-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Broughton, V.: ¬The Classification Research Group : then and now (2000)
0.01
0.007988722 = product of:
0.0372807 = sum of:
0.010755588 = weight(_text_:system in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010755588 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006682779 = score(doc=6089,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.019842334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019842334 = score(doc=6089,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The genesis of the Group: In 1948, as part of the post-war renewal of library services in the United Kingdom, the Royal Society organized a Conference on Scientific Information.' What, at the time, must have seemed a minute part of the grand plan, but was later to have a transforming effect on the theory of knowledge organization throughout the remainder of the century, was the setting up of a standing committee of a small group of specialists to investigate the organization and retrieval of scientific information. In 1950, the secretary of that committee, J.D. Bernal, suggested that it might be appropriate to ask a group of librarians to do a study of the problem. After a couple of years of informal discussion it was agreed, in February 1952, to form a Classification Research Group - the CRG as it has become known to subsequent generations. The Group published a brief corporate statement of its views in the Library Association Record in June 1953 and submitted a memorandum to the Library Association Research Committee in May 1955, entitled "The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval". This memorandum was published in the proceedings of what has become known as the "Dorking Conference" in 1957. Of the original fifteen members, four still belong to the Group, three of whom are in regular attendance: Eric Coates, Douglas Foskett and Jack Mills. Brian Vickery ceased attending regularly in the 1960s but has retained his interest in their doings: he was present at the 150th celebratory meeting in 1984 and played an active part in the "Dorking revisited" conference held in 1997. The stated aim of the Group was 'To review the basic principles of bibliographic classification, unhampered by allegiance to any particular published scheme' and it can truly be stated that the work of its members has had a fundamental influence on the teaching and practice of information retrieval. It is paradoxical that this collection of people has exerted such a strong theoretical sway because their aims were from the outset and remain essentially practical. This fact is sometimes overlooked in the literature on knowledge organization: there is a tendency to get carried away, and for researchers of today to concentrate so hard on what might be that they overlook what is needed, useful and practical - the entire objective of any retrieval system.
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The UDC and the World Wide Web (2003)
0.01
0.0075341864 = product of:
0.035159536 = sum of:
0.013444485 = weight(_text_:system in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013444485 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004176737 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.017538311 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017538311 = score(doc=3814,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The paper examines the potentiality of the Universal Decimal Classification as a means for retrieving subjects from the World Wide Web. The analytico-synthetic basis of the scheme provides the facility to link concepts at the input or search stage and to isolate concepts via the notation so as to retrieve the separate parts of a compound subject individually if required. Its notation permits hierarchical searching and overrides the shortcomings of natural language. Recent revisions have been constructed with this purpose in mind, the most recent being for Management. The use of the classification embedded in metadata, as in the GERHARD system or as a basis for subject trees is discussed. Its application as a gazetteer is another Web application to which it is put. The range of up to date editions in many languages and the availability of a Web-based version make its use as a switching language increasingly valuable.
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Subject control : the British viewpoint (1995)
0.01
0.0071805334 = product of:
0.050263733 = sum of:
0.030421399 = weight(_text_:system in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030421399 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.019842334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019842334 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Enthält das Ergebnis einer Befragung. 0 hielten das System für sehr gut; 13 für gut; 11 für halbwegs gut; 7 für halbwegs gut; 11 für schlecht. 8,9% der Befragten würden das System übernehmen, 47,5% nicht, 43,6% vielleicht
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Brian Vickery : 11th September 1918-17 th October 2009 (2010)
0.01
0.0057039345 = product of:
0.02661836 = sum of:
0.005906798 = weight(_text_:information in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005906798 = score(doc=3692,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.012401459 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012401459 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.008310104 = product of:
0.016620208 = sum of:
0.016620208 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016620208 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The death of Brian Vickery sees a great era of classification research coming towards an end. Born in Australia, he completed his schooling in England, before going up to Brasenose to read Chemistry just before the outbreak of the Second World War. Brian was never in the services, but after Oxford he worked as a chemist in the Royal Ordnance Factory from 1941-45. After the War he became a librarian at Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI). He was a delegate at the Royal Society Scientific Information Conference held in 1948. One of the offshoots of that conference was the formation of a small committee of scientists under the leadership of Professor J.D. Bernal, to make a study of library classification. After two years of discussions, they elicited the assistance of Jack Wells, then editor of the British National Bibliography, and Brian. They circularized a group of colleagues and convened a meeting in February 1952 which led to the formation of the Classification Research Group. As is well known, this Group, all practising librarians, were to exert a groundbreaking influence on the organization and retrieval of information.
