-
Mooers, C.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1963)
0.02
0.01746637 = product of:
0.06113229 = sum of:
0.03659429 = product of:
0.091485724 = sum of:
0.051786967 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051786967 = score(doc=1641,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1641, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1641)
0.03969876 = weight(_text_:system in 1641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03969876 = score(doc=1641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1641)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.024538001 = product of:
0.049076002 = sum of:
0.049076002 = weight(_text_:22 in 1641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049076002 = score(doc=1641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1641)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Cetre for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by. Wesley Simonton
-
Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966)
0.01
0.013337936 = product of:
0.046682775 = sum of:
0.029506175 = product of:
0.073765434 = sum of:
0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025633242 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
0.048132192 = weight(_text_:system in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048132192 = score(doc=2718,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.42190298 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- A study of the number of irrelevant documents retrieved in a co-ordinate indexing system that does not employ eitherr roles or links. These tests were based on one hundred actual inquiries received in the library and therefore an evaluation of recall efficiency is not included. Over half the enquiries produced no noise, but the mean average percentage niose figure was approximately 33 per cent based on a total average retireval figure of eighteen documents per search. Details of the size of the indexed collection, methods of indexing, and an analysis of the reasons for the retrieval of irrelevant documents are discussed, thereby providing information officers who are thinking of installing such a system with some evidence on which to base a decision as to whether or not to utilize these devices
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
-
Borko, H.: Determining user requirements for an information storage and retrieval system : a systems approach (1962)
0.01
0.0069776163 = product of:
0.048843313 = sum of:
0.048843313 = product of:
0.12210828 = sum of:
0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058590267 = score(doc=4980,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4980, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4980)
0.06351802 = weight(_text_:system in 4980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06351802 = score(doc=4980,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 4980, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4980)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Proceedings of first seminar on UDC in a mechanized retrieval system, conducted by R.R. Freeman u. P. Atherton, Copenhagen, 2.-6.9.1968 (1969)
0.01
0.0061054146 = product of:
0.0427379 = sum of:
0.0427379 = product of:
0.10684475 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=1984,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1984, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1984)
0.055578265 = weight(_text_:system in 1984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055578265 = score(doc=1984,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 1984, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1984)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Balay, R.; Gardner, J.: ¬An inexpensive information retrieval system using coordination of terms with edgenotched cards (1966)
0.01
0.0061054146 = product of:
0.0427379 = sum of:
0.0427379 = product of:
0.10684475 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=6251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 6251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6251)
0.055578265 = weight(_text_:system in 6251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055578265 = score(doc=6251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 6251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6251)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Chomsky, N.: Aspects of the theory of syntax (1965)
0.01
0.0056086862 = product of:
0.0392608 = sum of:
0.0392608 = product of:
0.0785216 = sum of:
0.0785216 = weight(_text_:22 in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0785216 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 6. 1.1999 10:29:22
-
Hockett, C.F.: ¬The problem of universals in language (1963)
0.01
0.0056086862 = product of:
0.0392608 = sum of:
0.0392608 = product of:
0.0785216 = sum of:
0.0785216 = weight(_text_:22 in 5591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0785216 = score(doc=5591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Pages
- S. 1-22
-
Freeman, R.R.: Research project for the evaluation of the UDC as the indexing language for a mechanized reference retrieval system : progress report for the period July 1, 1965 - Jan. 31, 1966 (1966)
0.01
0.0052332124 = product of:
0.036632486 = sum of:
0.036632486 = product of:
0.09158121 = sum of:
0.0439427 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0439427 = score(doc=3491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3491)
0.047638513 = weight(_text_:system in 3491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047638513 = score(doc=3491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 3491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3491)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Paisley, W.J.; Parker, E.B.: Information retrieval as a receiver-controlled communication system (1965)
0.01
0.0052332124 = product of:
0.036632486 = sum of:
0.036632486 = product of:
0.09158121 = sum of:
0.0439427 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0439427 = score(doc=3321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3321)
0.047638513 = weight(_text_:system in 3321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047638513 = score(doc=3321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 3321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3321)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Doyle, L.B.: Indexing and abstracting by association : Part 1 (1962)
0.01
0.0052332124 = product of:
0.036632486 = sum of:
0.036632486 = product of:
0.09158121 = sum of:
0.0439427 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0439427 = score(doc=1927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1927)
0.047638513 = weight(_text_:system in 1927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047638513 = score(doc=1927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 1927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1927)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.25-38
- Imprint
- Santa Monica, CA : System Development Corporation
-
Goffman, W.: ¬A searching procedure for information retrieval (1964)
0.00
0.0047142673 = product of:
0.03299987 = sum of:
0.03299987 = product of:
0.08249967 = sum of:
0.05074066 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05074066 = score(doc=5281,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 5281, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5281)
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 5281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=5281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 5281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5281)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- A search procedure for an information retrieval system is developed whereby the answer to a question is obtained by maximizing an evaluation function of the system's output in terms of the probility of relevance. Necessary and sufficient conditions are given for a set to be an answer to a query. A partition of the file is made in such way that all documents belonging to the answer are members of the same class. Hence the answer can be generated by one relevant document. In this manner a search of the total file is avoided
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 2(1964), S.73-78
-
International Symposium on Relational Factors in Classification, Univ. of Maryland, 8.-11.6.1966. Proceedings (1967)
0.00
0.004517464 = product of:
0.031622246 = sum of:
0.031622246 = product of:
0.079055615 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=1309,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027789133 = score(doc=1309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: PERREAULT, J.M. On the articulation of surrogates: an attempt at an epistemological foundation; RICHMOND, P.A.: Critique; CECCATO, S.: Concepts for a new systematics; BREGZIS, R., D.E. WALKER: Critique; SOERGEL, D.: Some remarks on information languages, their analysis and comparison; ATHERTON, P., FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: Critique; FARRADANE, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval; ATHERTON, P., H. BORKO: Critique; LÉVY, F.: On the relative nature of relational factors in classifications; RICHMOND, P.A., H. BORKO: Critique; NEWMAN, S.M.: An operative information retrieval system based on relational factors; LANCASTER, F.W., D.E. WALKER: Critique; PAGèS, R.: Relational aspects of conceptualization in message analysis; WILLIAMS, T.M., R. BREGZIS: Critique; DALE, A.G.: Indexing and classification for interactive retrieval systems; WILLIAMS, T.M., F.W. LANCASTER: Critique; GROLIER, E. de: Synoptic critique; RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Hidden roots of classification
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967), no.4
-
Melton, J.S.: ¬A use for the techniques of structural linguistics in documentation research (1965)
0.00
0.0042405236 = product of:
0.029683663 = sum of:
0.029683663 = product of:
0.07420915 = sum of:
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.044914022 = weight(_text_:system in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044914022 = score(doc=834,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Index language (the system of symbols for representing subject content after analysis) is considered as a separate component and a variable in an information retrieval system. It is suggested that for purposes of testing, comparing and evaluating index language, the techniques of structural linguistics may provide a descriptive methodology by which all such languages (hierarchical and faceted classification, analytico-synthetic indexing, traditional subject indexing, indexes and classifications based on automatic text analysis, etc.) could be described in term of a linguistic model, and compared on a common basis
-
Coates, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification (1969)
0.00
0.0042065145 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = product of:
0.0588912 = sum of:
0.0588912 = weight(_text_:22 in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0588912 = score(doc=1283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Pages
- S.19-22
-
Barden, B.R.; Denison, B.: Guide to the SLA loan collection of classification schemes and subject heading lists on deposit at Western Reserve Univ. as of March 20, 1961 (1961)
0.00
0.0042065145 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = product of:
0.0588912 = sum of:
0.0588912 = weight(_text_:22 in 6157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0588912 = score(doc=6157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.6, S.483-484 (A.R. Lindsay)
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.00
0.0042065145 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = product of:
0.0588912 = sum of:
0.0588912 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0588912 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Lesk, M.E.; Salton, G.: Relevance assements and retrieval system evaluation (1969)
0.00
0.0041249837 = product of:
0.028874883 = sum of:
0.028874883 = product of:
0.07218721 = sum of:
0.044398077 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044398077 = score(doc=4151,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027789133 = score(doc=4151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Two widerly used criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems are, respectively, the recall and the precision. Since the determiniation of these measures is dependent on a distinction between documents which are relevant to a given query and documents which are not relevant to that query, it has sometimes been claimed that an accurate, generally valid evaluation cannot be based on recall and precision measure. A study was made to determine the effect of variations in relevance assesments do not produce significant variations in average recall and precision. It thus appears that properly computed recall and precision data may represent effectiveness indicators which are gemerally valid for many distinct user classes.
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 4(1969), S.343-359
-
Gordon, T.J.; Helmer-Hirschberg, O.: Report on a long-range forecasting study (1964)
0.00
0.00396594 = product of:
0.027761579 = sum of:
0.027761579 = product of:
0.055523157 = sum of:
0.055523157 = weight(_text_:22 in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055523157 = score(doc=4204,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 22. 6.2018 13:24:08
22. 6.2018 13:54:52
-
Maron, M.E.; Kuhns, I.L.: On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval (1960)
0.00
0.0037767454 = product of:
0.026437217 = sum of:
0.026437217 = product of:
0.06609304 = sum of:
0.031712912 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031712912 = score(doc=1928,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
0.034380134 = weight(_text_:system in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034380134 = score(doc=1928,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.30135927 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Reports on a novel technique for literature indexing and searching in a mechanized library system. The notion of relevance is taken as the key concept in the theory of information retrieval and a comparative concept of relevance is explicated in terms of the theory of probability. The resulting technique called 'Probabilistic indexing' allows a computing machine, given a request for information, to make a statistical inference and derive a number (called the 'relevance number') for each document, which is a measure of the probability that the document will satisfy the given request. The result of a search is an ordered list of those documents which satisfy the request ranked according to their probable relevance. The paper goes on to show that whereas in a conventional library system the cross-referencing ('see' and 'see also') is based soley on the 'semantic closeness' between index terms, statistical measures of closeness between index terms can be defined and computed. Thus, given an arbitrary request consisting of one (or many) index term(s), a machine can eleborate on it to increase the probability of selecting relevant documents that would not otherwise have been selected. Finally, the paper suggest an interpretation of the whole library problem as one where the request is considered as a clue on the basis of which the library system makes a concatenated statistical inference in order to provide as an output an ordered list of those documents which most probably satisfy the information needs of the user
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.39-46.
-
Robertson, S.E.: ¬The parametric description of retrieval tests : Part I: The basic parameters (1969)
0.00
0.003710458 = product of:
0.025973205 = sum of:
0.025973205 = product of:
0.06493301 = sum of:
0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025633242 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.039299767 = weight(_text_:system in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039299767 = score(doc=4155,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Some parameters and techniques in use for describing the results of test on IR system are analysed. Several considerations outside the scope of the usual 2X2 table are relevant to the choice of parameters. In particular, a variable which produces a 'performance curve' of a system corresponds to an extension of the 2x2 table. Also, the statistical relationships between parameters are all-important. It is considered that precision is not such a useful measure of performance (in conjunction with recall)as fallout. A more powerful alternative to Cleverdon's 'invitable inverse relationship between recall and precision'is proposed and justified, namely that the recall-fallout graph is convex.
