Search (76 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  1. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.16 
    0.15682885 = product of:
  0.3136577 = sum of:
    0.019603608 = product of:
      0.098018035 = sum of:
        0.098018035 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098018035 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.098018035 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.098018035 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.098018035 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.098018035 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.098018035 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.098018035 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  2. Willer, M.; Dunsire, G.: Bibliographic information organization in the Semantic Web (2013) 0.04 
    0.038275976 = product of:
  0.1531039 = sum of:
    0.060688883 = weight(_text_:museum in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060688883 = score(doc=2143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.32962155 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
    0.09241502 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09241502 = score(doc=2143,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19105253 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.48371527 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    New technologies will underpin the future generation of library catalogues. To facilitate their role providing information, serving users, and fulfilling their mission as cultural heritage and memory institutions, libraries must take a technological leap; their standards and services must be transformed to those of the Semantic Web. Bibliographic Information Organization in the Semantic Web explores the technologies that may power future library catalogues, and argues the necessity of such a leap. The text introduces international bibliographic standards and models, and fundamental concepts in their representation in the context of the Semantic Web. Subsequent chapters cover bibliographic information organization, linked open data, methodologies for publishing library metadata, discussion of the wider environment (museum, archival and publishing communities) and users, followed by a conclusion.
    RSWK
    Bibliografische Daten / Informationsmanagement / Semantic Web / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
    Subject
    Bibliografische Daten / Informationsmanagement / Semantic Web / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
  3. Huemer, H.: Semantische Technologien : Analyse zum Status quo, Potentiale und Ziele im Bibliotheks-, Informations- und Dokumentationswesen (2006) 0.02 
    0.02002773 = product of:
  0.08011092 = sum of:
    0.04291352 = weight(_text_:museum in 641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04291352 = score(doc=641,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.23307763 = fieldWeight in 641, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=641)
    0.037197407 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037197407 = score(doc=641,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.258058 = fieldWeight in 641, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=641)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Content
    Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 2. Bibliothekspolitik 3. Begriffsdefinitionen 3.1. Bibliothek - 3.2. Archiv - 3.3. Museum - 3.4. Information und Dokumentation - 3.5. Information - 3.6. Semantik und semantische Technologien - 3.7. Ontologie - 3.8. Recall und Precision 4. Bibliotheken aus statistischer Sicht - Kennzahlen 5. Bibliographische Tools 5.1. Austauschformate 5.1.1. MAB / MAB2 - 5.1.2. Allegro-C - 5.1.3. MARC 2 - 5.1.4. Z39.50 - 5.1.5. Weitere Formate 5.2. Kataloge / OPACs 5.2.1. Aleph 500 - 5.2.2. Allegro-C - 5.2.3. WorldCat beta 5.3. Dokumentationssysteme 5.4. Suchmaschinen 5.4.1. Convera und ProTerm - 5.4.2. APA Online Manager - 5.4.3. Google Scholar - 5.4.4. Scirus - 5.4.5. OAIster - 5.4.6. GRACE 5.5. Informationsportale 5.5.1. iPort - 5.5.2. MetaLib - 5.5.3. Vascoda - 5.5.4. Dandelon - 5.5.5. BAM-Portal - 5.5.6. Prometheus 6. Semantische Anreicherung 6.1. Indexierung - 6.2. Klassifikation - 6.3. Thesauri 38 - 6.4. Social Tagging 7. Projekte 7.1. Bibster - 7.2. Open Archives Initiative OAI - 7.3. Renardus - 7.4. Perseus Digital Library - 7.5. JeromeDL - eLibrary with Semantics 8. Semantische Technologien in BAM-InstitutionenÖsterreichs 8.1. Verbundkatalog des Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbunds - 8.2. Bibliotheken Online - WebOPAC der Öffentlichen Bibliotheken - 8.3. Umfrage-Design - 8.4. Auswertung 9. Fazit und Ausblick 10. Quellenverzeichnis 11. Web-Links 12. Anhang Vgl.: http://www.semantic-web.at/file_upload/1_tmpphp154oO0.pdf.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 60(2007)H.3, S.80-81 (J. Bertram): "Wie aus dem Titel der Publikation hervorgeht, will der Autor eine Bestandsaufnahme zum Einsatz semantischer Technologien im BID-Bereich (Bibliothek - Information - Dokumentation) bzw. BAM-Bereich (Bibliothek - Archiv - Museum) vornehmen. einigem Befremden, dass eines von insgesamt drei Vorwörtern für ein einschlägiges Softwareprodukt wirbt und von einer Firmenmitarbeiterin verfasst worden ist. Nach einer Skizze des gegenwärtigen Standes nationaler und europäischer Bibliothekspolitik folgen kurze Definitionen zu den beteiligten Branchen, zu semantischen Technologien und zu Precision und Recall. Die Ausführungen zu semantischen Technologien hätten durchaus gleich an den Anfang gestellt werden können, schließlich sollen sie ja das Hauptthema der vorliegenden Publikation abgeben. Zudem hätten sie konkreter, trennschärfer und ausführlicher ausfallen können. Der Autor moniert zu Recht das Fehlen einer einheitlichen Auffassung, was unter semantischen Technologien denn nun genau zu verstehen sei. Seine Definition lässt allerdings Fragen offen. So wird z.B. nicht geklärt, was besagte Technologien von den hier auch immer wieder erwähnten semantischen Tools unterscheidet. Das nachfolgende Kapitel über bibliographische Tools vereint eine Aufzählung konkreter Beispiele für Austauschformate, Dokumentationssysteme, Suchmaschinen, Informationsportale und OPACs. Im Anschluss daran stellt der Autor Methoden semantischer Anreicherung (bibliographischer) Daten vor und präsentiert Projekte im Bibliotheksbereich. Der aufzählende Charakter dieses und des vorangestellten Kapitels mag einem schnellen Überblick über die fraglichen Gegenstände dienlich sein, für eine systematische Lektüre eignen sich diese Passagen weniger. Auch wird der Bezug zu semantischen Technologien nicht durchgängig hergestellt.
    RSWK
    Information und Dokumentation / Semantic Web (GBV)
    Subject
    Information und Dokumentation / Semantic Web (GBV)
  4. Corporate Semantic Web : wie semantische Anwendungen in Unternehmen Nutzen stiften (2015) 0.01 
    0.0135439895 = product of:
  0.054175958 = sum of:
    0.048551105 = weight(_text_:museum in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048551105 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.26369724 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
    0.005624854 = product of:
      0.016874561 = sum of:
        0.016874561 = weight(_text_:29 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016874561 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Content
