Search (811 results, page 1 of 41)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.24 
    0.24366415 = product of:
  0.36549622 = sum of:
    0.05089128 = product of:
      0.15267384 = sum of:
        0.15267384 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15267384 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3259835 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15267384 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15267384 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3259835 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.009257258 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009257258 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.15267384 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15267384 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3259835 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
    Imprint
    Wien / Library and Information Studies : Universität
  2. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.21 
    0.21374336 = product of:
  0.42748672 = sum of:
    0.061069533 = product of:
      0.1832086 = sum of:
        0.1832086 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1832086 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3259835 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1832086 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1832086 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3259835 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.1832086 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1832086 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3259835 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  3. Schoenbeck, O.; Schröter, M.; Werr, N.: Framework Informationskompetenz in der Hochschulbildung (2021) 0.05 
    0.046200205 = product of:
  0.09240041 = sum of:
    0.012960162 = weight(_text_:information in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012960162 = score(doc=298,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.0671744 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0671744 = score(doc=298,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.36758062 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.012265856 = product of:
      0.03679757 = sum of:
        0.03679757 = weight(_text_:29 in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679757 = score(doc=298,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Im Mittelpunkt dieses Beitrags steht das 2016 von der Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) veröffentlichte Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, dessen Kernideen und Entwicklung aus Vorläufern wie den 2000 von der ACRL publizierten Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education heraus skizziert werden. Die Rezeptionsgeschichte dieser Standards im deutschen Sprachraum wird vor dem Hintergrund der Geschichte ihrer (partiellen) Übersetzung nachgezeichnet und hieraus das Potenzial abgeleitet, das die nun vorliegende vollständige Übersetzung des Framework ins Deutsche für eine zeitgemäße Förderung von Informationskompetenz bietet. Die vielfältigen Herausforderungen einer solchen Übersetzung werden durch Einblicke in die Übersetzungswerkstatt exemplarisch reflektiert.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-29
  4. Christensen, A.; Finck, M.: Discovery-Systeme : eine Analyse ihrer Geschichte und Gegenwart mit dem Hype-Zyklus (2021) 0.03 
    0.030262953 = product of:
  0.090788856 = sum of:
    0.07677074 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07677074 = score(doc=552,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.42009214 = fieldWeight in 552, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=552)
    0.014018122 = product of:
      0.042054366 = sum of:
        0.042054366 = weight(_text_:29 in 552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042054366 = score(doc=552,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 552, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=552)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    6.12.2021 17:20:29
  5. Zech, M.: Wie Gelehrte eine Epoche erfanden : Achsenzeit (2023) 0.03 
    0.030262953 = product of:
  0.090788856 = sum of:
    0.07677074 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07677074 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.42009214 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
    0.014018122 = product of:
      0.042054366 = sum of:
        0.042054366 = weight(_text_:29 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042054366 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Im 1. Jahrtausend v. Chr. kam es zur Wende in der Menschheitsgeschichte. Gelehrte entwickelten weltweit aufklärerische Ideen. Die These der Achsenzeit klingt fantastisch - und ist es auch. Über eine verführerische Theorie, die das Verständnis von Geschichte radikal in Frage stellte. Bezugnahme auf die Darstellungen von Jan Assmann, die die von Karl Jaspers aufgestellten Behauptungen in ein neues Licht rücken.
    Date
    5. 1.2023 13:00:29
  6. Information : a historical companion (2021) 0.03 
    0.025703778 = product of:
  0.07711133 = sum of:
    0.022826228 = weight(_text_:information in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022826228 = score(doc=492,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.33817163 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
    0.05428511 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05428511 = score(doc=492,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.29705 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Thanks to modern technological advances, we now enjoy seemingly unlimited access to information. Yet how did information become so central to our everyday lives, and how did its processing and storage make our data-driven era possible? This volume is the first to consider these questions in comprehensive detail, tracing the global emergence of information practices, technologies, and more, from the premodern era to the present. With entries spanning archivists to algorithms and scribes to surveilling, this is the ultimate reference on how information has shaped and been shaped by societies.
    Written by an international team of experts (including Jeremy Adelman, Lorraine Daston, Devin Fitzgerald, John-Paul Ghobrial, Lisa Gitelman, Earle Havens, Randolph C. Head, Niv Horesh, Sarah Igo, Richard R. John, Lauren Kassell, Pamela Long, Erin McGuirl, David McKitterick, Elias Muhanna, Thomas S. Mullaney, Carla Nappi, Craig Robertson, Daniel Rosenberg, Neil Safier, Haun Saussy, Will Slauter, Jacob Soll, Heidi Tworek, Siva Vaidhyanathan, Alexandra Walsham), the book's inspired and original long- and short-form contributions reconstruct the rise of human approaches to creating, managing, and sharing facts and knowledge. Thirteen full-length chapters discuss the role of information in pivotal epochs and regions, with chief emphasis on Europe and North America, but also substantive treatment of other parts of the world as well as current global interconnections. More than 100 alphabetical entries follow, focusing on specific tools, methods, and concepts?from ancient coins to the office memo, and censorship to plagiarism. The result is a wide-ranging, deeply immersive collection that will appeal to anyone drawn to the story behind our modern mania for an informed existence.
    Content
    Cover -- Contents -- Introduction -- Alphabetical List of Entries -- Thematic List of Entries -- Contributors -- PART ONE -- 1. Premodern Regimes and Practices -- 2. Realms of Information in the Medieval Islamic World -- 3. Information in Early Modern East Asia -- 4. Information in Early Modern Europe -- 5. Networks and the Making of a Connected World in the Sixteenth Century -- 6. Records, Secretaries, and the European Information State, circa 1400-1700 -- 7. Periodicals and the Commercialization of Information in the Early Modern Era -- 8. Documents, Empire, and Capitalism in the Nineteenth Century -- 9. Nineteenth-Century Media Technologies -- 10. Networking: Information Circles the Modern World -- 11. Publicity, Propaganda, and Public Opinion: From the Titanic Disaster to the Hungarian Uprising -- 12. Communication, Computation, and Information -- 13. Search -- PART TWO -- Alphabetical Entries -- Glossary -- Index.
    LCSH
    Information science / History
    Information resources / History
    Information science / Enclopedias
    RSWK
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Geschichte
    Subject
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Geschichte
    Information science / History
    Information resources / History
    Information science / Enclopedias
  7. Colombi, C.: Bibliothekarische Fachsystematiken am Deutschen Archäologischen Institut : 180 Jahre Wissensordnung (2023) 0.03 
    0.025446206 = product of:
  0.07633862 = sum of:
    0.009164219 = weight(_text_:information in 999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009164219 = score(doc=999,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 999, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=999)
    0.0671744 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0671744 = score(doc=999,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.36758062 = fieldWeight in 999, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=999)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Seit 1836 werden bibliothekarische Titel an der Abteilung Rom des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts inhaltlich erschlossen. Die hierfür entwickelten Systematiken zeugen von der Entstehung der Klassischen Archäologie als Disziplin und von der Geschichte der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Die systematischen Kataloge und die Fachbibliographien des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts werden vorgestellt und ihre Entstehung kontextualisiert. Die Unterschiede zwischen den einzelnen Katalogen und den Bibliographien dienen als Ausgangspunkt, um die Anpassungsstrategien der Klassifikation an die Fortschritte der Forschung und der Technologie zu untersuchen. Der Abgleich mit dem Publikationsaufkommen ermöglicht zudem Bemerkungen zu den Änderungen in der Systematik.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 74(2023) H.2/3, S.172-178
  8. Schoenbeck, O.; Schröter, M.; Werr, N.: Making of oder Lost in translation? : Das Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education - Herausforderungen bei der Übersetzung ins Deutsche und der bibliothekarischen Anwendung (2021) 0.02 
    0.023727797 = product of:
  0.07118339 = sum of:
    0.013605336 = weight(_text_:information in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013605336 = score(doc=297,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
    0.057578053 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057578053 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3150691 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Im Mittelpunkt dieses Beitrags steht das 2016 von der Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) veröffentlichte Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, dessen Kernideen und Entwicklung aus Vorläufern wie den 2000 von der ACRL publizierten Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education heraus skizziert werden. Die Rezeptionsgeschichte dieser Standards im deutschen Sprachraum wird vor dem Hintergrund der Geschichte ihrer (partiellen) Übersetzung nachgezeichnet und hieraus das Potenzial abgeleitet, das die nun vorliegende vollständige Übersetzung des Framework ins Deutsche für eine zeitgemäße Förderung von Informationskompetenz bietet. Die vielfältigen Herausforderungen einer solchen Übersetzung werden durch Einblicke in die Übersetzungswerkstatt exemplarisch reflektiert.
  9. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.02 
    0.023395658 = product of:
  0.07018697 = sum of:
    0.028321764 = weight(_text_:information in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028321764 = score(doc=915,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.41958824 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
    0.04186521 = product of:
      0.062797815 = sum of:
        0.031540774 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031540774 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
        0.031257045 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031257045 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Experimentation is the process of trying something out to discover what happens. It is a widespread information practice, yet often bypassed in information-behavior research. This article argues that experimentation complements prior knowledge, documents, and people as an important fourth class of information sources. Relative to the other classes, the distinguishing characteristics of experimentation are that it is a personal-as opposed to interpersonal-source and that it provides "backtalk." When the information seeker tries something out and then attends to the resulting situation, it is as though the materials of the situation talk back: They provide the information seeker with a situated and direct experience of the consequences of the tried-out options. In this way, experimentation involves obtaining information by creating it. It also involves turning material and behavioral processes into information interactions. Thereby, information seeking by experimentation is important to practical information literacy and extends information-behavior research with new insights on the interrelations between creating and seeking information.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.383-387
  10. Robertson, C.: ¬The filing cabinet : a vertical history of information (2021) 0.02 
    0.023331732 = product of:
  0.069995195 = sum of:
    0.015710087 = weight(_text_:information in 641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015710087 = score(doc=641,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 641, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=641)
    0.05428511 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05428511 = score(doc=641,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.29705 = fieldWeight in 641, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=641)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The ubiquity of the filing cabinet in the twentieth-century office space, along with its noticeable absence of style, has obscured its transformative role in the histories of both information technology and work. In the first in-depth history of this neglected artifact, Craig Robertson explores how the filing cabinet profoundly shaped the way that information and data have been sorted, stored, retrieved, and used. Invented in the 1890s, the filing cabinet was a result of the nineteenth-century faith in efficiency. Previously, paper records were arranged haphazardly: bound into books, stacked in piles, curled into slots, or impaled on spindles. The filing cabinet organized loose papers in tabbed folders that could be sorted alphanumerically, radically changing how people accessed, circulated, and structured information. Robertson's unconventional history of the origins of the information age posits the filing cabinet as an information storage container, an 'automatic memory' machine that contributed to a new type of information labor privileging manual dexterity over mental deliberation. Gendered assumptions about women's nimble fingers helped to naturalize the changes that brought women into the workforce as low-level clerical workers. The filing cabinet emerges from this unexpected account as a sophisticated piece of information technology and a site of gendered labor that with its folders, files, and tabs continues to shape how we interact with information and data in today's digital world.
    RSWK
    Aktenordnung / Geschichte / Unternehmen
    Subject
    Aktenordnung / Geschichte / Unternehmen
  11. Gellman, B.: ¬Der dunkle Spiegel : Edward Snowden und die globale Überwachungsindustrie (2020) 0.02 
    0.022697216 = product of:
  0.068091646 = sum of:
    0.057578053 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 5991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057578053 = score(doc=5991,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3150691 = fieldWeight in 5991, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5991)
    0.010513592 = product of:
      0.031540774 = sum of:
        0.031540774 = weight(_text_:29 in 5991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031540774 = score(doc=5991,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5991, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5991)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Der Journalist Barton Gellman erhielt vom Whistleblower Edward Snowden eine Fülle streng geheimer Dokumente. Seitdem wird er von der US-Regierung überwacht. In seinem neuen Buch berichtet der Pulitzer-Preisträger, wie er mit der Überwachung umgeht und was das mit ihm macht. »Verax« - unter diesem Namen kontaktierte ein geheimnisvoller Informant Barton Gellman. Der Journalist konnte nicht ahnen, dass sich dahinter Edward Snowden verbarg - und der größte Überwachungsskandal aller Zeiten. Jetzt legt der dreifache Pulitzer-Preisträger die definitive Gesamtdarstellung der globalen Überwachung vor. »Der dunkle Spiegel« ist alles zusammen: Spionage-Thriller, Insider-Bericht, investigative Reportage - und ein einzigartiges Zeugnis der unersetzlichen Rolle des Journalismus. Wie in einem Krimi erzählt Gellman von Snowdens Leak bis zum heutigen Überwachungskapitalismus des Silicon Valley die ganze Geschichte. Gegen den Widerstand von Geheimdiensten der ganzen Welt gelingt es ihm, die Puzzleteile zusammenzusetzen. Als sein Rechner vor seinen eigenen Augen gehackt wird, ist ihm klar: Hier sind Mächte am Werk, die kaum zu kontrollieren sind. Doch wer spioniert uns aus und warum? Sein Buch ist die Antwort auf diese Fragen.
    Date
    29. 9.2020 18:50:27
  12. Miksa, S.D.: Cataloging principles and objectives : history and development (2021) 0.02 
    0.021811035 = product of:
  0.0654331 = sum of:
    0.007855045 = weight(_text_:information in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007855045 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
    0.057578053 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057578053 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3150691 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Cataloging principles and objectives guide the formation of cataloging rules governing the organization of information within the library catalog, as well as the function of the catalog itself. Changes in technologies wrought by the internet and the web have been the driving forces behind shifting cataloging practice and reconfigurations of cataloging rules. Modern cataloging principles and objectives started in 1841 with the creation of Panizzi's 91 Rules for the British Museum and gained momentum with Charles Cutter's Rules for Descriptive Cataloging (1904). The first Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) was adopted in 1961, holding their place through such codifications as AACR and AACR2 in the 1970s and 1980s. Revisions accelerated starting in 2003 with the three original FR models. The Library Reference Model (LRM) in 2017 acted as a catalyst for the evolution of principles and objectives culminating in the creation of Resource Description and Access (RDA) in 2013.
    Theme
    Geschichte der Kataloge
  13. Krishnamurthy, M.; Satija, M.P.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification of classifications : species of library classifications (2024) 0.02 
    0.021811035 = product of:
  0.0654331 = sum of:
    0.007855045 = weight(_text_:information in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007855045 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
    0.057578053 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057578053 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.3150691 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  14. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.02 
    0.019884203 = product of:
  0.059652608 = sum of:
    0.05089128 = product of:
      0.15267384 = sum of:
        0.15267384 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15267384 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3259835 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.008761327 = product of:
      0.02628398 = sum of:
        0.02628398 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02628398 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  15. Brandom, R.B.: Im Geiste des Vertrauens : eine Lektüre der »Phänomenologie des Geistes« (2021) 0.02 
    0.019588452 = product of:
  0.1175307 = sum of:
    0.1175307 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1175307 = score(doc=488,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.6431321 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Classification
    CK 3680: Primärliteratur / Philosophie / Geschichte der Philosophie
    CG 4077: Abhandlungen, Studien / Philosophie / Geschichte der Philosophie
    CD 4045: Textsammlungen / Philosophie / Geschichte der Philosophie
    RVK
    CK 3680: Primärliteratur / Philosophie / Geschichte der Philosophie
    CG 4077: Abhandlungen, Studien / Philosophie / Geschichte der Philosophie
    CD 4045: Textsammlungen / Philosophie / Geschichte der Philosophie
  16. Springer, M.: Oppenheimers gespaltene Geschichte (2023) 0.02 
    0.019192684 = product of:
  0.11515611 = sum of:
    0.11515611 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 1062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11515611 = score(doc=1062,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.6301382 = fieldWeight in 1062, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1062)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  17. Amirhosseini, M.; Avidan, G.: ¬A dialectic perspective on the evolution of thesauri and ontologies (2021) 0.02 
    0.018175863 = product of:
  0.054527584 = sum of:
    0.00654587 = weight(_text_:information in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00654587 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
    0.047981713 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047981713 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.2625576 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this article is to identify the most important factors and features in the evolution of thesauri and ontologies through a dialectic model. This model relies on a dialectic process or idea which could be discovered via a dialectic method. This method has focused on identifying the logical relationship between a beginning proposition, or an idea called a thesis, a negation of that idea called the antithesis, and the result of the conflict between the two ideas, called a synthesis. During the creation of knowl­edge organization systems (KOSs), the identification of logical relations between different ideas has been made possible through the consideration and use of the most influential methods and tools such as dictionaries, Roget's Thesaurus, thesaurus, micro-, macro- and metathesauri, ontology, lower, middle and upper level ontologies. The analysis process has adapted a historical methodology, more specifically a dialectic method and documentary method as the reasoning process. This supports our arguments and synthesizes a method for the analysis of research results. Confirmed by the research results, the principle of unity has shown to be the most important factor in the development and evolution of the structure of knowl­edge organization systems and their types. There are various types of unity when considering the analysis of logical relations. These include the principle of unity of alphabetical order, unity of science, semantic unity, structural unity and conceptual unity. The results have clearly demonstrated a movement from plurality to unity in the assembling of the complex structure of knowl­edge organization systems to increase information and knowl­edge storage and retrieval performance.
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  18. Suchsland, R.: Kritik der paranoiden Vernunft (2020) 0.02 
    0.015993904 = product of:
  0.095963426 = sum of:
    0.095963426 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.095963426 = score(doc=322,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18274738 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.5251152 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Zu Verschwörungstheorien und Fake News. Mit einer Zusammenstellung von Beispielen aus der Geschichte.
  19. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.02 
    0.01599314 = product of:
  0.04797942 = sum of:
    0.01309174 = weight(_text_:information in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01309174 = score(doc=178,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
    0.03488768 = product of:
      0.052331515 = sum of:
        0.02628398 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02628398 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13525672 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.026047537 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026047537 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.6, S.945-962
  20. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.02 
    0.01554635 = product of:
  0.046639048 = sum of:
    0.02927402 = weight(_text_:information in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02927402 = score(doc=1085,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.067498945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03845047 = queryNorm
        0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
    0.017365025 = product of:
      0.052095074 = sum of:
        0.052095074 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052095074 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13464698 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03845047 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2022-1-3/what-is-information-an-information-veteran-looks-back-jahrgang-49-2022-heft-1?page=1.
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
    Theme
    Information

Authors

Languages

  • e 653
  • d 152
  • pt 3
  • m 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 753
  • el 86
  • m 33
  • p 8
  • s 6
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications