-
Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001)
0.04
0.039774638 = product of:
0.09943659 = sum of:
0.08609679 = weight(_text_:inc in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609679 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.33449355 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
0.013339795 = product of:
0.02667959 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
- Source
- Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
-
Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000)
0.03
0.03106705 = product of:
0.15533525 = sum of:
0.15533525 = sum of:
0.07470285 = weight(_text_:management in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07470285 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.0806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0806324 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 16:22:19
- Source
- Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.3-36
-
Saracevic, T.: Individual differences in organizing, searching and retrieving information (1991)
0.03
0.027550975 = product of:
0.13775487 = sum of:
0.13775487 = weight(_text_:inc in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13775487 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.5351897 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Imprint
- Medford : Learned Information Inc.
-
Shenouda, W.: Online bibliographic searching : how end-users modify their search strategies (1990)
0.02
0.024107104 = product of:
0.12053552 = sum of:
0.12053552 = weight(_text_:inc in 4895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12053552 = score(doc=4895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.46829098 = fieldWeight in 4895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4895)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Learned Information Inc.
-
Wildemuth, B.M.: Measures of success in searching a full-text fact base (1990)
0.02
0.024107104 = product of:
0.12053552 = sum of:
0.12053552 = weight(_text_:inc in 2050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12053552 = score(doc=2050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.46829098 = fieldWeight in 2050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2050)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Learned Information Inc.
-
Saracevic, T.; Mokros, H.; Su, L.: Nature of interaction between users and intermediaries in online searching : a qualitative analysis (1990)
0.02
0.020663233 = product of:
0.103316166 = sum of:
0.103316166 = weight(_text_:inc in 4894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.103316166 = score(doc=4894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.40139228 = fieldWeight in 4894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4894)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Learned Information Inc.
-
Sullivan, M.V.; Borgman, C.L.: Bibliographic searching by end-users and intermediaries : front-end software vs native DIALOG commands (1988)
0.02
0.020663233 = product of:
0.103316166 = sum of:
0.103316166 = weight(_text_:inc in 3560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.103316166 = score(doc=3560,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.40139228 = fieldWeight in 3560, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3560)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Imprint
- Medford, New Jersey : Learned Information Inc.
-
Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001)
0.02
0.020663233 = product of:
0.103316166 = sum of:
0.103316166 = weight(_text_:inc in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.103316166 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.40139228 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
-
Wildemuth, B.M.; Jacob, E.K.; Fullington, A.;; Bliek, R. de; Friedman, C.P.: ¬A detailed analysis of end-user search behaviours (1991)
0.02
0.017219359 = product of:
0.08609679 = sum of:
0.08609679 = weight(_text_:inc in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609679 = score(doc=2423,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.33449355 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Imprint
- Medford : Learned Information Inc.
-
Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994)
0.02
0.015533525 = product of:
0.077667624 = sum of:
0.077667624 = sum of:
0.037351426 = weight(_text_:management in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037351426 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
0.0403162 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0403162 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
- Source
- Information processing and management. 30(1994) no.2, S.205-221
-
Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995)
0.02
0.015533525 = product of:
0.077667624 = sum of:
0.077667624 = sum of:
0.037351426 = weight(_text_:management in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037351426 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
0.0403162 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0403162 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 13:14:10
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.4, S.555-572
-
Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995)
0.01
0.013314451 = product of:
0.06657226 = sum of:
0.06657226 = sum of:
0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03201551 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.034556746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034556746 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.2, S.173-190
-
Petrelli, D.: On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.011095377 = product of:
0.05547688 = sum of:
0.05547688 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02879729 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.22-38
-
Ravana, S.D.; Taheri, M.S.; Rajagopal, P.: Document-based approach to improve the accuracy of pairwise comparison in evaluating information retrieval systems (2015)
0.01
0.011095377 = product of:
0.05547688 = sum of:
0.05547688 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02879729 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.4, S.408-421
-
Rajagopal, P.; Ravana, S.D.; Koh, Y.S.; Balakrishnan, V.: Evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems using effort-based relevance judgment (2019)
0.01
0.011095377 = product of:
0.05547688 = sum of:
0.05547688 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02879729 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 71(2019) no.1, S.2-17
-
Logan, E.: Cognitive styles and online behaviour of novice searchers (1990)
0.01
0.008537469 = product of:
0.042687345 = sum of:
0.042687345 = product of:
0.08537469 = sum of:
0.08537469 = weight(_text_:management in 6891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08537469 = score(doc=6891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 6891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.503-510
-
Cooper, W.S.: ¬The paradoxal role of unexamined documents in the evaluation of retrieval effectiveness (1976)
0.01
0.008537469 = product of:
0.042687345 = sum of:
0.042687345 = product of:
0.08537469 = sum of:
0.08537469 = weight(_text_:management in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08537469 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 12(1976), S.367-375
-
Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984)
0.01
0.008063241 = product of:
0.0403162 = sum of:
0.0403162 = product of:
0.0806324 = sum of:
0.0806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0806324 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 20.10.2000 12:22:23
-
Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998)
0.01
0.008063241 = product of:
0.0403162 = sum of:
0.0403162 = product of:
0.0806324 = sum of:
0.0806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0806324 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
-
Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990)
0.01
0.008063241 = product of:
0.0403162 = sum of:
0.0403162 = product of:
0.0806324 = sum of:
0.0806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0806324 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:43:54
