Search (68 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.02 
    0.02066886 = product of:
  0.124013156 = sum of:
    0.124013156 = sum of:
      0.08629343 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08629343 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
            0.034800336 = queryNorm
          0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
      0.037719723 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037719723 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.034800336 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This case study details the evolution of descriptive practices and standards used in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and the Five College Finding Aids Access Project, discusses the relationship of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the MARC standard in reference to archival description, and addresses the challenges and opportunities of transferring data from one metadata standard to another. The study demonstrates that greater standardization in archival description allows archivists to respond more effectively to technological change.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  2. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.02 
    0.018085252 = product of:
  0.10851151 = sum of:
    0.10851151 = sum of:
      0.07550675 = weight(_text_:evolution in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07550675 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
            0.034800336 = queryNorm
          0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
      0.033004757 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033004757 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.034800336 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  3. Desrichard, Y.: ¬Les formats et normes de catalogage : evolutions et perspectives (1998) 0.01 
    0.009341538 = product of:
  0.056049228 = sum of:
    0.056049228 = product of:
      0.112098455 = sum of:
        0.112098455 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112098455 = score(doc=2535,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.6081582 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The work of Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of Anglo-American Cataloguing rules gave rise to a confernce in Toronto, Canada, in Oct 1997. some contributors elaborated on prepared texts about precise points concerning the evolution of rules in general, and those of the AACR in particular. The evolution of the notion of the catalogue and that of the practice of cataloguing were the focus of contributions and debates at an electronic forum set up specially for the occasion. Synthesizes the topics discussed including: hypertext navigation within the body of catalogues or documents, the creation of metadata included in the electronic documents themselves, the evolution of the notion of authority, and the advent of a set of universal characters permitting liberation from the problems of transliteration
  4. Witt, M.: Evolution du format UNIMARC (1997) 0.01 
    0.008898556 = product of:
  0.053391334 = sum of:
    0.053391334 = product of:
      0.10678267 = sum of:
        0.10678267 = weight(_text_:evolution in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10678267 = score(doc=920,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.5793189 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Evolution of the UNIMARC format
  5. Ede, S.: Fitness for purpose : the future evolution of bibliographic records and their delivery (1995) 0.01 
    0.0071911192 = product of:
  0.043146715 = sum of:
    0.043146715 = product of:
      0.08629343 = sum of:
        0.08629343 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08629343 = score(doc=3086,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  6. Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.1: the emergence and divergence of MARC (1995) 0.01 
    0.0071911192 = product of:
  0.043146715 = sum of:
    0.043146715 = product of:
      0.08629343 = sum of:
        0.08629343 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08629343 = score(doc=3813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 3813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3813)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Surveys the evolution and development of MARC formats for the digital encoding of bibliographic data from their beginnings in 1968 at the Library of Congress to the present time, with particular emphasis on the development of 17 national formats. Examines the reasons for the divergence of MARC formats from each other as well as the early and recent trends in the development of national MARC formats
  7. Tillett, B.: Cataloguing rules and conceptual models for the electronic environment (1995) 0.01 
    0.0071911192 = product of:
  0.043146715 = sum of:
    0.043146715 = product of:
      0.08629343 = sum of:
        0.08629343 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08629343 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Offers the conceptual modelling technique as a means of analysing the future of library cataloguing with regard to cataloguing rules and MARC formats. Discusses the evolution of publishing technology and introduces the conceptual model that the IFLA is preparing in its study of the functional requirements of bibliographic records. Considers the purpose of cataloguing rules and how they have evolved in response to changes in technologies. Examines the future of cataloguing with future rules and alternative communication formats
  8. Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.1: the emergence and divergence of MARC (1996) 0.01 
    0.0071911192 = product of:
  0.043146715 = sum of:
    0.043146715 = product of:
      0.08629343 = sum of:
        0.08629343 = weight(_text_:evolution in 6726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08629343 = score(doc=6726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 6726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Surveys the evolution and development of MARC formats for the digital encoding of bibliographic data from their beginnings in 1968 at the Library of Congress to the present time, with particular emphasis on the development of 17 national formats. Examines the reasons for the divergence of MARC formats from each other as well as the early and recent trends in the development of national MARC formats
  9. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.006667968 = product of:
  0.040007807 = sum of:
    0.040007807 = product of:
      0.080015615 = sum of:
        0.080015615 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080015615 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  10. Campos, F.M.; Lopes, M.I.; Galvao, R.M.: MARC formats and their use : an overview (1995) 0.01 
    0.006292229 = product of:
  0.037753373 = sum of:
    0.037753373 = product of:
      0.07550675 = sum of:
        0.07550675 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07550675 = score(doc=3338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 3338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3338)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reports on work carried out as part of a feasibility study for UseMARCON (User Controlled Generic MARC Converter); a European Community funded project to develop a toolbox capable of converting bibliographic records from any MARC format into any other MARC format through a central conversion format. Reviews the use of MARC formats as internal or cataloguing formats or an exchange formats available in tape magnetic tape services. Special attention is paid to the actual us and use trends of UNIMARC, with particular reference to the role of UNIMARC as a new stage in the evolution of MARC formats, devised to improve and facilitate the exchange of bibliographic information between different systems
  11. Sandberg-Fox, A.M.: ¬The microcomputer revolution (2001) 0.01 
    0.006292229 = product of:
  0.037753373 = sum of:
    0.037753373 = product of:
      0.07550675 = sum of:
        0.07550675 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07550675 = score(doc=5409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    With the introduction of the microcomputer in the 1980s, a revolution of sorts was initiated. In libraries this was evidenced by the acquisition of personal computers and the software to run on them. All that catalogers needed were cataloging rules and a MARC format to ensure their bibliographic control. However, little did catalogers realize they were dealing with an industry that introduced rapid technological changes, which effected continual revision of existing rules and the formulation of special guidelines to deal with the industry's innovative products. This article focuses on the attempts of libraries and organized cataloging groups to develop the Chapter 9 descriptive cataloging rules in AACR2; it highlights selected events and includes cataloging examples that illustrate the evolution of the chapter.
  12. Spicher, K.M.: ¬The development of the MARC format (1996) 0.01 
    0.006292229 = product of:
  0.037753373 = sum of:
    0.037753373 = product of:
      0.07550675 = sum of:
        0.07550675 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07550675 = score(doc=5574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The use of computerized cataloguing data requires a commitment on the part of libraries to the standardization of data elements and record formats. Early computerized formats were initiated by several research libraries to serve the needs of particular university systems. In developing MARC, the LoC drew on the experiences of these libraries in establishing a standard acceptable to the research library community for the interchange of bibliographic data. Discusses early computerized formats influencing MARC, the origins of the MARC Pilot Project, and design factors influencing the evolution of the format through MARC2. Research was based on primary sources documenting the early history of MARC, including unpublished documents in the LoC archives
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.0062866206 = product of:
  0.037719723 = sum of:
    0.037719723 = product of:
      0.075439446 = sum of:
        0.075439446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075439446 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  14. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.005500793 = product of:
  0.033004757 = sum of:
    0.033004757 = product of:
      0.066009514 = sum of:
        0.066009514 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066009514 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  15. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01 
    0.005500793 = product of:
  0.033004757 = sum of:
    0.033004757 = product of:
      0.066009514 = sum of:
        0.066009514 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066009514 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  16. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.01 
    0.005500793 = product of:
  0.033004757 = sum of:
    0.033004757 = product of:
      0.066009514 = sum of:
        0.066009514 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066009514 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  17. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01 
    0.005500793 = product of:
  0.033004757 = sum of:
    0.033004757 = product of:
      0.066009514 = sum of:
        0.066009514 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066009514 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  18. Cataloging and classification standards and rules (1996) 0.01 
    0.005393339 = product of:
  0.032360032 = sum of:
    0.032360032 = product of:
      0.064720064 = sum of:
        0.064720064 = weight(_text_:evolution in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064720064 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: McCALLUM, S.: What makes a standard?; HOLLEY, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographical control; STERN, B.: Internationalizing the rules in AACR2: adopting and translating AACR2 for use in non-Anglo-American and non-English-speaking cataloging environments; GUILES, K., R. EWALD u. B. TILLETT: The evolution of LCRIs: from de facto standards to ?; SPICHER, K.M.: The development of the MARC format; THOMAS, S.E.: The core bibliographic record and the program for cooperative cataloging; PALOWITCH, C. u. L. HOROWITZ: Meta-information structures for networked information resources; KUHAGEN, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records; WILLIAMSON, N.: Standards and rules for subject access; GUENTHER, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme: implementation of the USMARC Format for Classification Data; LEAZER, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographical relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog: an examination of serials
  19. Horah, J.L.: from cards to the Web : ¬The evolution of a library database (1998) 0.01 
    0.005393339 = product of:
  0.032360032 = sum of:
    0.032360032 = product of:
      0.064720064 = sum of:
        0.064720064 = weight(_text_:evolution in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064720064 = score(doc=4842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  20. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.00 
    0.004714965 = product of:
  0.02828979 = sum of:
    0.02828979 = product of:
      0.05657958 = sum of:
        0.05657958 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05657958 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 50
  • d 12
  • f 2
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 61
  • s 5
  • b 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes