Search (174 results, page 9 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. Rooney, N.; Patterson, D.; Galushka, M.; Dobrynin, V.; Smirnova, E.: ¬An investigation into the stability of contextual document clustering (2008) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.2, S.256-266
  2. Mengle, S.S.R.; Goharian, N.: Ambiguity measure feature-selection algorithm (2009) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 2804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=2804,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2804, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2804)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.5, S.1037-1050
  3. Wang, J.: ¬An extensive study on automated Dewey Decimal Classification (2009) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 3172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=3172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3172)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2269-2286
  4. Kishida, K.: High-speed rough clustering for very large document collections (2010) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 3463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=3463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3463)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1092-1104
  5. Fagni, T.; Sebastiani, F.: Selecting negative examples for hierarchical text classification: An experimental comparison (2010) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 4101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=4101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4101)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.11, S.2256-2265
  6. Qu, B.; Cong, G.; Li, C.; Sun, A.; Chen, H.: ¬An evaluation of classification models for question topic categorization (2012) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=237)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.889-903
  7. Alberts, I.; Forest, D.: Email pragmatics and automatic classification : a study in the organizational context (2012) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.904-922
  8. Wartena, C.; Sommer, M.: Automatic classification of scientific records using the German Subject Heading Authority File (SWD) (2012) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The following paper deals with an automatic text classification method which does not require training documents. For this method the German Subject Heading Authority File (SWD), provided by the linked data service of the German National Library is used. Recently the SWD was enriched with notations of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). In consequence it became possible to utilize the subject headings as textual representations for the notations of the DDC. Basically, we we derive the classification of a text from the classification of the words in the text given by the thesaurus. The method was tested by classifying 3826 OAI-Records from 7 different repositories. Mean reciprocal rank and recall were chosen as evaluation measure. Direct comparison to a machine learning method has shown that this method is definitely competitive. Thus we can conclude that the enriched version of the SWD provides high quality information with a broad coverage for classification of German scientific articles.
  9. Fang, H.: Classifying research articles in multidisciplinary sciences journals into subject categories (2015) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 2194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=2194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2194)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    In the Thomson Reuters Web of Science database, the subject categories of a journal are applied to all articles in the journal. However, many articles in multidisciplinary Sciences journals may only be represented by a small number of subject categories. To provide more accurate information on the research areas of articles in such journals, we can classify articles in these journals into subject categories as defined by Web of Science based on their references. For an article in a multidisciplinary sciences journal, the method counts the subject categories in all of the article's references indexed by Web of Science, and uses the most numerous subject categories of the references to determine the most appropriate classification of the article. We used articles in an issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) to validate the correctness of the method by comparing the obtained results with the categories of the articles as defined by PNAS and their content. This study shows that the method provides more precise search results for the subject category of interest in bibliometric investigations through recognition of articles in multidisciplinary sciences journals whose work relates to a particular subject category.
  10. Salles, T.; Rocha, L.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Almeida, J.M.; Mourão, F.; Meira Jr., W.; Viegas, F.: ¬A quantitative analysis of the temporal effects on automatic text classification (2016) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.7, S.1639-1667
  11. Suominen, A.; Toivanen, H.: Map of science with topic modeling : comparison of unsupervised learning and human-assigned subject classification (2016) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=3121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.10, S.2464-2476
  12. Wang, H.; Hong, M.: Supervised Hebb rule based feature selection for text classification (2019) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 56(2019) no.1, S.167-191
  13. Pech, G.; Delgado, C.; Sorella, S.P.: Classifying papers into subfields using Abstracts, Titles, Keywords and KeyWords Plus through pattern detection and optimization procedures : an application in Physics (2022) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.11, S.1513-1528
  14. Kragelj, M.; Borstnar, M.K.: Automatic classification of older electronic texts into the Universal Decimal Classification-UDC (2021) 0.00
    2.3867069E-4 = product of:
      0.0033413896 = sum of:
        0.0033413896 = weight(_text_:information in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033413896 = score(doc=175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this study is to develop a model for automated classification of old digitised texts to the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), using machine-learning methods. Design/methodology/approach The general research approach is inherent to design science research, in which the problem of UDC assignment of the old, digitised texts is addressed by developing a machine-learning classification model. A corpus of 70,000 scholarly texts, fully bibliographically processed by librarians, was used to train and test the model, which was used for classification of old texts on a corpus of 200,000 items. Human experts evaluated the performance of the model. Findings Results suggest that machine-learning models can correctly assign the UDC at some level for almost any scholarly text. Furthermore, the model can be recommended for the UDC assignment of older texts. Ten librarians corroborated this on 150 randomly selected texts. Research limitations/implications The main limitations of this study were unavailability of labelled older texts and the limited availability of librarians. Practical implications The classification model can provide a recommendation to the librarians during their classification work; furthermore, it can be implemented as an add-on to full-text search in the library databases. Social implications The proposed methodology supports librarians by recommending UDC classifiers, thus saving time in their daily work. By automatically classifying older texts, digital libraries can provide a better user experience by enabling structured searches. These contribute to making knowledge more widely available and useable. Originality/value These findings contribute to the field of automated classification of bibliographical information with the usage of full texts, especially in cases in which the texts are old, unstructured and in which archaic language and vocabulary are used.

Years

Languages

  • e 147
  • d 25
  • a 1
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 150
  • el 21
  • x 4
  • m 3
  • r 3
  • s 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…