Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.02
    0.01699808 = product of:
      0.084990405 = sum of:
        0.084990405 = product of:
          0.1274856 = sum of:
            0.0640308 = weight(_text_:29 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0640308 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1176789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
            0.0634548 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0634548 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 4.2002 19:29:54
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  2. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.02
    0.01699808 = product of:
      0.084990405 = sum of:
        0.084990405 = product of:
          0.1274856 = sum of:
            0.0640308 = weight(_text_:29 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0640308 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1176789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
            0.0634548 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0634548 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2002 9:29:38
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  3. Fugmann, R.: ¬Das Buchregister : Methodische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung (2006) 0.01
    0.0075900652 = product of:
      0.037950326 = sum of:
        0.037950326 = weight(_text_:kritik in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037950326 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.1770148 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 58(2007) H.3, S.186 (J. Bertram): "Bei aller Kritik: Das Buch gemahnt eindrücklich daran, dass ein gutes Register sowohl den Anforderungen einer Entdeckungsrecherche als auch denen einer Erinnerungsrecherche dienlich sein sollte, um es mit Fugmanns Worten auszudrücken. Heißt: Es soll nicht nur denen zugute kommen, die das Buch gelesen haben, sondern eben gerade auch denjenigen, die es nicht gelesen haben. Nicht nur erinnerte Wortlaute sollen mit ihm wieder auffindbar sein, vielmehr soll das Register auch schnelle Antworten auf die Frage ermöglichen, ob ein Buch zum interessierenden Thema Ergiebiges enthält. Und dass für das zweite Anliegen ein Aufwand zu betreiben ist, der über ein reines Stichwortregister hinausgeht, wird von Fugmann anschaulich und überzeugend dargestellt. Auch seinem Wunsch, dass bei der Rezension vor Büchern Vorhandensein und Qualität des Registers (stärkere) Berücksichtigung finden mögen, ist uneingeschränkt zuzustimmen. Dass das vor ihm produzierte Register des Guten zu viel tut, steht auf einem anderen Blatt."
  4. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.00
    0.0048346515 = product of:
      0.024173258 = sum of:
        0.024173258 = product of:
          0.07251977 = sum of:
            0.07251977 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07251977 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  5. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.00
    0.0048346515 = product of:
      0.024173258 = sum of:
        0.024173258 = product of:
          0.07251977 = sum of:
            0.07251977 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07251977 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  6. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.00
    0.0048346515 = product of:
      0.024173258 = sum of:
        0.024173258 = product of:
          0.07251977 = sum of:
            0.07251977 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07251977 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  7. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.00
    0.0048346515 = product of:
      0.024173258 = sum of:
        0.024173258 = product of:
          0.07251977 = sum of:
            0.07251977 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07251977 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  8. Hodges, J.E.: Automated systems for the generation of document indexes (2000) 0.00
    0.0042687203 = product of:
      0.0213436 = sum of:
        0.0213436 = product of:
          0.0640308 = sum of:
            0.0640308 = weight(_text_:29 in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0640308 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1176789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.66, [=Suppl.29]
  9. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.00
    0.00423032 = product of:
      0.0211516 = sum of:
        0.0211516 = product of:
          0.0634548 = sum of:
            0.0634548 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0634548 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  10. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.00
    0.00423032 = product of:
      0.0211516 = sum of:
        0.0211516 = product of:
          0.0634548 = sum of:
            0.0634548 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0634548 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  11. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.00
    0.00423032 = product of:
      0.0211516 = sum of:
        0.0211516 = product of:
          0.0634548 = sum of:
            0.0634548 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0634548 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  12. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.00
    0.00423032 = product of:
      0.0211516 = sum of:
        0.0211516 = product of:
          0.0634548 = sum of:
            0.0634548 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0634548 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  13. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.00
    0.00423032 = product of:
      0.0211516 = sum of:
        0.0211516 = product of:
          0.0634548 = sum of:
            0.0634548 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0634548 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  14. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.00
    0.00423032 = product of:
      0.0211516 = sum of:
        0.0211516 = product of:
          0.0634548 = sum of:
            0.0634548 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0634548 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  15. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.00
    0.003418615 = product of:
      0.017093075 = sum of:
        0.017093075 = product of:
          0.051279224 = sum of:
            0.051279224 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051279224 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  16. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.00
    0.0030216572 = product of:
      0.015108286 = sum of:
        0.015108286 = product of:
          0.04532486 = sum of:
            0.04532486 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04532486 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  17. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.00
    0.0024173257 = product of:
      0.012086629 = sum of:
        0.012086629 = product of:
          0.036259886 = sum of:
            0.036259886 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036259886 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  18. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.00
    0.00211516 = product of:
      0.0105758 = sum of:
        0.0105758 = product of:
          0.0317274 = sum of:
            0.0317274 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0317274 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  19. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.00
    0.0018294513 = product of:
      0.009147257 = sum of:
        0.009147257 = product of:
          0.02744177 = sum of:
            0.02744177 = weight(_text_:29 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02744177 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1176789 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  20. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.00
    0.0015108286 = product of:
      0.007554143 = sum of:
        0.007554143 = product of:
          0.02266243 = sum of:
            0.02266243 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02266243 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033453487 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.