    Kapitel 1; Corporate Semantic Web; 1.1 Das Semantic Web; 1.2 Semantische Anwendungen im Unternehmenseinsatz; 1.3 Bereitstellen von Linked Data reicht nicht; 1.4 Eine global vernetzte Wissensbasis -- Fiktion oder Realität?; 1.5 Semantik)=)RDF?; 1.6 Richtig vorgehen; 1.7 Modellieren ist einfach (?!); 1.8 Juristische Fragen; 1.9 Semantische Anwendungen stiften Nutzen in Unternehmen -- nachweislich!; 1.10 Fazit; Literatur; Kapitel 2; Einordnung und Abgrenzung des Corporate Semantic Webs; 2.1 Grundlegende Begriffe; 2.2 Corporate Semantic Web 2.3 Public Semantic Web2.4 Social Semantic Web 3.0; 2.5 Pragmatic Web; 2.6 Zusammenfassung und Ausblick "Ubiquitous Pragmatic Web 4.0"; Literatur; Kapitel 3; Marktstudie: Welche Standards und Tools werden in Unternehmen eingesetzt?; 3.1 Einleitung; 3.2 Semantische Suche in Webarchiven (Quantinum AG); 3.2.1 Kundenanforderungen; 3.2.2 Technische Umsetzung; 3.2.3 Erfahrungswerte; 3.3 Semantische Analyse und Suche in Kundenspezifikationen (Ontos AG); 3.3.1 Kundenanforderungen; 3.3.2 Technische Umsetzung; 3.3.3 Erfahrungswerte 3.4 Sicherheit für Banken im Risikomanagement (VICO Research & Consulting GmbH)3.4.1 Kundenanforderungen; 3.4.2 Technische Umsetzung; 3.4.3 Erfahrungswerte; 3.5 Interaktive Fahrzeugdiagnose (semafora GmbH); 3.5.1 Kundenanforderungen; 3.5.2 Technische Umsetzung; 3.5.3 Erfahrungswerte; 3.6 Quo Vadis?; 3.7 Umfrage-Ergebnisse; 3.8 Semantic Web Standards & Tools; 3.9 Ausblick; Literatur; Kapitel 4; Modellierung des Sprachraums von Unternehmen; 4.1 Hintergrund; 4.2 Eine Frage der Bedeutung; 4.3 Bedeutung von Begriffen im Unternehmenskontext; 4.3.1 Website-Suche bei einem Industrieunternehmen 4.3.2 Extranet-Suche bei einem Marktforschungsunternehmen4.3.3 Intranet-Suche bei einem Fernsehsender; 4.4 Variabilität unserer Sprache und unseres Sprachgebrauchs; 4.4.1 Konsequenzen des Sprachgebrauchs; 4.5 Terminologiemanagement und Unternehmensthesaurus; 4.5.1 Unternehmensthesaurus; 4.5.2 Mut zur Lücke: Arbeiten mit unvollständigen Terminologien; 4.6 Pragmatischer Aufbau von Unternehmensthesauri; 4.6.1 Begriffsanalyse des Anwendungsbereichs; 4.6.2 Informationsquellen; 4.6.3 Häufigkeitsverteilung; 4.6.4 Aufwand und Nutzen; Literatur; Kapitel 5 Schlendern durch digitale Museen und Bibliotheken5.1 Einleitung; 5.2 Anwendungsfall 1: Schlendern durch das Digitale Museum; 5.3 Anwendungsfall 2: Literatur in Bibliotheken finden; 5.4 Herausforderungen; 5.5 Die Anforderungen treiben die Architektur; 5.5.1 Semantic ETL; 5.5.2 Semantic Logic; 5.5.3 Client; 5.6 Diskussion; 5.7 Empfehlungen und Fazit; Literatur; Kapitel 6; Semantische Suche im Bereich der Energieforschungsförderung; 6.1 Das Projekt EnArgus®; 6.2 Die Fachontologie; 6.2.1 Semantische Suche; 6.2.2 Repräsentation der semantischen Relationen in der Fachontologie
    Date
    29. 9.2015 19:11:44
  5. Boer, V. de; Wielemaker, J.; Gent, J. van; Hildebrand, M.; Isaac, A.; Ossenbruggen, J. van; Schreiber, G.: Supporting linked data production for cultural heritage institutes : the Amsterdam Museum case study (2012) 0.01 
    0.013139529 = product of:
  0.10511623 = sum of:
    0.10511623 = weight(_text_:museum in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10511623 = score(doc=265,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.5709213 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Within the cultural heritage field, proprietary metadata and vocabularies are being transformed into public Linked Data. These efforts have mostly been at the level of large-scale aggregators such as Europeana where the original data is abstracted to a common format and schema. Although this approach ensures a level of consistency and interoperability, the richness of the original data is lost in the process. In this paper, we present a transparent and interactive methodology for ingesting, converting and linking cultural heritage metadata into Linked Data. The methodology is designed to maintain the richness and detail of the original metadata. We introduce the XMLRDF conversion tool and describe how it is integrated in the ClioPatria semantic web toolkit. The methodology and the tools have been validated by converting the Amsterdam Museum metadata to a Linked Data version. In this way, the Amsterdam Museum became the first 'small' cultural heritage institution with a node in the Linked Data cloud.
  6. Shaw, R.; Buckland, M.: Open identification and linking of the four Ws (2008) 0.01 
    0.0118399225 = product of:
  0.04735969 = sum of:
    0.042482216 = weight(_text_:museum in 2665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042482216 = score(doc=2665,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.23073508 = fieldWeight in 2665, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2665)
    0.0048774728 = product of:
      0.014632418 = sum of:
        0.014632418 = weight(_text_:22 in 2665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014632418 = score(doc=2665,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2665, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2665)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Platforms for social computing connect users via shared references to people with whom they have relationships, events attended, places lived in or traveled to, and topics such as favorite books or movies. Since free text is insufficient for expressing such references precisely and unambiguously, many social computing platforms coin identifiers for topics, places, events, and people and provide interfaces for finding and selecting these identifiers from controlled lists. Using these interfaces, users collaboratively construct a web of links among entities. This model needn't be limited to social networking sites. Understanding an item in a digital library or museum requires context: information about the topics, places, events, and people to which the item is related. Students, journalists and investigators traditionally discover this kind of context by asking "the four Ws": what, where, when and who. The DCMI Kernel Metadata Community has recognized the four Ws as fundamental elements of descriptions (Kunze & Turner, 2007). Making better use of metadata to answer these questions via links to appropriate contextual resources has been our focus in a series of research projects over the past few years. Currently we are building a system for enabling readers of any text to relate any topic, place, event or person mentioned in the text to the best explanatory resources available. This system is being developed with two different corpora: a diverse variety of biographical texts characterized by very rich and dense mentions of people, events, places and activities, and a large collection of newly-scanned books, journals and manuscripts relating to Irish culture and history. Like a social computing platform, our system consists of tools for referring to topics, places, events or people, disambiguating these references by linking them to unique identifiers, and using the disambiguated references to provide useful information in context and to link to related resources. Yet current social computing platforms, while usually amenable to importing and exporting data, tend to mint proprietary identifiers and expect links to be traversed using their own interfaces. We take a different approach, using identifiers from both established and emerging naming authorities, representing relationships using standardized metadata vocabularies, and publishing those representations using standard protocols so that links can be stored and traversed anywhere. Central to our strategy is to move from appearances in a text to naming authorities to the the construction of links for searching or querying trusted resources. Using identifiers from naming authorities, rather than literal values (as in the DCMI Kernel) or keys from a proprietary database, makes it more likely that links constructed using our system will continue to be useful in the future. WorldCat Identities URIs (http://worldcat.org/identities/) linked to Library of Congress and Deutsche Nationalbibliothek authority files for persons and organizations and Geonames (http://geonames.org/) URIs for places are stable identifiers attached to a wealth of useful metadata. Yet no naming authority can be totally comprehensive, so our system can be extended to use new sources of identifiers as needed. For example, we are experimenting with using Freebase (http://freebase.com/) URIs to identify historical events, for which no established naming authority currently exists. Stable identifiers (URIs), standardized hyperlinked data formats (XML), and uniform publishing protocols (HTTP) are key ingredients of the web's open architecture. Our system provides an example of how this open architecture can be exploited to build flexible and useful tools for connecting resources via shared references to topics, places, events, and people.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  7. Gradmann, S.: Semantic Web und Linked Open Data (2013) 0.01 
    0.009299352 = product of:
  0.074394815 = sum of:
    0.074394815 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074394815 = score(doc=716,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.516116 = fieldWeight in 716, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=716)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
  8. LeBoeuf, P.: ¬A strange model named FRBRoo (2012) 0.01 
    0.009103332 = product of:
  0.07282665 = sum of:
    0.07282665 = weight(_text_:museum in 1904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07282665 = score(doc=1904,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.39554584 = fieldWeight in 1904, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1904)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Libraries and museums developed rules for the description of their collections prior to formalizing the underlying conceptualization reflected in such rules. That formalizing process took place in the 1990s and resulted in two independent conceptual models: FRBR for bibliographic information (published in 1998), and CIDOC CRM for museum information (developed from 1996 on, and issued as ISO standard 21127 in 2006). An international working group was formed in 2003 with the purpose of harmonizing these two models. The resulting model, FRBROO, was published in 2009. It is an extension to CIDOC CRM, using the formalism in which the former is written. It adds to FRBR the dynamic aspects of CIDOC CRM, and a number of refinements (e.g. in the definitions of Work and Manifestation). Some modifications were made in CIDOC CRM as well. FRBROO was developed with Semantic Web technologies in mind, and lends itself well to the Linked Data environment; but will it be used in that context?
  9. Semantische Technologien : Grundlagen - Konzepte - Anwendungen (2012) 0.01 
    0.005717888 = product of:
  0.045743104 = sum of:
    0.045743104 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045743104 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19105253 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.23942685 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Dieses Lehrbuch bietet eine umfassende Einführung in Grundlagen, Potentiale und Anwendungen Semantischer Technologien. Es richtet sich an Studierende der Informatik und angrenzender Fächer sowie an Entwickler, die Semantische Technologien am Arbeitsplatz oder in verteilten Applikationen nutzen möchten. Mit seiner an praktischen Beispielen orientierten Darstellung gibt es aber auch Anwendern und Entscheidern in Unternehmen einen breiten Überblick über Nutzen und Möglichkeiten dieser Technologie. Semantische Technologien versetzen Computer in die Lage, Informationen nicht nur zu speichern und wieder zu finden, sondern sie ihrer Bedeutung entsprechend auszuwerten, zu verbinden, zu Neuem zu verknüpfen, und so flexibel und zielgerichtet nützliche Leistungen zu erbringen. Das vorliegende Buch stellt im ersten Teil die als Semantische Technologien bezeichneten Techniken, Sprachen und Repräsentationsformalismen vor. Diese Elemente erlauben es, das in Informationen enthaltene Wissen formal und damit für den Computer verarbeitbar zu beschreiben, Konzepte und Beziehungen darzustellen und schließlich Inhalte zu erfragen, zu erschließen und in Netzen zugänglich zu machen. Der zweite Teil beschreibt, wie mit Semantischen Technologien elementare Funktionen und umfassende Dienste der Informations- und Wissensverarbeitung realisiert werden können. Hierzu gehören etwa die Annotation und das Erschließen von Information, die Suche in den resultierenden Strukturen, das Erklären von Bedeutungszusammenhängen sowie die Integration einzelner Komponenten in komplexe Ablaufprozesse und Anwendungslösungen. Der dritte Teil beschreibt schließlich vielfältige Anwendungsbeispiele in unterschiedlichen Bereichen und illustriert so Mehrwert, Potenzial und Grenzen von Semantischen Technologien. Die dargestellten Systeme reichen von Werkzeugen für persönliches, individuelles Informationsmanagement über Unterstützungsfunktionen für Gruppen bis hin zu neuen Ansätzen im Internet der Dinge und Dienste, einschließlich der Integration verschiedener Medien und Anwendungen von Medizin bis Musik.
  10. Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008) 0.00 
    0.00489961 = product of:
  0.03919688 = sum of:
    0.03919688 = product of:
      0.058795318 = sum of:
        0.02953048 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02953048 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
        0.029264836 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029264836 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:29:39
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.00 
    0.004199666 = product of:
  0.033597328 = sum of:
    0.033597328 = product of:
      0.050395988 = sum of:
        0.02531184 = weight(_text_:29 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02531184 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
        0.025084145 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025084145 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  12. Hooland, S. van; Verborgh, R.; Wilde, M. De; Hercher, J.; Mannens, E.; Wa, R.Van de: Evaluating the success of vocabulary reconciliation for cultural heritage collections (2013) 0.00 
    0.004199666 = product of:
  0.033597328 = sum of:
    0.033597328 = product of:
      0.050395988 = sum of:
        0.02531184 = weight(_text_:29 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02531184 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
        0.025084145 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025084145 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:29:20
  13. Metadata and semantics research : 7th Research Conference, MTSR 2013 Thessaloniki, Greece, November 19-22, 2013. Proceedings (2013) 0.00 
    0.002954884 = product of:
  0.023639072 = sum of:
    0.023639072 = product of:
      0.035458606 = sum of:
        0.01476524 = weight(_text_:29 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01476524 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
        0.020693365 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020693365 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    All the papers underwent a thorough and rigorous peer-review process. The review and selection this year was highly competitive and only papers containing significant research results, innovative methods, or novel and best practices were accepted for publication. Only 29 of 89 submissions were accepted as full papers, representing 32.5% of the total number of submissions. Additional contributions covering noteworthy and important results in special tracks or project reports were accepted, totaling 42 accepted contributions. This year's conference included two outstanding keynote speakers. Dr. Stefan Gradmann, a professor arts department of KU Leuven (Belgium) and director of university library, addressed semantic research drawing from his work with Europeana. The title of his presentation was, "Towards a Semantic Research Library: Digital Humanities Research, Europeana and the Linked Data Paradigm". Dr. Michail Salampasis, associate professor from our conference host institution, the Department of Informatics of the Alexander TEI of Thessaloniki, presented new potential, intersecting search and linked data. The title of his talk was, "Rethinking the Search Experience: What Could Professional Search Systems Do Better?"
    Date
    17.12.2013 12:51:22
  14. Borst, T.; Löhden, A.; Neubert, J.; Pohl, A.: "Linked Open Data" im Fokus : Spannende Themen und Diskussionen bei der SWIB12 (2013) 0.00 
    0.0027898054 = product of:
  0.022318443 = sum of:
    0.022318443 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022318443 = score(doc=3352,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.1548348 = fieldWeight in 3352, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3352)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    Metadaten verschiedener Quellen Die Dokumentation der Provenienz ist nicht nur für Medien wichtig, sondern - insbesondere wenn Metadaten verschiedener Quellen zusammengeführt werden - auch für die Metadaten selbst. Werden bibliothekarische Metadaten mit Daten aus Web2.0-Quellen angereichert (oder umgekehrt), so sollte mindestens zwischen der Herkunft aus Kulturerbeinstitutionen und Web2.0-Plattformen unterschieden werden. Im Provenance-Workshop wurden verschiedene Vokabulare zur Darstellung der Provenienz von Ressourcen und Metadaten diskutiert. Einen allgemein akzeptierten Ansatz für Linked Data scheint es bisher nicht zu geben - die verfügbaren Ansätze seien teils komplex, sodass auf Metadaten operierende Applikationen speziell auf sie ausgerichtet sein müssten, oder aber unterstützten nicht gut mehrfache Metaaussagen wie zum Beispiel verschachtelte Quellen. Daher empfehle sich eine fallweise pragmatische Vorgehensweise. Dass der Workshop zum Thema Provenance innerhalb weniger Tage ausgebucht war, weist ebenfalls auf die Aktualität des Themas hin. Um für die verschiedensprachigen Wikipedia-Artikel die Datenpflege zu erleichtern, sammelt Wikidata deren Fakten und stellt sie als Datenbasis bereit. Die sogenannten Claims von Wikidata enthalten neben den - über die lokalen Wikipedias divergierenden - Aussagen auch ihre Quellen und Zeitkontexte. Auf die Darstellung der Rechte und Lizenzen der veröffentlichten Bestände an Linked Data wurde mehrfach eingegangen, zum Beispiel in den Vorträgen der Universitätsbibliothek von Amsterdam und der OEG-UPM. Neben den bibliotheksspezifischen Formaten und Schnittstellen trägt auch dies zur Abschottung beziehungsweise Öffnung von Bibliotheksdaten bei. Im Kontext der »Europeana« wird an der Darstellung von Ressourcen-Lizenzen gearbeitet, mithilfe von URLs werden Ressource- und Lizenzinformationen dynamisch zusammen angezeigt."
  15. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.00 
    0.0024387364 = product of:
  0.019509891 = sum of:
    0.019509891 = product of:
      0.05852967 = sum of:
        0.05852967 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05852967 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  16. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.00 
    0.0020903456 = product of:
  0.016722765 = sum of:
    0.016722765 = product of:
      0.05016829 = sum of:
        0.05016829 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05016829 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  17. Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007) 0.00 
    0.0020903456 = product of:
  0.016722765 = sum of:
    0.016722765 = product of:
      0.05016829 = sum of:
        0.05016829 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05016829 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  18. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: ¬The Semantic Web : a new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities (2001) 0.00 
    0.0017577668 = product of:
  0.014062135 = sum of:
    0.014062135 = product of:
      0.0421864 = sum of:
        0.0421864 = weight(_text_:29 in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0421864 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
  19. Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.00 
    0.0017419546 = product of:
  0.013935637 = sum of:
    0.013935637 = product of:
      0.04180691 = sum of:
        0.04180691 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04180691 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  20. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: Mein Computer versteht mich (2001) 0.00 
    0.0014062135 = product of:
  0.011249708 = sum of:
    0.011249708 = product of:
      0.033749122 = sum of:
        0.033749122 = weight(_text_:29 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033749122 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 58
  • d 18

Types

  • a 46
  • m 18
  • el 14
  • s 12
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications