-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.28
0.27833402 = product of:
0.77933526 = sum of:
0.15586706 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15586706 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20800096 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.15586706 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15586706 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20800096 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.15586706 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15586706 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20800096 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.15586706 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15586706 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20800096 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.15586706 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15586706 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20800096 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Wolfram, D.: Applied informetrics for information retrieval research (2003)
0.02
0.02168165 = product of:
0.10118103 = sum of:
0.032266766 = weight(_text_:system in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032266766 = score(doc=4589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
0.01736237 = weight(_text_:information in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01736237 = score(doc=4589,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
0.051551897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051551897 = score(doc=4589,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The author demonstrates how informetric analysis of information retrieval system content and use provides valuable insights that have applications for the modelling, design, and evaluation of information retrieval systems.
-
Quoniam, L.: Bibliometric law used for information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.011066877 = product of:
0.051645428 = sum of:
0.018822279 = weight(_text_:system in 1162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018822279 = score(doc=1162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 1162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1162)
0.008269517 = weight(_text_:information in 1162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008269517 = score(doc=1162,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1162, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1162)
0.024553634 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024553634 = score(doc=1162,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1162, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1162)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Zipf's law was used to qualify all the key words of documents in a data set. This qualification was used to build a graphical representation of the resulting indicator in each document. The graphical resolution leads to a document dispatch in a 3 dimensional space. This graphical representation was used as an information retrieval tool without using any keyword. The presentation of a case study is available on the WWW. The graph is drawn in VRML allowing a dynamic picture which is linked to a database management system (FreeWAIS)
-
Rees-Potter, L.K.: Dynamic thesaural systems : a bibliometric study of terminological and conceptual change in sociology and economics with application to the design of dynamic thesaural systems (1989)
0.01
0.010886654 = product of:
0.050804388 = sum of:
0.021511177 = weight(_text_:system in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021511177 = score(doc=5059,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
0.009450877 = weight(_text_:information in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009450877 = score(doc=5059,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
0.019842334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019842334 = score(doc=5059,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Thesauri have been used in the library and information science field to provide a standard descriptor language for indexers or searchers to use in an informations storage and retrieval system. One difficulty has been the maintenance and updating of thesauri since terms used to describe concepts change over time and vary between users. This study investigates a mechanism by which thesauri can be updated and maintained using citation, co-citation analysis and citation context analysis.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 25(1989) no.6, S.677-691
-
Stock, W.G.; Weber, S.: Facets of informetrics : Preface (2006)
0.01
0.0100526875 = product of:
0.04691254 = sum of:
0.024050226 = weight(_text_:system in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024050226 = score(doc=76,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.31124252 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.012941146 = weight(_text_:information in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012941146 = score(doc=76,freq=30.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3004734 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.009921167 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009921167 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- According to Jean M. Tague-Sutcliffe "informetrics" is "the study of the quantitative aspects of information in any form, not just records or bibliographies, and in any social group, not just scientists" (Tague-Sutcliffe, 1992, 1). Leo Egghe also defines "informetrics" in a very broad sense. "(W)e will use the term' informetrics' as the broad term comprising all-metrics studies related to information science, including bibliometrics (bibliographies, libraries,...), scientometrics (science policy, citation analysis, research evaluation,...), webometrics (metrics of the web, the Internet or other social networks such as citation or collaboration networks), ..." (Egghe, 2005b,1311). According to Concepcion S. Wilson "informetrics" is "the quantitative study of collections of moderatesized units of potentially informative text, directed to the scientific understanding of information processes at the social level" (Wilson, 1999, 211). We should add to Wilson's units of text also digital collections of images, videos, spoken documents and music. Dietmar Wolfram divides "informetrics" into two aspects, "system-based characteristics that arise from the documentary content of IR systems and how they are indexed, and usage-based characteristics that arise how users interact with system content and the system interfaces that provide access to the content" (Wolfram, 2003, 6). We would like to follow Tague-Sutcliffe, Egghe, Wilson and Wolfram (and others, for example Björneborn & Ingwersen, 2004) and call this broad research of empirical information science "informetrics". Informetrics includes therefore all quantitative studies in information science. If a scientist performs scientific investigations empirically, e.g. on information users' behavior, on scientific impact of academic journals, on the development of the patent application activity of a company, on links of Web pages, on the temporal distribution of blog postings discussing a given topic, on availability, recall and precision of retrieval systems, on usability of Web sites, and so on, he or she contributes to informetrics. We see three subject areas in information science in which such quantitative research takes place, - information users and information usage, - evaluation of information systems, - information itself, Following Wolfram's article, we divide his system-based characteristics into the "information itself "-category and the "information system"-category. Figure 1 is a simplistic graph of subjects and research areas of informetrics as an empirical information science.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.385-389
