Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bates, M.J."
  1. Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989) 0.02
    0.024107104 = product of:
      0.12053552 = sum of:
        0.12053552 = weight(_text_:inc in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12053552 = score(doc=2883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042509552 = queryNorm
            0.46829098 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online '88. Proceedings of the Online Inc., Conference, New York, 11-12 October 1988
  2. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.02
    0.018829735 = product of:
      0.09414867 = sum of:
        0.09414867 = sum of:
          0.06535138 = weight(_text_:management in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06535138 = score(doc=1003,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.45609936 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
          0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02879729 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
  3. Bates, M.J.: Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? (1990) 0.01
    0.008537469 = product of:
      0.042687345 = sum of:
        0.042687345 = product of:
          0.08537469 = sum of:
            0.08537469 = weight(_text_:management in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08537469 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.575-591
  4. Bates, M.J.: System meets user : problems in matching subject search terms (1977) 0.01
    0.008537469 = product of:
      0.042687345 = sum of:
        0.042687345 = product of:
          0.08537469 = sum of:
            0.08537469 = weight(_text_:management in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08537469 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 13(1977), S.367-375
  5. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.01
    0.0057015726 = product of:
      0.028507862 = sum of:
        0.028507862 = product of:
          0.057015724 = sum of:
            0.057015724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057015724 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
  6. Bates, M.J.: Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students (1996) 0.00
    0.004607566 = product of:
      0.02303783 = sum of:
        0.02303783 = product of:
          0.04607566 = sum of:
            0.04607566 = weight(_text_:22 in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04607566 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    14. 4.1997 20:22:55
  7. Bates, M.J.: Document familiarity, relevance, and Bradford's law : the Getty Online Searching Project report; no.5 (1996) 0.00
    0.0042687347 = product of:
      0.021343673 = sum of:
        0.021343673 = product of:
          0.042687345 = sum of:
            0.042687345 = weight(_text_:management in 6978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042687345 = score(doc=6978,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 6978, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6978)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.6, S.697-707
  8. Bates, M.J.: Defining the information disciplines in encyclopedia development (2007) 0.00
    0.003773064 = product of:
      0.018865319 = sum of:
        0.018865319 = product of:
          0.037730638 = sum of:
            0.037730638 = weight(_text_:management in 3400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037730638 = score(doc=3400,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 3400, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Introduction. Dramatic changes in society and in the information disciplines and professions constituted the basis for a re-conceptualization of the content of the Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. Method. Marcia J. Bates and Mary Niles Maack, Editors of the forthcoming Third Edition, working with a fifty-person Editorial Advisory Board, developed the new, projected contents list for the encyclopedia, based upon principles developed in the re-conceptualization. Analysis. Drawing on Bates' "Invisible Substrate of Information Science" article, and other sources, the information disciplines are seen as consisting of the "disciplines of the cultural record" and the "information sciences." These disciplines are all concerned with the collection, organization and access to information, across the entire traditional spectrum of disciplines, such as the humanities and natural and social sciences. Results. The disciplines covered in the encyclopedia are library and information science, archival science, records management, information systems, informatics, knowledge management, museum studies, bibliography, document and genre studies, and social studies of information. A variety of cognate disciplines are briefly covered as well. Conclusions. The information disciplines are coming into their own in the 21st century. They are increasingly prominent in universities and in society generally, and, possibly with the help of the encyclopedia, may come increasingly to be seen as a set of related disciplines traversing a spectrum of their own.
  9. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.00
    0.0034556747 = product of:
      0.017278373 = sum of:
        0.017278373 = product of:
          0.034556746 = sum of:
            0.034556746 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034556746 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23