-
Frank, I.: Fortschritt durch Rückschritt : vom Bibliothekskatalog zum Denkwerkzeug. Eine Idee (2016)
0.03
0.026614187 = product of:
0.15968512 = sum of:
0.15968512 = weight(_text_:strukturierung in 3982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15968512 = score(doc=3982,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26115823 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.6114497 = fieldWeight in 3982, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3982)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Der Text zeigt anhand einer essayistisch selektiven Rückschau in die Zeit vor den Digital Humanities bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftliche Ansätze zur Entwicklung hypertextueller Werkzeuge für Bibliographie-Verwaltung und Strukturierung des wissenschaftlichen Diskurses - eine zukunftsweisende Idee für eine digitale Geisteswissenschaft zur Unterstützung geisteswissenschaftlicher Denkarbeit jenseits von reinem 'distant thinking'.
-
Hilberer, T.: Numerus currens und iPod : die Organisation von Information mittels Metadaten und die Aufgabe der Bibliotheken im digitalen Zeitalter oder Die Kraft der digitalen Ordnung (2011)
0.02
0.02230991 = product of:
0.06692973 = sum of:
0.008997706 = weight(_text_:information in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008997706 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
0.05793202 = product of:
0.08689803 = sum of:
0.05109407 = weight(_text_:29 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05109407 = score(doc=162,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
0.03580396 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580396 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 29. 5.2012 13:58:08
29. 5.2012 14:10:37
- Source
- ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
-
Stoker, D.: Computer cataloguing in retrospect (1997)
0.01
0.014447611 = product of:
0.043342832 = sum of:
0.0090890555 = weight(_text_:information in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0090890555 = score(doc=605,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
0.034253776 = product of:
0.05138066 = sum of:
0.025806403 = weight(_text_:29 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025806403 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
0.025574258 = weight(_text_:22 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025574258 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Pays tribute to the recent advances in the ability to access computerized catalogues from the desktop via the Internet but emphasizes that there are problems still to be overcome before the ideal of universal access to catalogue records for UK libraries is achieved. Advances in computerized cataloguing over the past 40 years have been an obstacle to retrospective cataloguing in a coherent and standardized manner which even the adoption of common standards for information retrieval and the Z39.50 protocol have failed to prevent. Many libraries with modern methods for cataloguing new materials still have earlier sequences of records on microfiche or other hard copy format. Other specialized collections are such that they have never been catalogued to professional standards or in a convenient format. Illustrates the point with reference to practical searching of catalogues in Aberystwyth, Wales, and to 2 studies of the logistical and financial issues of a programme of retrospective cataloguing as reported in BLRIC report 53. Discusses the proposed UK coordinating body and coordinated natioanl prgramme, to select which catalogues should be converted, set priorities for work, ensure maintenance of requisite standards, and arrange collaboration between neighbouring or related institutions
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.4, S.175-177
-
Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998)
0.01
0.013793338 = product of:
0.08276003 = sum of:
0.08276003 = product of:
0.12414004 = sum of:
0.07299153 = weight(_text_:29 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07299153 = score(doc=2268,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
0.051148515 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051148515 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 23.10.1996 17:26:29
12.12.1998 12:00:29
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
-
Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994)
0.01
0.011417925 = product of:
0.06850755 = sum of:
0.06850755 = product of:
0.10276132 = sum of:
0.051612806 = weight(_text_:29 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051612806 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
0.051148515 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051148515 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 20. 4.2020 20:22:29
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.01
0.009394031 = product of:
0.028182093 = sum of:
0.014542488 = weight(_text_:information in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014542488 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.013639605 = product of:
0.040918812 = sum of:
0.040918812 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040918812 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.01
0.009275038 = product of:
0.027825113 = sum of:
0.013358129 = weight(_text_:information in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013358129 = score(doc=101,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.014466985 = product of:
0.043400954 = sum of:
0.043400954 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043400954 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002)
0.01
0.009158324 = product of:
0.027474973 = sum of:
0.01724527 = weight(_text_:information in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01724527 = score(doc=54,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.010229703 = product of:
0.030689107 = sum of:
0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030689107 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Extensive literatures exist on information searching theory and techniques, as well as on the Bradford Distribution. This distribution, also known as "Bradford's Law of Scattering," tells us that information on a subject is dispersed in a characteristic and robust pattern that appears consistently across many different environments. This pattern may be expected to have important implications for information searching theory and techniques. Yet these two research literatures are rarely considered in relation to each other. It is the purpose of this article to distinguish three Bradford regions and speculate on the optimum searching techniques for each region. In the process, browsing, directed searching in databases, and the pursuit of various forms of links will all be considered. Implications of growth in size of a literature for optimal information organization and searching will also be addressed.
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
- Source
- Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
-
Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998)
0.01
0.009134339 = product of:
0.054806035 = sum of:
0.054806035 = product of:
0.08220905 = sum of:
0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041290242 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.040918812 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040918812 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 17:18:10
22. 2.1999 20:40:57
-
Ducharme, C.: ¬Le catalogue, signe du changement (1997)
0.01
0.008255888 = product of:
0.024767663 = sum of:
0.012724677 = weight(_text_:information in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012724677 = score(doc=905,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
0.012042987 = product of:
0.03612896 = sum of:
0.03612896 = weight(_text_:29 in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03612896 = score(doc=905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Digital documents and Internet access are changing cataloguing practices. MARC formats can accomodate Internet documents by assigning a field for URL but quality control is vital, especially with multimedia catalogues, and new links have to be created. Heterogeneous distant resources can now be searches using the Z39.50 standard, thus enabling access to a wide range of diverse catalogues, and Internet formats are being used to create local systems (intranets). The librarian needs new skills to manipulate digital documents and use information technology tool but the mission is the same: to optimise access to the widest possible range of information
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:50:24
-
Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996)
0.01
0.008219777 = product of:
0.02465933 = sum of:
0.012724677 = weight(_text_:information in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012724677 = score(doc=600,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.011934653 = product of:
0.03580396 = sum of:
0.03580396 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580396 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article first compares and contrasts the essential, fundamental differences between traditional and digital information mediums. It then reexamines the role of the online public access catalog (OPAC), refines the definition of library's catalog, and advocates the addition of Internet resources within the OPAC. Next, the article describes the building of the Alex Catalog, a catalog of Internet resources in the in the form of MARC records. Finally, this article outlines a process of integrating the futher inclusion of other Internet resources into OPACs as well as some of the obstacles such a process manifests.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
-
McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996)
0.01
0.008219777 = product of:
0.02465933 = sum of:
0.012724677 = weight(_text_:information in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012724677 = score(doc=601,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.011934653 = product of:
0.03580396 = sum of:
0.03580396 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580396 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Theses and dissertations as electronic files transferred from the student author to the Graduate School to the Library may well be the first major source of electronic texts that many libraries encounter. To prepare for this potential influx of electronic texts, an ad hoc task force considered work flow and cataloging guidelines. The author suggests expanding current theses cataloging and taking advantage of online information prepared by authors so that the bibliographic records provide OPACS with much more valuable information than does traditional theses cataloging. This should not require a lot of extra work.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125
-
Oddy, P.: Future libraries, future catalogues (1996)
0.01
0.008015502 = product of:
0.024046507 = sum of:
0.010283092 = weight(_text_:information in 1988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010283092 = score(doc=1988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1988)
0.013763415 = product of:
0.041290242 = sum of:
0.041290242 = weight(_text_:29 in 1988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041290242 = score(doc=1988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1988)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of documentation. 53(1997) no.2, S.200-203 (M. Line); Electronic library. 15(1997) no.2, S.147 (A. O'Brien); Program. 31(1997) no.2, S.199-201 (M.A. Burke); Journal of academic librarianship. 23(1997) no.1, S.54-55 (M. Johansen); Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.2, S.110-111 (J.H. Bowman)
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.01
0.007992547 = product of:
0.047955282 = sum of:
0.047955282 = product of:
0.07193292 = sum of:
0.03612896 = weight(_text_:29 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03612896 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.03580396 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580396 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.39-59
-
Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012)
0.01
0.007992547 = product of:
0.047955282 = sum of:
0.047955282 = product of:
0.07193292 = sum of:
0.03612896 = weight(_text_:29 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03612896 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.03580396 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580396 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 11:08:22
-
Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007)
0.01
0.007974233 = product of:
0.023922697 = sum of:
0.010283092 = weight(_text_:information in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010283092 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.013639605 = product of:
0.040918812 = sum of:
0.040918812 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040918812 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Debate about the future of library catalogs and cataloging has been, and continues to be, featured in the literature of librarianship. Some research into the ways undergraduate students at one institution assign subjects to selected works provides insight into the cognitive elements of categorization. The design of catalogs can be informed by this research, as well as work currently being done on alternative means of organization, such as information systems ontologies.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Crosnier, H. Le: Nouveaux besoins, nouveaux services, nouveaux catalogues (1997)
0.01
0.007893564 = product of:
0.02368069 = sum of:
0.013358129 = weight(_text_:information in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013358129 = score(doc=918,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.0103225615 = product of:
0.030967683 = sum of:
0.030967683 = weight(_text_:29 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030967683 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- For users, the catalogue is a tool to assist in satisfying information demands. Bibliographic databases raise the question of how to describe a document to facilitate retrieval. Information technology development have led to the creation of hypercatalogues, affording links to related material and other services. This necessitates improved descriptive cataloguing and also improved search interfaces to simplify user manipulation, along the lines of the Web. Given the massive output of electronic documents, the librarian's role is to select, prioritise and organise. The information society and its consequent economic consequences for the social organisation of knowledge raise the prospect of marginalisation of libraries. Catalogues enable access to knowledge as a public good, but this access must be democratic
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:50:24
-
Lee, H.-L.; Clyde, J.: Users' perspectives of the "Collection" and the online catalogue (2004)
0.01
0.007076476 = product of:
0.021229427 = sum of:
0.010906866 = weight(_text_:information in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010906866 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.0103225615 = product of:
0.030967683 = sum of:
0.030967683 = weight(_text_:29 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030967683 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The paper reports an a study that examined the parameters provided in the online catalogue of a university library for defining its collection and subcollections that would facilitate information seeking. Taking a user-centered approach, the study asked two questions: (1) Does the online catalogue provide a useful collection structure for the users? (2) Are there any parameters that are considered useful by the users for structuring the collection absent from the online catalogue? The online catalogue was found to adequately provide only a few of the user collection and subcollection parameters, including user privilege and document type. However, it lacked most of the important parameters required by the users, including catalogue representation of the entire collection and disciplinary categories for defining subject subcollections.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 15:09:11
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Miksa, S.D.: Educators: what are the cataloging issues students get excited about? : professional and intellectual appeals of cataloging and students' misconceptions of cataloging (2008)
0.01
0.0070135645 = product of:
0.021040693 = sum of:
0.008997706 = weight(_text_:information in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008997706 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
0.012042987 = product of:
0.03612896 = sum of:
0.03612896 = weight(_text_:29 in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03612896 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the professional and intellectual appeals demonstrated by cataloging students, as well as some common misconceptions. Given the current digital environment and the "Amazoogle" effect, students face many challenges when striving to complete a basic course in descriptive and subject cataloging. In the process, they face issues of varieties of information objects, how to tame tools such as AACR2 and LCSH, and how MARC encoding fits into the overall process of cataloging. They also must learn to re-conceptualize their ideas of copy cataloging and learn to appreciate the authoritative power that comes with using and applying cataloger's judgment.
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 14:58:13
-
Gardner, S.A.: ¬The changing landscape of contemporary cataloging (2008)
0.01
0.0070135645 = product of:
0.021040693 = sum of:
0.008997706 = weight(_text_:information in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008997706 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
0.012042987 = product of:
0.03612896 = sum of:
0.03612896 = weight(_text_:29 in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03612896 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037751827 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Intended to contribute to the current dialogue about how the emerging information environment is impacting cataloging issues, this survey paper covers a broad range of topics, such as how search engines compare with integrated library systems, and includes some thoughts on how cataloging processes may evolve to continue to remain relevant. The author suggests that there is a need for significant changes in integrated library system interfaces and infrastructures as well as some changes in cataloging practice. The value of descriptive vs. non-descriptive elements in the catalog record and some pros and cons of the MARC format are covered.
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 14:55:39
