Search (34 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01
    0.0065390747 = product of:
      0.03923445 = sum of:
        0.03923445 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03923445 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  2. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01
    0.0065390747 = product of:
      0.03923445 = sum of:
        0.03923445 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03923445 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  3. Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014) 0.01
    0.0065390747 = product of:
      0.03923445 = sum of:
        0.03923445 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03923445 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.01
    0.0065390747 = product of:
      0.03923445 = sum of:
        0.03923445 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03923445 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01
    0.0065390747 = product of:
      0.03923445 = sum of:
        0.03923445 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03923445 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  6. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.01
    0.0054492294 = product of:
      0.032695375 = sum of:
        0.032695375 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032695375 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
  7. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.01
    0.0054492294 = product of:
      0.032695375 = sum of:
        0.032695375 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032695375 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22
  8. Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014) 0.01
    0.0054492294 = product of:
      0.032695375 = sum of:
        0.032695375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032695375 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  9. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.01
    0.0054492294 = product of:
      0.032695375 = sum of:
        0.032695375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032695375 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  10. Zhang, J.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬A new similarity measure for subject hierarchical structures (2014) 0.01
    0.0054492294 = product of:
      0.032695375 = sum of:
        0.032695375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032695375 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    8. 4.2015 16:22:13
  11. Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015) 0.01
    0.0054492294 = product of:
      0.032695375 = sum of:
        0.032695375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032695375 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    8.11.2015 21:27:22
  12. Classification Research Group: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (1985) 0.00
    0.0048033725 = product of:
      0.028820235 = sum of:
        0.028820235 = weight(_text_:problem in 3640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028820235 = score(doc=3640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485485 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.14068612 = fieldWeight in 3640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3640)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The technique chosen was S. R. Ranganathan's facet analysis (q.v.). This method works from the bottom up: a term is categorized according to its parent class, as a kind, state, property, action, operation upon something, result of an Operation, agent, and so on. These modes of definition represent characteristics of division. Following the publication of this paper, the group worked for over ten years developing systems following this general pattern with various changes and experimental arrangements. Ranganathan's Colon Classification was the original of this type of method, but the Group rejected his contention that there are only five fundamental categories to be found in the knowledge base. They did, in fact, end up with varying numbers of categories in the experimental systems which they ultimately were to make. Notation was also recognized as a problem, being complex, illogical, lengthy, obscure and hard to understand. The Group tried to develop a rationale for notation, both as an ordering and as a finding device. To describe and represent a class, a notation could be long, but as a finding device, brevity would be preferable. The Group was to experiment with this aspect of classification and produce a number of interesting results. The Classification Research Group began meeting informally to discuss classification matters in 1952 and continues to meet, usually in London, to the present day. Most of the British authors whose work is presented in these pages have been members for most of the Group's life and continue in it. The Group maintains the basic position outlined in this paper to the present day. Its experimental approach has resulted in much more information about the nature and functions of classification systems. The ideal system has yet to be found. Classification research is still a promising area. The future calls for more experimentation based an reasoned approaches, following the example set by the Classification Research Group.
  13. Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003) 0.00
    0.004359383 = product of:
      0.026156299 = sum of:
        0.026156299 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026156299 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    12. 9.2004 17:22:35
  14. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.00
    0.004359383 = product of:
      0.026156299 = sum of:
        0.026156299 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026156299 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1690115 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04826377 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04