Search (204 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.09 
    0.085012816 = product of:
  0.21253203 = sum of:
    0.053133007 = product of:
      0.15939902 = sum of:
        0.15939902 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15939902 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28361905 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15939902 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15939902 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28361905 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.07 
    0.07084402 = product of:
  0.17711005 = sum of:
    0.04427751 = product of:
      0.13283253 = sum of:
        0.13283253 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13283253 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28361905 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13283253 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13283253 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28361905 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Schrenk, P.: Gesamtnote 1 für Signal - Telegram-Defizite bei Sicherheit und Privatsphäre : Signal und Telegram im Test (2022) 0.05 
    0.053411067 = product of:
  0.13352767 = sum of:
    0.121441044 = weight(_text_:kritik in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.121441044 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.5664474 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
    0.012086629 = product of:
      0.036259886 = sum of:
        0.036259886 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036259886 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Während der Messenger-Dienst Signal von Größen wie Edward Snowden empfohlen wird, steht der Telegram-Messenger immer häufiger in Kritik. Die IT-Sicherheitsexperten der PSW GROUP www.psw-group.de haben beide Messenger-Dienste auf Usability, die AGBs und die Sicherheit geprüft.
    Date
    22. 1.2022 14:01:14
  4. Jörs, B.: Informationskompetenz oder Information Literacy : Das große Missverständnis und Versäumnis der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft im Zeitalter der Desinformation. Teil 4: "Informationskompetenz" messbar machen. Ergänzende Anmerkungen zum "16th International Symposium of Information Science" ("ISI 2021", Regensburg 8. März - 10. März 2021) (2021) 0.05 
    0.048541248 = product of:
  0.12135312 = sum of:
    0.10626092 = weight(_text_:kritik in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10626092 = score(doc=428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.49564147 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
    0.015092204 = product of:
      0.045276612 = sum of:
        0.045276612 = weight(_text_:29 in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045276612 = score(doc=428,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1176789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Im abschließenden Teil 4 dieser Reihe zur Kritik des "Informationskompetenz"-Ansatzes der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft und dessen Eignung für die Aufdeckung und "Bekämpfung" von Desinformationen bzw. Fake News (Open Password - noch einzufügen) werden ausgewählte Forschungsergebnisse vorgestellt. Diese entstammen der Studie "Quelle: Internet? - Digitale Nachrichten- und Informationskompetenzen der deutschen Bevölkerung im Test". Träger der Studie ist die Berliner Stiftung "Neue Verantwortung", ein Forschungs-"Think Tank für die Gesellschaft im technologischen Wandel" (https://www.stiftung-nv.de/de/publikation/quelle-internet-digitale-nachrichten-und-informationskompetenzen-der-deutschen).
    Date
    29. 9.2021 18:17:40
    Source
    Open Password. 2021, Nr.979 vom 29. September 2021 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzM1OSwiNWZhNTM1ZjgxZDVlIiwwLDAsMzI2LDFd]
  5. Suchsland, R.: Kritik der paranoiden Vernunft (2020) 0.04 
    0.042935893 = product of:
  0.21467946 = sum of:
    0.21467946 = weight(_text_:kritik in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21467946 = score(doc=322,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        1.001347 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Kritik-der-paranoiden-Vernunft-4770674.html?seite=all
  6. D'Avis, W.: Denkende Maschinen (2020) 0.04 
    0.036432315 = product of:
  0.18216157 = sum of:
    0.18216157 = weight(_text_:kritik in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18216157 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.84967107 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch das Buch: D'Avis, W.: Geisteswissenschaftliche Grundlagen der Naturwissenschaften: eine Kritik des Szientismus. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa 2019.
  7. Meineck, S.: Gesichter-Suchmaschine PimEyes bricht das Schweigen : Neuer Chef (2022) 0.03 
    0.030360261 = product of:
  0.1518013 = sum of:
    0.1518013 = weight(_text_:kritik in 418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1518013 = score(doc=418,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.7080592 = fieldWeight in 418, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=418)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    PimEyes untergräbt die Anonymität von Menschen, deren Gesicht im Internet zu finden ist. Nach breiter Kritik hatte sich die polnische Suchmaschine auf die Seychellen abgesetzt. Jetzt hat PimEyes einen neuen Chef - und geht an die Öfffentlichkeit.
