Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  1. Vlaeminck, S.; Wagner, G.G.: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern im Bereich der Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Zur Rolle von Forschungsdatenzentren beim Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten (2014) 0.02
    0.01862782 = product of:
      0.0931391 = sum of:
        0.0931391 = sum of:
          0.052822895 = weight(_text_:management in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052822895 = score(doc=2543,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
          0.0403162 = weight(_text_:22 in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0403162 = score(doc=2543,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse einer Analyse zusammengefasst, in der untersucht wurde, ob, und wenn ja welche Services für das Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten gegenwärtig bei wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften bestehen. Die Analyse wurde Mithilfe von Desktop-Research sowie einer Online-Befragung, an der sich 22 von 46 angeschriebenen Institutionen beteiligten, durchgeführt. Untersucht wurden vor allem deutsche und europäische Forschungsdatenzentren, Bibliotheken und Archive. Insbesondere wurde untersucht, ob diese Organisationen extern erzeugte Forschungsdaten, den dazugehörigen Berechnungscode (Syntax) und ggf. genutzte (selbstgeschriebene) Software grundsätzlich speichern und hosten. Weitere Themenfelder waren Metadatenstandards, Persistente Identifikatoren, Verfügbarkeit von Schnittstellen (APIs) und Unterstützung von semantischen Technologien.
  2. Pinto, M.: Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies (2016) 0.01
    0.0088763 = product of:
      0.044381503 = sum of:
        0.044381503 = sum of:
          0.021343673 = weight(_text_:management in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021343673 = score(doc=2963,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
          0.02303783 = weight(_text_:22 in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02303783 = score(doc=2963,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 68(2016) no.2, S.227-247
  3. Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015) 0.01
    0.005759458 = product of:
      0.02879729 = sum of:
        0.02879729 = product of:
          0.05759458 = sum of:
            0.05759458 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05759458 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:45:48
  4. Bertram, J.: Stand der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2013) 0.00
    0.0048870626 = product of:
      0.024435312 = sum of:
        0.024435312 = product of:
          0.048870623 = sum of:
            0.048870623 = weight(_text_:22 in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048870623 = score(doc=2658,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Dass eine erfolgreiche Suche nach im Unternehmen vorhandenen Informationen oftmals schwieriger zu bewerkstelligen ist als eine Suche im Internet, wird in der Privatwirtschaft zunehmend als Problem gesehen. Enterprise Search ist eine Strategie, diesem Problem zu begegnen. In einer Studie mit explorativem Charakter wurde der Frage nachgegangen, wie es um den Stand unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Unternehmen bestellt ist. m Rahmen einer Onlinebefragung wurden dazu im März / April 2009 469 Unternehmen befragt. Es beteiligten sich 104 Unternehmen. Das entspricht einem Rücklauf von 22 %. Dieser Beitrag gibt Auskunft über Status quo der unternehmensweiten Informationsorganisation und -suche in Österreich und benennt unternehmens- bzw. personengebundene Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Im einzelnen werden Ergebnisse zu folgenden Aspekten präsentiert: Regelung der Informationsorganisation; Anreicherung unstrukturierter Informationen mit Metadaten; Probleme bei der Suche nach unternehmensinternen Informationen; täglicher Zeitaufwand für die Suche; vorhandene, wünschenswerte und benötigte Suchfunktionalitäten; Zufriedenheit mit der Suche und der Informationsorganisation Unternehmen.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 19:00:02
  5. Meier, F.: Informationsverhalten in Social Media (2015) 0.00
    0.004607566 = product of:
      0.02303783 = sum of:
        0.02303783 = product of:
          0.04607566 = sum of:
            0.04607566 = weight(_text_:22 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04607566 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.1, S.22-28
  6. Bertram, J.: Informationen verzweifelt gesucht : Enterprise Search in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2011) 0.00
    0.0040725516 = product of:
      0.020362757 = sum of:
        0.020362757 = product of:
          0.040725514 = sum of:
            0.040725514 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040725514 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 20:40:31
  7. Smith, C.L.; Matteson, M.L.: Information literacy in the age of machines that learn : desiderata for machines that teach (2018) 0.00
    0.0034556747 = product of:
      0.017278373 = sum of:
        0.017278373 = product of:
          0.034556746 = sum of:
            0.034556746 = weight(_text_:22 in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034556746 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    16. 3.2019 14:33:22
  8. Knoll, A.: Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen (2016) 0.00
    0.0034556747 = product of:
      0.017278373 = sum of:
        0.017278373 = product of:
          0.034556746 = sum of:
            0.034556746 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034556746 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2016 16:22:54
  9. Plieninger, J.: Informationskompetenz online vermitteln : eTeaching für OPLs (2011) 0.00
    0.0032580413 = product of:
      0.016290206 = sum of:
        0.016290206 = product of:
          0.032580413 = sum of:
            0.032580413 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032580413 = score(doc=166,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2012 14:20:22
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  10. Jamali, H.R.; Nicholas, D.: Interdisciplinarity and the information-seeking behavior of scientists (2010) 0.00
    0.003201551 = product of:
      0.016007755 = sum of:
        0.016007755 = product of:
          0.03201551 = sum of:
            0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 4231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03201551 = score(doc=4231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 4231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.2, S.233-243
  11. Borlund, P.; Dreier, S.: ¬An investigation of the search behaviour associated with Ingwersen's three types of information needs (2014) 0.00
    0.003201551 = product of:
      0.016007755 = sum of:
        0.016007755 = product of:
          0.03201551 = sum of:
            0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 2691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03201551 = score(doc=2691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 50(2014) no.4, S.493-507
  12. Joint, N.: If Google makes you stupid, what should librarians do about it? (2011) 0.00
    0.0030184512 = product of:
      0.015092256 = sum of:
        0.015092256 = product of:
          0.030184511 = sum of:
            0.030184511 = weight(_text_:management in 303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030184511 = score(doc=303,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.21066327 = fieldWeight in 303, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=303)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the question of whether modern digital information technologies damage their users' cognitive capacities in some way, and to speculate on how librarians should adapt their services as a consequence of the controversy surrounding this question. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews some recent literature on this subject, combined with an examination of the role played by technology, librarians and government in determining the nature of our society's response to problematic aspects of the use of digital, internet-based applications in education. Findings - The paper finds that highly differentiated and highly polemical attitudes to this subject mean that librarians have to acknowledge the existence of important challenges to the apparent consensus about the way information technologies should be used in education in Western societies. This has important consequences for the approach to collection building (the balance between digital versus print provision), for library building design, and for the value which should be placed on systematic information literacy teaching. The existence of such an important debate should also embolden information professionals to make their own insights into these issues more widely known. Research limitations/implications - Some of the findings in this paper are amenable to further development through practitioner-oriented research; however, the bulk of the content used for this paper is derived from the literature on this topic, so there is no original research data presented to back up the assertions made by the author. It is simply an account of a debate which has to be acknowledged by librarians. Practical implications - The implications of the issues under discussion in the paper are presented in clear practical terms, and the consequences for library management made explicit. Social implications - The clash between two different theories of learning and information provision is debated and the links with issues of government policy are explored. The social connections between education and wealth generation are brought into this debate. Originality/value - The paper provides a useful, up-to-date briefing on recent controversial issues in education, information management and socio-economic policy making.
  13. Lercher, A.: Efficiency of scientific communication : a survey of world science (2010) 0.00
    0.002879729 = product of:
      0.014398645 = sum of:
        0.014398645 = product of:
          0.02879729 = sum of:
            0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02879729 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this study was to measure the efficiency of the system by which scientists worldwide communicate results to each other, providing one measure of the degree to which the system, including all media, functions well. A randomly selected and representative sample of 246 active research scientists worldwide was surveyed. The main measure was the reported rate of "late finds": scientific literature that would have been useful to scientists' projects if it had been found at the beginning of these projects. The main result was that 46% of the sample reported late finds (±6.25%, p0.05). Among respondents from European Union countries or other countries classified as "high income" by the World Bank, 42% reported late finds. Among respondents from low- and middle-income countries, 56% reported late finds. The 42% rate in high-income countries in 2009 can be compared with results of earlier surveys by Martyn (1964a, b, 1987). These earlier surveys found a rate of 22% late finds in 1963-1964 and a rate of 27% in 1985-1986. Respondents were also queried about search habits, but this study failed to support any explanations for this increase in the rate of late finds. This study also permits a crude estimate of the cost in time and money of the increase in late finds.
