Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.01

0.010110574 = product of:
  0.040442295 = sum of:
    0.040442295 = product of:
      0.08088459 = sum of:
        0.08088459 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08088459 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26

Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.01

0.010110574 = product of:
  0.040442295 = sum of:
    0.040442295 = product of:
      0.08088459 = sum of:
        0.08088459 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08088459 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18

Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.01

0.010110574 = product of:
  0.040442295 = sum of:
    0.040442295 = product of:
      0.08088459 = sum of:
        0.08088459 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08088459 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20

Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.01

0.010110574 = product of:
  0.040442295 = sum of:
    0.040442295 = product of:
      0.08088459 = sum of:
        0.08088459 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08088459 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141

Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01

0.008846751 = product of:
  0.035387006 = sum of:
    0.035387006 = product of:
      0.07077401 = sum of:
        0.07077401 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07077401 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22

Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.01

0.008846751 = product of:
  0.035387006 = sum of:
    0.035387006 = product of:
      0.07077401 = sum of:
        0.07077401 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07077401 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127

Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.01

0.008846751 = product of:
  0.035387006 = sum of:
    0.035387006 = product of:
      0.07077401 = sum of:
        0.07077401 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07077401 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122

Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01

0.008846751 = product of:
  0.035387006 = sum of:
    0.035387006 = product of:
      0.07077401 = sum of:
        0.07077401 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07077401 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13

Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.01

0.008846751 = product of:
  0.035387006 = sum of:
    0.035387006 = product of:
      0.07077401 = sum of:
        0.07077401 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07077401 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28

Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.01

0.008846751 = product of:
  0.035387006 = sum of:
    0.035387006 = product of:
      0.07077401 = sum of:
        0.07077401 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07077401 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24

Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.01

0.008846751 = product of:
  0.035387006 = sum of:
    0.035387006 = product of:
      0.07077401 = sum of:
        0.07077401 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07077401 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194

Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.01

0.008846751 = product of:
  0.035387006 = sum of:
    0.035387006 = product of:
      0.07077401 = sum of:
        0.07077401 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07077401 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180

Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.01

0.008846751 = product of:
  0.035387006 = sum of:
    0.035387006 = product of:
      0.07077401 = sum of:
        0.07077401 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07077401 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 17.10.2005 13:54:22

Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.01

0.00758293 = product of:
  0.03033172 = sum of:
    0.03033172 = product of:
      0.06066344 = sum of:
        0.06066344 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06066344 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote: Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)

Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.01

0.00758293 = product of:
  0.03033172 = sum of:
    0.03033172 = product of:
      0.06066344 = sum of:
        0.06066344 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06066344 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote: Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)

Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.01

0.0071492554 = product of:
  0.028597021 = sum of:
    0.028597021 = product of:
      0.057194043 = sum of:
        0.057194043 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057194043 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
Source: Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22

Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.01

0.0071492554 = product of:
  0.028597021 = sum of:
    0.028597021 = product of:
      0.057194043 = sum of:
        0.057194043 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057194043 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote: Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95

Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.01

0.0063191084 = product of:
  0.025276434 = sum of:
    0.025276434 = product of:
      0.050552867 = sum of:
        0.050552867 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050552867 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83

Rosemann, L.: ¬Die Volltextabfrage und das Alleinstellungsmerkmal des physischen Buches (2006) 0.01
```
0.005355373 = product of:
  0.021421492 = sum of:
    0.021421492 = product of:
      0.042842984 = sum of:
        0.042842984 = weight(_text_:zukunft in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042842984 = score(doc=5142,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18466926 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.949301 = idf(docFreq=851, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.23199847 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.949301 = idf(docFreq=851, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Content

"Mit Google Print bzw. mittlerweile Google Book Search und dem Projekt zur Übernahme eines brancheneigenen Portals zur Pflege und Bereitstellung digitaler Daten aus Büchern namens "Volltextsuche online" initiiert durch den Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels tritt ein Thema auf den Plan, das im deutschen Sprachraum lange vernachlässigt wurde: allgemein gesprochen, die Notwendigkeit der Texterschließung durch Indexierung - sei sie gedruckt in Form von Registern im Anhang von Sach- und wissenschaftlichen Büchern oder ungedruckt in Form sog. Volltextabfragen per Suchmaske am Computer. Angesichts der exponentiell wachsenden Menge an Wissen ist es gut, wenn hierzu Überlegungen angestellt werden und damit die Chance besteht, neben der wirtschaftlichen auch über die wissenstheoretische Dimension dieser Dienste nachzudenken. Zweifellos wird die Bedeutung der Indexierung von Fließtext aus wissenstheoretischer Sicht in Zukunft noch weiter wachsen und bedeutet im Falle einer Online-Plattform (wenn sie denn in naher Zukunft eine hinreichend große Menge an Büchern in ihrem Datenbestand aufweisen wird) die Erfüllung eines Traumes für die wissenschaftliche Arbeit: Es ist fantastisch, in Millisekunden das Vorhandensein von Personen, Termen, Phrasen und Wortkomposita zu ermitteln, um die Ein- bzw. Nichteinschlägigkeit eines Buches und - mehr noch -vieler Bücher für die eigene Arbeit eindeutig beantworten zu können. Es ist fantastisch, im Trefferfall die gesuchte Information sogleich auf dem Monitor exzerpieren zu können oder sich auch bei ausbleibenden Treffern das Durcharbeiten eines ganzen Buches, vielleicht sogar einer halben Bibliothek ersparen zu können. Dabei ist das letztere Resultat mindestens eine genauso wichtige Information wie die erste, denn auch sie wird- man darf fast sagen, so gut wie immer - zu einer unglaublichen Ersparnis an Zeit verhelfen; hier bedeutet allein schon die Verringerung der Datenmenge einen Zuwachs an Wissen unter minimalem Zeitaufwand. Angesichts dieser Diagnose ist die These zu wagen, die digitale Revolution beginnt erst wirklich bei der Nutzung der Volltexte selbst als Datenquelle zur Wissensabfrage.

Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.01

0.005055287 = product of:
  0.020221148 = sum of:
    0.020221148 = product of:
      0.040442295 = sum of:
        0.040442295 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040442295 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066094 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731219 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract: Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative

Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes