-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.05
0.04827202 = product of:
0.12068005 = sum of:
0.10054368 = weight(_text_:engineering in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10054368 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.47486886 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.020136368 = product of:
0.060409103 = sum of:
0.060409103 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060409103 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The article discusses a series of usability studies on indexes from a systems engineering and human factors perspective. The purpose of these studies is to establish a set of user requirements that indexes need to satisfy. The results from the first set of studies are presented and suggestions made as to how these can be applied to improve the usability and quality of indexes.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Chisman, J.K.: Creating keyword indexes using PC-File Plus (1991)
0.03
0.02513592 = product of:
0.1256796 = sum of:
0.1256796 = weight(_text_:engineering in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1256796 = score(doc=2336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5935861 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Describes the work undertaken at the Owen Science and Engineering Library, Washington State University, to create a keyword index to the National Library of Medicine's Quick Bibliographic Series using the PC-File Plus software
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.020024462 = product of:
0.1001223 = sum of:
0.1001223 = product of:
0.15018345 = sum of:
0.075431004 = weight(_text_:29 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075431004 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.07475245 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07475245 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 20. 4.2002 19:29:54
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.02
0.020024462 = product of:
0.1001223 = sum of:
0.1001223 = product of:
0.15018345 = sum of:
0.075431004 = weight(_text_:29 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075431004 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.07475245 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07475245 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 21. 4.2002 9:29:38
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1994)
0.02
0.017595144 = product of:
0.08797572 = sum of:
0.08797572 = weight(_text_:engineering in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08797572 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.41551027 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
-
Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1997)
0.02
0.017595144 = product of:
0.08797572 = sum of:
0.08797572 = weight(_text_:engineering in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08797572 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.41551027 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.0114425495 = product of:
0.057212748 = sum of:
0.057212748 = product of:
0.08581912 = sum of:
0.04310343 = weight(_text_:29 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04310343 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.042715687 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042715687 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
- Source
- Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
-
Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992)
0.01
0.010012231 = product of:
0.05006115 = sum of:
0.05006115 = product of:
0.07509173 = sum of:
0.037715502 = weight(_text_:29 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037715502 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.037376225 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037376225 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
-
Bernier, C.L.: Subject indexes (1980)
0.01
0.005747124 = product of:
0.02873562 = sum of:
0.02873562 = product of:
0.08620686 = sum of:
0.08620686 = weight(_text_:29 in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08620686 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.29
-
Roberts, C.: HyperIndex : new indexing software for the Mac (1996)
0.01
0.005747124 = product of:
0.02873562 = sum of:
0.02873562 = product of:
0.08620686 = sum of:
0.08620686 = weight(_text_:29 in 6808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08620686 = score(doc=6808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 6808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6808)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Keywords. 4(1996) nos.3/4, S.29-31
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.005695425 = product of:
0.028477125 = sum of:
0.028477125 = product of:
0.085431375 = sum of:
0.085431375 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085431375 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.01
0.005695425 = product of:
0.028477125 = sum of:
0.028477125 = product of:
0.085431375 = sum of:
0.085431375 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085431375 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.01
0.005695425 = product of:
0.028477125 = sum of:
0.028477125 = product of:
0.085431375 = sum of:
0.085431375 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085431375 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.01
0.005695425 = product of:
0.028477125 = sum of:
0.028477125 = product of:
0.085431375 = sum of:
0.085431375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085431375 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Hodges, J.E.: Automated systems for the generation of document indexes (2000)
0.01
0.0050287335 = product of:
0.025143668 = sum of:
0.025143668 = product of:
0.075431004 = sum of:
0.075431004 = weight(_text_:29 in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075431004 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.66, [=Suppl.29]
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.00
0.004983497 = product of:
0.024917483 = sum of:
0.024917483 = product of:
0.07475245 = sum of:
0.07475245 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07475245 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.00
0.004983497 = product of:
0.024917483 = sum of:
0.024917483 = product of:
0.07475245 = sum of:
0.07475245 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07475245 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.00
0.004983497 = product of:
0.024917483 = sum of:
0.024917483 = product of:
0.07475245 = sum of:
0.07475245 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07475245 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.00
0.004983497 = product of:
0.024917483 = sum of:
0.024917483 = product of:
0.07475245 = sum of:
0.07475245 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07475245 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.00
0.004983497 = product of:
0.024917483 = sum of:
0.024917483 = product of:
0.07475245 = sum of:
0.07475245 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07475245 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
