Search (110 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.59 
    0.5940175 = product of:
  0.99002916 = sum of:
    0.05025416 = product of:
      0.15076247 = sum of:
        0.15076247 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.022339594 = weight(_text_:web in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022339594 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.15076247 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15076247 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26825202 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.01286072 = product of:
      0.02572144 = sum of:
        0.02572144 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02572144 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(9/15)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Piros, A.: Automatic interpretation of complex UDC numbers : towards support for library systems (2015) 0.04 
    0.038915284 = product of:
  0.116745844 = sum of:
    0.00910727 = product of:
      0.01821454 = sum of:
        0.01821454 = weight(_text_:online in 2301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01821454 = score(doc=2301,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.18968134 = fieldWeight in 2301, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2301)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.031123376 = weight(_text_:software in 2301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031123376 = score(doc=2301,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.24794699 = fieldWeight in 2301, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2301)
    0.014893063 = weight(_text_:web in 2301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014893063 = score(doc=2301,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 2301, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2301)
    0.04221307 = weight(_text_:site in 2301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04221307 = score(doc=2301,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1738463 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.24281834 = fieldWeight in 2301, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2301)
    0.01940906 = product of:
      0.03881812 = sum of:
        0.03881812 = weight(_text_:analyse in 2301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03881812 = score(doc=2301,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23284946 = fieldWeight in 2301, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2301)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Abstract
    Analytico-synthetic and faceted classifications, such as Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) express content of documents with complex, pre-combined classification codes. Without classification authority control that would help manage and access structured notations, the use of UDC codes in searching and browsing is limited. Existing UDC parsing solutions are usually created for a particular database system or a specific task and are not widely applicable. The approach described in this paper provides a solution by which the analysis and interpretation of UDC notations would be stored into an intermediate format (in this case, in XML) by automatic means without any data or information loss. Due to its richness, the output file can be converted into different formats, such as standard mark-up and data exchange formats or simple lists of the recommended entry points of a UDC number. The program can also be used to create authority records containing complex UDC numbers which can be comprehensively analysed in order to be retrieved effectively. The Java program, as well as the corresponding schema definition it employs, is under continuous development. The current version of the interpreter software is now available online for testing purposes at the following web site: http://interpreter-eto.rhcloud.com. The future plan is to implement conversion methods for standard formats and to create standard online interfaces in order to make it possible to use the features of software as a service. This would result in the algorithm being able to be employed both in existing and future library systems to analyse UDC numbers without any significant programming effort.
  3. Kwon, O.W.; Lee, J.H.: Text categorization based on k-nearest neighbor approach for web site classification (2003) 0.03 
    0.026846847 = product of:
  0.20135134 = sum of:
    0.072100736 = weight(_text_:web in 1070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.072100736 = score(doc=1070,freq=30.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.69824153 = fieldWeight in 1070, product of:
          5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
            30.0 = termFreq=30.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1070)
    0.1292506 = weight(_text_:site in 1070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1292506 = score(doc=1070,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.1738463 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.7434763 = fieldWeight in 1070, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1070)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Automatic categorization is a viable method to deal with the scaling problem on the World Wide Web. For Web site classification, this paper proposes the use of Web pages linked with the home page in a different manner from the sole use of home pages in previous research. To implement our proposed method, we derive a scheme for Web site classification based on the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) approach. It consists of three phases: Web page selection (connectivity analysis), Web page classification, and Web site classification. Given a Web site, the Web page selection chooses several representative Web pages using connectivity analysis. The k-NN classifier next classifies each of the selected Web pages. Finally, the classified Web pages are extended to a classification of the entire Web site. To improve performance, we supplement the k-NN approach with a feature selection method and a term weighting scheme using markup tags, and also reform its document-document similarity measure. In our experiments on a Korean commercial Web directory, the proposed system, using both a home page and its linked pages, improved the performance of micro-averaging breakeven point by 30.02%, compared with an ordinary classification which uses a home page only.
