-
Hildreth, C.R.: Intelligent interfaces and retrieval methods for subject searching in bibliographic retrieval systems (1989)
0.04
0.03943221 = product of:
0.13801272 = sum of:
0.066881716 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066881716 = score(doc=2306,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
0.071131006 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071131006 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15681393 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.4536013 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship (1990) S.44 (R.J. Dorn); Bibliothek; Forschung u. Praxis 14(1990) S.90-91 (W. Umstätter)
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Garlock, K.L.; Piontek, S.: Designing Web interfaces to library services and resources (1999)
0.03
0.03193372 = product of:
0.11176802 = sum of:
0.09958341 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09958341 = score(doc=1550,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15681393 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.63504183 = fieldWeight in 1550, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1550)
0.0121846115 = product of:
0.036553834 = sum of:
0.036553834 = weight(_text_:29 in 1550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036553834 = score(doc=1550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1550)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 26. 8.2005 13:29:50
- RSWK
- Bibliothek / Web-Seite / Gestaltung (BVB)
Bibliothek / Homepage / Gestaltung (BVB)
- Subject
- Bibliothek / Web-Seite / Gestaltung (BVB)
Bibliothek / Homepage / Gestaltung (BVB)
-
Lee, C.; Chen, Y.T.: Distributed visual reasoning for intelligent information retrieval on the Web (2000)
0.03
0.030158078 = product of:
0.10555327 = sum of:
0.05405985 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05405985 = score(doc=2018,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2018, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2018)
0.051493417 = weight(_text_:internet in 2018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051493417 = score(doc=2018,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.45665127 = fieldWeight in 2018, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2018)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Theme
- Internet
-
Johnson, C.; Dunlop, M.D.: Subjectivity and notions of time and value in interactive information retrieval (1998)
0.03
0.029848756 = product of:
0.10447064 = sum of:
0.053505376 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053505376 = score(doc=3611,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
0.05096527 = weight(_text_:internet in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05096527 = score(doc=3611,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.45196757 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- In the short term, technological advances will not solve the problems of information saturation and electronic gridlock on the Internet. Advocates interface design techniques as the only effective means of addressing the usability problems that frustrate interaction with Internet resources. Collaborative approaches to information retrieval, where search engines are augmented by advice from human experts, can reduce the problems of electronic gridlock and information saturation
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special section devoted to human computer interaction and information retrieval
- Theme
- Internet
-
Visual interfaces to digital libraries : [extended papers presented at the first and second International Workshops on Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries, held at the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) in 2001 and 2002] (2002)
0.03
0.028448474 = product of:
0.06637977 = sum of:
0.016382609 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016382609 = score(doc=1784,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.1417929 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
0.042678602 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042678602 = score(doc=1784,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15681393 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.27216077 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
0.0073185572 = product of:
0.02195567 = sum of:
0.02195567 = weight(_text_:22 in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02195567 = score(doc=1784,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 3.2008 15:02:37
- RSWK
- Elektronische Bibliothek / Information Retrieval / Visualisierung / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation / Graphische Benutzeroberfläche / Aufsatzsammlung
Benutzeroberfläche / Elektronische Bibliothek / Kongress (BVB)
- Subject
- Elektronische Bibliothek / Information Retrieval / Visualisierung / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation / Graphische Benutzeroberfläche / Aufsatzsammlung
Benutzeroberfläche / Elektronische Bibliothek / Kongress (BVB)
-
Eibl, M.: Visualisierung im Document Retrieval : Theoretische und praktische Zusammenführung von Softwareergonomie und Graphik Design (2003)
0.03
0.025717327 = product of:
0.060007095 = sum of:
0.023168506 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023168506 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.022068607 = weight(_text_:internet in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022068607 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.014769981 = product of:
0.04430994 = sum of:
0.04430994 = weight(_text_:29 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430994 = score(doc=5996,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Bei der Frage nach der Ästhetik in der Ergonomie hat sich in den letzten Jahren ein Wandel vollzogen. Noch in den 1990er Jahren missachteten Ergonomen ästhetische Faktoren in der Gestaltung von Benutzungsschnittstellen weitgehend. Inzwischen hat sich allerdings das gegenseitige Interesse von Ergonomen und Designern verstärkt, so dass sich Herausgeber und Autor entschlossen, mit dem vorliegenden Band eine erweiterte und aktualisierte Ausgabe der vergriffenen ersten Auflage vorzustellen. Einige Teile der Erstauflage sind gestrafft, andere aktualisiert. Ferner wurden Teile hinzugefügt, die den aktuellen Stand der Thematik in Theorie und Praxis widerspiegeln. Der nun vorliegende Forschungsbericht enthält über 50 neue Textseiten, 39 neue Abbildungen und fast 90 neu eingearbeitete Referenzen. Weitere Informationen zum Inhalt von Buch und CD-ROM sowie eine tabellarische Gbersicht über die Veränderungen gegenüber der ersten Auflage finden sich im Internet unter www.gesis.org/Information/Forschungsuebersichten/Forschungsberichte/Visualisierung2.htm, Informationen zur (vergriffenen) ersten Auflage unter www.gesis.org/Information/Forschungsuebersichten/Forschungsberichte/Visualisierung.htm.
- Date
- 29. 1.2005 19:19:29
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Information retrieval : a confluence of models, techniques and tools into a process (1992)
0.02
0.024082374 = product of:
0.08428831 = sum of:
0.066881716 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066881716 = score(doc=5284,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 5284, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5284)
0.017406588 = product of:
0.052219763 = sum of:
0.052219763 = weight(_text_:29 in 5284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052219763 = score(doc=5284,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5284, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5284)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Describes the basic premises, components, search characteristics, user interfaces, design models and design features of information retrieval. Discusses computer assisted information retrieval, examines current research areas and considers future research areas, trends, and possibilities
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:20:29
-
Poo, D.C.C.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Online Catalog Subject Searching (2009)
0.02
0.023863314 = product of:
0.055681065 = sum of:
0.023168506 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023168506 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
0.022068607 = weight(_text_:internet in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022068607 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
0.010443954 = product of:
0.03133186 = sum of:
0.03133186 = weight(_text_:29 in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03133186 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC) is an information retrieval system characterized by short bibliographic records, mainly of books, journals, and audiovisual materials available in a particular library. This, coupled with a Boolean search interface and a heterogeneous user population with diverse needs, presents special problems for subject searching by end users. To perform effective subject searching in the OPAC system requires a wide range of knowledge and skills. Various approaches to improving the OPAC design for subject searching have been proposed and are reviewed in this entry. The trend toward Web-based OPAC interfaces and the developments in Internet and digital library technologies present fresh opportunities for enhancing the effectiveness of the OPAC system for subject searching.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:24:29
-
Appelt, W.; Hinrichs, E.; Woetzel, G.: Effectiveness and efficiency : the need for tailorable user interfaces on the Web (1998)
0.02
0.02121884 = product of:
0.074265935 = sum of:
0.025746709 = weight(_text_:internet in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025746709 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.048519224 = product of:
0.072778836 = sum of:
0.036553834 = weight(_text_:29 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036553834 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.036225006 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036225006 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
15. 5.1999 14:54:29
- Theme
- Internet
-
Wolff, C.: Leistungsvergleich der Retrievaloberflächen zwischen Web und klassischen Expertensystemen (2001)
0.02
0.020732546 = product of:
0.07256391 = sum of:
0.046817202 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046817202 = score(doc=5870,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
0.025746709 = weight(_text_:internet in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025746709 = score(doc=5870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Die meisten Web-Auftritte der Hosts waren bisher für den Retrieval-Laien gedacht. Im Hintergrund steht dabei das Ziel: mehr Nutzung durch einfacheres Retrieval. Dieser Ansatz steht aber im Konflikt mit der wachsenden Datenmenge und Dokumentgröße, die eigentlich ein immer ausgefeilteres Retrieval verlangen. Häufig wird von Information Professionals die Kritik geäußert, dass die Webanwendungen einen Verlust an Relevanz bringen. Wie weit der Nutzer tatsächlich einen Kompromiss zwischen Relevanz und Vollständigkeit eingehen muss, soll in diesem Beitrag anhand verschiedener Host-Rechner quantifiziert werden
- Theme
- Internet
-
Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996)
0.02
0.020718787 = product of:
0.07251575 = sum of:
0.06044075 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06044075 = score(doc=6958,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.012075002 = product of:
0.036225006 = sum of:
0.036225006 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036225006 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993)
0.02
0.019230109 = product of:
0.06730538 = sum of:
0.053505376 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053505376 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.013800003 = product of:
0.041400008 = sum of:
0.041400008 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041400008 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:22:09
-
Potmesil, M.: Maps alive : viewing geospatial information on the WWW (1997)
0.02
0.018187577 = product of:
0.06365652 = sum of:
0.022068607 = weight(_text_:internet in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022068607 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.04158791 = product of:
0.062381864 = sum of:
0.03133186 = weight(_text_:29 in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03133186 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.031050006 = weight(_text_:22 in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031050006 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Source
- Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1327-1342
- Theme
- Internet
-
Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002)
0.02
0.018002678 = product of:
0.06300937 = sum of:
0.038614176 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038614176 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.024395188 = product of:
0.07318556 = sum of:
0.07318556 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07318556 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:17:40
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Denning, R.; Shuttleworth, M.; Smith, P.: Interface design concepts in the development of a Web-based information retrieval system (1998)
0.02
0.017233187 = product of:
0.060316153 = sum of:
0.030891342 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030891342 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.02942481 = weight(_text_:internet in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02942481 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.2609436 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Theme
- Internet
-
Barker, A.L.: DataStar Web : a comparison with 'classic' DataStar command language searching (1998)
0.02
0.016424846 = product of:
0.057486955 = sum of:
0.043686952 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043686952 = score(doc=7691,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
0.013800003 = product of:
0.041400008 = sum of:
0.041400008 = weight(_text_:22 in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041400008 = score(doc=7691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Compares and contrasts online searching on DataStar using the 'classic' command language, with access via the more recent Web interface (DataStar Web). The search functionality of the 2 interfaces is not identical, although both use the same retrieval software and access the same databases. Many of the differences affect retrieval effectiveness and may trip up novice and experienced searchers alike
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.155-167
-
Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006)
0.02
0.015800778 = product of:
0.055302717 = sum of:
0.038226083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038226083 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.017076634 = product of:
0.051229898 = sum of:
0.051229898 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051229898 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:56:22
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Schulz, U.: Search engine usability : über die Nutzungsqualität von Suchmaschinen (2001)
0.02
0.015416004 = product of:
0.05395601 = sum of:
0.035565503 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 5776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035565503 = score(doc=5776,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15681393 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.22680065 = fieldWeight in 5776, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5776)
0.018390507 = weight(_text_:internet in 5776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018390507 = score(doc=5776,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 5776, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5776)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Web Usability konnte sich als Forschungsbereich zunächst nur in größeren Firmen der Internet-Branche wie z. B. Icon Medialab etablieren. Mit zunehmender Konkurrenz und ersten Pleiten im E-Commerce entsteht die Einsicht oder bittere Erfahrung, dass bunte, multimediale Internetpräsenz nicht alles ist: Die Nutzungsqualität von Websites tritt in den Vordergrund und damit ein neuer Arbeitsmarkt für Informationsarchitekten und HCI- bzw. Usability-Spezialisten. Suchmaschinen sind eine besondere Kategorie von Website. Sie entstehen in einem Spannungsfeld zweier unterschiedlicher Interessen: Mit kommerziellen Websites teilen sie den Wettbewerb um Kunden und die Art der Kunden: den ungeduldigen gelegentlichen Anwender. Mit der akademischen Welt teilen sie das forschende Bemühen um die Optimierung von Features und Funktionen und die déformation professionelle der Eingeweihten. Am Beispiel zweier Untersuchungen wird deutlich, wie es der richtige 'Methodenmix' ermöglicht, bei der Evaluation der Nutzungsqualität von Suchmaschinen ganz unterschiedlicher Art (a) diesen Interessenkonflikt bewusst zu machen, (b) Empathie für die Nöte der Kunden zu entwickeln und c) allgemeingültige Kriterien zur Entwicklung gebrauchstauglicher Suchmaschinen aufzustellen. Beide Untersuchungen fanden im Rahmen des Projekts Jorschung und Forschungsumgebung für Web Usability« unter Mitwirkung von Studierenden am Fachbereich Bibliothek und Information der FH Hamburg statt
-
Chowdhury, S.; Chowdhury, G.G.: Using DDC to create a visual knowledge map as an aid to online information retrieval (2004)
0.02
0.01522847 = product of:
0.053299643 = sum of:
0.04633701 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04633701 = score(doc=2643,freq=18.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.40105084 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.0069626356 = product of:
0.020887906 = sum of:
0.020887906 = weight(_text_:29 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020887906 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Content
- 1. Introduction Web search engines and digital libraries usually expect the users to use search terms that most accurately represent their information needs. Finding the most appropriate search terms to represent an information need is an age old problem in information retrieval. Keyword or phrase search may produce good search results as long as the search terms or phrase(s) match those used by the authors and have been chosen for indexing by the concerned information retrieval system. Since this does not always happen, a large number of false drops are produced by information retrieval systems. The retrieval results become worse in very large systems that deal with millions of records, such as the Web search engines and digital libraries. Vocabulary control tools are used to improve the performance of text retrieval systems. Thesauri, the most common type of vocabulary control tool used in information retrieval, appeared in the late fifties, designed for use with the emerging post-coordinate indexing systems of that time. They are used to exert terminology control in indexing, and to aid in searching by allowing the searcher to select appropriate search terms. A large volume of literature exists describing the design features, and experiments with the use, of thesauri in various types of information retrieval systems (see for example, Furnas et.al., 1987; Bates, 1986, 1998; Milstead, 1997, and Shiri et al., 2002).
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 13:37:50
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Helbig, H.; Gnörlich, C.; Leveling, J.: Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Informationsanbietern im Internet und zu lokalen Datenbanken (2000)
0.01
0.014617252 = product of:
0.05116038 = sum of:
0.019307088 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019307088 = score(doc=5558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5558)
0.031853292 = weight(_text_:internet in 5558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031853292 = score(doc=5558,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.28247973 = fieldWeight in 5558, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5558)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Die Schaffung eines natürlichsprachlichen Interfaces (NLI), (das einem Nutzer die Formulierung von Anfragen an Informationsanbieter in seiner Muttersprache erlaubt, stellt eine der interessantesten Herausforderungen im Bereich des Information-Retrieval und der Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache dar. Dieser Beitrag beschreibt Methoden zur Obersetzung natürlichsprachlicher Anfragen in Ausdrücke formaler Retrievalsprachen sowohl für Informationsressourcen im Internet als auch für lokale Datenbanken. Die vorgestellten Methoden sind Teil das Informationsrecherchesystems LINAS, das an der Fernuniversität Hagen entwickelt wurde, um Nutzern einen natürlichsprachlichen Zugang zu lokalen und zu im Internet verteilten wissenschaftlichen und technischen Informationen anzubieten. Das LINAS-System unterscheidet sich von anderen Systemen und natürlichsprachlichen Interfaces (vgl. OSIRIS) oder die früheren Systeme INTELLECT, Q&A durch die explizite Einbeziehung von Hintergrundwissen und speziellen Dialogmodellen in den Übersetzungsprozeß. Darüber hinaus ist das System auf ein vollständiges Verstehen des natürlichsprachlichen Textes ausgerichtet, während andere Systeme typischerweise nur nach Stichworten oder bestimmten grammatikalischen Mustern in der Eingabe suchen. Ein besonderer Schwerpunkt von LINAS liegt in der Repräsentation und Auswertung der semantischen Relationen zwischen den in der Nutzeranfrage gegebenen Konzepten
