Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2012) 0.01
    0.0052309306 = product of:
      0.03661651 = sum of:
        0.011813596 = weight(_text_:information in 3802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011813596 = score(doc=3802,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 3802, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3802)
        0.024802918 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024802918 = score(doc=3802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3802)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  2. Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2016) 0.01
    0.005135515 = product of:
      0.0359486 = sum of:
        0.014468643 = weight(_text_:information in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014468643 = score(doc=3803,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
        0.021479957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021479957 = score(doc=3803,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The 4th edition of this popular and well-cited text is now co-authored, and includes significant changes from earlier texts. Presenting a comprehensive review of over a century of research on information behavior (IB), this book is intended for students in information studies and disciplines interested in research on information activities. The initial two chapters introduce IB as a multi-disciplinary topic, the 3rd provides a brief history of research on information seeking. Chapter four discusses what is meant by the terms "information" and "knowledge. "Chapter five discusses "information needs," and how they are addressed. The 6th chapter identifies many related concepts. Twelve models of information behavior (expanded from earlier editions) are illustrated in chapter seven. Chapter eight reviews various paradigms and theories informing IB research. Chapter nine examines research methods invoked in IB studies and a discussion of qualitative and mixed approaches. The 10th chapter gives examples of IB studies by context. The final chapter looks at strengths and weaknesses, recent trends, and future development.
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval
    Series
    Studies in information
    Subject
    Information Retrieval
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  3. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.00
    0.0049947365 = product of:
      0.034963153 = sum of:
        0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011694863 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
        0.02326829 = product of:
          0.04653658 = sum of:
            0.04653658 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04653658 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02453417 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.367-430
  4. Sugimoto, C.R.; Work, S.; Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.: Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics : A review of the literature (2017) 0.00
    0.0039754473 = product of:
      0.02782813 = sum of:
        0.022816047 = weight(_text_:system in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022816047 = score(doc=3781,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
        0.0050120843 = weight(_text_:information in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050120843 = score(doc=3781,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Social media has become integrated into the fabric of the scholarly communication system in fundamental ways, principally through scholarly use of social media platforms and the promotion of new indicators on the basis of interactions with these platforms. Research and scholarship in this area has accelerated since the coining and subsequent advocacy for altmetrics-that is, research indicators based on social media activity. This review provides an extensive account of the state-of-the art in both scholarly use of social media and altmetrics. The review consists of 2 main parts: the first examines the use of social media in academia, reviewing the various functions these platforms have in the scholarly communication process and the factors that affect this use. The second part reviews empirical studies of altmetrics, discussing the various interpretations of altmetrics, data collection and methodological limitations, and differences according to platform. The review ends with a critical discussion of the implications of this transformation in the scholarly communication system.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.9, S.2037-2062
  5. Winget, M.A.: Videogame preservation and massively multiplayer online role-playing games : a review of the literature (2011) 0.00
    0.003317363 = product of:
      0.023221541 = sum of:
        0.016133383 = weight(_text_:system in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016133383 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
        0.0070881573 = weight(_text_:information in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070881573 = score(doc=4760,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Videogames are important cultural and economic artifacts. They also present challenges that anticipate the problems inherent in any complex digital interactive system. Not only are they digital and hence very difficult to preserve but they also are software systems that have significant hardware, peripheral, and network dependencies, which are difficult to collect and formally represent. This article reviews the literature related to videogame preservation. In addition to covering the traditional technology-related issues inherent in all digital preservation endeavors, this review also attempts to describe the complexities and relationships between the traditional acts of technology preservation, representation, and collection development. Future work should include the identification of important user groups, an examination of games' context of use, and the development of representational models to describe interaction of players with the game and the interactions between players playing the game.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.1869-1883
  6. Fagan, J.C.: Usability studies of faceted browsing : a literature review (2010) 0.00
    0.0033156392 = product of:
      0.023209473 = sum of:
        0.0058474317 = weight(_text_:information in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058474317 = score(doc=4396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
        0.017362041 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017362041 = score(doc=4396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 2010, June, S.58-66
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  7. Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015) 0.00
    0.0028433804 = product of:
      0.019903662 = sum of:
        0.008269517 = weight(_text_:information in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008269517 = score(doc=2092,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
        0.011634145 = product of:
          0.02326829 = sum of:
            0.02326829 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02326829 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02453417 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The object of this literature review is to provide a historical perspective of R and D work in the area of Knowledge Organization (KO). This overview/summarization will provide information on major areas of KO. Journal articles published in core areas of KO: (Classification, Indexing, Thesauri and Taxonomies, Internet and Subject approach to information in the electronic era and Ontologies will be predominantly covered in this literature review. Coverage in this overview may not be completely exhaustive, but it succinctly showcases major developments in the area of KO. This review is a good source of additional reading material on KO apart from prescribed reading material on KO
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:13:38
  8. Caidi, N.; Allard, D.; Quirke, L.: Information practices of information (2010) 0.00
    0.0014468642 = product of:
      0.020256098 = sum of:
        0.020256098 = weight(_text_:information in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020256098 = score(doc=4204,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.47031528 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010), S.xxx-xxx
  9. Furner, J.: Philosophy and information studies (2010) 0.00
    0.0011813596 = product of:
      0.016539034 = sum of:
        0.016539034 = weight(_text_:information in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016539034 = score(doc=1559,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.159-200
  10. Brown, C.: Communication in the sciences (2010) 0.00
    9.5468276E-4 = product of:
      0.013365558 = sum of:
        0.013365558 = weight(_text_:information in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013365558 = score(doc=4205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010), S.xxx-xxx
  11. Kurtz, M.; Bollen, J.: Usage bibliometrics (2010) 0.00
    9.5468276E-4 = product of:
      0.013365558 = sum of:
        0.013365558 = weight(_text_:information in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013365558 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010), S.xxx-xxx
  12. Meschede, C.; Henkel, C.M.: Library and information science and sustainable development : a structured literature review (2019) 0.00
    8.438283E-4 = product of:
      0.011813596 = sum of:
        0.011813596 = weight(_text_:information in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011813596 = score(doc=5472,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Awareness on and importance of sustainability in all aspects of our lives is becoming more and more important. The question arises, how - not if - scientists can contribute to a sustainable development. As information plays an important role for development, information scientists should be included in this debate. However, is there a sustainable information science or an information science of sustainability? The purpose of this paper is to perform a mapping of publications in library and information science (LIS) directly dealing with sustainability and sustainable development. Design/methodology/approach A structured literature review was conducted, enhanced by bibliometric analyses. For this purpose, 102 LIS journals and conferences were considered. The authors identified 81 publications dealing with sustainability and sustainable development and analyzed the concrete contents and methodological approaches of these. Findings A large proportion of articles could be found dealing with sustainable development and libraries. Other publications focus on information and communication technology or information systems. Only few articles deal with further topics like government, urban development or scientific output. Research limitations/implications Sustainability and sustainable development are complex topics. This work only considers literature whose title or keywords contain the string sustainab*. Originality/value The presented work helps to get an overview on sustainability research and activities in the LIS field and additionally, potential research gaps may be identified. The authors call for more research in this area and concrete ideas to help develop a sustainable future.
  13. Wacholder, N.: Interactive query formulation (2011) 0.00
    8.353474E-4 = product of:
      0.011694863 = sum of:
        0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 4196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011694863 = score(doc=4196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4196)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.157-196
  14. LaBarre, K.: Facet analysis (2010) 0.00
    8.353474E-4 = product of:
      0.011694863 = sum of:
        0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 1596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011694863 = score(doc=1596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1596)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.243-284
  15. Ekbia, H.: Fifty years of research in artificial intelligence (2010) 0.00
    8.353474E-4 = product of:
      0.011694863 = sum of:
        0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 1598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011694863 = score(doc=1598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1598)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.201-242
  16. Blake, C.: Text mining (2011) 0.00
    8.353474E-4 = product of:
      0.011694863 = sum of:
        0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 1599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011694863 = score(doc=1599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1599)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.121-155
  17. Bornmann, L.: Scientific peer review (2011) 0.00
    8.353474E-4 = product of:
      0.011694863 = sum of:
        0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 1600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011694863 = score(doc=1600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1600)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.197-245
  18. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.00
    8.310104E-4 = product of:
      0.011634145 = sum of:
        0.011634145 = product of:
          0.02326829 = sum of:
            0.02326829 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02326829 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02453417 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Egghe, L.: ¬The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010) 0.00
    7.160121E-4 = product of:
      0.0100241685 = sum of:
        0.0100241685 = weight(_text_:information in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0100241685 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.65-114
  20. Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014) 0.00
    7.1229466E-4 = product of:
      0.009972124 = sum of:
        0.009972124 = product of:
          0.019944249 = sum of:
            0.019944249 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019944249 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02453417 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22