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:32:06
-
Vickery, B.C.; McIlwaine, I.C.: Structuring and switching: a discussion of the Broad System of Ordering (1979)
0.01
0.005696039 = product of:
0.039872274 = sum of:
0.030421399 = weight(_text_:system in 1866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030421399 = score(doc=1866,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 1866, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1866)
0.009450877 = weight(_text_:information in 1866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009450877 = score(doc=1866,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1866, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1866)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- After a short presentation of major background principles used in BSO construction, the authors consider the most important structural peculiarities and spheres of application of this system. Some specific remarks deal with subdivisions within several major headings. In general, the BSO is viewed as a reasonable and up-to-date structural outline of modern knowledge and a useful tool to interconnect or switch between information systems
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 4(1979) no.3, S.13-15
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995)
0.00
0.004350918 = product of:
0.030456424 = sum of:
0.018822279 = weight(_text_:system in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018822279 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.011634145 = product of:
0.02326829 = sum of:
0.02326829 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02326829 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Survey on the activities going to develop the UDC into a fully faceted classification system according to the Recommendations of the UDC Management Board. A Master Reference File (MRF) has been created from which any publisher or insitution may develop its own versions according to the requests of its clientele. The UDC Technical Director at the FID Headquarters in The Hague maintains the file. An Editorial Board and an Editor in Chief was appointed. Extensions and Corrections are being published. Examples are given on ongoing revision work in the classes for Astronomy, Linguistics and Philology as well as in Medicine. Cooperation with the Editors of the Bliss Classification and the DDC exists
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Some problems of context and terminology (1998)
0.00
0.004184745 = product of:
0.029293211 = sum of:
0.009450877 = weight(_text_:information in 4495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009450877 = score(doc=4495,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4495, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4495)
0.019842334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019842334 = score(doc=4495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4495)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Points out that designers of information systems for subject retrieval aiming at some kind of uinversal usage face the major problem of context, as a word by itself is not meaningful; and inseparable from this problem is that of the terminology used. This problem is most evident in systems that rely totally on words, rather than a systematic structure of some kind
- Source
- Information studies. 4(1998) no.4, S.195-201
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress in 2003 (2003)
0.00
0.0039919773 = product of:
0.055887677 = sum of:
0.055887677 = weight(_text_:system in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055887677 = score(doc=3788,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.72326225 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Contains the proposed table for 617 Cardiovascular System. Nervous System. Glandular System
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Interdisciplinarity : a new retrieval problem? (2000)
0.00
0.0031385582 = product of:
0.021969907 = sum of:
0.0070881573 = weight(_text_:information in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070881573 = score(doc=124,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.014881751 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014881751 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Cross-fertilization between disciplines is held to be a new phenomenon. This is not really the case, but what is new is the availability of vast quantities of information that crosses disciplinary boundaries and is unorganized on the WWW. Browsability is no longer an option in the same way it has been in the past and new methods have to be devised for accessing information. Rather than abandoning the tried and tested, it is suggested that a more practical approach might be to redesign existing tools, i.e. bibliographic classifications for this purpose. Two interdisciplinary fields of study, Tourism and Environmental Science, have recently been revised in the Universal Decimal Classification, in an attempt to make the scheme more appropriate for the needs of the twenty-first century.
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Where have all the flowers gone? : An investigation into the fate of some special classification schemes (2003)
0.00
0.0029538223 = product of:
0.020676754 = sum of:
0.010755588 = weight(_text_:system in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010755588 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.009921167 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009921167 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Prior to the OPAC many institutions devised classifications to suit their special needs. Others expanded or altered general schemes to accommodate specific approaches. A driving force in the creation of these classifications was the Classification Research Group, celebrating its golden jubilee in 2002, whose work created a framework and body of principles that remain valid for the retrieval needs of today. The paper highlights some of these special schemes and highlights the fundamental principles which remain valid. 1. Introduction The distinction between a general and a special classification scheme is made frequently in the textbooks, but is one that it is sometimes difficult to draw. The Library of Congress classification could be described as the special classification par excellence. Normally, however, a special classification is taken to be one that is restricted to a specific subject, and quite often used in one specific context only, either a library or a bibliographic listing or for a specific purpose such as a search engine and it is in this sense that I propose to examine some of these schemes. Today, there is a widespread preference for searching an words as a supplement to the use of a standard system, usually the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). This is enhanced by the ability to search documents full-text in a computerized environment, a situation that did not exist 20 or 30 years ago. Today's situation is a great improvement in many ways, but it does depend upon the words used by the author and the searcher corresponding, and often presupposes the use of English. In libraries, the use of co-operative services and precatalogued records already provided with classification data has also spelt the demise of the special scheme. In many instances, the survival of a special classification depends upon its creaior and, with the passage of time, this becomes inevitably more precarious.
