Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.07
    0.0737088 = product of:
      0.1474176 = sum of:
        0.11336221 = weight(_text_:engineering in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11336221 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23872319 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044434052 = queryNorm
            0.47486886 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
        0.034055397 = product of:
          0.068110794 = sum of:
            0.068110794 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068110794 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The article discusses a series of usability studies on indexes from a systems engineering and human factors perspective. The purpose of these studies is to establish a set of user requirements that indexes need to satisfy. The results from the first set of studies are presented and suggestions made as to how these can be applied to improve the usability and quality of indexes.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  2. Chisman, J.K.: Creating keyword indexes using PC-File Plus (1991) 0.04
    0.03542569 = product of:
      0.14170276 = sum of:
        0.14170276 = weight(_text_:engineering in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14170276 = score(doc=2336,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23872319 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044434052 = queryNorm
            0.5935861 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the work undertaken at the Owen Science and Engineering Library, Washington State University, to create a keyword index to the National Library of Medicine's Quick Bibliographic Series using the PC-File Plus software
  3. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1994) 0.02
    0.024797983 = product of:
      0.099191934 = sum of:
        0.099191934 = weight(_text_:engineering in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099191934 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23872319 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044434052 = queryNorm
            0.41551027 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
  4. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1997) 0.02
    0.024797983 = product of:
      0.099191934 = sum of:
        0.099191934 = weight(_text_:engineering in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099191934 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23872319 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044434052 = queryNorm
            0.41551027 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
  5. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.01
    0.012040401 = product of:
      0.048161604 = sum of:
        0.048161604 = product of:
          0.09632321 = sum of:
            0.09632321 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09632321 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  6. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.01
    0.012040401 = product of:
      0.048161604 = sum of:
        0.048161604 = product of:
          0.09632321 = sum of:
            0.09632321 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09632321 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  7. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.01
    0.012040401 = product of:
      0.048161604 = sum of:
        0.048161604 = product of:
          0.09632321 = sum of:
            0.09632321 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09632321 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  8. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.01
    0.012040401 = product of:
      0.048161604 = sum of:
        0.048161604 = product of:
          0.09632321 = sum of:
            0.09632321 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09632321 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  9. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01
    0.010535351 = product of:
      0.042141404 = sum of:
        0.042141404 = product of:
          0.08428281 = sum of:
            0.08428281 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08428281 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  10. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.01
    0.010535351 = product of:
      0.042141404 = sum of:
        0.042141404 = product of:
          0.08428281 = sum of:
            0.08428281 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08428281 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  11. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.01
    0.010535351 = product of:
      0.042141404 = sum of:
        0.042141404 = product of:
          0.08428281 = sum of:
            0.08428281 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08428281 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  12. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01
    0.010535351 = product of:
      0.042141404 = sum of:
        0.042141404 = product of:
          0.08428281 = sum of:
            0.08428281 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08428281 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  13. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.01
    0.010535351 = product of:
      0.042141404 = sum of:
        0.042141404 = product of:
          0.08428281 = sum of:
            0.08428281 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08428281 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  14. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.01
    0.010535351 = product of:
      0.042141404 = sum of:
        0.042141404 = product of:
          0.08428281 = sum of:
            0.08428281 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08428281 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  15. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.01
    0.010535351 = product of:
      0.042141404 = sum of:
        0.042141404 = product of:
          0.08428281 = sum of:
            0.08428281 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08428281 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  16. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.01
    0.010535351 = product of:
      0.042141404 = sum of:
        0.042141404 = product of:
          0.08428281 = sum of:
            0.08428281 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08428281 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  17. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.01
    0.010535351 = product of:
      0.042141404 = sum of:
        0.042141404 = product of:
          0.08428281 = sum of:
            0.08428281 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08428281 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  18. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.01
    0.0090303 = product of:
      0.0361212 = sum of:
        0.0361212 = product of:
          0.0722424 = sum of:
            0.0722424 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0722424 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
  19. Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.01
    0.0090303 = product of:
      0.0361212 = sum of:
        0.0361212 = product of:
          0.0722424 = sum of:
            0.0722424 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0722424 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
  20. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.01
    0.008513849 = product of:
      0.034055397 = sum of:
        0.034055397 = product of:
          0.068110794 = sum of:
            0.068110794 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068110794 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15560047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044434052 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22