Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.02
    0.015221252 = product of:
      0.045663755 = sum of:
        0.03299894 = product of:
          0.06599788 = sum of:
            0.06599788 = weight(_text_:web in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06599788 = score(doc=2878,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012664813 = product of:
          0.037994437 = sum of:
            0.037994437 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037994437 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  2. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01
    0.010601912 = product of:
      0.06361147 = sum of:
        0.06361147 = product of:
          0.0954172 = sum of:
            0.047924157 = weight(_text_:29 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047924157 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
            0.047493048 = weight(_text_:22 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047493048 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Source
    Library technology reports. 29(1993), no.2
  3. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01
    0.010601912 = product of:
      0.06361147 = sum of:
        0.06361147 = product of:
          0.0954172 = sum of:
            0.047924157 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047924157 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
            0.047493048 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047493048 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Source
    Library technology reports. 29(1993), no.3
  4. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.01
    0.010499589 = product of:
      0.031498767 = sum of:
        0.020417055 = product of:
          0.04083411 = sum of:
            0.04083411 = weight(_text_:web in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04083411 = score(doc=679,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01108171 = product of:
          0.03324513 = sum of:
            0.03324513 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03324513 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  5. Jayakanth, F.; Aswath, L.: ¬A PFT-based approach to make CDS/ISIS data based OAI-compliant (2006) 0.01
    0.008616188 = product of:
      0.025848562 = sum of:
        0.017861202 = product of:
          0.035722405 = sum of:
            0.035722405 = weight(_text_:web in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035722405 = score(doc=1495,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.00798736 = product of:
          0.023962079 = sum of:
            0.023962079 = weight(_text_:29 in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023962079 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    CDS/ISIS is a powerful and popular software package for managing computerized bibliographic data. It is developed and maintained by UNESCO since 1985. It is free software available in binary form for MS-DOS, MS-Windows, Unix, and Unix-based operating systems like Linux. It is used by many libraries and organizations in many countries to maintain their Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) and other bibliographic databases. With the advent of the Internet and Web technologies, publishing the content of databases on the Web provides a round the clock access to the content from any PC with Internet access. Some CDS-ISIS databases are published on the Web, but many are still on standalone systems or on local area networks. Interoperability is the key for the efficient dissemination of information to end-users. The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) provides a technical framework for interoperability of OAI-compliant digital libraries (UNESCO. 2004). However, CDS/ISIS databases are not OAI-compliant. In this paper, we describe a simple approach, to make CDS/ISIS OAI-compliant. It is based on printing CDS/ISIS records in an OAI static repository format.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 16:51:04
  6. McMahon, T.E.: Procite 4: a look at the latest release in bibliographic management software (1998) 0.01
    0.007291071 = product of:
      0.021873213 = sum of:
        0.012374603 = product of:
          0.024749206 = sum of:
            0.024749206 = weight(_text_:web in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024749206 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009498609 = product of:
          0.028495826 = sum of:
            0.028495826 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028495826 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    On Nov 26, 1997, Research Information Systems released its newest version of the ProCite bibliographic management software. The most notable change to the programme is the retooling for compatibility with Windows 95 and NT. In addition to the Windows 95 upgrade, ProCite added 2 new workforms. These forms allow users to capture information about Web pages and e-mail messages. This latest release builds on the Cite While You Write feature that allows users to link citations in a single manuscript to records in multiple databases. The program simplifies the generation of bibliographies and endnotes while allowing users to create bibliographic databases using 28 distinct workforms. Workforms cover a wide range of materials to patents. While there are a few idiosyncrasies users should be aware of, this product is a solid addition to the librarian's toolkit and should be considered by those libraries that have a need for a small but powerful programme to catalogue resources and create bibliographies
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  7. dwi: Quellenarchiv (2002) 0.01
    0.0060998434 = product of:
      0.01829953 = sum of:
        0.01031217 = product of:
          0.02062434 = sum of:
            0.02062434 = weight(_text_:web in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02062434 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.00798736 = product of:
          0.023962079 = sum of:
            0.023962079 = weight(_text_:29 in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023962079 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    "Für bibliografische Angaben wie Autor, Titel und Erscheinungsjahr ist der obere Teil der Eingabemaske vorgesehen. Der Mittelteil hilft bei Beschaffung und Archi-vierung der Materialien: Ein Häkchen zeigt, ob eine Veröffentlichung noch fehlt oder schon abgelegt wurde. Angaben dazu, unter welcher Signatur und in welcher Bibliothek das Werk verfügbar ist, finden hier ebenso Platz wie Verweise auf das heimische Ablagesystem. Die Stichwort-Zuordnung erleichtert später das Suchen nach Material zu einem bestimmten Teilgebiet. In das Feld für die Zusammenfassung passen bis zu 4000 Zeichen; sinnvoll sind hier eine Inhaltsangabe oder einige kurze Zitate. Mit dem Literaturmanager kann man zwar beliebig viele Datenbanken aufbauen, allerdings immer nur eine zur selben Zeit öffnen. Der Export der Daten ist nur in eine Textdatei möglich, dabei kann man das Format mit einem kleinen Editor festlegen. Zum Import geeignet sind Datensätze aus Standard-Datenbanken, außerdem versteht Liman Excel- und Txt-Dateien. Hersteller infoball hofft vor allem auf Anwender, die das Web-Portal infoball.de zur Literaturrecherche benutzen. Der Import dieses Recherche-Ergebnisses in die Liman-Datenbank ist dabei für Inhaber eines kostenpflichtigen Accounts besonders einfach, möglich ist er aber bereits nach einer kostenlosen Registrierung. Insgesamt ist Liman 2.7 ein unkompliziertes Einsteigerprogramm, das auch für Studenten erschwinglich ist (? 50)."
    Date
    29. 1.2002 9:53:06
  8. Hobohm, H.-C.: Persönliche Literaturverwaltung im Umbruch vom Bibliographie-Management zum Social Bookmarking : Anmerkungen zu EndNote, Reference Manager, RefWorks und Connotea (2005) 0.00
    0.00426989 = product of:
      0.01280967 = sum of:
        0.0072185188 = product of:
          0.0144370375 = sum of:
            0.0144370375 = weight(_text_:web in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0144370375 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0055911513 = product of:
          0.016773453 = sum of:
            0.016773453 = weight(_text_:29 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016773453 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Im Sommer 2005 ist die neueste Version des weit verbreiteten persönlichen Literaturverwaltungssystems EndNote erschienen. Noch im Jahre 2000 musste diese Gattung von Software genauer beschrieben und für deutsche Wissenschaftler erklärt werden. Mittlerweile hat sich deren Gebrauch sogar institutionell verbreitet. So bietet der GBV EndNote und Reference Manager Connection Files, der edoc-Server der HU Berlin schreibt die Benutzung eigener Formate zur Ablieferung von Dissertationsliteraturlisten vor und die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft nutzt EndNote und Reference Manager offiziell für ihre Jahres-Berichte um nur einige Beispiele zu nennen. Obwohl viele (Natur-)Wissenschaftler eher von BiB-TeX oder "freien" Bibliographiemanagementsystemen kommen, scheinen sich diese beiden doch immer mehr durchzusetzen. Es erstaunt etwas, dass Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftler sich dieser Systeme offenbar weniger bedienen, obwohl bekannt ist, dass deren Forschungsfront gerade eher auf bibliographische Vollständigkeit angewiesen ist als die der Naturwissenschaftler. Der Wettlauf zwischen EndNote und dem Konkurrenzprodukt aus dem Hause ISI ist jedoch nicht beendet wie ich noch vor Jahren spekulierte. ISI bzw. Thomson als dem Produzenten von Reference Manager hatte die beiden Konkurrenten EndNote und ProCite aufgekauft und man konnte erwarten, dass sich die Systeme angleichen und dem Nutzer der Übergang zu einem zentral gepflegten ISI Angebot erleichtert wird. In gewissen Teilen hat tatsächlich eine Angleichung stattgefunden. Die als herausragend empfundene Eigenschaft von Profite in höherem Maße inhaltliche Erschließung zu unterstützen ist mittlerweile auch bei den beiden anderen implementiert. Die einzigen verbleibenden Unterschiede (marketingtechnisch gesprochen: USPs - unique selling propositions) sind die Fähigkeit ProCites, Webseiten "on-the-fly" zu katalogisieren-sofern diese Metadaten aufweisen, die Web Publisher Funktion und erhöhte Netzwerkfähigkeit von Reference Manager sowie die Palm Version und die leicht größeren technischen Kapazitäten von Endnote und dessen Fähigkeit Abbildungen und Objekte direkt einzufügen. Zumindest ist zwischen EndNote und Reference Manager die Entscheidung nicht gefallen, da beide auf eigene Weise weiterentwickelt werden, während Profite seit sechs Jahren kein Update mehr erfahren hat. EndNote ist in den fünf Jahren seit der letzten Besprechung um 5 Versionsnummern auf Nummer 9 gewachsen. Reference Manager hat es auf elf (von 9.5) geschafft. In anderthalb Jahren wird EndNote also Reference Manager überholt haben. Man fragt sich, was die Unterschiede ausmacht, die solche Sprünge in den Versionsbezeichnungen rechtfertigen. Meist handelt es sich um die Einbindung neuer connection files und Importfilter, die Vorgabe neuer Medienformen und neuer bibliographischer Stile (Formatvorlagen): also neben der Anpassung an weiterentwickelte Betriebssysteme eher um quantitative Verbesserungen. Vielleicht ist der Vergleich gewagt, aber mir drängt sich die Parallele zu Virusprogrammen auf: Was wäre wenn diese bei jedem update des virus defintion files eine neue Versionsnummer erhielten? Andere Neuerungen wie die Unterstützung von XML, WSDL, openURL und teilweise auch Unicode werden von den Kunden sicher als selbstverständlich vorausgesetzt oder aber gar nicht bemerkt. Der Abstand der aktuellen Versionsnummer zur eigenen Version erhöht oft nur den psychologischen Druck, endlich auf die neue Fassung umzusteigen. Die meist um die 200 EUR (120 EUR für das update) dafür sind nicht immer gerechtfertigt.
    Date
    4.11.2005 13:29:37
  9. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.00
    0.004221604 = product of:
      0.025329625 = sum of:
        0.025329625 = product of:
          0.075988874 = sum of:
            0.075988874 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075988874 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  10. Sühnhold, K.H.: Anwendung von DV-Systemen in Bibliotheken : Ergebnisse der DBI-Umfrage 1994 (1995) 0.00
    0.0037274342 = product of:
      0.022364605 = sum of:
        0.022364605 = product of:
          0.06709381 = sum of:
            0.06709381 = weight(_text_:29 in 552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06709381 = score(doc=552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=552)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.2, S.328-337
  11. Endnote X2 für Mac OS X : bibliographies made easy ; search online bibliographic database, organize references, images, and PDFs easily, cite while you write (patent pending) in 3,000+styles, collaborate with others using EndNote Web (2008) 0.00
    0.00343739 = product of:
      0.02062434 = sum of:
        0.02062434 = product of:
          0.04124868 = sum of:
            0.04124868 = weight(_text_:web in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04124868 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  12. Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996) 0.00
    0.0034028427 = product of:
      0.020417055 = sum of:
        0.020417055 = product of:
          0.04083411 = sum of:
            0.04083411 = weight(_text_:web in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04083411 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
  13. Biggs, D.R.: ProCite in libraries : applications in bibliographic database management (1995) 0.00
    0.0031949438 = product of:
      0.019169662 = sum of:
        0.019169662 = product of:
          0.057508986 = sum of:
            0.057508986 = weight(_text_:29 in 5694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057508986 = score(doc=5694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5694)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    11.11.1996 19:29:56
  14. EndNote X7 : bibliographies made easy [= Version 17] (2013) 0.00
    0.0031662032 = product of:
      0.018997218 = sum of:
        0.018997218 = product of:
          0.05699165 = sum of:
            0.05699165 = weight(_text_:22 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05699165 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    17. 9.2018 18:19:22
  15. Hertramph, H.: Ihr Internet-Archiv : askSam Online (1996) 0.00
    0.002749912 = product of:
      0.01649947 = sum of:
        0.01649947 = product of:
          0.03299894 = sum of:
            0.03299894 = weight(_text_:web in 6001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03299894 = score(doc=6001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 6001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Das Internet explodiert - und mit ihm die Informationsflut auf der Festplatte des eigenen PCs: E-Mails aus verschiedenen Online-Diensten, gespeicherte Web-Seiten, Texte und Zahlen aus Archiven ... Wer die Informationen des Internet systematisch auswerten möchte, verzweifelt angesichts dieses Chaos. Hilfe verspricht ein Programm, das gerade auf den Markt gkommen ist: das 'askSam Internet-Online-Paket'
  16. Beiser, K.: Publishing text databases on the Web with Inmagic's DB/Text WebServer (1996) 0.00
    0.002749912 = product of:
      0.01649947 = sum of:
        0.01649947 = product of:
          0.03299894 = sum of:
            0.03299894 = weight(_text_:web in 7663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03299894 = score(doc=7663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 7663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7663)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  17. Böhner, D.; Stöber, T.; Teichert, A.; Lemke, D.; Tietze, K.; Helfer, M.; Frauenrath, P.; Podschull, S.: Literaturverwaltungsprogramme im Vergleich (2016) 0.00
    0.002749912 = product of:
      0.01649947 = sum of:
        0.01649947 = product of:
          0.03299894 = sum of:
            0.03299894 = weight(_text_:web in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03299894 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Object
    EndNote Web
  18. Chowdhury, S.; Chowdhury, G.G.: Text retrieval system : an overview (1992) 0.00
    0.0026624533 = product of:
      0.01597472 = sum of:
        0.01597472 = product of:
          0.047924157 = sum of:
            0.047924157 = weight(_text_:29 in 6508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047924157 = score(doc=6508,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 6508, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6508)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th National IASLIC Conference, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, India, 26-29 December 1992. Ed. by A. Chatterjee et al
  19. Ravindran, S.: Bibliographic databases : software issues (1997) 0.00
    0.0026624533 = product of:
      0.01597472 = sum of:
        0.01597472 = product of:
          0.047924157 = sum of:
            0.047924157 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047924157 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    12. 8.1998 8:29:25
  20. Freese, E.; Göbel, E.: Literaturdokumentation mit LIDOS und Archivierung am Beispiel des Spezialarchives Arbeit und Gesundheit : Handlungsanleitung (1998) 0.00
    0.0026385027 = product of:
      0.015831016 = sum of:
        0.015831016 = product of:
          0.047493048 = sum of:
            0.047493048 = weight(_text_:22 in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047493048 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    17. 7.2002 15:38:22