)
0.00
0.0027839874 = product of:
0.0222719 = sum of:
0.0222719 = product of:
0.0668157 = sum of:
0.0668157 = weight(_text_:22 in 5815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0668157 = score(doc=5815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5815)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 4. 8.2006 21:35:22