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: New wine in old bottles : problems of maintaining classification schemes (1996)
0.00
0.0023683137 = product of:
0.016578196 = sum of:
0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 5168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004176737 = score(doc=5168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5168)
0.012401459 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012401459 = score(doc=5168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5168)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Editors of long-standing classifications have to adopt their schemes to totally different circumstances from those they were originally designed to suit. The need to retrieve information accurately in an online environment and a world dominated by the Internet is vital and contrasts with the basic linear approach for which these classifications were intended. The latter need still has to be satisfied, so ways of achieving both goals must be explored. The need for greater synthesis, clearly defined factes, with distinctive notation and a closely adhered to citation order is essential. An expressive notation is attractive in an online environmen. Modern educational approaches make traditional structures meaningless and the current economic climate and expense of developing new publication formats is reducing revision budgets. Co-operation between editors and the use of one scheme, e.g. DDC, as a switching language between other schemes, e.g., UDC, thesauri and subject headings lists are one way forward. Existing co-operative projects and future plans between the editors of DDC, UDC and BC2 are discussed and the complementing of classification by a thesaurus is recommended
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A question of place (2004)
0.00
0.0023683137 = product of:
0.016578196 = sum of:
0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004176737 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.012401459 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012401459 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at the problems raised by maintaining an Area Table in a general scheme of classification. It examines the tools available to assist in producing a standardized listing and demonstrates how recent developments in the Universal Decimal Classification enable users to have a retrieval tool suitable for use in a networked environment which acts as both a gazetteer and a classification.
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress in 2004 (2004)
0.00
0.0023047691 = product of:
0.032266766 = sum of:
0.032266766 = weight(_text_:system in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032266766 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Proposal for the restructuring of UDC class 617.6/.9 - Nervous system. Neurology
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress 2000 (2000)
0.00
0.0016620208 = product of:
0.02326829 = sum of:
0.02326829 = product of:
0.04653658 = sum of:
0.04653658 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04653658 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.49-75
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A feasibility study on the restructuring of the Universal Decimal Classification into a fully-facetd classification system (1994)
0.00
0.0013444485 = product of:
0.018822279 = sum of:
0.018822279 = weight(_text_:system in 7738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018822279 = score(doc=7738,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 7738, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7738)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Trends in knowledge organization research (2003)
0.00
9.4972615E-4 = product of:
0.0132961655 = sum of:
0.0132961655 = product of:
0.026592331 = sum of:
0.026592331 = weight(_text_:22 in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026592331 = score(doc=2289,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 10. 6.2004 19:22:56
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Present role and future policy for UDC as a standard for subject control (1991)
0.00
6.750627E-4 = product of:
0.009450877 = sum of:
0.009450877 = weight(_text_:information in 7934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009450877 = score(doc=7934,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 7934, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7934)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: International trends in subject analysis research (1999)
0.00
4.7734138E-4 = product of:
0.006682779 = sum of:
0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006682779 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a survey of subject analysis research over the ten year period 1988 to 1998. Data are drawn from the 'research environment' encompassing publications, conference papers, major bibliographic resources in the field of Library and Information Science and selective searches of the Internet. Findings reveal major and minor areas of research activity. Trends and developments are identified and conclusions drawn. Strengths and weaknesses in the approaches taken to subject analysis research are discussed and suggestions for improvements are made with a view to future research directions
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : some factors concerning its origins, development, and influence (1997)
0.00
4.2191416E-4 = product of:
0.005906798 = sum of:
0.005906798 = weight(_text_:information in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005906798 = score(doc=141,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Footnote
- Contribution to part 1 of a 2 part series on the history of documentation and information science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.4, S.331-339
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : a guide to its use (2000)
0.00
4.2191416E-4 = product of:
0.005906798 = sum of:
0.005906798 = weight(_text_:information in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005906798 = score(doc=161,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- This book is an extension and total revision of the author's earlier Guide to the use of UDC. The original was written in 1993 and in the intervening years much has happened with the classification. In particular, a much more rigorous approach has been undertaken in revision to ensure that the scheme is able to handle the requirements of a networked world. The book outlines the history and development of the Universal Decimal Classification, provides practical hints on its application and works through all the auxiliary and main tables highlighting aspects that need to be noted in applying the scheme. It also provides guidance on the use of the Master Reference File and discusses the ways in which the classification is used in the 21st century and its suitability as an aid to subject description in tagging metadata and consequently for application on the Internet. It is intended as a source for information about the scheme, for practical usage by classifiers in their daily work and as a guide to the student learning how to apply the classification. It is amply provided with examples to illustrate the many ways in which the scheme can be applied and will be a useful source for a wide range of information workers
