-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.33
0.3338872 = product of:
0.58430254 = sum of:
0.09614123 = product of:
0.16023538 = sum of:
0.115060724 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.115060724 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=5820,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.015879504 = weight(_text_:system in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015879504 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
0.16272044 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16272044 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.16272044 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16272044 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.16272044 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16272044 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.32
0.31559512 = product of:
0.55229145 = sum of:
0.034518216 = product of:
0.17259108 = sum of:
0.17259108 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17259108 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.17259108 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17259108 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.17259108 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17259108 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.17259108 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17259108 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.26
0.26491702 = product of:
0.46360478 = sum of:
0.118422605 = product of:
0.197371 = sum of:
0.115060724 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.115060724 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.054806177 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054806177 = score(doc=701,freq=28.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5001983 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.027504109 = weight(_text_:system in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027504109 = score(doc=701,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.24108742 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
0.115060724 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.115060724 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.115060724 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.115060724 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.115060724 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.115060724 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Öttl, S.; Streiff, D.; Stettler, N.; Studer, M.: Aufbau einer Testumgebung zur Ermittlung signifikanter Parameter bei der Ontologieabfrage (2010)
0.05
0.051381815 = product of:
0.17983635 = sum of:
0.003661892 = product of:
0.01830946 = sum of:
0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01830946 = score(doc=4257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 4257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4257)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.17617446 = weight(_text_:abfrage in 4257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17617446 = score(doc=4257,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28580084 = queryWeight, product of:
7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.61642385 = fieldWeight in 4257, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4257)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Der Einsatz von semantischen Technologien ist mittlerweile ein etabliertes Mittel zur Optimierung von Information-Retrieval-Systemen. Obwohl der Einsatz von Ontologien für verschiedene Anwendungsbereiche wie beispielsweise zur Query-Expansion (Bhogal et al. 2007), zur Strukturierung von Benutzeroberflächen bzw. zur Dialoggestaltung (z. B. Garcia & Sicilia 2003; Liu et al. 2005; Lopez et al. 2006; Paulheim 2009; Paulheim & Probst 2010), in Recommendersystemen (z. B. Taehee et al. 2006; Cantador et al. 2008; Middleton et al. 2001; Middleton et al. 2009) usw. rege erforscht wird, gibt es noch kaum Bestrebungen, die einzelnen Abfragemethodiken für Ontologien systematisch zu untersuchen. Bei der Abfrage von Ontologien geht es in erster Linie darum, Zusammenhänge zwischen Begriffen zu ermitteln, indem hierarchische (Classes und Individuals), semantische (Object Properties) und ergänzende (Datatype Properties) Beziehungen abgefragt oder logische Verknüpfungen abgeleitet werden. Hierbei werden sogenannte Reasoner für die Ableitungen und als Abfragesprache SPARQL (seltener auch XPath) eingesetzt. Ein weiterer, weniger oft eingesetzter, vielversprechender Ansatz findet sich bei Hoser et al. (2006) und Weng & Chang (2008), die Techniken der Sozialen Netzwerkanalyse zur Auswertung von Ontologien miteinsetzen (Semantic Network Analysis). Um die Abfrage von Ontologien sowie Kombinationen der unterschiedlichen Abfragemöglichkeiten systematisch untersuchen zu können, wurde am SII eine entsprechende Testumgebung entwickelt, die in diesem Beitrag genauer vorgestellt werden soll.