  14. Cole, C.; Behesthi, J.; Large, A.; Lamoureux, I.; Abuhimed, D.; AlGhamdi, M.: Seeking information for a middle school history project : the concept of implicit knowledge in the students' transition from Kuhlthau's Stage 3 to Stage 4 (2013) 0.00
    0.002879729 = product of:
      0.014398645 = sum of:
        0.014398645 = product of:
          0.02879729 = sum of:
            0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02879729 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:41:17
  15. Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: Question types and intermediary elicitations (2016) 0.00
    0.002879729 = product of:
      0.014398645 = sum of:
        0.014398645 = product of:
          0.02879729 = sum of:
            0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02879729 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:58:25
  16. Chew, S.W.; Khoo, K.S.G.: Comparison of drug information on consumer drug review sites versus authoritative health information websites (2016) 0.00
    0.002879729 = product of:
      0.014398645 = sum of:
        0.014398645 = product of:
          0.02879729 = sum of:
            0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02879729 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:24:05
  17. Pontis, S.; Blandford, A.; Greifeneder, E.; Attalla, H.; Neal, D.: Keeping up to date : an academic researcher's information journey (2017) 0.00
    0.002879729 = product of:
      0.014398645 = sum of:
        0.014398645 = product of:
          0.02879729 = sum of:
            0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02879729 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35
  18. Jaskolla, L.; Rugel, M.: Smart questions : steps towards an ontology of questions and answers (2014) 0.00
    0.002879729 = product of:
      0.014398645 = sum of:
        0.014398645 = product of:
          0.02879729 = sum of:
            0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02879729 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2017 19:22:59
  19. Sahib, N.G.; Tombros, A.; Stockman, T.: ¬A comparative analysis of the information-seeking behavior of visually impaired and sighted searchers (2012) 0.00
    0.002667959 = product of:
      0.013339795 = sum of:
        0.013339795 = product of:
          0.02667959 = sum of:
            0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 4989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02667959 = score(doc=4989,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4989, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4989)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Understanding search behavior is important and leads to more effective interfaces that support searchers throughout the search process. In this article, through an observational user study, we investigate the search behavior of 15 visually impaired and 15 sighted searchers while they complete complex search tasks online. We study complex search tasks because they are challenging, cognitively intensive and affect performance of searchers. We compare the behavior of the two groups of searchers at four stages of the information-seeking process namely, Query Formulation, Search Results Exploration, Query Reformulation, and Search Results Management. For each stage, we identify research questions to investigate the impact of speech-based screen readers on the information-seeking behavior of visually impaired users. Significant differences were observed during query formulation and in the use of query-level support features such as query suggestions and spelling suggestions. In addition, screen-reader users submitted a lower number of queries and displayed comparatively limited exploratory behavior during search results exploration. We investigate how a lack of visual cues affected visually impaired searchers' approach towards query reformulation and observed different strategies to manage and use information encountered during the search process. We discuss the implications that our findings have for the design of search interfaces and propose a set of design guidelines to consider when designing interfaces that are usable and accessible with screen readers. This work also enhances our understanding of search behavior when using an auditory interface and could be useful when designing audio-based information retrieval systems.
  20. Genuis, S.K.: Constructing "sense" from evolving health information : a qualitative investigation of information seeking and sense making across sources (2012) 0.00
    0.002667959 = product of:
      0.013339795 = sum of:
        0.013339795 = product of:
          0.02667959 = sum of:
            0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02667959 = score(doc=370,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 370, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=370)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Focusing on information behavior in a context where medical evidence is explicitly evolving (management of the menopause transition), this investigation explored how women interact with and make sense of uncertain health information mediated by formal and informal sources. Based on interviews with 28 information seekers and 12 health professionals (HPs), findings demonstrate that participants accessed and valued a wide range of information sources, moved fluidly between formal and informal sources, and trust was strengthened through interaction and referral between sources. Participants were motivated to seek information to prepare for formal encounters with HPs, evaluate and/or supplement information already gathered, establish that they were "normal," understand and address the physical embodiment of their experiences, and prepare for future information needs. Findings revealed four strategies used to construct sense from health information mediated by the many information sources encountered and accessed on an everyday basis: women assumed analytic and experiential "postures"; they valued social contexts for learning and knowledge construction; information consistency was used as a heuristic representing accuracy and credibility; and an important feature of sense making was source complementarity. Implications for health information literacy and patient education are discussed.