Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008) 0.04
    0.03777719 = product of:
      0.07555438 = sum of:
        0.068283096 = weight(_text_:trend in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068283096 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.2738107 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
        0.0072712842 = product of:
          0.021813853 = sum of:
            0.021813853 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021813853 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Many libraries and other cultural institutions are incorporating Web 2.0 features and enhanced metadata into their catalogs (Trant 2006). These value-added elements include those typically found in commercial and social networking sites, such as book jacket images, reviews, and usergenerated tags. One such site that libraries are exploring as a model is LibraryThing (www.librarything.com) LibraryThing is a social networking site that allows users to "catalog" their own book collections. Members can add tags and reviews to records for books, as well as engage in online discussions. In addition to its service for individuals, LibraryThing offers a feebased service to libraries, where institutions can add LibraryThing tags, recommendations, and other features to their online catalog records. This poster will present data analyzing the quality and quantity of the metadata that a large academic library would expect to gain if utilizing such a service, focusing on the overlap between titles found in the library's catalog and in LibraryThing's database, and on a comparison between the controlled subject headings in the former and the user-generated tags in the latter. During February through April 2008, a random sample of 383 titles from the University of Minnesota Libraries catalog was searched in LibraryThing. Eighty works, or 21 percent of the sample, had corresponding records available in LibraryThing. Golder and Huberman (2006) outline the advantages and disadvantages of using controlled vocabulary for subject access to information resources versus the growing trend of tags supplied by users or by content creators. Using the 80 matched records from the sample, comparisons were made between the user-supplied tags in LibraryThing (social tags) and the subject headings in the library catalog records (controlled vocabulary system). In the library records, terms from all 6XX MARC fields were used. To make a more meaningful comparison, controlled subject terms were broken down into facets according to their headings and subheadings, and each unique facet counted separately. A total of 227 subject terms were applied to the 80 catalog records, an average of 2.84 per record. In LibraryThing, 698 tags were applied to the same 80 titles, an average of 8.73 per title. The poster will further explore the relationships between the terms applied in each source, and identify where overlaps and complementary levels of access occur.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Shiri, A.: Trend analysis in social tagging : an LIS perspective (2007) 0.03
    0.034141548 = product of:
      0.13656619 = sum of:
        0.13656619 = weight(_text_:trend in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13656619 = score(doc=529,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.5476214 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  3. Xu, C.; Ma, B.; Chen, X.; Ma, F.: Social tagging in the scholarly world (2013) 0.03
    0.030177148 = product of:
      0.12070859 = sum of:
        0.12070859 = weight(_text_:trend in 1091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12070859 = score(doc=1091,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.48403352 = fieldWeight in 1091, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1091)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The number of research studies on social tagging has increased rapidly in the past years, but few of them highlight the characteristics and research trends in social tagging. A set of 862 academic documents relating to social tagging and published from 2005 to 2011 was thus examined using bibliometric analysis as well as the social network analysis technique. The results show that social tagging, as a research area, develops rapidly and attracts an increasing number of new entrants. There are no key authors, publication sources, or research groups that dominate the research domain of social tagging. Research on social tagging appears to focus mainly on the following three aspects: (a) components and functions of social tagging (e.g., tags, tagging objects, and tagging network), (b) taggers' behaviors and interface design, and (c) tags' organization and usage in social tagging. The trend suggest that more researchers turn to the latter two integrated with human computer interface and information retrieval, although the first aspect is the fundamental one in social tagging. Also, more studies relating to social tagging pay attention to multimedia tagging objects and not only text tagging. Previous research on social tagging was limited to a few subject domains such as information science and computer science. As an interdisciplinary research area, social tagging is anticipated to attract more researchers from different disciplines. More practical applications, especially in high-tech companies, is an encouraging research trend in social tagging.
  4. Yi, K.: ¬A semantic similarity approach to predicting Library of Congress subject headings for social tags (2010) 0.02
    0.021338467 = product of:
      0.085353866 = sum of:
        0.085353866 = weight(_text_:trend in 3707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085353866 = score(doc=3707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.3422634 = fieldWeight in 3707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3707)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Social tagging or collaborative tagging has become a new trend in the organization, management, and discovery of digital information. The rapid growth of shared information mostly controlled by social tags poses a new challenge for social tag-based information organization and retrieval. A plausible approach for this challenge is linking social tags to a controlled vocabulary. As an introductory step for this approach, this study investigates ways of predicting relevant subject headings for resources from social tags assigned to the resources. The prediction of subject headings was measured by five different similarity measures: tf-idf, cosine-based similarity (CoS), Jaccard similarity (or Jaccard coefficient; JS), Mutual information (MI), and information radius (IRad). Their results were compared to those by professionals. The results show that a CoS measure based on top five social tags was most effective. Inclusions of more social tags only aggravate the performance. The performance of JS is comparable to the performance of CoS while tf-idf is comparable with up to 70% less than the best performance. MI and IRad have inferior performance compared to the other methods. This study demonstrates the application of the similarity measuring techniques to the prediction of correct Library of Congress subject headings.
  5. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.01
    0.014608572 = product of:
      0.05843429 = sum of:
        0.05843429 = product of:
          0.08765143 = sum of:
            0.04402373 = weight(_text_:29 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04402373 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
            0.043627705 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043627705 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 9:55:29
    Pages
    S.15-22
  6. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.01
    0.013235833 = product of:
      0.05294333 = sum of:
        0.05294333 = product of:
          0.07941499 = sum of:
            0.04669422 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04669422 = score(doc=164,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
            0.03272078 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03272078 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:15:36
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  7. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.01
    0.009130359 = product of:
      0.036521435 = sum of:
        0.036521435 = product of:
          0.05478215 = sum of:
            0.027514832 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027514832 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
            0.027267316 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027267316 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:29:07
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  8. Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011) 0.00
    0.0036686442 = product of:
      0.014674577 = sum of:
        0.014674577 = product of:
          0.04402373 = sum of:
            0.04402373 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04402373 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.29-53
  9. Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016) 0.00
    0.0036686442 = product of:
      0.014674577 = sum of:
        0.014674577 = product of:
          0.04402373 = sum of:
            0.04402373 = weight(_text_:29 in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04402373 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  10. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.00
    0.0032134843 = product of:
      0.012853937 = sum of:
        0.012853937 = product of:
          0.03856181 = sum of:
            0.03856181 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03856181 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008) 0.00
    0.0032100636 = product of:
      0.012840254 = sum of:
        0.012840254 = product of:
          0.03852076 = sum of:
            0.03852076 = weight(_text_:29 in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03852076 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
  12. Oudenaar, H.; Bullard, J.: NOT A BOOK : goodreads and the risks of social cataloging with insufficient direction (2024) 0.00
    0.0032100636 = product of:
      0.012840254 = sum of:
        0.012840254 = product of:
          0.03852076 = sum of:
            0.03852076 = weight(_text_:29 in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03852076 = score(doc=1156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22.11.2023 18:29:56
  13. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.00
    0.003181187 = product of:
      0.012724748 = sum of:
        0.012724748 = product of:
          0.03817424 = sum of:
            0.03817424 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03817424 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  14. Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007) 0.00
    0.002751483 = product of:
      0.011005932 = sum of:
        0.011005932 = product of:
          0.033017796 = sum of:
            0.033017796 = weight(_text_:29 in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033017796 = score(doc=703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:29:31
  15. Corrado, E.; Moulaison, H.L.: Social tagging and communities of practice : two case studies (2008) 0.00
    0.002751483 = product of:
      0.011005932 = sum of:
        0.011005932 = product of:
          0.033017796 = sum of:
            0.033017796 = weight(_text_:29 in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033017796 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:20:29
  16. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.00
    0.0027267316 = product of:
      0.010906926 = sum of:
        0.010906926 = product of:
          0.03272078 = sum of:
            0.03272078 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03272078 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  17. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.00
    0.0027267316 = product of:
      0.010906926 = sum of:
        0.010906926 = product of:
          0.03272078 = sum of:
            0.03272078 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03272078 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.00
    0.0027267316 = product of:
      0.010906926 = sum of:
        0.010906926 = product of:
          0.03272078 = sum of:
            0.03272078 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03272078 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Santini, M.: Zero, single, or multi? : genre of web pages through the users' perspective (2008) 0.00
    0.0022929027 = product of:
      0.009171611 = sum of:
        0.009171611 = product of:
          0.027514832 = sum of:
            0.027514832 = weight(_text_:29 in 2059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027514832 = score(doc=2059,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2059, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2059)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2008 10:29:54
  20. Matthews, B.; Jones, C.; Puzon, B.; Moon, J.; Tudhope, D.; Golub, K.; Nielsen, M.L.: ¬An evaluation of enhancing social tagging with a knowledge organization system (2010) 0.00
    0.0022929027 = product of:
      0.009171611 = sum of:
        0.009171611 = product of:
          0.027514832 = sum of:
            0.027514832 = weight(_text_:29 in 4171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027514832 = score(doc=4171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04025106 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4171)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 11:39:20