-
Hauer, M.: Mehrsprachige semantische Netze leichter entwickeln (2002)
0.03
0.0337115 = product of:
0.11799024 = sum of:
0.0029295133 = product of:
0.014647567 = sum of:
0.014647567 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014647567 = score(doc=3894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 3894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3894)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.115060724 = weight(_text_:mehrsprachigkeit in 3894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.115060724 = score(doc=3894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 3894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3894)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- AGI - Information Management Consultants liefern seit nunmehr 16 Jahren eine Software zur Entwicklung von Thesauri und Klassifikationen, ehemals bezeichnet als INDEX, seit zweieinhalb Jahren als IC INDEX neu entwickelt. Solche Terminologien werden oft auch als Glossar, Lexikon, Topic Maps, RDF, semantisches Netz, Systematik, Aktenplan oder Nomenklatur bezeichnet. Die Software erlaubt zwar schon immer, dass solche terminologischen Werke mehrsprachig angelegt sind, doch es gab keine speziellen Werkzeuge, um die Übersetzung zu erleichtern. Die Globalisierung führt zunehmend auch zur Mehrsprachigkeit von Fachterminologien, wie laufende Projekte belegen. In IC INDEX 5.08 wurde deshalb ein spezieller Workflow für die Übersetzung implementiert, der Wortfelder bearbeitet und dabei weitgehend automatisch, aber vom Übersetzer kontrolliert, die richtigen Verbindungen zwischen den Termen in den anderen Sprachen erzeugt. Bereits dieser Workflow beschleunigt wesentlich die Übersetzungstätigkeit. Doch es geht noch schneller: der eTranslation Server von Linguatec generiert automatisch Übersetzungsvorschläge für Deutsch/English und Deutsch/Französisch. Demnächst auch Deutsch/Spanisch und Deutsch/Italienisch. Gerade bei Mehrwortbegriffen, Klassenbezeichnungen und Komposita spielt die automatische Übersetzung gegenüber dem Wörterbuch-Lookup ihre Stärke aus. Der Rückgriff ins Wörterbuch ist selbstverständlich auch implementiert, sowohl auf das Linguatec-Wörterbuch und zusätzlich jedes beliebige über eine URL adressierbare Wörterbuch. Jeder Übersetzungsvorschlag muss vom Terminologie-Entwickler bestätigt werden. Im Rahmen der Oualitätskontrolle haben wir anhand vorliegender mehrsprachiger Thesauri getestet mit dem Ergebnis, dass die automatischen Vorschläge oft gleich und fast immer sehr nahe an der gewünschten Übersetzung waren. Worte, die für durchschnittlich gebildete Menschen nicht mehr verständlich sind, bereiten auch der maschinellen Übersetzung Probleme, z.B. Fachbegriffe aus Medizin, Chemie und anderen Wissenschaften. Aber auch ein Humanübersetzer wäre hier ohne einschlägige Fachausbildung überfordert. Also, ohne Fach- und ohne Sprachkompetenz geht es nicht, aber mit geht es ziemlich flott. IC INDEX basiert auf Lotus Notes & Domino 5.08. Beliebige Relationen zwischen Termen sind zulässig, die ANSI-Normen sind implementiert und um zusätzliche Relationen ergänzt, 26 Relationen gehören zum Lieferumfang. Ausgaben gemäß Topic Maps oder RDF - zwei eng verwandte Normen-werden bei Nachfrage entwickelt. Ausgaben sind in HMTL, XML, eine ansprechende Druckversion unter MS Word 2000 und für verschiedene Search-Engines vorhanden. AGI - Information Management Consultants, Neustadt an der Weinstraße, beraten seit 1983 Unternehmen und Organisationen im dem heute als Knowledge Management bezeichneten Feld. Seit 1994 liefern sie eine umfassende, hochintegrative Lösung: "Information Center" - darin ist IC INDEX ein eigenständiges Modul zur Unterstützung von mehrsprachiger Indexierung und mehrsprachigem semantischem Retrieval. Linguatec, München, ist einstmals aus den linguistischen Forschungslabors von IBM hervorgegangen und ist über den Personal Translator weithin bekannt.
-
Kreissig, B.: ¬Der neue Brockhaus : Einsatz von Sprachtechnologie und Wissensnetz (2006)
0.02
0.021355567 = product of:
0.14948897 = sum of:
0.14948897 = weight(_text_:abfrage in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14948897 = score(doc=6015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28580084 = queryWeight, product of:
7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.52305293 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Menschliches Wissen und menschliche Sprache sind aufeinander bezogen und voneinander abhängig. Dies gilt auch und gerade bei den Bemühungen, Sprache und Wissen computergestützt so zu verarbeiten, dass für Menschen nutzbare maschinelle Wissensverarbeitung stattfindet. Jenseits von eher akademischen "Laborversuchen" hat wissenschaftliche Forschungsarbeit auf diesem Gebiet die Verfügbarkeit umfangreicher, gepflegter und sauber codierter Wissensbasen sowohl der verwendeten Sprache als auch des abgebildeten Gegenstands zur Voraussetzung. In einem Forschungsprojekt der Firma Brockhaus Duden Neue Medien GmbH gemeinsam mit namhaften wissenschaftlichen Partnern, u.a. dem Fraunhofer-IPSI, dem IICM der TU Graz, dem IAI der Universität Saarbrücken und dem KNOW-Center, Graz, wurde diese Herausforderung erfolgreich angegangen. Für eine neue digitale Brockhaus-Auflage wurden Informationsrepräsentations- und Retrievaltechniken entwickelt, die nicht auf domänenspezifischen Beschränkungen beruhend den gesamten enzyklopädischen Wissenskreis abdecken. Die entwickelten Formalismen erwiesen sich nicht nur zur Abfrage des enzyklopädischen Wissens in natürlicher Sprache als geeignet, sondern konnten auch darauf basierend neuartige Formen der Visualisierung von Wissenszusammenhängen implementiert werden. Die Ergebnisse zeigen zum einen Möglichkeiten erfolgreichen semantischen Retrievals ohne extensiven Einsatzformaler Metacodierungen, zum anderen weisen sie den Weg und die nächsten Schritte bei der Entwicklung noch leistungsfähigerer Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstellen.
-
Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.013270704 = product of:
0.046447463 = sum of:
0.031724665 = product of:
0.07931166 = sum of:
0.0380555 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0380555 = score(doc=3261,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.041256163 = weight(_text_:system in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041256163 = score(doc=3261,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.0147228 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0294456 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Ontologies improve IR systems regarding its retrieval and presentation of information, which make the task of finding information more effective, efficient, and interactive. In this paper we argue that ontologies also greatly improve the engineering of such systems. We created a framework that uses ontology to drive the process of engineering an IR system. We developed a prototype that shows how a domain specialist without knowledge in the IR field can build an IR system with interactive components. The resulting system provides support for users not only to find their information needs but also to extend their state of knowledge. This way, our approach to ontology-enabled information retrieval addresses both the engineering aspect described here and also the usability aspect described elsewhere.
- Date
- 28.11.2016 12:43:22
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.01
0.011013014 = product of:
0.03854555 = sum of:
0.02136895 = product of:
0.053422377 = sum of:
0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025633242 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027789133 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.011013014 = product of:
0.03854555 = sum of:
0.02136895 = product of:
0.053422377 = sum of:
0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025633242 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027789133 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008)
0.01
0.010479822 = product of:
0.036679376 = sum of:
0.021956576 = product of:
0.054891437 = sum of:
0.03107218 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03107218 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.023819257 = weight(_text_:system in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023819257 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.0147228 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0294456 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Das, S.; Roy, S.: Faceted ontological model for brain tumour study (2016)
0.01
0.008806083 = product of:
0.03082129 = sum of:
0.018552288 = product of:
0.04638072 = sum of:
0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01830946 = score(doc=2831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
0.028071264 = weight(_text_:system in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028071264 = score(doc=2831,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.0122690005 = product of:
0.024538001 = sum of:
0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024538001 = score(doc=2831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this work is to develop an ontology-based framework for developing an information retrieval system to cater to specific queries of users. For creating such an ontology, information was obtained from a wide range of information sources involved with brain tumour study and research. The information thus obtained was compiled and analysed to provide a standard, reliable and relevant information base to aid our proposed system. Facet-based methodology has been used for ontology formalization for quite some time. Ontology formalization involves different steps such as identification of the terminology, analysis, synthesis, standardization and ordering. A vast majority of the ontologies being developed nowadays lack flexibility. This becomes a formidable constraint when it comes to interoperability. We found that a facet-based method provides a distinct guideline for the development of a robust and flexible model concerning the domain of brain tumours. Our attempt has been to bridge library and information science and computer science, which itself involved an experimental approach. It was discovered that a faceted approach is really enduring, as it helps in the achievement of properties like navigation, exploration and faceted browsing. Computer-based brain tumour ontology supports the work of researchers towards gathering information on brain tumour research and allows users across the world to intelligently access new scientific information quickly and efficiently.
- Date
- 12. 3.2016 13:21:22
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.01
0.008182896 = product of:
0.028640134 = sum of:
0.011463534 = product of:
0.05731767 = sum of:
0.05731767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05731767 = score(doc=4330,freq=10.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- One vision of the Semantic Web is that it will be much like the Web we know today, except that documents will be enriched by annotations in machine understandable markup. These annotations will provide metadata about the documents as well as machine interpretable statements capturing some of the meaning of document content. We discuss how the information retrieval paradigm might be recast in such an environment. We suggest that retrieval can be tightly bound to inference. Doing so makes today's Web search engines useful to Semantic Web inference engines, and causes improvements in either retrieval or inference to lead directly to improvements in the other.
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
-
Mahesh, K.: Highly expressive tagging for knowledge organization in the 21st century (2014)
0.01
0.007866439 = product of:
0.027532537 = sum of:
0.015263537 = product of:
0.03815884 = sum of:
0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01830946 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
0.01984938 = weight(_text_:system in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01984938 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.0122690005 = product of:
0.024538001 = sum of:
0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024538001 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization of large-scale content on the Web requires substantial amounts of semantic metadata that is expensive to generate manually. Recent developments in Web technologies have enabled any user to tag documents and other forms of content thereby generating metadata that could help organize knowledge. However, merely adding one or more tags to a document is highly inadequate to capture the aboutness of the document and thereby to support powerful semantic functions such as automatic classification, question answering or true semantic search and retrieval. This is true even when the tags used are labels from a well-designed classification system such as a thesaurus or taxonomy. There is a strong need to develop a semantic tagging mechanism with sufficient expressive power to capture the aboutness of each part of a document or dataset or multimedia content in order to enable applications that can benefit from knowledge organization on the Web. This article proposes a highly expressive mechanism of using ontology snippets as semantic tags that map portions of a document or a part of a dataset or a segment of a multimedia content to concepts and relations in an ontology of the domain(s) of interest.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014)
0.01
0.00752827 = product of:
0.026348945 = sum of:
0.011626146 = product of:
0.058130726 = sum of:
0.058130726 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058130726 = score(doc=987,freq=14.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5305404 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0147228 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0294456 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Content
- Introduction: envisioning semantic information spacesIndexing and knowledge organization -- Semantic technologies for knowledge representation -- Information retrieval and knowledge exploration -- Approaches to handle heterogeneity -- Problems with establishing semantic interoperability -- Formalization in indexing languages -- Typification of semantic relations -- Inferences in retrieval processes -- Semantic interoperability and inferences -- Remaining research questions.
- Date
- 23. 7.2017 13:49:22
- LCSH
- Information retrieval
- RSWK
- Information Retrieval
- Subject
- Information retrieval
Information Retrieval
-
Thenmalar, S.; Geetha, T.V.: Enhanced ontology-based indexing and searching (2014)
0.01
0.0072365343 = product of:
0.025327869 = sum of:
0.016739568 = product of:
0.04184892 = sum of:
0.022199038 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022199038 = score(doc=1633,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.20260347 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
0.019649884 = weight(_text_:system in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019649884 = score(doc=1633,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.17224117 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.0085883 = product of:
0.0171766 = sum of:
0.0171766 = weight(_text_:22 in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0171766 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to improve the conceptual-based search by incorporating structural ontological information such as concepts and relations. Generally, Semantic-based information retrieval aims to identify relevant information based on the meanings of the query terms or on the context of the terms and the performance of semantic information retrieval is carried out through standard measures-precision and recall. Higher precision leads to the (meaningful) relevant documents obtained and lower recall leads to the less coverage of the concepts. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper, the authors enhance the existing ontology-based indexing proposed by Kohler et al., by incorporating sibling information to the index. The index designed by Kohler et al., contains only super and sub-concepts from the ontology. In addition, in our approach, we focus on two tasks; query expansion and ranking of the expanded queries, to improve the efficiency of the ontology-based search. The aforementioned tasks make use of ontological concepts, and relations existing between those concepts so as to obtain semantically more relevant search results for a given query. Findings - The proposed ontology-based indexing technique is investigated by analysing the coverage of concepts that are being populated in the index. Here, we introduce a new measure called index enhancement measure, to estimate the coverage of ontological concepts being indexed. We have evaluated the ontology-based search for the tourism domain with the tourism documents and tourism-specific ontology. The comparison of search results based on the use of ontology "with and without query expansion" is examined to estimate the efficiency of the proposed query expansion task. The ranking is compared with the ORank system to evaluate the performance of our ontology-based search. From these analyses, the ontology-based search results shows better recall when compared to the other concept-based search systems. The mean average precision of the ontology-based search is found to be 0.79 and the recall is found to be 0.65, the ORank system has the mean average precision of 0.62 and the recall is found to be 0.51, while the concept-based search has the mean average precision of 0.56 and the recall is found to be 0.42. Practical implications - When the concept is not present in the domain-specific ontology, the concept cannot be indexed. When the given query term is not available in the ontology then the term-based results are retrieved. Originality/value - In addition to super and sub-concepts, we incorporate the concepts present in same level (siblings) to the ontological index. The structural information from the ontology is determined for the query expansion. The ranking of the documents depends on the type of the query (single concept query, multiple concept queries and concept with relation queries) and the ontological relations that exists in the query and the documents. With this ontological structural information, the search results showed us better coverage of concepts with respect to the query.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005)
0.01
0.006979079 = product of:
0.024426775 = sum of:
0.007250175 = product of:
0.036250874 = sum of:
0.036250874 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036250874 = score(doc=4324,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:25
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005)
0.01
0.0063723573 = product of:
0.02230325 = sum of:
0.0051266486 = product of:
0.025633242 = sum of:
0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025633242 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:58
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.01
0.0063723573 = product of:
0.02230325 = sum of:
0.0051266486 = product of:
0.025633242 = sum of:
0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025633242 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996)
0.01
0.005982068 = product of:
0.020937236 = sum of:
0.006214436 = product of:
0.03107218 = sum of:
0.03107218 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03107218 = score(doc=2230,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0147228 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0294456 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Kottmann, N.; Studer, T.: Improving semantic query answering (2006)
0.01
0.0055579958 = product of:
0.038905967 = sum of:
0.038905967 = product of:
0.097264916 = sum of:
0.06550591 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06550591 = score(doc=3979,freq=10.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 3979, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3979)
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 3979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=3979,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 3979, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3979)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The retrieval problem is one of the main reasoning tasks for knowledge base systems. Given a knowledge base K and a concept C, the retrieval problem consists of finding all individuals a for which K logically entails C(a). We present an approach to answer retrieval queries over (a restriction of) OWL ontologies. Our solution is based on reducing the retrieval problem to a problem of evaluating an SQL query over a database constructed from the original knowledge base. We provide complete answers to retrieval problems. Still, our system performs very well as is shown by a standard benchmark.