  8. Hemel, U.: Kritik der digitalen Vernunft : warum Humanität der Maßstab sein muss (2020) 0.03 
    0.025761535 = product of:
  0.12880768 = sum of:
    0.12880768 = weight(_text_:kritik in 199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12880768 = score(doc=199,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.60080814 = fieldWeight in 199, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=199)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: https://weltethos-institut.org/news/pressespiegel-kritik-der-digitalen-vernunft/.
  9. Schüller-Zwierlein, A.: ¬Die Fragilität des Zugangs : eine Kritik der Informationsgesellschaft (2021) 0.02 
    0.02428821 = product of:
  0.121441044 = sum of:
    0.121441044 = weight(_text_:kritik in 5716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.121441044 = score(doc=5716,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.5664474 = fieldWeight in 5716, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5716)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  10. Bredemeier, W.: "Strategische Deökonomisierung und Demokratisierung der Informationszugänge" : Eine Alternative zu Google und den Sozialen Medien? (2022) 0.02 
    0.021467946 = product of:
  0.10733973 = sum of:
    0.10733973 = weight(_text_:kritik in 598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10733973 = score(doc=598,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.5006735 = fieldWeight in 598, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=598)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Gibt es eine Alternative zu Google? Sollte es sie geben? Die vorherrschende Kritik an den HighTech-Konzernen setzt an ihrer Marktmacht und deren Missbrauch an. Diesen ist politisch mit "Regulierung", "Sanktionierung" und "Sicherstellung von mehr Wettbewerb" zu begegnen. Evgeny Morozov, der aus Weißrussland stammende Technologie- und Internet-Kritiker, wurde mit den Büchern "The Net Delusion" (2011) und "To Save Everything Click Here" (2013), speziell in Deutschland als FAZ-Kolumnist bekannt. Mit seiner Kritik an den Tech-Konzernen setzt er grundsätzlicher als die in der öffentlichen Debatte dominierenden wirtschaftlichen Zusammenhänge an: Er fragt nach der Qualität, Relevanz und Originalität der suchbar und verfügbar gemachten Inhalte. Folgen wir ihm, so würde mehr Wettbewerb unter Suchmaschinen wenig nützen, wenn sich die neuen Player in den Kriterien, auf die ihre Algorithmen festgelegt sind, nicht von Google unterscheiden (und die aus technischer Sicht womöglich schlechter als Google sind).
  11. Dogtas, G.; Ibitz, M.-P.; Jonitz, F.; Kocher, V.; Poyer, A.,; Stapf, L.: Kritik an rassifizierenden und diskriminierenden Titeln und Metadaten : Praxisorientierte Lösungsansätze (2022) 0.02 
    0.021252183 = product of:
  0.10626092 = sum of:
    0.10626092 = weight(_text_:kritik in 1828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10626092 = score(doc=1828,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.49564147 = fieldWeight in 1828, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1828)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  12. Barth, T.: Digitalisierung und Lobby : Transhumanismus I (2020) 0.02 
    0.021252183 = product of:
  0.10626092 = sum of:
    0.10626092 = weight(_text_:kritik in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10626092 = score(doc=5665,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.49564147 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Transhumanisten bringen bunte Tupfer in die aktuelle Digitalisierungsdebatte, aber auch gefährliche Blütenträume, Lobbyismus und Angst - vor den Chinesen. Wir werfen einen Blick auf die Transhumanistische Partei Deutschlands, den transhumanen Philosophen Sorgner, die mit aktueller Magnet-Hirnstimulation noch unzufriedene Medienforscherin Miriam Meckel, aber auch auf Kritiker einer allzu euphorischen Digitalisierung. Es wird sich zeigen, dass der Transhumanismus differenziert gesehen werden muss - und dass man am Ende bei aller Technik-Euphorie doch nicht um eine Kritik des Internet-Panoptikums herumkommt.
  13. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.02 
    0.020760091 = product of:
  0.051900227 = sum of:
    0.04427751 = product of:
      0.13283253 = sum of:
        0.13283253 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13283253 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28361905 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.007622714 = product of:
      0.022868142 = sum of:
        0.022868142 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022868142 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1176789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  14. Sack, H.: Hybride Künstliche Intelligenz in der automatisierten Inhaltserschließung (2021) 0.02 
    0.018216157 = product of:
  0.091080785 = sum of:
    0.091080785 = weight(_text_:kritik in 372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.091080785 = score(doc=372,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.42483553 = fieldWeight in 372, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=372)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Effizienter (Online-)Zugang zu Bibliotheks- und Archivmaterialien erfordert eine qualitativ hinreichende inhaltliche Erschließung dieser Dokumente. Die passgenaue Verschlagwortung und Kategorisierung dieser unstrukturierten Dokumente ermöglichen einen strukturell gegliederten Zugang sowohl in der analogen als auch in der digitalen Welt. Darüber hinaus erweitert eine vollständige Transkription der Dokumente den Zugang über die Möglichkeiten der Volltextsuche. Angesichts der in jüngster Zeit erzielten spektakulären Erfolge der Künstlichen Intelligenz liegt die Schlussfolgerung nahe, dass auch das Problem der automatisierten Inhaltserschließung für Bibliotheken und Archive als mehr oder weniger gelöst anzusehen wäre. Allerdings lassen sich die oftmals nur in thematisch engen Teilbereichen erzielten Erfolge nicht immer problemlos verallgemeinern oder in einen neuen Kontext übertragen. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Darstellung liegt in der Diskussion des aktuellen Stands der Technik der automatisierten inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand ausgewählter Beispiele sowie möglicher Fortschritte und Prognosen basierend auf aktuellen Entwicklungen des maschinellen Lernens und der Künstlichen Intelligenz einschließlich deren Kritik.
  15. Niemann, R.: Searles Welten : zur Kritik an einer geistfundierten Sprachtheorie (2021) 0.02 
    0.0151801305 = product of:
  0.07590065 = sum of:
    0.07590065 = weight(_text_:kritik in 755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07590065 = score(doc=755,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2143907 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033453487 = queryNorm
        0.3540296 = fieldWeight in 755, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=755)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  16. Bärnreuther, K.: Informationskompetenz-Vermittlung für Schulklassen mit Wikipedia und dem Framework Informationskompetenz in der Hochschulbildung (2021) 0.01 
    0.007284892 = product of:
  0.036424458 = sum of:
    0.036424458 = product of:
      0.054636683 = sum of:
        0.02744177 = weight(_text_:29 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02744177 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1176789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
        0.027194913 = weight(_text_:22 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027194913 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    30. 6.2021 16:29:52
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-22
  17. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.01 
    0.007284892 = product of:
  0.036424458 = sum of:
    0.036424458 = product of:
      0.054636683 = sum of:
        0.02744177 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02744177 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1176789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
        0.027194913 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027194913 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
  18. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01 
    0.0060707433 = product of:
  0.030353716 = sum of:
    0.030353716 = product of:
      0.045530573 = sum of:
        0.022868142 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022868142 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1176789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.02266243 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02266243 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  19. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.01 
    0.0060707433 = product of:
  0.030353716 = sum of:
    0.030353716 = product of:
      0.045530573 = sum of:
        0.022868142 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022868142 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1176789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.02266243 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02266243 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117148414 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  20. Barthel, J.; Ciesielski, R.: Regeln zu ChatGPT an Unis oft unklar : KI in der Bildung (2023) 0.01 
    0.0052811713 = product of:
  0.026405856 = sum of:
    0.026405856 = product of:
      0.07921757 = sum of:
        0.07921757 = weight(_text_:29 in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07921757 = score(doc=925,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1176789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033453487 = queryNorm
            0.6731671 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 3.2023 13:23:26
    29. 3.2023 13:29:19

Authors

Languages

  • e 125
  • d 78

Types

  • a 181
  • el 46
  • m 10
  • p 4
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications