-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.13
0.13075322 = product of:
0.26150644 = sum of:
0.06537661 = product of:
0.19612981 = sum of:
0.19612981 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19612981 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.19612981 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19612981 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021)
0.11
0.10896101 = product of:
0.21792202 = sum of:
0.054480504 = product of:
0.16344151 = sum of:
0.16344151 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16344151 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16344151 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16344151 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
-
Palsdottir, A.: Data literacy and management of research data : a prerequisite for the sharing of research data (2021)
0.04
0.043739844 = product of:
0.08747969 = sum of:
0.08004379 = weight(_text_:management in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08004379 = score(doc=183,freq=30.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.57692516 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
0.007435893 = product of:
0.022307679 = sum of:
0.022307679 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022307679 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the knowledge and attitude about research data management, the use of data management methods and the perceived need for support, in relation to participants' field of research. Design/methodology/approach This is a quantitative study. Data were collected by an email survey and sent to 792 academic researchers and doctoral students. Total response rate was 18% (N = 139). The measurement instrument consisted of six sets of questions: about data management plans, the assignment of additional information to research data, about metadata, standard file naming systems, training at data management methods and the storing of research data. Findings The main finding is that knowledge about the procedures of data management is limited, and data management is not a normal practice in the researcher's work. They were, however, in general, of the opinion that the university should take the lead by recommending and offering access to the necessary tools of data management. Taken together, the results indicate that there is an urgent need to increase the researcher's understanding of the importance of data management that is based on professional knowledge and to provide them with resources and training that enables them to make effective and productive use of data management methods. Research limitations/implications The survey was sent to all members of the population but not a sample of it. Because of the response rate, the results cannot be generalized to all researchers at the university. Nevertheless, the findings may provide an important understanding about their research data procedures, in particular what characterizes their knowledge about data management and attitude towards it. Practical implications Awareness of these issues is essential for information specialists at academic libraries, together with other units within the universities, to be able to design infrastructures and develop services that suit the needs of the research community. The findings can be used, to develop data policies and services, based on professional knowledge of best practices and recognized standards that assist the research community at data management. Originality/value The study contributes to the existing literature about research data management by examining the results by participants' field of research. Recognition of the issues is critical in order for information specialists in collaboration with universities to design relevant infrastructures and services for academics and doctoral students that can promote their research data management.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.2, S.322-341
-
Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020)
0.03
0.031929873 = product of:
0.063859746 = sum of:
0.054480504 = product of:
0.16344151 = sum of:
0.16344151 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16344151 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.00937924 = product of:
0.02813772 = sum of:
0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02813772 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
-
Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020)
0.03
0.031591117 = product of:
0.063182235 = sum of:
0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025834022 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.03734821 = product of:
0.056022316 = sum of:
0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02813772 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.027884599 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027884599 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.6, S.945-962
-
Qin, H.; Wang, H.; Johnson, A.: Understanding the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of new-generation engineering designers for effective knowledge management (2020)
0.03
0.029030014 = product of:
0.058060028 = sum of:
0.050624136 = weight(_text_:management in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050624136 = score(doc=181,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.3648795 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
0.007435893 = product of:
0.022307679 = sum of:
0.022307679 = weight(_text_:22 in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022307679 = score(doc=181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose This paper aims to explore the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of the new generation of engineering designers. A survey study is used to approach what their information needs are, how these needs change during an engineering design project and how their information-seeking behaviours have been influenced by the newly developed information technologies (ITs). Through an in-depth analysis of the survey results, the key functions have been identified for the next-generation management systems. Design/methodology/approach The paper first proposed four hypotheses on the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of young engineers. Then, a survey study was undertaken to understand their information usage in terms of the information needs and information-seeking behaviours during a complete engineering design process. Through analysing the survey results, several findings were obtained and on this basis, further comparisons were made to discuss and evaluate the hypotheses. Findings The paper has revealed that the engineering designers' information needs will evolve throughout the engineering design project; thus, they should be assisted at several different levels. Although they intend to search information and knowledge on know-what and know-how, what they really require is the know-why knowledge in order to help them complete design tasks. Also, the paper has shown how the newly developed ITs and web-based applications have influenced the engineers' information-seeking practices. Research limitations/implications The research subjects chosen in this study are engineering students in universities who, although not as experienced as engineers in companies, do go through a complete design process with the tasks similar to industrial scenarios. In addition, the focus of this study is to understand the information-seeking behaviours of a new generation of design engineers, so that the development of next-generation information and knowledge management systems can be well informed. In this sense, the results obtained do reveal some new knowledge about the information-seeking behaviours during a general design process. Practical implications This paper first identifies the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of the new generation of engineering designers. On this basis, the varied ways to meet these needs and behaviours are discussed and elaborated. This intends to provide the key characteristics for the development of the next-generation knowledge management system for engineering design projects. Originality/value This paper proposes a novel means of exploring the future engineers' information needs and information-seeking behaviours in a collaborative working environment. It also characterises the key features and functions for the next generation of knowledge management systems for engineering design.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.6, S.853-868
-
Bedford, D.: Knowledge architectures : structures and semantics (2021)
0.03
0.0268246 = product of:
0.0536492 = sum of:
0.046213306 = weight(_text_:management in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046213306 = score(doc=566,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.3330879 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.007435893 = product of:
0.022307679 = sum of:
0.022307679 = weight(_text_:22 in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022307679 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Knowledge Architectures reviews traditional approaches to managing information and explains why they need to adapt to support 21st-century information management and discovery. Exploring the rapidly changing environment in which information is being managed and accessed, the book considers how to use knowledge architectures, the basic structures and designs that underlie all of the parts of an effective information system, to best advantage. Drawing on 40 years of work with a variety of organizations, Bedford explains that failure to understand the structure behind any given system can be the difference between an effective solution and a significant and costly failure. Demonstrating that the information user environment has shifted significantly in the past 20 years, the book explains that end users now expect designs and behaviors that are much closer to the way they think, work, and act. Acknowledging how important it is that those responsible for developing an information or knowledge management system understand knowledge structures, the book goes beyond a traditional library science perspective and uses case studies to help translate the abstract and theoretical to the practical and concrete. Explaining the structures in a simple and intuitive way and providing examples that clearly illustrate the challenges faced by a range of different organizations, Knowledge Architectures is essential reading for those studying and working in library and information science, data science, systems development, database design, and search system architecture and engineering.
- Content
- Section 1 Context and purpose of knowledge architecture -- 1 Making the case for knowledge architecture -- 2 The landscape of knowledge assets -- 3 Knowledge architecture and design -- 4 Knowledge architecture reference model -- 5 Knowledge architecture segments -- Section 2 Designing for availability -- 6 Knowledge object modeling -- 7 Knowledge structures for encoding, formatting, and packaging -- 8 Functional architecture for identification and distinction -- 9 Functional architectures for knowledge asset disposition and destruction -- 10 Functional architecture designs for knowledge preservation and conservation -- Section 3 Designing for accessibility -- 11 Functional architectures for knowledge seeking and discovery -- 12 Functional architecture for knowledge search -- 13 Functional architecture for knowledge categorization -- 14 Functional architectures for indexing and keywording -- 15 Functional architecture for knowledge semantics -- 16 Functional architecture for knowledge abstraction and surrogation -- Section 4 Functional architectures to support knowledge consumption -- 17 Functional architecture for knowledge augmentation, derivation, and synthesis -- 18 Functional architecture to manage risk and harm -- 19 Functional architectures for knowledge authentication and provenance -- 20 Functional architectures for securing knowledge assets -- 21 Functional architectures for authorization and asset management -- Section 5 Pulling it all together - the big picture knowledge architecture -- 22 Functional architecture for knowledge metadata and metainformation -- 23 The whole knowledge architecture - pulling it all together
- LCSH
- Information storage and retrieval systems / Management
- Subject
- Information storage and retrieval systems / Management
-
Heng, G.; Cole, T.W.; Tian, T.(C.); Han, M.-J.: Rethinking authority reconciliation process (2022)
0.02
0.024649281 = product of:
0.049298562 = sum of:
0.03616763 = weight(_text_:management in 727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03616763 = score(doc=727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=727)
0.013130935 = product of:
0.039392803 = sum of:
0.039392803 = weight(_text_:29 in 727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039392803 = score(doc=727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=727)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Entity identity management and name reconciliation are intrinsic to both Linked Open Data (LOD) and traditional library authority control. Does this mean that LOD sources can facilitate authority control? This Emblematica Online case study examines the utility of five LOD sources for name reconciliation, comparing design differences regarding ontologies, linking models, and entity properties. It explores the challenges of name reconciliation in the LOD environment and provides lessons learned during a semi-automated name reconciliation process. It also briefly discusses the potential values and benefits of LOD authorities to the authority reconciliation process itself and library services in general.
- Date
- 29. 9.2022 17:15:12
-
Thomas, M.A.; Li, Y.; Sistenich, V.; Diango, K.N.; Kabongo, D.: ¬A multi-stakeholder engagement framework for knowledge management in ICT4D (2023)
0.02
0.02295703 = product of:
0.04591406 = sum of:
0.036534823 = weight(_text_:management in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036534823 = score(doc=1086,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
0.00937924 = product of:
0.02813772 = sum of:
0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02813772 = score(doc=1086,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Knowledge management (KM) is increasingly important to the field of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D). Yet, scant literature has addressed KM in the ICT4D context. This study takes an important step toward addressing this gap by conceptualizing KM in the context of ICT4D based on the people-process-technology perspective. To elicit KM factors most relevant to ICT4D, a Delphi study is conducted with a panel of experts representing three key stakeholder groups (beneficiaries, partners, and designers) with cumulative experience of leading ICT4D projects in 25 countries. Based on the Delphi study findings, 16 factors relevant to KM in ICT4D are synthesized. A multi-stakeholder engagement framework for KM in ICT4D and an activity checklist are proposed. The study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing insights into the differing views of stakeholders related to KM practices in ICT4D projects. Practitioners may find the framework and checklist useful in coordinating and managing KM in ICT4D projects. As development initiatives become increasingly knowledge focused, the study calls upon researchers for more enquiry in this progressive area of study.
- Date
- 16.11.2023 18:55:29
-
Bergman, O.; Israeli, T.; Whittaker, S.: Factors hindering shared files retrieval (2020)
0.02
0.022914845 = product of:
0.04582969 = sum of:
0.036534823 = weight(_text_:management in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036534823 = score(doc=5843,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
0.009294867 = product of:
0.027884599 = sum of:
0.027884599 = weight(_text_:22 in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027884599 = score(doc=5843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose Personal information management (PIM) is an activity in which people store information items in order to retrieve them later. The purpose of this paper is to test and quantify the effect of factors related to collection size, file properties and workload on file retrieval success and efficiency. Design/methodology/approach In the study, 289 participants retrieved 1,557 of their shared files in a naturalistic setting. The study used specially developed software designed to collect shared files' names and present them as targets for the retrieval task. The dependent variables were retrieval success, retrieval time and misstep/s. Findings Various factors compromise shared files retrieval including: collection size (large number of files), file properties (multiple versions, size of team sharing the file, time since most recent retrieval and folder depth) and workload (daily e-mails sent and received). The authors discuss theoretical reasons for these negative effects and suggest possible ways to overcome them. Originality/value Retrieval is the main reason people manage personal information. It is essential for retrieval to be successful and efficient, as information cannot be used unless it can be re-accessed. Prior PIM research has assumed that factors related to collection size, file properties and workload affect file retrieval. However, this is the first study to systematically quantify the negative effects of these factors. As each of these factors is expected to be exacerbated in the future, this study is a necessary first step toward addressing these problems.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.1, S.130-147
-
Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023)
0.02
0.022914845 = product of:
0.04582969 = sum of:
0.036534823 = weight(_text_:management in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036534823 = score(doc=884,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
0.009294867 = product of:
0.027884599 = sum of:
0.027884599 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027884599 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:43:02
-
Lorentzen, D.G.: Bridging polarised Twitter discussions : the interactions of the users in the middle (2021)
0.02
0.021077333 = product of:
0.042154666 = sum of:
0.031000827 = weight(_text_:management in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031000827 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
0.0111538395 = product of:
0.03346152 = sum of:
0.03346152 = weight(_text_:22 in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03346152 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.1, S.129-143
-
Park, Y.J.: ¬A socio-technological model of search information divide in US cities (2021)
0.02
0.021077333 = product of:
0.042154666 = sum of:
0.031000827 = weight(_text_:management in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031000827 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
0.0111538395 = product of:
0.03346152 = sum of:
0.03346152 = weight(_text_:22 in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03346152 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.2 S.144-159
-
Dootson, P.; Tate, M.; Desouza, K.C.; Townson, P.: Transforming public records management : six key insights (2021)
0.02
0.020667218 = product of:
0.08266887 = sum of:
0.08266887 = weight(_text_:management in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08266887 = score(doc=214,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Records management in the public sector is integral for delivering public good. However, several institutional challenges inhibit the required implementation of innovative and information-centric tools to transform records management in response to the challenges of digitization and to capitalize on new opportunities in the digital economy. In this article, we make recommendations to overcome institutional and legislative barriers to transform records management in the public sector.
-
Kodua-Ntim, K.: Narrative review on open access institutional repositories and knowledge sharing in South Africa (2023)
0.02
0.01760663 = product of:
0.03521326 = sum of:
0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025834022 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.00937924 = product of:
0.02813772 = sum of:
0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02813772 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This brief communication conveys a critical assessment of the benefits, challenges, and potential of Open Access Institutional Repositories (OAIRs) for knowledge sharing in South Africa. The review identifies best practices and recommendations to promote and improve their usage. Researchers need training and support to understand guidelines and best practices for depositing their work. Limited funding for OAIRs can be addressed by government funding or exploring alternative models. Legal and policy frameworks must support OAIRs and ensure they comply with international standards. Proper management and indexing policies enhance institutional visibility and information retrieval. OAIRs promote collaboration and cooperation among researchers and provide a platform for knowledge sharing and feedback. Standardized platforms and frameworks ensure digital outputs are accessible and usable for the academic community. Sharing knowledge on self-archiving encourages researchers to deposit their works. Formal reviews must focus on metadata and ensure that articles are from DHET-accredited journals and that theses and dissertations meet institutional requirements. These efforts promote open access and preserve scholarly works for future generations.
- Date
- 29. 8.2023 19:15:23
-
Ekstrand, M.D.; Wright, K.L.; Pera, M.S.: Enhancing classroom instruction with online news (2020)
0.02
0.017564444 = product of:
0.035128888 = sum of:
0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025834022 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
0.009294867 = product of:
0.027884599 = sum of:
0.027884599 = weight(_text_:22 in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027884599 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.5, S.725-744
-
Rha, E.Y.; Belkin, N.: Exploring social aspects of task perception using cognitive sociology : a social cognitive perspective (2020)
0.02
0.017564444 = product of:
0.035128888 = sum of:
0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025834022 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
0.009294867 = product of:
0.027884599 = sum of:
0.027884599 = weight(_text_:22 in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027884599 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.4, S.525-543
-
Kang, M.: Dual paths to continuous online knowledge sharing : a repetitive behavior perspective (2020)
0.02
0.017564444 = product of:
0.035128888 = sum of:
0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 5985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025834022 = score(doc=5985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5985)
0.009294867 = product of:
0.027884599 = sum of:
0.027884599 = weight(_text_:22 in 5985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027884599 = score(doc=5985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5985)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.2, S.159-178
-
Zhou, Q.; Lee, C.S.; Sin, S.-C.J.; Lin, S.; Hu, H.; Ismail, M.F.F. Bin: Understanding the use of YouTube as a learning resource : a social cognitive perspective (2020)
0.02
0.017564444 = product of:
0.035128888 = sum of:
0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025834022 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.009294867 = product of:
0.027884599 = sum of:
0.027884599 = weight(_text_:22 in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027884599 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.3, S.339-359
-
Ilhan, A.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.: Data privacy-related behavior and concerns of activity tracking technology users from Germany and the USA (2021)
0.02
0.017564444 = product of:
0.035128888 = sum of:
0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025834022 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.009294867 = product of:
0.027884599 = sum of:
0.027884599 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027884599 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041162275 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.2, S.180-200
