Search (79 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.: Analysis of change in users' assessment of search results over time (2017) 0.03 
    0.031401675 = product of:
  0.09420502 = sum of:
    0.085665286 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.085665286 = score(doc=3593,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03747799 = queryNorm
        0.42258036 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
    0.008539738 = product of:
      0.025619213 = sum of:
        0.025619213 = weight(_text_:29 in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025619213 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    We present the first systematic study of the influence of time on user judgements for rankings and relevance grades of web search engine results. The goal of this study is to evaluate the change in user assessment of search results and explore how users' judgements change. To this end, we conducted a large-scale user study with 86 participants who evaluated 2 different queries and 4 diverse result sets twice with an interval of 2 months. To analyze the results we investigate whether 2 types of patterns of user behavior from the theory of categorical thinking hold for the case of evaluation of search results: (a) coarseness and (b) locality. To quantify these patterns we devised 2 new measures of change in user judgements and distinguish between local (when users swap between close ranks and relevance values) and nonlocal changes. Two types of judgements were considered in this study: (a) relevance on a 4-point scale, and (b) ranking on a 10-point scale without ties. We found that users tend to change their judgements of the results over time in about 50% of cases for relevance and in 85% of cases for ranking. However, the majority of these changes were local.
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:33:29
  2. Su, L.T.; Chen, H.L.: Evaluation of Web search engines by undergraduate students (1999) 0.02 
    0.018430464 = product of:
  0.055291392 = sum of:
    0.0484596 = weight(_text_:ranking in 6546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0484596 = score(doc=6546,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03747799 = queryNorm
        0.23904754 = fieldWeight in 6546, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6546)
    0.0068317903 = product of:
      0.02049537 = sum of:
        0.02049537 = weight(_text_:29 in 6546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02049537 = score(doc=6546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 6546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6546)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This research continues to explore the user's evaluation of Web search engines using a methodology proposed by Su (1997) and tested in a pilot study (Su, Chen, & Dong, 1998). It seeks to generate useful insight for system design and improvement, and for engine choice. The researchers were interested in how undergraduate students used four selected engines to retrieve information for their studies or personal interests and how they evaluated the interaction and search results retrieved by the four engines. Measures used were based on five evaluation criteria: relevance, efficiency, utility, user satisfaction, and connectivity. Thirty-six undergraduate juniors and seniors were recruited from the disciplines of sciences, social sciences and humanities. Each searched his/her own topic on all four engines in an assigned order and each made relevance judgements of retrieved items in relation to his/her information need or problem. The study found some significant differences among the four engines but none dominated in every aspect of the multidimensional evaluation. Alta Vista had the highest number of relevant and partially relevant documents, the best relative recall and the highest precision ratio based on PR1, Alter Vista had significantly better scores for these three measures than for Lycos. Infoseek had the highest satisfaction rating for response time. Both Infoseek and Excite had significantly higher satisfaction ratings for response time than Lycos. Excite had the best score for output display. Excite and Alta Vista had significantly better scores for output display than Lycos. Excite had the best rating for time saving while Alta Vista achieved the best score for value of search results as a whole and for overall performance. Alta Vista and Excite had significantly better ratings for these three measures than Lycos. Lycos achieved the best relevance ranking performance. Further work will provide more complete picture for engine comparison and choice by taking into account participant characteristics and identify factors contributing to the user's satisfaction to gain better insight for system design and improvement
    Date
    29. 9.2001 20:39:10
  3. Unkel, J.; Haas, A.: ¬The effects of credibility cues on the selection of search engine results (2017) 0.02 
    0.017486354 = product of:
  0.10491812 = sum of:
    0.10491812 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10491812 = score(doc=3752,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03747799 = queryNorm
        0.51755315 = fieldWeight in 3752, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3752)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Web search engines act as gatekeepers when people search for information online. Research has shown that search engine users seem to trust the search engines' ranking uncritically and mostly select top-ranked results. This study further examines search engine users' selection behavior. Drawing from the credibility and information research literature, we test whether the presence or absence of certain credibility cues influences the selection probability of search engine results. In an observational study, participants (N?=?247) completed two information research tasks on preset search engine results pages, on which three credibility cues (source reputation, message neutrality, and social recommendations) as well as the search result ranking were systematically varied. The results of our study confirm the significance of the ranking. Of the three credibility cues, only reputation had an additional effect on selection probabilities. Personal characteristics (prior knowledge about the researched issues, search engine usage patterns, etc.) did not influence the preference for search results linked with certain credibility cues. These findings are discussed in light of situational and contextual characteristics (e.g., involvement, low-cost scenarios).
  4. Kohlstädt, K.: Schüler suchen im Netz : Eine exemplarische Erhebung zu Erfahrungen und Problemen von Jugendlichen bei der Internetrecherche für schulische Zwecke (2004) 0.02 
    0.015444675 = product of:
  0.09266805 = sum of:
    0.09266805 = weight(_text_:suchmaschine in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09266805 = score(doc=3713,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21191008 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03747799 = queryNorm
        0.43729892 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Nach Einführungen zu Jugend und Internet, Medienkompetenz und Lernen durch Medien, wird im praktischen Teil eine schriftliche Umfrage unter 90 Schülern eines Gymnasiums und einer Gesamtschule über deren Internetnutzung für schulische Zwecke analysiert. Suchpraxis, Einbindung des Internets in den schulischen Alltag, Unterschiede bei Geschlechtern und Schulformen werden besonders untersucht. Die Auswertung ergibt selbstbewußte Grundeinstellung der Schüler zum Internet, eher privat als schulisch genutzt, geschätzt wegen Schnelligkeit, Informationsmenge und Spaßfaktor bei Fixierung auf die Suchmaschine Google. Die Schüler geben sich meistens mit den gefundenen Ergebnissen zufrieden, stellen deren Qualität nicht weiter in Frage.
  5. Liu, J.; Zhang, X.: ¬The role of domain knowledge in document selection from search results (2019) 0.01 
    0.014277548 = product of:
  0.085665286 = sum of:
    0.085665286 = weight(_text_:ranking in 5410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.085665286 = score(doc=5410,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03747799 = queryNorm
        0.42258036 = fieldWeight in 5410, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5410)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    It is a frequently seen scenario that when people are not familiar with their search topics, they use a simple keyword search, which leads to a large amount of search results in multiple pages. This makes it difficult for users to pick relevant documents, especially given that they are not knowledgeable of the topics. To explore how systems can better help users find relevant documents from search results, the current research analyzed document selection behaviors of users with different levels of domain knowledge (DK). Data were collected in a laboratory study with 35 participants each searching on four tasks in the genomics domain. The results show that users with high and low DK levels selected different sets of documents to view; those high in DK read more documents and gave higher relevance ratings for the viewed documents than those low in DK did. Users with low DK tended to select documents ranking toward the top of the search result lists, and those with high in DK tended to also select documents ranking down the search result lists. The findings help design search systems that can personalize search results to users with different levels of DK.
  6. Wilbur, W.J.: ¬A comparison of group and individual performance among subject experts and untrained workers at the document retrieval task (1998) 0.01 
    0.014134051 = product of:
  0.084804304 = sum of:
    0.084804304 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084804304 = score(doc=3263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03747799 = queryNorm
        0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 3263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3263)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reports on a study that contrdicts the hypothesis that building detailed subject knowledge into search system improves retrieval. A group with a background in molecular biology performed the same judgements when considering document retrieval as another group without subject knowledge. The untrained panel performed better than any of the members of the trained panel and almost at the level of the trained panel as a whole. Explains the method which uses the probability ranking principle to measure retrieval
  7. Nahl, D.: Ethnography of novices' first use of Web search engines : affective control in cognitive processing (1998) 0.01 
    0.0121149 = product of:
  0.0726894 = sum of:
    0.0726894 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0726894 = score(doc=2131,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03747799 = queryNorm
        0.35857132 = fieldWeight in 2131, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2131)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study, conducted at Hawaii University, Department of Information and Computer Science, to understand the novide searchers' experience in learning to use a WWW search engine. Without prior searching instruction, undergraduate novives wrote structured self reports during their first session on a Web search engine. Users choose their own topics and followed written instructions that prompted them to describe thoughts and feelings during specified stages of the search; pre search formulation; search statement formulation; search strategy; and evaluation of the results. The sentences in the self reports were numbered and then coded according to their affective or cognitive function. The affective sentences reveal how users set goals and limit the scope of the cognitive operations. Search acts appear to be governed by an affective filter that organizes incoming information and provides criteria for ranking cognitive relevance to search goal. Content analysis identifies reasons users have for rating self confidence, stress level, satisfaction, usefulness, and success with future searches
  8. Pu, H.-T.; Chuang, S.-L.; Yang, C.: Subject categorization of query terms for exploring Web users' search interests (2002) 0.01 
    0.010095751 = product of:
  0.0605745 = sum of:
    0.0605745 = weight(_text_:ranking in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0605745 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03747799 = queryNorm
        0.29880944 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Subject content analysis of Web query terms is essential to understand Web searching interests. Such analysis includes exploring search topics and observing changes in their frequency distributions with time. To provide a basis for in-depth analysis of users' search interests on a larger scale, this article presents a query categorization approach to automatically classifying Web query terms into broad subject categories. Because a query is short in length and simple in structure, its intended subject(s) of search is difficult to judge. Our approach, therefore, combines the search processes of real-world search engines to obtain highly ranked Web documents based on each unknown query term. These documents are used to extract cooccurring terms and to create a feature set. An effective ranking function has also been developed to find the most appropriate categories. Three search engine logs in Taiwan were collected and tested. They contained over 5 million queries from different periods of time. The achieved performance is quite encouraging compared with that of human categorization. The experimental results demonstrate that the approach is efficient in dealing with large numbers of queries and adaptable to the dynamic Web environment. Through good integration of human and machine efforts, the frequency distributions of subject categories in response to changes in users' search interests can be systematically observed in real time. The approach has also shown potential for use in various information retrieval applications, and provides a basis for further Web searching studies.
  9. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: Mental models of the bibliographic universe : part 2: comparison task and conclusions (2010) 0.01 
    0.010095751 = product of:
  0.0605745 = sum of:
    0.0605745 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0605745 = score(doc=4146,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03747799 = queryNorm
        0.29880944 = fieldWeight in 4146, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4146)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper aims to provide some insight into mental models of the bibliographic universe and how they compare with functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR) as a conceptual model of the bibliographic universe. Design/methodology/approach - To get a more complete picture of the mental models, different elicitation techniques were used. The three tasks of the paper were: card-sorting, concept mapping and comparison task. The paper deals with comparison task, which consisted of interviews and rankings, and provides a discussion of the results of the paper as a whole. Findings - Results of the ranking part of the comparison task confirm the findings of concept mapping task. In both cases, while there are individual differences between mental models, on average they gravitate towards FRBR. Research limitations/implications - This is a small study and it provides only a glimpse of the implications of using FRBR as a conceptual basis for cataloguing. More FRBR-related user studies are needed, including similar studies on different groups of individuals and different types of materials, as well as practical studies of user needs and user interfaces. Practical implications - The results of this study are the first user-tested indication of the validity of FRBR as a conceptual basis for the future of cataloguing. Originality/value - This is the first published paper of mental models of the bibliographic universe and uses a unique combination of mental model elicitation techniques.
  10. Balatsoukas, P.; Ruthven, I.: ¬An eye-tracking approach to the analysis of relevance judgments on the Web : the case of Google search engine (2012) 0.01 
    0.010095751 = product of:
  0.0605745 = sum of:
    0.0605745 = weight(_text_:ranking in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0605745 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03747799 = queryNorm
        0.29880944 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Eye movement data can provide an in-depth view of human reasoning and the decision-making process, and modern information retrieval (IR) research can benefit from the analysis of this type of data. The aim of this research was to examine the relationship between relevance criteria use and visual behavior in the context of predictive relevance judgments. To address this objective, a multimethod research design was employed that involved observation of participants' eye movements, talk-aloud protocols, and postsearch interviews. Specifically, the results reported in this article came from the analysis of 281 predictive relevance judgments made by 24 participants using the Google search engine. We present a novel stepwise methodological framework for the analysis of relevance judgments and eye movements on the Web and show new patterns of relevance criteria use during predictive relevance judgment. For example, the findings showed an effect of ranking order and surrogate components (Title, Summary, and URL) on the use of relevance criteria. Also, differences were observed in the cognitive effort spent between very relevant and not relevant judgments. We conclude with the implications of this study for IR research.
  11. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.01 
    0.009068082 = product of:
  0.05440849 = sum of:
    0.05440849 = product of:
      0.081612736 = sum of:
        0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04099074 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
        0.040622 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040622 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  12. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.01 
    0.009068082 = product of:
  0.05440849 = sum of:
    0.05440849 = product of:
      0.081612736 = sum of:
        0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04099074 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
        0.040622 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040622 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  13. Waligora, J.: Benutzerverhalten in Freihandbibliotheken (1975) 0.01 
    0.005693159 = product of:
  0.034158953 = sum of:
    0.034158953 = product of:
      0.10247685 = sum of:
        0.10247685 = weight(_text_:29 in 4401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10247685 = score(doc=4401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.77730644 = fieldWeight in 4401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=4401)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Bibliothekar. 29(1975), S.659-664
  14. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.00 
    0.0039493614 = product of:
  0.023696167 = sum of:
    0.023696167 = product of:
      0.0710885 = sum of:
        0.0710885 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0710885 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  15. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.00 
    0.0039493614 = product of:
  0.023696167 = sum of:
    0.023696167 = product of:
      0.0710885 = sum of:
        0.0710885 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0710885 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  16. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.00 
    0.0033851666 = product of:
  0.020311 = sum of:
    0.020311 = product of:
      0.060932998 = sum of:
        0.060932998 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060932998 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
  17. Sullenger, P.: ¬A serials transaction log analysis (1997) 0.00 
    0.0028465795 = product of:
  0.017079476 = sum of:
    0.017079476 = product of:
      0.051238425 = sum of:
        0.051238425 = weight(_text_:29 in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051238425 = score(doc=1627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:54:49
  18. Summey, T.P.; Walchle, B.A.: ¬An investigation into use and instruction for an online catalog (1992) 0.00 
    0.0022772634 = product of:
  0.013663581 = sum of:
    0.013663581 = product of:
      0.04099074 = sum of:
        0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04099074 = score(doc=5065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Technical services quarterly. 10(1992) no.2, S.29-49
  19. Mann, L.; Ball, C.: ¬The relationship between search strategy and risky choice (1994) 0.00 
    0.0022772634 = product of:
  0.013663581 = sum of:
    0.013663581 = product of:
      0.04099074 = sum of:
        0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04099074 = score(doc=3136,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 19:58:10
  20. Berger, M.; Moore, M.J.: ¬The user meets the MELVYL system (1996) 0.00 
    0.0022772634 = product of:
  0.013663581 = sum of:
    0.013663581 = product of:
      0.04099074 = sum of:
        0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 7909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04099074 = score(doc=7909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 7909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7909)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 12:21:39

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 67
  • d 6
  • f 2
  • i 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 78
  • b 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes