Search (1565 results, page 2 of 79)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  1. Danowski, P.: Step one: blow up the silo! : Open bibliographic data, the first step towards Linked Open Data (2010) 0.06
    0.062061667 = product of:
      0.15515417 = sum of:
        0.118616216 = weight(_text_:semantic in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118616216 = score(doc=3962,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.616327 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
        0.03653796 = product of:
          0.07307592 = sum of:
            0.07307592 = weight(_text_:web in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07307592 = score(doc=3962,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    More and more libraries starting semantic web projects. The question about the license of the data is not discussed or the discussion is deferred to the end of project. In this paper is discussed why the question of the license is so important in context of the semantic web that is should be one of the first aspects in a semantic web project. Also it will be shown why a public domain weaver is the only solution that fulfill the the special requirements of the semantic web and that guaranties the reuseablitly of semantic library data for a sustainability of the projects.
    Object
    Web 2.0
  2. O'Kane, K.C.: World Wide Web-based information storage and retrieval (1996) 0.06
    0.06182182 = product of:
      0.15455455 = sum of:
        0.05673526 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05673526 = score(doc=4737,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 4737, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4737)
        0.09781929 = sum of:
          0.053920146 = weight(_text_:web in 4737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053920146 = score(doc=4737,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 4737, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4737)
          0.043899145 = weight(_text_:22 in 4737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043899145 = score(doc=4737,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4737, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4737)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the design and implementation of a system for computer generation of linked HTML documents to support information retrieval and hypertext applications on the WWW. The system does not require text query input, nor any client or host processing other than hypertext linkage. The goal is to construct a fully automatic system in which original text documents are read and processed by a computer program that generates HTML files, which can be used immediately by Web browsers to search and retrieve the original documents. A user with a large collection of information: for instance, newspaper articles; can feed these documents to this program and produce directly the necessary files to establish WWW home page and related pages, to support interactive retrieval and distribution of the original documents
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:13:07
  3. Bachiochi, D.: Usability studies and designing navigational aids for the World Wide Web (1997) 0.06
    0.059691615 = product of:
      0.14922903 = sum of:
        0.03743556 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03743556 = score(doc=2402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2402)
        0.11179347 = sum of:
          0.061623022 = weight(_text_:web in 2402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061623022 = score(doc=2402,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 2402, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2402)
          0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 2402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05017045 = score(doc=2402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2402)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes how usability testing was used to validate design recommendations WWW navigation aids. The results show a need for navigational aids that are related to the particular Website and located beneath browser buttons. Usability criteria were established that limits page changes to 4 and search times to 60 seconds for information retrieval
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue of papers from the 6th International World Wide Web conference, held 7-11 Apr 1997, Santa Clara, California
  4. Firnkes, M.: Schöne neue Welt : der Content der Zukunft wird von Algorithmen bestimmt (2015) 0.06
    0.05891159 = product of:
      0.14727898 = sum of:
        0.05304678 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05304678 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.2756298 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
        0.0942322 = sum of:
          0.056604367 = weight(_text_:web in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056604367 = score(doc=2118,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
          0.03762784 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03762784 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Während das Internet vor noch nicht allzu langer Zeit hauptsächlich ein weiteres Informationsmedium darstellte, so explodieren die technischen Möglichkeiten derzeit förmlich. Diese stärken nicht nur den gegenseitigen Austausch der Nutzer. Sie alle vermessen unsere täglichen Gewohnheiten - auf sehr vielfältige Art und Weise. Die Mechanismen, die das gekaufte Web ausmachen, werden hierdurch komplexer. In den meisten neuen Technologien und Anwendungen verbergen sich Wege, die Verbraucherverführung zu perfektionieren. Nicht wenige davon dürften zudem für die Politik und andere Interessensverbände von Bedeutung sein, als alternativer Kanal, um Wählergruppen und Unterstützer zu mobilisieren. Das nachfolgende Kapitel nennt die wichtigsten Trends der nächsten Jahre, mitsamt ihren möglichen manipulativen Auswirkungen. Nur wenn wir beobachten, von wem die Zukunftstechniken wie genutzt werden, können wir kommerziellen Auswüchsen vorbeugen.
    Content
    Mit Verweis auf das Buch: Firnkes, M.: Das gekaufte Web: wie wir online manipuliert werden. Hannover : Heise Zeitschriften Verlag 2015. 220 S.
    Date
    5. 7.2015 22:02:31
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  5. Nait-Baha, L.; Jackiewicz, A.; Djioua, B.; Laublet, P.: Query reformulation for information retrieval on the Web using the point of view methodology : preliminary results (2001) 0.06
    0.05847824 = product of:
      0.09746373 = sum of:
        0.028076671 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028076671 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.05304678 = weight(_text_:semantic in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05304678 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.2756298 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.01634027 = product of:
          0.03268054 = sum of:
            0.03268054 = weight(_text_:web in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03268054 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The work we are presenting is devoted to the information collected on the WWW. By the term collected we mean the whole process of retrieving, extracting and presenting results to the user. This research is part of the RAP (Research, Analyze, Propose) project in which we propose to combine two methods: (i) query reformulation using linguistic markers according to a given point of view; and (ii) text semantic analysis by means of contextual exploration results (Descles, 1991). The general project architecture describing the interactions between the users, the RAP system and the WWW search engines is presented in Nait-Baha et al. (1998). We will focus this paper on showing how we use linguistic markers to reformulate the queries according to a given point of view
  6. Johnson, E.H.: S R Ranganathan in the Internet age (2019) 0.06
    0.05847824 = product of:
      0.09746373 = sum of:
        0.028076671 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028076671 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
        0.05304678 = weight(_text_:semantic in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05304678 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.2756298 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
        0.01634027 = product of:
          0.03268054 = sum of:
            0.03268054 = weight(_text_:web in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03268054 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    S R Ranganathan's ideas have influenced library classification since the inception of his Colon Classification in 1933. His address at Elsinore, "Library Classification Through a Century", was his grand vision of the century of progress in classification from 1876 to 1975, and looked to the future of faceted classification as the means to provide a cohesive system to organize the world's information. Fifty years later, the internet and its achievements, social ecology, and consequences present a far more complicated picture, with the library as he knew it as a very small part and the problems that he confronted now greatly exacerbated. The systematic nature of Ranganathan's canons, principles, postulates, and devices suggest that modern semantic algorithms could guide automatic subject tagging. The vision presented here is one of internet-wide faceted classification and retrieval, implemented as open, distributed facets providing unified faceted searching across all web sites.
  7. Krabo, U.; Knitel, M.: Library linked data : Technologien, Projekte, Potentiale (2011) 0.06
    0.058128126 = product of:
      0.14532031 = sum of:
        0.10719301 = weight(_text_:semantic in 4908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10719301 = score(doc=4908,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.55697227 = fieldWeight in 4908, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4908)
        0.038127303 = product of:
          0.076254606 = sum of:
            0.076254606 = weight(_text_:web in 4908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076254606 = score(doc=4908,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 4908, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4908)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Das Semantic Web und seine Auswirkungen auf Bibliotheken rücken immer mehr in den Fokus informationswissenschaftlicher Forschung. Dieser Artikel erläutert grundlegende funktionale wie technische Konzepte des Semantic Web, um darauf aufbauend in das Thema Library Linked Data einzuführen. Dafür werden einige kürzlich entstandene Projekte und Initiativen vorgestellt. Neben den Visionen und Zielen der jeweiligen Initiatoren, wie bessere Sichtbarkeit von bibliographischen Daten und Entwicklung neuer Applikationen, werden auch offene technische und rechtliche Fragestellungen bzw. Probleme kurzangerissen. In einem letzten Punkt werden mögliche praktische Linked Data-Anwendungsfalle für den österreichischen Kontext vorgestellt.
    Content
    Inhalt 1. Einleitung 2. Das Semantic Web 3. Technologien und Standards 4. Linked Data 5. Library Linked Data: Projekte und Erwartungen 6. Herausforderungen 7. LLD-Anwendungen in Österreich 8. Fazit
    Object
    Web 2.0
  8. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: Mein Computer versteht mich (2001) 0.06
    0.057440013 = product of:
      0.14360003 = sum of:
        0.100025974 = weight(_text_:semantic in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.100025974 = score(doc=4550,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.51973253 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
        0.043574058 = product of:
          0.087148115 = sum of:
            0.087148115 = weight(_text_:web in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087148115 = score(doc=4550,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Was wäre, wenn der Computer den Inhalt einer Seite aus dem World Wide Web nicht nur anzeigen, sondern auch seine Bedeutung erfassen würde? Er könnte ungeahnte Dinge für seinen Benutzer tun - und das vielleicht schon bald, wenn das semantische Netz etabliert ist
    Footnote
    Dt. Übersetzung von: The Semantic Web: a new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. In: Scientific American. 284(2001) no.5, S.34-43.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  9. Feigenbaum, L.; Herman, I.; Hongsermeier, T.; Neumann, E.; Stephens, S.: ¬The Semantic Web in action (2007) 0.06
    0.055721242 = product of:
      0.1393031 = sum of:
        0.100025974 = weight(_text_:semantic in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.100025974 = score(doc=3000,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.51973253 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
        0.039277125 = product of:
          0.07855425 = sum of:
            0.07855425 = weight(_text_:web in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07855425 = score(doc=3000,freq=26.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.520022 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
                  5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                    26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Six years ago in this magazine, Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler and Ora Lassila unveiled a nascent vision of the Semantic Web: a highly interconnected network of data that could be easily accessed and understood by any desktop or handheld machine. They painted a future of intelligent software agents that would head out on the World Wide Web and automatically book flights and hotels for our trips, update our medical records and give us a single, customized answer to a particular question without our having to search for information or pore through results. They also presented the young technologies that would make this vision come true: a common language for representing data that could be understood by all kinds of software agents; ontologies--sets of statements--that translate information from disparate databases into common terms; and rules that allow software agents to reason about the information described in those terms. The data format, ontologies and reasoning software would operate like one big application on the World Wide Web, analyzing all the raw data stored in online databases as well as all the data about the text, images, video and communications the Web contained. Like the Web itself, the Semantic Web would grow in a grassroots fashion, only this time aided by working groups within the World Wide Web Consortium, which helps to advance the global medium. Since then skeptics have said the Semantic Web would be too difficult for people to understand or exploit. Not so. The enabling technologies have come of age. A vibrant community of early adopters has agreed on standards that have steadily made the Semantic Web practical to use. Large companies have major projects under way that will greatly improve the efficiencies of in-house operations and of scientific research. Other firms are using the Semantic Web to enhance business-to-business interactions and to build the hidden data-processing structures, or back ends, behind new consumer services. And like an iceberg, the tip of this large body of work is emerging in direct consumer applications, too.
    Content
    Vgl. auch unter: http://thefigtrees.net/lee/sw/sciam/semantic-web-in-action#single-page.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  10. Polleres, A.; Lausen, H.; Lara, R.: Semantische Beschreibung von Web Services (2006) 0.06
    0.055184163 = product of:
      0.1379604 = sum of:
        0.08752273 = weight(_text_:semantic in 5813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08752273 = score(doc=5813,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.45476598 = fieldWeight in 5813, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5813)
        0.05043768 = product of:
          0.10087536 = sum of:
            0.10087536 = weight(_text_:web in 5813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10087536 = score(doc=5813,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 5813, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Kapitel werden Anwendungsgebiete und Ansätze für die semantische Beschreibung von Web Services behandelt. Bestehende Web Service Technologien leisten einen entscheidenden Beitrag zur Entwicklung verteilter Anwendungen dadurch, dass weithin akzeptierte Standards vorliegen, die die Kommunikation zwischen Anwendungen bestimmen und womit deren Kombination zu komplexeren Einheiten ermöglicht wird. Automatisierte Mechanismen zum Auffinden geeigneter Web Services und deren Komposition dagegen werden von bestehenden Technologien in vergleichsweise geringem Maß unterstützt. Ähnlich wie bei der Annotation statischer Daten im "Semantic Web" setzen Forschung und Industrie große Hoffnungen in die semantische Beschreibung von Web Services zur weitgehenden Automatisierung dieser Aufgaben.
    Source
    Semantic Web: Wege zur vernetzten Wissensgesellschaft. Hrsg.: T. Pellegrini, u. A. Blumauer
  11. Burke, R.D.: Question answering from frequently asked question files : experiences with the FAQ Finder System (1997) 0.05
    0.054984618 = product of:
      0.13746154 = sum of:
        0.03743556 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03743556 = score(doc=1191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1191)
        0.100025974 = weight(_text_:semantic in 1191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.100025974 = score(doc=1191,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.51973253 = fieldWeight in 1191, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1191)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes FAQ Finder, a natural language question-answering system that uses files of frequently asked questions as its knowledge base. Unlike information retrieval approaches that rely on a purely lexical metric of similarity between query and document, FAQ Finder uses a semantic knowledge base (Wordnet) to improve its ability to match question and answer. Includes results from an evaluation of the system's performance and shows that a combination of semantic and statistical techniques works better than any single approach
  12. Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999) 0.05
    0.054756757 = product of:
      0.13689189 = sum of:
        0.05304678 = weight(_text_:semantic in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05304678 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.2756298 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
        0.08384511 = sum of:
          0.046217266 = weight(_text_:web in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046217266 = score(doc=3968,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
          0.03762784 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03762784 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
    Date
    21.10.2000 15:01:22
    Source
    The World Wide Web and Databases: International Workshop WebDB'98, Valencia, Spain, March 27-28, 1998, Selected papers. Eds.: P. Atzeni et al
  13. Berners-Lee, T.: ¬Das Web ist noch nicht vollendet (2000) 0.05
    0.05423264 = product of:
      0.1355816 = sum of:
        0.0884113 = weight(_text_:semantic in 4250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0884113 = score(doc=4250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.45938298 = fieldWeight in 4250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4250)
        0.0471703 = product of:
          0.0943406 = sum of:
            0.0943406 = weight(_text_:web in 4250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0943406 = score(doc=4250,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.6245262 = fieldWeight in 4250, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Tim Berners-Lee ist der Erfinder des WWW. Der Brite, der 1989 den ersten Browser entwickelt hat, schildert im Interview seine Vision von der Zukunft des Web
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  14. Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 9th European conference, ECDL 2005, Vienna, Austria, September 18 - 23, 2005 ; proceedings (2005) 0.05
    0.052923508 = product of:
      0.088205844 = sum of:
        0.03743556 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03743556 = score(doc=2423,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
        0.03536452 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03536452 = score(doc=2423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.18375319 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
        0.0154057555 = product of:
          0.030811511 = sum of:
            0.030811511 = weight(_text_:web in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030811511 = score(doc=2423,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Inhalt u.a.: - Digital Library Models and Architectures - Multimedia and Hypermedia Digital Libraries - XML - Building Digital Libraries - User Studies - Digital Preservation - Metadata - Digital Libraries and e-Learning - Text Classification in Digital Libraries - Searching - - Focused Crawling Using Latent Semantic Indexing - An Application for Vertical Search Engines / George Almpanidis, Constantine Kotropoulos, Ioannis Pitas - - Active Support for Query Formulation in Virtual Digital Libraries: A Case Study with DAFFODIL / Andre Schaefer, Matthias Jordan, Claus-Peter Klas, Norbert Fuhr - - Expression of Z39.50 Supported Search Capabilities by Applying Formal Descriptions / Michalis Sfakakis, Sarantos Kapidakis - Text Digital Libraries
    RSWK
    Elektronische Bibliothek / Multimedia / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Wien <2005>
    World Wide Web / Elektronische Bibliothek / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Wien <2005>
    Subject
    Elektronische Bibliothek / Multimedia / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Wien <2005>
    World Wide Web / Elektronische Bibliothek / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Wien <2005>
  15. Bradley, P.: Advanced Internet searcher's handbook (1998) 0.05
    0.052841317 = product of:
      0.1321033 = sum of:
        0.0935889 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0935889 = score(doc=5454,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 5454, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5454)
        0.03851439 = product of:
          0.07702878 = sum of:
            0.07702878 = weight(_text_:web in 5454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07702878 = score(doc=5454,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 5454, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5454)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    LCSH
    World Wide Web (Information retrieval system)
    Information retrieval
    Subject
    World Wide Web (Information retrieval system)
    Information retrieval
  16. Wenyin, L.; Chen, Z.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.: ¬A media agent for automatically builiding a personalized semantic index of Web media objects (2001) 0.05
    0.05276202 = product of:
      0.13190505 = sum of:
        0.091879725 = weight(_text_:semantic in 6522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091879725 = score(doc=6522,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.47740483 = fieldWeight in 6522, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6522)
        0.04002533 = product of:
          0.08005066 = sum of:
            0.08005066 = weight(_text_:web in 6522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08005066 = score(doc=6522,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 6522, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6522)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A novel idea of media agent is briefly presented, which can automatically build a personalized semantic index of Web media objects for each particular user. Because the Web is a rich source of multimedia data and the text content on the Web pages is usually semantically related to those media objects on the same pages, the media agent can automatically collect the URLs and related text, and then build the index of the multimedia data, on behalf of the user whenever and wherever she accesses these multimedia data or their container Web pages. Moreover, the media agent can also use an off-line crawler to build the index for those multimedia objects that are relevant to the user's favorites but have not accessed by the user yet. When the user wants to find these multimedia data once again, the semantic index facilitates text-based search for her.
    Theme
    Web-Agenten
  17. Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998) 0.05
    0.052426238 = product of:
      0.13106559 = sum of:
        0.028076671 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028076671 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.10298892 = sum of:
          0.06536108 = weight(_text_:web in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06536108 = score(doc=4190,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.03762784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03762784 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
    Object
    Nordic Web Index
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  18. Drabenstott, K.M.: Web search strategies (2000) 0.05
    0.05238045 = product of:
      0.13095112 = sum of:
        0.01871778 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01871778 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
        0.11223334 = sum of:
          0.087148115 = weight(_text_:web in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.087148115 = score(doc=1188,freq=32.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
                5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                  32.0 = termFreq=32.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
          0.025085226 = weight(_text_:22 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025085226 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Surfing the World Wide Web used to be cool, dude, real cool. But things have gotten hot - so hot that finding something useful an the Web is no longer cool. It is suffocating Web searchers in the smoke and debris of mountain-sized lists of hits, decisions about which search engines they should use, whether they will get lost in the dizzying maze of a subject directory, use the right syntax for the search engine at hand, enter keywords that are likely to retrieve hits an the topics they have in mind, or enlist a browser that has sufficient functionality to display the most promising hits. When it comes to Web searching, in a few short years we have gone from the cool image of surfing the Web into the frying pan of searching the Web. We can turn down the heat by rethinking what Web searchers are doing and introduce some order into the chaos. Web search strategies that are tool-based-oriented to specific Web searching tools such as search en gines, subject directories, and meta search engines-have been widely promoted, and these strategies are just not working. It is time to dissect what Web searching tools expect from searchers and adjust our search strategies to these new tools. This discussion offers Web searchers help in the form of search strategies that are based an strategies that librarians have been using for a long time to search commercial information retrieval systems like Dialog, NEXIS, Wilsonline, FirstSearch, and Data-Star.
    Content
    "Web searching is different from searching commercial IR systems. We can learn from search strategies recommended for searching IR systems, but most won't be effective for Web searching. Web searchers need strate gies that let search engines do the job they were designed to do. This article presents six new Web searching strategies that do just that."
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  19. Information retrieval on the Web (1996) 0.05
    0.052310236 = product of:
      0.13077559 = sum of:
        0.09264828 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09264828 = score(doc=628,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
        0.038127303 = product of:
          0.076254606 = sum of:
            0.076254606 = weight(_text_:web in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076254606 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    An issue devoted to information retrieval on the WWW
  20. Eichel, D.: ¬Die globalisierte Semantic Web Informationswissenschaftlerin (2010) 0.05
    0.050260015 = product of:
      0.12565003 = sum of:
        0.08752273 = weight(_text_:semantic in 4269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08752273 = score(doc=4269,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.45476598 = fieldWeight in 4269, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4269)
        0.038127303 = product of:
          0.076254606 = sum of:
            0.076254606 = weight(_text_:web in 4269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076254606 = score(doc=4269,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 4269, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Transformation vom Web der Dokumente hin zum Web von Daten stellt die informationswissenschaftliche Gemeinschaft vor neue Herausforderungen. Der Beitrag zeigt, wie diese Aufgabe durch die gegenseitige Vernetzung untereinander und mit Experten außerhalb der eigenen Gemeinschaft bewältig werden kann. Mit Hilfe der Theorie " Communities of Practice" werden die essentiellen Elemente einer solchen Vernetzung bestimmt und vom Autor besuchte Veranstaltungen daraufhin evaluiert. Es wird deutlich, dass diese Art der Vernetzung besonders für junge Informationsspezialistinnen vorteilhaft ist.
    Source
    Semantic web & linked data: Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen ; 1. DGI-Konferenz ; 62. Jahrestagung der DGI ; Frankfurt am Main, 7. - 9. Oktober 2010 ; Proceedings / Deutsche Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 1307
  • m 168
  • s 68
  • el 58
  • x 10
  • r 6
  • b 3
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications