Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Farkas, M.G.: Social software in libraries : building collaboration, communication, and community online (2007) 0.02 
    0.021336703 = product of:
  0.106683515 = sum of:
    0.106683515 = weight(_text_:intelligenz in 2364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.106683515 = score(doc=2364,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20040482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03529314 = queryNorm
        0.53234005 = fieldWeight in 2364, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2364)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    BK
    54.72 / Künstliche Intelligenz
    Classification
    54.72 / Künstliche Intelligenz
  2. Niemann, C.: Intelligenz im Chaos : erste Schritte zur Analyse des Kreativen Potenzials eines Tagging-Systems (2010) 0.02 
    0.017780587 = product of:
  0.088902935 = sum of:
    0.088902935 = weight(_text_:intelligenz in 4375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.088902935 = score(doc=4375,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20040482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03529314 = queryNorm
        0.44361675 = fieldWeight in 4375, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4375)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Die Auszeichnung digitaler Medien durch Tagging ist zur festen Größe für das Wissensmanagement im Internet avanciert. Im Kontext des zunehmenden information overload' stehen wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken vor der Aufgabe, die große Flut digital publizierter Artikel und Werke möglichst inhaltlich erschlossen verfügbar zu machen. Die Frage ist, ob durch den Einsatz von Tagging-Systemen die kollaborative Intelligenz der NutzerInnen für die Sacherschließung eingesetzt werden kann, während diese von einer intuitiven und individuellen Wissensorganisation profitieren. Die große Freiheit bei der Vergabe von Deskriptoren durch die NutzerInnen eines Tagging-Systems ist nämlich ein ambivalentes Phänomen: Kundennähe und kreatives Potenzial stehen der großen Menge völlig unkontrollierter Meta-Informationen gegenüber, deren inhaltliche Qualität und Aussagekraft noch unklar ist. Bisherige Forschungsbemühungen konzentrieren sich hauptsächlich auf die automatische Hierarchisierung bzw. Relationierung der Tag-Daten (etwa mittels Ähnlichkeitsalgorithmen) oder auf die Analyse des (Miss-)Erfolgs, den die NutzerInnen bei einer Suchanfrage subjektiv erfahren. Aus der Sicht stark strukturierter Wissensorganisation, wie sie Experten z. B. durch die Anwendung von Klassifikationen realisieren, handelt es sich bei den zunächst unvermittelt nebeneinander stehenden Tags allerdings kurz gesagt um Chaos. Dass in diesem Chaos aber auch Struktur und wertvolles Wissen als Gemeinschaftsprodukt erzeugt werden kann, ist eine der zentralen Thesen dieses Artikels.
  3. Schiefner, M.: Social Tagging in der universitären Lehre (2008) 0.01 
    0.011792625 = product of:
  0.058963124 = sum of:
    0.058963124 = product of:
      0.11792625 = sum of:
        0.11792625 = weight(_text_:prozess in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11792625 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2319791 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.5083486 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    "Social Tagging" bezeichnet das gemeinsame Verwalten und Verschlagworten von Ressourcen und wird vor allem durch Dienste wie del.icio.us oder bibsonomy immer beliebter. Auch in Blogs wird mittlerweile getaggt. Der folgende Beitrag soll die Frage klären: Können Prozesse wie "wisdom of the crowd" und die Folksonomy mit strukturiert und hierarchisch arbeitenden Hochschulen in Verbindung gebracht werden? Obwohl Tagging im Kern verschiedene Dienste und Aufgaben an Hochschulen betrifft, bleibt die Frage bislang unbeantwortet, ob und wie dies an Hochschulen, vor allem im Prozess des Lehrens und Lernens integriert und nutzbar gemacht werden kann.
  4. Güntner, G.; Sint, R.; Westenthaler, R.: ¬Ein Ansatz zur Unterstützung traditioneller Klassifikation durch Social Tagging (2008) 0.01 
    0.010107964 = product of:
  0.05053982 = sum of:
    0.05053982 = product of:
      0.10107964 = sum of:
        0.10107964 = weight(_text_:prozess in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10107964 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2319791 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.43572736 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Der vorliegende Beitrag stellt einen Ansatz zur Kombination von traditionellen, geschlossenen Klassifikationsverfahren mit offenen, auf Social Tagging basierenden Klassifikationsverfahren vor. Die Darstellung geht von den grundsätzlichen Anforderungen an die Suche und Navigation in Dokumentenarchiven aus, erörtert die Vor- und Nachteile von geschlossenen und offenen Klassifikationsansätzen und präsentiert schließlich einen kombinierten Lösungsansatz, der im Rahmen eines Prototypen umgesetzt wurde. Der Lösungsansatz sieht vor, dass Dokumente grundsätzlich mit freien Tags klassifiziert werden können: Die Klassifikation wird jedoch durch ein kontrolliertes Vokabular unterstützt. Freie Tags werden in einem nachgeordneten, moderierten Prozess in das kontrollierte Vokabular übernommen. Das auf diese Weise wachsende und laufend gepflegte Vokabular unterstützt die Suche und Navigation im Dokumentenraum.
  5. Pammer, V.; Ley, T.; Lindstaedt, S.: tagr: Unterstützung in kollaborativen Tagging-Umgebungen durch semantische und assoziative Netzwerke (2008) 0.01 
    0.010107964 = product of:
  0.05053982 = sum of:
    0.05053982 = product of:
      0.10107964 = sum of:
        0.10107964 = weight(_text_:prozess in 2898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10107964 = score(doc=2898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2319791 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.43572736 = fieldWeight in 2898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2898)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Stellen Sie sich vor, Sie laden ein Bild auf Flickr hoch und bekommen automatisch Vorschläge für Tags sowie Beispiele, wie ähnliche Bilder verschlagwortet worden sind. Wir stellen den Forschungsprototypen tagr vor, der auf Basis von vorhandenen Tags Information über die Benutzerin sowie eine Analyse des Bildes neue Tags für ein Bild vorschlägt. Wir verstehen kollaboratives Tagging als einen Prozess der verteilten Kognition, den wir mit entsprechenden Diensten unterstützen wollen. Wir gehen in diesem Artikel genauer auf den Termähnlichkeitsservice ein, der sich ein semantisches Netzwerk (WordNet) und ein assoziatives Netzwerk (Kookkurrenz der verwendeten Tags) zu Nutze macht. Wir diskutieren die Evaluierung des Prototypen und schließen mit einem Ausblick auf unsere weiteren Arbeiten.
  6. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.00 
    0.0038253868 = product of:
  0.019126933 = sum of:
    0.019126933 = product of:
      0.038253866 = sum of:
        0.038253866 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038253866 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.15-22
  7. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.00 
    0.0033811957 = product of:
  0.016905978 = sum of:
    0.016905978 = product of:
      0.033811957 = sum of:
        0.033811957 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033811957 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  8. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.00 
    0.0033472131 = product of:
  0.016736066 = sum of:
    0.016736066 = product of:
      0.033472132 = sum of:
        0.033472132 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033472132 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  9. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.00 
    0.0028690398 = product of:
  0.014345199 = sum of:
    0.014345199 = product of:
      0.028690398 = sum of:
        0.028690398 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028690398 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  10. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.00 
    0.0028690398 = product of:
  0.014345199 = sum of:
    0.014345199 = product of:
      0.028690398 = sum of:
        0.028690398 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028690398 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.00 
    0.0028690398 = product of:
  0.014345199 = sum of:
    0.014345199 = product of:
      0.028690398 = sum of:
        0.028690398 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028690398 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.00 
    0.0028690398 = product of:
  0.014345199 = sum of:
    0.014345199 = product of:
      0.028690398 = sum of:
        0.028690398 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028690398 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  13. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.00 
    0.0023908666 = product of:
  0.011954333 = sum of:
    0.011954333 = product of:
      0.023908665 = sum of:
        0.023908665 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023908665 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  14. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.00 
    0.0023908666 = product of:
  0.011954333 = sum of:
    0.011954333 = product of:
      0.023908665 = sum of:
        0.023908665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023908665 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  15. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.00 
    0.0023908666 = product of:
  0.011954333 = sum of:
    0.011954333 = product of:
      0.023908665 = sum of:
        0.023908665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023908665 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  16. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.00 
    0.0023908666 = product of:
  0.011954333 = sum of:
    0.011954333 = product of:
      0.023908665 = sum of:
        0.023908665 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023908665 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  17. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.00 
    0.0023908666 = product of:
  0.011954333 = sum of:
    0.011954333 = product of:
      0.023908665 = sum of:
        0.023908665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023908665 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
  18. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.00 
    0.0023908666 = product of:
  0.011954333 = sum of:
    0.011954333 = product of:
      0.023908665 = sum of:
        0.023908665 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023908665 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  19. Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008) 0.00 
    0.0019126934 = product of:
  0.0095634665 = sum of:
    0.0095634665 = product of:
      0.019126933 = sum of:
        0.019126933 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019126933 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  20. DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008) 0.00 
    0.0019126934 = product of:
  0.0095634665 = sum of:
    0.0095634665 = product of:
      0.019126933 = sum of:
        0.019126933 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019126933 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12359056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03529314 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 14
  • d 7

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications