Search (299 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.19
    0.18870348 = product of:
      0.37740695 = sum of:
        0.07198795 = product of:
          0.21596384 = sum of:
            0.21596384 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21596384 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38426498 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.305419 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.305419 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38426498 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  2. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.04
    0.038202286 = product of:
      0.07640457 = sum of:
        0.05184098 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05184098 = score(doc=4869,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
        0.02456359 = product of:
          0.04912718 = sum of:
            0.04912718 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04912718 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Bouidghaghen, O.; Tamine, L.: Spatio-temporal based personalization for mobile search (2012) 0.04
    0.036704175 = product of:
      0.07340835 = sum of:
        0.05498566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05498566 = score(doc=108,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.018422693 = product of:
          0.036845386 = sum of:
            0.036845386 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036845386 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The explosion of the information available on the Internet has made traditional information retrieval systems, characterized by one size fits all approaches, less effective. Indeed, users are overwhelmed by the information delivered by such systems in response to their queries, particularly when the latter are ambiguous. In order to tackle this problem, the state-of-the-art reveals that there is a growing interest towards contextual information retrieval (CIR) which relies on various sources of evidence issued from the user's search background and environment, in order to improve the retrieval accuracy. This chapter focuses on mobile context, highlights challenges they present for IR, and gives an overview of CIR approaches applied in this environment. Then, the authors present an approach to personalize search results for mobile users by exploiting both cognitive and spatio-temporal contexts. The experimental evaluation undertaken in front of Yahoo search shows that the approach improves the quality of top search result lists and enhances search result precision.
    Date
    20. 4.2012 13:19:22
    Source
    Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
  4. Hsieh-Yee, I.: ¬The retrieval power of selected search engines : how well do they address general reference questions and subject questions? (1998) 0.03
    0.033427 = product of:
      0.066854 = sum of:
        0.045360856 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045360856 = score(doc=2186,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
        0.02149314 = product of:
          0.04298628 = sum of:
            0.04298628 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04298628 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluates the performance of 8 major Internet search engines in answering 21 real reference questions and 5 made up subject questions. Reports on the retrieval and relevancy ranking abilities of the search engines. Concludes that the search engines did not produce good results for the reference questions unlike for the subject questions. The best engines are identified by type of questions, with Infoseek best for the subject questions, and OpenText best for refrence questions
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:51
  5. Wiley, D.L.: Beyond information retrieval : ways to provide content in context (1998) 0.03
    0.033427 = product of:
      0.066854 = sum of:
        0.045360856 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045360856 = score(doc=3647,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3647, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3647)
        0.02149314 = product of:
          0.04298628 = sum of:
            0.04298628 = weight(_text_:22 in 3647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04298628 = score(doc=3647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The days of the traditional abstracting and indexing services are waning, as abstracts and bibliographic data become commodities. However, there are tremedous opportunities for those organizations willing to look beyond the status quo to the new possibilities enabled by the latest wave of advanced technologies. Those who own content need to focus on the delivery mechanisms and new markets that technology can provide. Features like automatic extraction of key concepts or names, collaborative filtering to help with trend analysis, and visualization techniques can take information past the retrieval stage and into the management area
    Source
    Database. 21(1998) no.4, S.18-22
  6. Altmann, O.; Pöhl, S.: Information Retrieval im Internet : bekannte Suchdienste und ihre Eigenschaften (1997) 0.03
    0.030610349 = product of:
      0.061220698 = sum of:
        0.036657106 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036657106 = score(doc=205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=205)
        0.02456359 = product of:
          0.04912718 = sum of:
            0.04912718 = weight(_text_:22 in 205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04912718 = score(doc=205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Pages
    S.18-22
  7. Amato, G.; Rabitti, F.; Savino, P.: Multimedia document search on the Web (1998) 0.03
    0.030610349 = product of:
      0.061220698 = sum of:
        0.036657106 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036657106 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
        0.02456359 = product of:
          0.04912718 = sum of:
            0.04912718 = weight(_text_:22 in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04912718 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a multimedia model which describes the various multimedia components, their structure and their relationships with a pre-defined taxonomy of concepts, in order to support search engine information retrieval process
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  8. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.03
    0.030610349 = product of:
      0.061220698 = sum of:
        0.036657106 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036657106 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
        0.02456359 = product of:
          0.04912718 = sum of:
            0.04912718 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04912718 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  9. Schüler, P.: Wertes Wissen : Knowledge Management vermeidet Datenfriedhöfe (2001) 0.03
    0.030610349 = product of:
      0.061220698 = sum of:
        0.036657106 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036657106 = score(doc=6815,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6815, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6815)
        0.02456359 = product of:
          0.04912718 = sum of:
            0.04912718 = weight(_text_:22 in 6815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04912718 = score(doc=6815,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6815, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6815)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Wer ohne spezielle Vorkenntnisse schnell in einem Thema Fuß fassen will, ist auf intelligente Recherchierhilfen angewiesen. Gurus der künstlichen Intelligenz kennen schon langm Wege, die Datenwelt besser als mit Schlagwort-Suchmaschinen nach Inhalten zu durchforsten - nur in der Praxis war davon wenig zu sehen. Aktuelle Software zum Content-Retrieval will die scheinbare Utopie verwirklichen
    Date
    8.11.2001 19:58:22
  10. Mukherjea, S.; Hirata, K.; Hara, Y.: Towards a multimedia World-Wide Web information retrieval engine (1997) 0.03
    0.028651714 = product of:
      0.05730343 = sum of:
        0.038880736 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038880736 = score(doc=2678,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2678, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2678)
        0.018422693 = product of:
          0.036845386 = sum of:
            0.036845386 = weight(_text_:22 in 2678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036845386 = score(doc=2678,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2678, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2678)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a search engine that integrate text and image search. 1 or more Web site can be indexed for both textual and image information, allowing the user to search based on keywords or images or both. Another problem with the current search engines is that they show the results as pages of scrolled lists; this is not very user-friendly. The search engine allows the user to visualise to results in various ways. Explains the indexing and searching techniques of the search engine and highlights several features of the querying interface to make the retrieval process more efficient. Use examples to show the usefulness of the technology
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  11. Herrera-Viedma, E.; Pasi, G.: Soft approaches to information retrieval and information access on the Web : an introduction to the special topic section (2006) 0.03
    0.0285887 = product of:
      0.0571774 = sum of:
        0.044895604 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044895604 = score(doc=5285,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.32745665 = fieldWeight in 5285, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5285)
        0.012281795 = product of:
          0.02456359 = sum of:
            0.02456359 = weight(_text_:22 in 5285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02456359 = score(doc=5285,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5285, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5285)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web is a popular and interactive medium used to collect, disseminate, and access an increasingly huge amount of information, which constitutes the mainstay of the so-called information and knowledge society. Because of its spectacular growth, related to both Web resources (pages, sites, and services) and number of users, the Web is nowadays the main information repository and provides some automatic systems for locating, accessing, and retrieving information. However, an open and crucial question remains: how to provide fast and effective retrieval of the information relevant to specific users' needs. This is a very hard and complex task, since it is pervaded with subjectivity, vagueness, and uncertainty. The expression soft computing refers to techniques and methodologies that work synergistically with the aim of providing flexible information processing tolerant of imprecision, vagueness, partial truth, and approximation. So, soft computing represents a good candidate to design effective systems for information access and retrieval on the Web. One of the most representative tools of soft computing is fuzzy set theory. This special topic section collects research articles witnessing some recent advances in improving the processes of information access and retrieval on the Web by using soft computing tools, and in particular, by using fuzzy sets and/or integrating them with other soft computing tools. In this introductory article, we first review the problem of Web retrieval and the concept of soft computing technology. We then briefly introduce the articles in this section and conclude by highlighting some future research directions that could benefit from the use of soft computing technologies.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:59:33
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einer Special Topic Section on Soft Approaches to Information Retrieval and Information Access on the Web
  12. Garcés, P.J.; Olivas, J.A.; Romero, F.P.: Concept-matching IR systems versus word-matching information retrieval systems : considering fuzzy interrelations for indexing Web pages (2006) 0.03
    0.027517365 = product of:
      0.05503473 = sum of:
        0.039682485 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039682485 = score(doc=5288,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
        0.0153522445 = product of:
          0.030704489 = sum of:
            0.030704489 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030704489 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a semantic-based Web retrieval system that is capable of retrieving the Web pages that are conceptually related to the implicit concepts of the query. The concept of concept is managed from a fuzzy point of view by means of semantic areas. In this context, the proposed system improves most search engines that are based on matching words. The key of the system is to use a new version of the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy-Based Concept Representation Model (FIS-CRM) to extract and represent the concepts contained in both the Web pages and the user query. This model, which was integrated into other tools such as the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy based Searcher (FISS) metasearcher and the fz-mail system, considers the fuzzy synonymy and the fuzzy generality interrelations as a means of representing word interrelations (stored in a fuzzy synonymy dictionary and ontologies). The new version of the model, which is based on the study of the cooccurrences of synonyms, integrates a soft method for disambiguating word senses. This method also considers the context of the word to be disambiguated and the thematic ontologies and sets of synonyms stored in the dictionary.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:14:12
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einer Special Topic Section on Soft Approaches to Information Retrieval and Information Access on the Web
  13. Bertelmann, R.; Rusch-Feja, D.: Informationsretrieval im Internet : Surfen, Browsen, Suchen - mit einem Überblick über strukturierte Informationsangebote (1997) 0.03
    0.026784055 = product of:
      0.05356811 = sum of:
        0.03207497 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03207497 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
        0.02149314 = product of:
          0.04298628 = sum of:
            0.04298628 = weight(_text_:22 in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04298628 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das gezielte Suchen im Internet findet in erster Linie mit Hilfe der Suchmaschinen statt. Daneben gibt es aber bereits eine Fülle von strukturierten Informationsangeboten, aufbereiteten Listen und Sammelstellen, die als Clearinghouse, Subject Gateway, Subject Tree oder Resource Pages bezeichnet werden. Solche intellektuell erstellten Übersichten geben in der Regel bereits Hinweise zu Inhalt und fachlichem Niveau der Quelle. Da die Art und Weise der Aufbereitung bei den Sammelstellen sehr unterschiedlich funktioniert, ist die Kenntnis ihrer Erschließungskriterien für ein erfolgreiches Retrieval unverzichtbar
    Date
    9. 7.2000 11:31:22
  14. Kurzke, C.; Galle, M.; Bathelt, M.: WebAssistant : a user profile specific information retrieval assistant (1998) 0.03
    0.026784055 = product of:
      0.05356811 = sum of:
        0.03207497 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03207497 = score(doc=3559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3559)
        0.02149314 = product of:
          0.04298628 = sum of:
            0.04298628 = weight(_text_:22 in 3559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04298628 = score(doc=3559,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3559, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3559)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  15. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.03
    0.026784055 = product of:
      0.05356811 = sum of:
        0.03207497 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03207497 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
        0.02149314 = product of:
          0.04298628 = sum of:
            0.04298628 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04298628 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  16. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.03
    0.026784055 = product of:
      0.05356811 = sum of:
        0.03207497 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03207497 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
        0.02149314 = product of:
          0.04298628 = sum of:
            0.04298628 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04298628 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des klassischen Information Retrieval wurden verschiedene Verfahren für das Ranking sowie die Suche in einer homogenen strukturlosen Dokumentenmenge entwickelt. Die Erfolge der Suchmaschine Google haben gezeigt dass die Suche in einer zwar inhomogenen aber zusammenhängenden Dokumentenmenge wie dem Internet unter Berücksichtigung der Dokumentenverbindungen (Links) sehr effektiv sein kann. Unter den von der Suchmaschine Google realisierten Konzepten ist ein Verfahren zum Ranking von Suchergebnissen (PageRank), das in diesem Artikel kurz erklärt wird. Darüber hinaus wird auf die Konzepte eines Systems namens CiteSeer eingegangen, welches automatisch bibliographische Angaben indexiert (engl. Autonomous Citation Indexing, ACI). Letzteres erzeugt aus einer Menge von nicht vernetzten wissenschaftlichen Dokumenten eine zusammenhängende Dokumentenmenge und ermöglicht den Einsatz von Banking-Verfahren, die auf den von Google genutzten Verfahren basieren.
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  17. Gossen, T.: Search engines for children : search user interfaces and information-seeking behaviour (2016) 0.03
    0.025015112 = product of:
      0.050030224 = sum of:
        0.03928365 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03928365 = score(doc=2752,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.28652456 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
        0.01074657 = product of:
          0.02149314 = sum of:
            0.02149314 = weight(_text_:22 in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02149314 = score(doc=2752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Acknowledgments; Abstract; Zusammenfassung; Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; List of Acronyms; Chapter 1 Introduction ; 1.1 Research Questions; 1.2 Thesis Outline; Part I Fundamentals ; Chapter 2 Information Retrieval for Young Users ; 2.1 Basics of Information Retrieval; 2.1.1 Architecture of an IR System; 2.1.2 Relevance Ranking; 2.1.3 Search User Interfaces; 2.1.4 Targeted Search Engines; 2.2 Aspects of Child Development Relevant for Information Retrieval Tasks; 2.2.1 Human Cognitive Development; 2.2.2 Information Processing Theory; 2.2.3 Psychosocial Development 2.3 User Studies and Evaluation2.3.1 Methods in User Studies; 2.3.2 Types of Evaluation; 2.3.3 Evaluation with Children; 2.4 Discussion; Chapter 3 State of the Art ; 3.1 Children's Information-Seeking Behaviour; 3.1.1 Querying Behaviour; 3.1.2 Search Strategy; 3.1.3 Navigation Style; 3.1.4 User Interface; 3.1.5 Relevance Judgement; 3.2 Existing Algorithms and User Interface Concepts for Children; 3.2.1 Query; 3.2.2 Content; 3.2.3 Ranking; 3.2.4 Search Result Visualisation; 3.3 Existing Information Retrieval Systems for Children; 3.3.1 Digital Book Libraries; 3.3.2 Web Search Engines 3.4 Summary and DiscussionPart II Studying Open Issues ; Chapter 4 Usability of Existing Search Engines for Young Users ; 4.1 Assessment Criteria; 4.1.1 Criteria for Matching the Motor Skills; 4.1.2 Criteria for Matching the Cognitive Skills; 4.2 Results; 4.2.1 Conformance with Motor Skills; 4.2.2 Conformance with the Cognitive Skills; 4.2.3 Presentation of Search Results; 4.2.4 Browsing versus Searching; 4.2.5 Navigational Style; 4.3 Summary and Discussion; Chapter 5 Large-scale Analysis of Children's Queries and Search Interactions; 5.1 Dataset; 5.2 Results; 5.3 Summary and Discussion Chapter 6 Differences in Usability and Perception of Targeted Web Search Engines between Children and Adults 6.1 Related Work; 6.2 User Study; 6.3 Study Results; 6.4 Summary and Discussion; Part III Tackling the Challenges ; Chapter 7 Search User Interface Design for Children ; 7.1 Conceptual Challenges and Possible Solutions; 7.2 Knowledge Journey Design; 7.3 Evaluation; 7.3.1 Study Design; 7.3.2 Study Results; 7.4 Voice-Controlled Search: Initial Study; 7.4.1 User Study; 7.5 Summary and Discussion; Chapter 8 Addressing User Diversity ; 8.1 Evolving Search User Interface 8.1.1 Mapping Function8.1.2 Evolving Skills; 8.1.3 Detection of User Abilities; 8.1.4 Design Concepts; 8.2 Adaptation of a Search User Interface towards User Needs; 8.2.1 Design & Implementation; 8.2.2 Search Input; 8.2.3 Result Output; 8.2.4 General Properties; 8.2.5 Configuration and Further Details; 8.3 Evaluation; 8.3.1 Study Design; 8.3.2 Study Results; 8.3.3 Preferred UI Settings; 8.3.4 User satisfaction; 8.4 Knowledge Journey Exhibit; 8.4.1 Hardware; 8.4.2 Frontend; 8.4.3 Backend; 8.5 Summary and Discussion; Chapter 9 Supporting Visual Searchers in Processing Search Results 9.1 Related Work
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval
  18. Lehrke, C.: Architektur von Suchmaschinen : Googles Architektur, insb. Crawler und Indizierer (2005) 0.02
    0.023876429 = product of:
      0.047752857 = sum of:
        0.03240061 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03240061 = score(doc=867,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
        0.0153522445 = product of:
          0.030704489 = sum of:
            0.030704489 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030704489 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das Internet mit seinen ständig neuen Usern und seinem extremen Wachstum bringt viele neue Herausforderungen mit sich. Aufgrund dieses Wachstums bedienen sich die meisten Leute der Hilfe von Suchmaschinen um Inhalte innerhalb des Internet zu finden. Suchmaschinen nutzen für die Beantwortung der User-Anfragen Information Retrieval Techniken. Problematisch ist nur, dass traditionelle Information Retrieval (IR) Systeme für eine relativ kleine und zusammenhängende Sammlung von Dokumenten entwickelt wurden. Das Internet hingegen unterliegt einem ständigen Wachstum, schnellen Änderungsraten und es ist über geographisch verteilte Computer verteilt. Aufgrund dieser Tatsachen müssen die alten Techniken erweitert oder sogar neue IRTechniken entwickelt werden. Eine Suchmaschine die diesen Herausforderungen vergleichsweise erfolgreich entgegnet ist Google. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es aufzuzeigen, wie Suchmaschinen funktionieren. Der Fokus liegt dabei auf der Suchmaschine Google. Kapitel 2 wird sich zuerst mit dem Aufbau von Suchmaschinen im Allgemeinen beschäftigen, wodurch ein grundlegendes Verständnis für die einzelnen Komponenten geschaffen werden soll. Im zweiten Teil des Kapitels wird darauf aufbauend ein Überblick über die Architektur von Google gegeben. Kapitel 3 und 4 dienen dazu, näher auf die beiden Komponenten Crawler und Indexer einzugehen, bei denen es sich um zentrale Elemente im Rahmen von Suchmaschinen handelt.
    Pages
    22 S
  19. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.02
    0.02295776 = product of:
      0.04591552 = sum of:
        0.02749283 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02749283 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
        0.018422693 = product of:
          0.036845386 = sum of:
            0.036845386 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036845386 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  20. Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998) 0.02
    0.02295776 = product of:
      0.04591552 = sum of:
        0.02749283 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02749283 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.018422693 = product of:
          0.036845386 = sum of:
            0.036845386 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036845386 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

Years

Languages

  • e 182
  • d 109
  • sp 3
  • f 2
  • nl 2
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 257
  • m 22
  • el 20
  • x 5
  • s 4
  • p 2
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Subjects