-
Lin, X.; White, H.D.; Buzydlowski, J.: Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching (2003)
0.01
0.009938354 = product of:
0.046378985 = sum of:
0.022816047 = weight(_text_:system in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022816047 = score(doc=1080,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.008681185 = weight(_text_:information in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008681185 = score(doc=1080,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.014881751 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014881751 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Author searching is traditionally based on the matching of name strings. Special characteristics of authors as personal names and subject indicators are not considered. This makes it difficult to identify a set of related authors or to group authors by subjects in retrieval systems. In this paper, we describe the design and implementation of a prototype visualization system to enhance author searching. The system, called AuthorLink, is based on author co-citation analysis and visualization mapping algorithms such as Kohonen's feature maps and Pathfinder networks. AuthorLink produces interactive author maps in real time from a database of 1.26 million records supplied by the Institute for Scientific Information. The maps show subject groupings and more fine-grained intellectual connections among authors. Through the interactive interface the user can take advantage of such information to refine queries and retrieve documents through point-and-click manipulation of the authors' names.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 39(2003) no.5, S.689-706
-
Tuomaala, O.; Järvelin, K.; Vakkari, P.: Evolution of library and information science, 1965-2005 : content analysis of journal articles (2014)
0.01
0.0097395945 = product of:
0.04545144 = sum of:
0.013444485 = weight(_text_:system in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013444485 = score(doc=1309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
0.014468643 = weight(_text_:information in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014468643 = score(doc=1309,freq=24.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
0.017538311 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017538311 = score(doc=1309,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This article first analyzes library and information science (LIS) research articles published in core LIS journals in 2005. It also examines the development of LIS from 1965 to 2005 in light of comparable data sets for 1965, 1985, and 2005. In both cases, the authors report (a) how the research articles are distributed by topic and (b) what approaches, research strategies, and methods were applied in the articles. In 2005, the largest research areas in LIS by this measure were information storage and retrieval, scientific communication, library and information-service activities, and information seeking. The same research areas constituted the quantitative core of LIS in the previous years since 1965. Information retrieval has been the most popular area of research over the years. The proportion of research on library and information-service activities decreased after 1985, but the popularity of information seeking and of scientific communication grew during the period studied. The viewpoint of research has shifted from library and information organizations to end users and development of systems for the latter. The proportion of empirical research strategies was high and rose over time, with the survey method being the single most important method. However, attention to evaluation and experiments increased considerably after 1985. Conceptual research strategies and system analysis, description, and design were quite popular, but declining. The most significant changes from 1965 to 2005 are the decreasing interest in library and information-service activities and the growth of research into information seeking and scientific communication.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.7, S.1446-1462
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008)
0.01
0.009643741 = product of:
0.045004122 = sum of:
0.027943838 = weight(_text_:system in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027943838 = score(doc=2758,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.0070881573 = weight(_text_:information in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070881573 = score(doc=2758,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.009972124 = product of:
0.019944249 = sum of:
0.019944249 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019944249 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- A representation of science as a citation density landscape is proposed and scaling rules with the field-specific citation density as a main topological property are investigated. The focus is on the size-dependence of several main bibliometric indicators for a large set of research groups while distinguishing between top-performance and lower-performance groups. It is demonstrated that this representation of the science system is particularly effective to understand the role and the interdependencies of the different bibliometric indicators and related topological properties of the landscape.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:03:12
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.4, S.565-576
-
Kronegger, L.; Mali, F.; Ferligoj, A.; Doreian, P.: Classifying scientific disciplines in Slovenia : a study of the evolution of collaboration structures (2015)
0.01
0.009643741 = product of:
0.045004122 = sum of:
0.027943838 = weight(_text_:system in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027943838 = score(doc=1639,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
0.0070881573 = weight(_text_:information in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070881573 = score(doc=1639,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
0.009972124 = product of:
0.019944249 = sum of:
0.019944249 = weight(_text_:22 in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019944249 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- We explore classifying scientific disciplines including their temporal features by focusing on their collaboration structures over time. Bibliometric data for Slovenian researchers registered at the Slovenian Research Agency were used. These data were obtained from the Slovenian National Current Research Information System. We applied a recently developed hierarchical clustering procedure for symbolic data to the coauthorship structure of scientific disciplines. To track temporal changes, we divided data for the period 1986-2010 into five 5-year time periods. The clusters of disciplines for the Slovene science system revealed 5 clusters of scientific disciplines that, in large measure, correspond with the official national classification of sciences. However, there were also some significant differences pointing to the need for a dynamic classification system of sciences to better characterize them. Implications stemming from these results, especially with regard to classifying scientific disciplines, understanding the collaborative structure of science, and research and development policies, are discussed.
- Date
- 21. 1.2015 14:55:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.2, S.321-339
-
Harter, S.P.; Cheng, Y.-R.: Colinked descriptors : improving vocabulary selection for end-user searching (1996)
0.01
0.009485896 = product of:
0.044267513 = sum of:
0.016133383 = weight(_text_:system in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016133383 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.0070881573 = weight(_text_:information in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070881573 = score(doc=4216,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.021045974 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021045974 = score(doc=4216,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This article introduces a new concept and technique for information retrieval called 'colinked descriptors'. Borrowed from an analogous idea in bibliometrics - cocited references - colinked descriptors provide a theory and method for identifying search terms that, by hypothesis, will be superior to those entered initially by a searcher. The theory suggests a means of moving automatically from 2 or more initial search terms, to other terms that should be superior in retrieval performance to the 2 original terms. A research project designed to test this colinked descriptor hypothesis is reported. The results suggest that the approach is effective, although methodological problems in testing the idea are reported. Algorithms to generate colinked descriptors can be incorporated easily into system interfaces, front-end or pre-search systems, or help software, in any database that employs a thesaurus. The potential use of colinked descriptors is a strong argument for building richer and more complex thesauri that reflect as many legitimate links among descriptors as possible
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.311-325
-
Glänzel, W.: Bibliometrics-aided retrieval - where information retrieval meets scientometrics (2015)
0.01
0.009389745 = product of:
0.06572821 = sum of:
0.014176315 = weight(_text_:information in 1690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014176315 = score(doc=1690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1690)
0.051551897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051551897 = score(doc=1690,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 1690, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1690)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue "Combining bibliometrics and information retrieval"
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009)
0.01
0.008544928 = product of:
0.03987633 = sum of:
0.022816047 = weight(_text_:system in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022816047 = score(doc=2761,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.0070881573 = weight(_text_:information in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070881573 = score(doc=2761,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.009972124 = product of:
0.019944249 = sum of:
0.019944249 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019944249 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- International co-authorship relations and university-industry-government (Triple Helix) relations have hitherto been studied separately. Using Japanese publication data for the 1981-2004 period, we were able to study both kinds of relations in a single design. In the Japanese file, 1,277,030 articles with at least one Japanese address were attributed to the three sectors, and we know additionally whether these papers were coauthored internationally. Using the mutual information in three and four dimensions, respectively, we show that the Japanese Triple-Helix system has been continuously eroded at the national level. However, since the mid-1990s, international coauthorship relations have contributed to a reduction of the uncertainty at the national level. In other words, the national publication system of Japan has developed a capacity to retain surplus value generated internationally. In a final section, we compare these results with an analysis based on similar data for Canada. A relative uncoupling of national university-industry-government relations because of international collaborations is indicated in both countries.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:07:20
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.778-788
-
Eijk, C.C. van der; Mulligen, E.M. van; Kors, J.A.; Mons, B.; Berg, J. van den: Constructing an associative concept space for literature-based discovery (2004)
0.01
0.008506355 = product of:
0.03969632 = sum of:
0.016133383 = weight(_text_:system in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016133383 = score(doc=2228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
0.008681185 = weight(_text_:information in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008681185 = score(doc=2228,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
0.014881751 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014881751 = score(doc=2228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Scientific literature is often fragmented, which implies that certain scientific questions can only be answered by combining information from various articles. In this paper, a new algorithm is proposed for finding associations between related concepts present in literature. To this end, concepts are mapped to a multidimensional space by a Hebbian type of learning algorithm using co-occurrence data as input. The resulting concept space allows exploration of the neighborhood of a concept and finding potentially novel relationships between concepts. The obtained information retrieval system is useful for finding literature supporting hypotheses and for discovering previously unknown relationships between concepts. Tests an artificial data show the potential of the proposed methodology. In addition, preliminary tests an a set of Medline abstracts yield promising results.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.5, S.436-444
-
Mayr, P.; Scharnhorst, A.: Scientometrics and information retrieval - weak-links revitalized (2015)
0.01
0.008038323 = product of:
0.05626826 = sum of:
0.014176315 = weight(_text_:information in 1688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014176315 = score(doc=1688,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1688, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1688)
0.042091947 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042091947 = score(doc=1688,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 1688, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1688)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Editorial zu einem Special Issue "Combining bibliometrics and information retrieval"
-
Wolfram, D.: ¬The symbiotic relationship between information retrieval and informetrics (2015)
0.01
0.008038323 = product of:
0.05626826 = sum of:
0.014176315 = weight(_text_:information in 1689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014176315 = score(doc=1689,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1689, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1689)
0.042091947 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042091947 = score(doc=1689,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 1689, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1689)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue "Combining bibliometrics and information retrieval"
-
Abbasi, M. K.; Frommholz, I.: Cluster-based polyrepresentation as science modelling approach for information retrieval (2015)
0.01
0.008038323 = product of:
0.05626826 = sum of:
0.014176315 = weight(_text_:information in 1691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014176315 = score(doc=1691,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1691, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1691)
0.042091947 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042091947 = score(doc=1691,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 1691, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1691)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue "Combining bibliometrics and information retrieval"
-
Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011)
0.01
0.007985508 = product of:
0.037265703 = sum of:
0.008269517 = weight(_text_:information in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008269517 = score(doc=4188,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
0.017362041 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017362041 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
0.011634145 = product of:
0.02326829 = sum of:
0.02326829 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02326829 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This article aims to identify whether different weighted PageRank algorithms can be applied to author citation networks to measure the popularity and prestige of a scholar from a citation perspective. Information retrieval (IR) was selected as a test field and data from 1956-2008 were collected from Web of Science. Weighted PageRank with citation and publication as weighted vectors were calculated on author citation networks. The results indicate that both popularity rank and prestige rank were highly correlated with the weighted PageRank. Principal component analysis was conducted to detect relationships among these different measures. For capturing prize winners within the IR field, prestige rank outperformed all the other measures
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:02:21
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.236-245
-
White, H. D.: Co-cited author retrieval and relevance theory : examples from the humanities (2015)
0.01
0.0074451594 = product of:
0.052116115 = sum of:
0.0100241685 = weight(_text_:information in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0100241685 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
0.042091947 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042091947 = score(doc=1687,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue "Combining bibliometrics and information retrieval"
-
White, H.D.: Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis : a remapping of paradigmatic information scientists (2003)
0.01
0.0073284465 = product of:
0.034199417 = sum of:
0.013444485 = weight(_text_:system in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013444485 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
0.008353474 = weight(_text_:information in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008353474 = score(doc=1459,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
0.012401459 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012401459 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- In their 1998 article "Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation analysis of information science, 1972-1995," White and McCain used multidimensional scaling, hierarchical clustering, and factor analysis to display the specialty groupings of 120 highly-cited ("paradigmatic") information scientists. These statistical techniques are traditional in author cocitation analysis (ACA). It is shown here that a newer technique, Pathfinder Networks (PFNETs), has considerable advantages for ACA. In PFNETs, nodes represent authors, and explicit links represent weighted paths between nodes, the weights in this case being cocitation counts. The links can be drawn to exclude all but the single highest counts for author pairs, which reduces a network of authors to only the most salient relationships. When these are mapped, dominant authors can be defined as those with relatively many links to other authors (i.e., high degree centrality). Links between authors and dominant authors define specialties, and links between dominant authors connect specialties into a discipline. Maps are made with one rather than several computer routines and in one rather than many computer passes. Also, PFNETs can, and should, be generated from matrices of raw counts rather than Pearson correlations, which removes a computational step associated with traditional ACA. White and McCain's raw data from 1998 are remapped as a PFNET. It is shown that the specialty groupings correspond closely to those seen in the factor analysis of the 1998 article. Because PFNETs are fast to compute, they are used in AuthorLink, a new Web-based system that creates live interfaces for cocited author retrieval an the fly.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.423-434
-
Della Mea, V.; Demartini, G.; Di Gaspero, L.; Mizzaro, S.: Measuring retrieval effectiveness with Average Distance Measure (ADM) (2006)
0.01
0.0072167963 = product of:
0.05051757 = sum of:
0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011694863 = score(doc=774,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
0.038822707 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038822707 = score(doc=774,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Most common effectiveness measures for information retrieval systems are based on the assumptions of binary relevance (either a document is relevant to a given query or it is not) and binary retrieval (either a document is retrieved or it is not). In this paper, we describe an information retrieval effectiveness measure named ADM (Average Distance Measure) that questions these assumptions. We compare ADM with other measures, discuss it from a conceptual point of view, and report some experimental results. Both conceptual analysis and experimental evidence demonstrate ADM adequacy in measuring the effectiveness of information retrieval systems.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.433-443