  4. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (1998) 0.02 
    0.01903538 = product of:
  0.14276534 = sum of:
    0.03723266 = weight(_text_:web in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03723266 = score(doc=1103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
    0.105532676 = weight(_text_:site in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105532676 = score(doc=1103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1738463 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.6070458 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    This article presents our exploration of computer science clustering algorithms as they relate to the Scorpion system. Scorpion is a research project at OCLC that explores the indexing and cataloging of electronic resources. For a more complete description of the Scorpion, please visit the Scorpion Web site at <http://purl.oclc.org/scorpion>
  5. Montesi, M.; Navarrete, T.: Classifying web genres in context : A case study documenting the web genres used by a software engineer (2008) 0.02 
    0.016559478 = product of:
  0.124196075 = sum of:
    0.05717729 = weight(_text_:software in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05717729 = score(doc=2100,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
    0.067018785 = weight(_text_:web in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067018785 = score(doc=2100,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.64902663 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    This case study analyzes the Internet-based resources that a software engineer uses in his daily work. Methodologically, we studied the web browser history of the participant, classifying all the web pages he had seen over a period of 12 days into web genres. We interviewed him before and after the analysis of the web browser history. In the first interview, he spoke about his general information behavior; in the second, he commented on each web genre, explaining why and how he used them. As a result, three approaches allow us to describe the set of 23 web genres obtained: (a) the purposes they serve for the participant; (b) the role they play in the various work and search phases; (c) and the way they are used in combination with each other. Further observations concern the way the participant assesses quality of web-based resources, and his information behavior as a software engineer.
  6. Yao, H.; Etzkorn, L.H.; Virani, S.: Automated classification and retrieval of reusable software components (2008) 0.02 
    0.015188244 = product of:
  0.11391182 = sum of:
    0.09529549 = weight(_text_:software in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09529549 = score(doc=1382,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.75917953 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
    0.01861633 = weight(_text_:web in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01861633 = score(doc=1382,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    The authors describe their research which improves software reuse by using an automated approach to semantically search for and retrieve reusable software components in large software component repositories and on the World Wide Web (WWW). Using automation and smart (semantic) techniques, their approach speeds up the search and retrieval of reusable software components, while retaining good accuracy, and therefore improves the affordability of software reuse. A program understanding of software components and natural language understanding of user queries was employed. Then the software component descriptions were compared by matching the resulting semantic representations of the user queries to the semantic representations of the software components to search for software components that best match the user queries. A proof of concept system was developed to test the authors' approach. The results of this proof of concept system were compared to human experts, and statistical analysis was performed on the collected experimental data. The results from these experiments demonstrate that this automated semantic-based approach for software reusable component classification and retrieval is successful when compared to the labor-intensive results from the experts, thus showing that this approach can significantly benefit software reuse classification and retrieval.
  7. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.01 
    0.014283209 = product of:
  0.07141604 = sum of:
    0.011269671 = product of:
      0.022539342 = sum of:
        0.022539342 = weight(_text_:online in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022539342 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0451422 = weight(_text_:web in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0451422 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
    0.015004174 = product of:
      0.030008348 = sum of:
        0.030008348 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030008348 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    The Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) is a WWW search engine that provides access to UK based information. The experimental version developed in 1995, was a success but highlighted the need for a much higher degree of automation. An interesting feature of the experimental WWLib was that it organised information according to DDC. Discusses the advantages of classification and describes the automatic classifier that is being developed in Java as part of the new, fully automated WWLib
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia; vgl. auch: http://www7.scu.edu.au/programme/posters/1846/com1846.htm.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  8. Golub, K.; Lykke, M.: Automated classification of web pages in hierarchical browsing (2009) 0.01 
    0.013026592 = product of:
  0.06513296 = sum of:
    0.008049765 = product of:
      0.01609953 = sum of:
        0.01609953 = weight(_text_:online in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01609953 = score(doc=3614,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.030755727 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030755727 = score(doc=3614,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
    0.026327467 = weight(_text_:web in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026327467 = score(doc=3614,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this study is twofold: to investigate whether it is meaningful to use the Engineering Index (Ei) classification scheme for browsing, and then, if proven useful, to investigate the performance of an automated classification algorithm based on the Ei classification scheme. Design/methodology/approach - A user study was conducted in which users solved four controlled searching tasks. The users browsed the Ei classification scheme in order to examine the suitability of the classification systems for browsing. The classification algorithm was evaluated by the users who judged the correctness of the automatically assigned classes. Findings - The study showed that the Ei classification scheme is suited for browsing. Automatically assigned classes were on average partly correct, with some classes working better than others. Success of browsing showed to be correlated and dependent on classification correctness. Research limitations/implications - Further research should address problems of disparate evaluations of one and the same web page. Additional reasons behind browsing failures in the Ei classification scheme also need further investigation. Practical implications - Improvements for browsing were identified: describing class captions and/or listing their subclasses from start; allowing for searching for words from class captions with synonym search (easily provided for Ei since the classes are mapped to thesauri terms); when searching for class captions, returning the hierarchical tree expanded around the class in which caption the search term is found. The need for improvements of classification schemes was also indicated. Originality/value - A user-based evaluation of automated subject classification in the context of browsing has not been conducted before; hence the study also presents new findings concerning methodology.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  9. Cortez, E.; Herrera, M.R.; Silva, A.S. da; Moura, E.S. de; Neubert, M.: Lightweight methods for large-scale product categorization (2011) 0.01 
    0.0126550095 = product of:
  0.094912566 = sum of:
    0.031592958 = weight(_text_:web in 4758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031592958 = score(doc=4758,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 4758, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4758)
    0.06331961 = weight(_text_:site in 4758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06331961 = score(doc=4758,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1738463 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.3642275 = fieldWeight in 4758, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4758)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a study about classification methods for large-scale categorization of product offers on e-shopping web sites. We present a study about the performance of previously proposed approaches and deployed a probabilistic approach to model the classification problem. We also studied an alternative way of modeling information about the description of product offers and investigated the usage of price and store of product offers as features adopted in the classification process. Our experiments used two collections of over a million product offers previously categorized by human editors and taxonomies of hundreds of categories from a real e-shopping web site. In these experiments, our method achieved an improvement of up to 9% in the quality of the categorization in comparison with the best baseline we have found.
  10. Search Engines and Beyond : Developing efficient knowledge management systems, April 19-20 1999, Boston, Mass (1999) 0.01 
    0.012301038 = product of:
  0.06150519 = sum of:
    0.02200755 = weight(_text_:software in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02200755 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
    0.024604581 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024604581 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.18538132 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
    0.014893063 = weight(_text_:web in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014893063 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Content
    Ramana Rao (Inxight, Palo Alto, CA) 7 ± 2 Insights on achieving Effective Information Access Session One: Updates and a twelve month perspective Danny Sullivan (Search Engine Watch, US / England) Portalization and other search trends Carol Tenopir (University of Tennessee) Search realities faced by end users and professional searchers Session Two: Today's search engines and beyond Daniel Hoogterp (Retrieval Technologies, McLean, VA) Effective presentation and utilization of search techniques Rick Kenny (Fulcrum Technologies, Ontario, Canada) Beyond document clustering: The knowledge impact statement Gary Stock (Ingenius, Kalamazoo, MI) Automated change monitoring Gary Culliss (Direct Hit, Wellesley Hills, MA) User popularity ranked search engines Byron Dom (IBM, CA) Automatically finding the best pages on the World Wide Web (CLEVER) Peter Tomassi (LookSmart, San Francisco, CA) Adding human intellect to search technology Session Three: Panel discussion: Human v automated categorization and editing Ev Brenner (New York, NY)- Chairman James Callan (University of Massachusetts, MA) Marc Krellenstein (Northern Light Technology, Cambridge, MA) Dan Miller (Ask Jeeves, Berkeley, CA) Session Four: Updates and a twelve month perspective Steve Arnold (AIT, Harrods Creek, KY) Review: The leading edge in search and retrieval software Ellen Voorhees (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD) TREC update Session Five: Search engines now and beyond Intelligent Agents John Snyder (Muscat, Cambridge, England) Practical issues behind intelligent agents Text summarization Therese Firmin, (Dept of Defense, Ft George G. Meade, MD) The TIPSTER/SUMMAC evaluation of automatic text summarization systems Cross language searching Elizabeth Liddy (TextWise, Syracuse, NY) A conceptual interlingua approach to cross-language retrieval. Video search and retrieval Armon Amir (IBM, Almaden, CA) CueVideo: Modular system for automatic indexing and browsing of video/audio Speech recognition Michael Witbrock (Lycos, Waltham, MA) Retrieval of spoken documents Visualization James A. Wise (Integral Visuals, Richland, WA) Information visualization in the new millennium: Emerging science or passing fashion? Text mining David Evans (Claritech, Pittsburgh, PA) Text mining - towards decision support
  11. Golub, K.; Soergel, D.; Buchanan, G.; Tudhope, D.; Lykke, M.; Hiom, D.: ¬A framework for evaluating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval (2016) 0.01 
    0.010770657 = product of:
  0.080779925 = sum of:
    0.027509436 = weight(_text_:software in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027509436 = score(doc=3311,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
    0.053270485 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053270485 = score(doc=3311,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.40136236 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Tools for automatic subject assignment help deal with scale and sustainability in creating and enriching metadata, establishing more connections across and between resources and enhancing consistency. Although some software vendors and experimental researchers claim the tools can replace manual subject indexing, hard scientific evidence of their performance in operating information environments is scarce. A major reason for this is that research is usually conducted in laboratory conditions, excluding the complexities of real-life systems and situations. The article reviews and discusses issues with existing evaluation approaches such as problems of aboutness and relevance assessments, implying the need to use more than a single "gold standard" method when evaluating indexing and retrieval, and proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework. The framework is informed by a systematic review of the literature on evaluation approaches: evaluating indexing quality directly through assessment by an evaluator or through comparison with a gold standard, evaluating the quality of computer-assisted indexing directly in the context of an indexing workflow, and evaluating indexing quality indirectly through analyzing retrieval performance.
  12. Egbert, J.; Biber, D.; Davies, M.: Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification (2015) 0.01 
    0.010139552 = product of:
  0.07604664 = sum of:
    0.063185915 = weight(_text_:web in 2158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063185915 = score(doc=2158,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.6119082 = fieldWeight in 2158, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2158)
    0.01286072 = product of:
      0.02572144 = sum of:
        0.02572144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02572144 = score(doc=2158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.110801086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    This paper introduces a project to develop a reliable, cost-effective method for classifying Internet texts into register categories, and apply that approach to the analysis of a large corpus of web documents. To date, the project has proceeded in 2 key phases. First, we developed a bottom-up method for web register classification, asking end users of the web to utilize a decision-tree survey to code relevant situational characteristics of web documents, resulting in a bottom-up identification of register and subregister categories. We present details regarding the development and testing of this method through a series of 10 pilot studies. Then, in the second phase of our project we applied this procedure to a corpus of 53,000 web documents. An analysis of the results demonstrates the effectiveness of these methods for web register classification and provides a preliminary description of the types and distribution of registers on the web.
    Date
    4. 8.2015 19:22:04
  13. Prabowo, R.; Jackson, M.; Burden, P.; Knoell, H.-D.: Ontology-based automatic classification for the Web pages : design, implementation and evaluation (2002) 0.01 
    0.010080026 = product of:
  0.07560019 = sum of:
    0.036906876 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036906876 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.278072 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
    0.038693316 = weight(_text_:web in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038693316 = score(doc=3383,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    In recent years, we have witnessed the continual growth in the use of ontologies in order to provide a mechanism to enable machine reasoning. This paper describes an automatic classifier, which focuses on the use of ontologies for classifying Web pages with respect to the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and Library of Congress Classification (LCC) schemes. Firstly, we explain how these ontologies can be built in a modular fashion, and mapped into DDC and LCC. Secondly, we propose the formal definition of a DDC-LCC and an ontology-classification-scheme mapping. Thirdly, we explain the way the classifier uses these ontologies to assist classification. Finally, an experiment in which the accuracy of the classifier was evaluated is presented. The experiment shows that our approach results an improved classification in terms of accuracy. This improvement, however, comes at a cost in a low overage ratio due to the incompleteness of the ontologies used
    Content
    Beitrag bei: The Third International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE'00) Dec., 12-14, 2002, Singapore, S.182.
  14. Kasprzik, A.: Automatisierte und semiautomatisierte Klassifizierung : eine Analyse aktueller Projekte (2014) 0.01 
    0.009891222 = product of:
  0.074184164 = sum of:
    0.033011325 = weight(_text_:software in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033011325 = score(doc=2470,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12552431 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
    0.041172836 = product of:
      0.08234567 = sum of:
        0.08234567 = weight(_text_:analyse in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08234567 = score(doc=2470,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16670908 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.49394834 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Das sprunghafte Anwachsen der Menge digital verfügbarer Dokumente gepaart mit dem Zeit- und Personalmangel an wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken legt den Einsatz von halb- oder vollautomatischen Verfahren für die verbale und klassifikatorische Inhaltserschließung nahe. Nach einer kurzen allgemeinen Einführung in die gängige Methodik beleuchtet dieser Artikel eine Reihe von Projekten zur automatisierten Klassifizierung aus dem Zeitraum 2007-2012 und aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum. Ein Großteil der vorgestellten Projekte verwendet Methoden des Maschinellen Lernens aus der Künstlichen Intelligenz, arbeitet meist mit angepassten Versionen einer kommerziellen Software und bezieht sich in der Regel auf die Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Als Datengrundlage dienen Metadatensätze, Abstracs, Inhaltsverzeichnisse und Volltexte in diversen Datenformaten. Die abschließende Analyse enthält eine Anordnung der Projekte nach einer Reihe von verschiedenen Kriterien und eine Zusammenfassung der aktuellen Lage und der größten Herausfordungen für automatisierte Klassifizierungsverfahren.
  15. Koch, T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: DDC and knowledge organization in the digital library : Research and development. Demonstration pages (1999) 0.01 
    0.009730577 = product of:
  0.07297932 = sum of:
    0.009659718 = product of:
      0.019319436 = sum of:
        0.019319436 = weight(_text_:online in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019319436 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.06331961 = weight(_text_:site in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06331961 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1738463 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.3642275 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Content
    1. Increased Importance of Knowledge Organization in Internet Services - 2. Quality Subject Service and the role of classification - 3. Developing the DDC into a knowledge organization instrument for the digital library. OCLC site - 4. DESIRE's Barefoot Solutions of Automatic Classification - 5. Advanced Classification Solutions in DESIRE and CORC - 6. Future directions of research and development - 7. General references
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  16. Krüger, C.: Evaluation des WWW-Suchdienstes GERHARD unter besonderer Beachtung automatischer Indexierung (1999) 0.01 
    0.009309685 = product of:
  0.06982263 = sum of:
    0.043495167 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043495167 = score(doc=1777,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.327711 = fieldWeight in 1777, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1777)
    0.026327467 = weight(_text_:web in 1777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026327467 = score(doc=1777,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 1777, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1777)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Die vorliegende Arbeit beinhaltet eine Beschreibung und Evaluation des WWW - Suchdienstes GERHARD (German Harvest Automated Retrieval and Directory). GERHARD ist ein Such- und Navigationssystem für das deutsche World Wide Web, weiches ausschließlich wissenschaftlich relevante Dokumente sammelt, und diese auf der Basis computerlinguistischer und statistischer Methoden automatisch mit Hilfe eines bibliothekarischen Klassifikationssystems klassifiziert. Mit dem DFG - Projekt GERHARD ist der Versuch unternommen worden, mit einem auf einem automatischen Klassifizierungsverfahren basierenden World Wide Web - Dienst eine Alternative zu herkömmlichen Methoden der Interneterschließung zu entwickeln. GERHARD ist im deutschsprachigen Raum das einzige Verzeichnis von Internetressourcen, dessen Erstellung und Aktualisierung vollständig automatisch (also maschinell) erfolgt. GERHARD beschränkt sich dabei auf den Nachweis von Dokumenten auf wissenschaftlichen WWW - Servern. Die Grundidee dabei war, kostenintensive intellektuelle Erschließung und Klassifizierung von lnternetseiten durch computerlinguistische und statistische Methoden zu ersetzen, um auf diese Weise die nachgewiesenen Internetressourcen automatisch auf das Vokabular eines bibliothekarischen Klassifikationssystems abzubilden. GERHARD steht für German Harvest Automated Retrieval and Directory. Die WWW - Adresse (URL) von GERHARD lautet: http://www.gerhard.de. Im Rahmen der vorliegenden Diplomarbeit soll eine Beschreibung des Dienstes mit besonderem Schwerpunkt auf dem zugrundeliegenden Indexierungs- bzw. Klassifizierungssystem erfolgen und anschließend mit Hilfe eines kleinen Retrievaltests die Effektivität von GERHARD überprüft werden.
  17. Cosh, K.J.; Burns, R.; Daniel, T.: Content clouds : classifying content in Web 2.0 (2008) 0.01 
    0.009133312 = product of:
  0.06849983 = sum of:
    0.036906876 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036906876 = score(doc=2013,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.278072 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
    0.031592958 = weight(_text_:web in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031592958 = score(doc=2013,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Purpose - With increasing amounts of user generated content being produced electronically in the form of wikis, blogs, forums etc. the purpose of this paper is to investigate a new approach to classifying ad hoc content. Design/methodology/approach - The approach applies natural language processing (NLP) tools to automatically extract the content of some text, visualizing the results in a content cloud. Findings - Content clouds share the visual simplicity of a tag cloud, but display the details of an article at a different level of abstraction, providing a complimentary classification. Research limitations/implications - Provides the general approach to creating a content cloud. In the future, the process can be refined and enhanced by further evaluation of results. Further work is also required to better identify closely related articles. Practical implications - Being able to automatically classify the content generated by web users will enable others to find more appropriate content. Originality/value - The approach is original. Other researchers have produced a cloud, simply by using skiplists to filter unwanted words, this paper's approach improves this by applying appropriate NLP techniques.
  18. Golub, K.: Automated subject classification of textual web documents (2006) 0.01 
    0.009065119 = product of:
  0.06798839 = sum of:
    0.030755727 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 5600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030755727 = score(doc=5600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 5600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5600)
    0.03723266 = weight(_text_:web in 5600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03723266 = score(doc=5600,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 5600, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5600)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Purpose - To provide an integrated perspective to similarities and differences between approaches to automated classification in different research communities (machine learning, information retrieval and library science), and point to problems with the approaches and automated classification as such. Design/methodology/approach - A range of works dealing with automated classification of full-text web documents are discussed. Explorations of individual approaches are given in the following sections: special features (description, differences, evaluation), application and characteristics of web pages. Findings - Provides major similarities and differences between the three approaches: document pre-processing and utilization of web-specific document characteristics is common to all the approaches; major differences are in applied algorithms, employment or not of the vector space model and of controlled vocabularies. Problems of automated classification are recognized. Research limitations/implications - The paper does not attempt to provide an exhaustive bibliography of related resources. Practical implications - As an integrated overview of approaches from different research communities with application examples, it is very useful for students in library and information science and computer science, as well as for practitioners. Researchers from one community have the information on how similar tasks are conducted in different communities. Originality/value - To the author's knowledge, no review paper on automated text classification attempted to discuss more than one community's approach from an integrated perspective.
  19. Leroy, G.; Miller, T.; Rosemblat, G.; Browne, A.: ¬A balanced approach to health information evaluation : a vocabulary-based naïve Bayes classifier and readability formulas (2008) 0.01 
    0.0087806815 = product of:
  0.06585511 = sum of:
    0.013660905 = product of:
      0.02732181 = sum of:
        0.02732181 = weight(_text_:online in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02732181 = score(doc=1998,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.284522 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.052194204 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052194204 = score(doc=1998,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13272417 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.3932532 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Since millions seek health information online, it is vital for this information to be comprehensible. Most studies use readability formulas, which ignore vocabulary, and conclude that online health information is too difficult. We developed a vocabularly-based, naïve Bayes classifier to distinguish between three difficulty levels in text. It proved 98% accurate in a 250-document evaluation. We compared our classifier with readability formulas for 90 new documents with different origins and asked representative human evaluators, an expert and a consumer, to judge each document. Average readability grade levels for educational and commercial pages was 10th grade or higher, too difficult according to current literature. In contrast, the classifier showed that 70-90% of these pages were written at an intermediate, appropriate level indicating that vocabulary usage is frequently appropriate in text considered too difficult by readability formula evaluations. The expert considered the pages more difficult for a consumer than the consumer did.
  20. Möller, G.: Automatic classification of the World Wide Web using Universal Decimal Classification (1999) 0.01 
    0.008682382 = product of:
  0.065117866 = sum of:
    0.027885206 = product of:
      0.055770412 = sum of:
        0.055770412 = weight(_text_:online in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055770412 = score(doc=494,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.096027054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031640913 = queryNorm
            0.5807781 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.03723266 = weight(_text_:web in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03723266 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10326045 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031640913 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Source
    Online information 99: 23rd International Online Information Meeting, Proceedings, London, 7-9 December 1999. Ed.: D. Raitt et al
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 83
  • d 27

Types

  • a 83
  • el 24
  • x 6
  • m 3
  • r 3
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects