-
Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997)
0.01
0.014190985 = product of:
0.049668446 = sum of:
0.016133383 = weight(_text_:system in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016133383 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.008681185 = weight(_text_:information in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008681185 = score(doc=2246,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.014881751 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014881751 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.009972124 = product of:
0.019944249 = sum of:
0.019944249 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019944249 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses the apparently unattainable goal of compatibility of information languages. While controlled languages can improve retrieval performance within a single system, they make cooperation across different systems more difficult. The Internet and downloading accentuate this adverse outcome and the acceleration of data exchange aggravates the problem of compatibility. Defines this familiar concept and demonstrates that coherence is just as necessary as it was for indexing languages, the proliferation of which has created confusion in grouped data banks. Describes 2 types of potential solutions, similar to those applied to automatic translation of natural languages: - harmonizing the information languages themselves, both difficult and expensive, or, the more flexible solution involving automatic harmonization of indexing formulae based on pre established concordance tables. However, structural incompatibilities between post coordinated languages and classifications may lead any harmonization tools up a blind alley, while the paths of a universal concordance model are rare and narrow
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Integration of information data banks and compatibility of indexing languages
-
Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval (2002)
0.01
0.012989433 = product of:
0.06061735 = sum of:
0.016133383 = weight(_text_:system in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016133383 = score(doc=1201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.011207362 = weight(_text_:information in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011207362 = score(doc=1201,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.033276606 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033276606 = score(doc=1201,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Thesaural relations have long been used in information retrieval to enrich queries; they have sometimes been used to cluster documents as well. Sometimes the first query to an information retrieval system yields no results at all, or, what can be even more disconcerting, many thousands of hits. One solution is to rephrase the query, improving the choice of query terms by using related terms of different types. A collection of related terms is often called a thesaurus. This chapter describes the lexical-semantic relations that have been used in building thesauri and summarizes some of the effects of using these relational thesauri in information retrieval experiments
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Melton, J.S.: ¬A use for the techniques of structural linguistics in documentation research (1965)
0.01
0.0122028245 = product of:
0.056946512 = sum of:
0.030421399 = weight(_text_:system in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030421399 = score(doc=834,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006682779 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.019842334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019842334 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Index language (the system of symbols for representing subject content after analysis) is considered as a separate component and a variable in an information retrieval system. It is suggested that for purposes of testing, comparing and evaluating index language, the techniques of structural linguistics may provide a descriptive methodology by which all such languages (hierarchical and faceted classification, analytico-synthetic indexing, traditional subject indexing, indexes and classifications based on automatic text analysis, etc.) could be described in term of a linguistic model, and compared on a common basis
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.01
0.011431382 = product of:
0.040009834 = sum of:
0.013309361 = weight(_text_:system in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013309361 = score(doc=3644,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.17224117 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.0058474317 = weight(_text_:information in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058474317 = score(doc=3644,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.01503597 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01503597 = score(doc=3644,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20260347 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.0058170725 = product of:
0.011634145 = sum of:
0.011634145 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011634145 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
-
Farradane, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval (1967)
0.01
0.009378044 = product of:
0.065646306 = sum of:
0.016539034 = weight(_text_:information in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016539034 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
0.04910727 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04910727 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967) S.297-314
-
Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996)
0.01
0.0080088675 = product of:
0.056062073 = sum of:
0.037258454 = weight(_text_:system in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037258454 = score(doc=2943,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.48217484 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.018803619 = product of:
0.037607238 = sum of:
0.037607238 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037607238 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Describes the developments of the Statistical System for Subject Designation (SSSD): a syntactical system for subject designation for libraries in Croatia, based on the construction of subject headings in agreement with the theory of the sentence nature of subject headings. The discussion is preceded by a brief summary of theories underlying basic principles and fundamental rules of the alphabetical subject catalogue
- Date
- 31. 7.2006 14:22:21
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
-
Fox, E.A.: Lexical relations : enhancing effectiveness of information retrieval systems (1980)
0.01
0.0075786044 = product of:
0.053050227 = sum of:
0.013365558 = weight(_text_:information in 5310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013365558 = score(doc=5310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5310)
0.03968467 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03968467 = score(doc=5310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5310)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.01
0.0074664894 = product of:
0.034843616 = sum of:
0.0058474317 = weight(_text_:information in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058474317 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.017362041 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017362041 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.011634145 = product of:
0.02326829 = sum of:
0.02326829 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02326829 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- A thesaurus in the controlled vocabulary environment is a tool designed to support effective infonnation retrieval (IR) by guiding indexers and searchers consistently to choose the same terms for expressing a given concept or combination of concepts. Terms in the thesaurus are linked by relationships of three well-known types: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. The functions and properties of these three basic types and some subcategories are described, as well as some additional relationship types conunonly found in thesauri. Progressive automation of IR processes and the capability for simultaneous searching of vast networked resources are creating some pressures for change in the categorization and consistency of relationships.
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.01
0.0074664894 = product of:
0.034843616 = sum of:
0.0058474317 = weight(_text_:information in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058474317 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.017362041 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017362041 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.011634145 = product of:
0.02326829 = sum of:
0.02326829 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02326829 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Relationships in the organization of knowledge (2001)
0.01
0.007088628 = product of:
0.033080265 = sum of:
0.013444485 = weight(_text_:system in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013444485 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
0.0072343214 = weight(_text_:information in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072343214 = score(doc=1139,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
0.012401459 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012401459 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- With fourteen contributions grouped in two sections, "Theoretical background" and "Systems", this work discusses the most common relationships used in the organization of recorded knowledge to facilitate information retrieval: the relationships between bibliographic entities, intra- and intertextual relationships, relevance relationships, and subject relationships in thesauri and other classificatory structures. The editors' goal is to "spur further interest, debate, research, and development".
- Content
- Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: GREEN, R.: Relationships in the organization of knowledge: an overview; TILLETT, B.: Bibliographic relationships; CLARKE, S.G.D.: Thesaural relationships; MILSTEAD, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms; HUDON, M.: Relationships in multilingual thesauri; BODENREIDER, O. u. C.A. BEAN: Relationships among knowledge structures: vocabulary integration within a subject domain; BEGHTOL, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning; BEAN, C.A. u. R. GREEN: Relevance relationships; EL-HOSHY, L.M.: Relationships in Library of Congress Subject Headings; MOLHOLT, P.: The Art and Architecture Thesaurus: controlling relationships through rules and structure; NELSON, S.J. u.a.: Relationships in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH); NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Lateral relationships in multicultural, mulrilingual databases in the spiritual and religous domains: the OM information service; SATIJA, M.P.: Relationships in Ranganathan's Colon classification; MITCHELL, J.S.: Relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification System
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
-
Kuhlen, R.: Linguistische Grundlagen (1980)
0.01
0.007048489 = product of:
0.04933942 = sum of:
0.037644558 = weight(_text_:system in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037644558 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011694863 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: eine Einführung. 2. Aufl
- Theme
- Preserved Context Index System (PRECIS)
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The analytico-synthetic foundation for large indexing & information retrieval systems : dedicated to Prof. Dr. Werner Schultheis, the vigorous initiator of modern chem. documentation in Germany on the occasion of his 85th birthday (1983)
0.01
0.00704444 = product of:
0.04931108 = sum of:
0.014943148 = weight(_text_:information in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014943148 = score(doc=215,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.03436793 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03436793 = score(doc=215,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- LCSH
- Information retrieval
- RSWK
- Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
- Subject
- Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
Information retrieval
-
Lopes, M.I.: Principles underlying subject heading languages : an international approach (1996)
0.01
0.0069848886 = product of:
0.04889422 = sum of:
0.018822279 = weight(_text_:system in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018822279 = score(doc=5608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
0.03007194 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03007194 = score(doc=5608,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses the problems in establishing commonly accepted principles for subject retrieval between different bibliographic systems. The Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages was established to devise general principles for any subject retrieval system and to review existing real systems in the light of such principles and compare them in order to evaluate the extent of their coverage and their application in current practices. Provides a background and history of the Working Group. Discusses the principles underlying subject headings and their purposes and the state of the work and major findings
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Kobrin, R.Y.: On the principles of terminological work in the creation of thesauri for information retrieval systems (1979)
0.01
0.0066312784 = product of:
0.046418946 = sum of:
0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011694863 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
0.034724083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034724083 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Salton, G.: Experiments in automatic thesaurus construction for information retrieval (1972)
0.01
0.0066312784 = product of:
0.046418946 = sum of:
0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 5314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011694863 = score(doc=5314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5314)
0.034724083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034724083 = score(doc=5314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5314)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Maniez, J.: Actualité des langages documentaires : fondements théoriques de la recherche d'information (2002)
0.01
0.0062771165 = product of:
0.043939814 = sum of:
0.014176315 = weight(_text_:information in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014176315 = score(doc=887,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.029763501 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029763501 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Actuality of information languages: theoretical foundation of information retrieval
-
Khoo, S.G.; Na, J.-C.: Semantic relations in information science (2006)
0.01
0.006271343 = product of:
0.029266268 = sum of:
0.008066691 = weight(_text_:system in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008066691 = score(doc=1978,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.104393914 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
0.008311601 = weight(_text_:information in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008311601 = score(doc=1978,freq=22.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.19298252 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
0.012887974 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012887974 = score(doc=1978,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.17366013 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This chapter examines the nature of semantic relations and their main applications in information science. The nature and types of semantic relations are discussed from the perspectives of linguistics and psychology. An overview of the semantic relations used in knowledge structures such as thesauri and ontologies is provided, as well as the main techniques used in the automatic extraction of semantic relations from text. The chapter then reviews the use of semantic relations in information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and automatic text summarization applications. Concepts and relations are the foundation of knowledge and thought. When we look at the world, we perceive not a mass of colors but objects to which we automatically assign category labels. Our perceptual system automatically segments the world into concepts and categories. Concepts are the building blocks of knowledge; relations act as the cement that links concepts into knowledge structures. We spend much of our lives identifying regular associations and relations between objects, events, and processes so that the world has an understandable structure and predictability. Our lives and work depend on the accuracy and richness of this knowledge structure and its web of relations. Relations are needed for reasoning and inferencing. Chaffin and Herrmann (1988b, p. 290) noted that "relations between ideas have long been viewed as basic to thought, language, comprehension, and memory." Aristotle's Metaphysics (Aristotle, 1961; McKeon, expounded on several types of relations. The majority of the 30 entries in a section of the Metaphysics known today as the Philosophical Lexicon referred to relations and attributes, including cause, part-whole, same and opposite, quality (i.e., attribute) and kind-of, and defined different types of each relation. Hume (1955) pointed out that there is a connection between successive ideas in our minds, even in our dreams, and that the introduction of an idea in our mind automatically recalls an associated idea. He argued that all the objects of human reasoning are divided into relations of ideas and matters of fact and that factual reasoning is founded on the cause-effect relation. His Treatise of Human Nature identified seven kinds of relations: resemblance, identity, relations of time and place, proportion in quantity or number, degrees in quality, contrariety, and causation. Mill (1974, pp. 989-1004) discoursed on several types of relations, claiming that all things are either feelings, substances, or attributes, and that attributes can be a quality (which belongs to one object) or a relation to other objects.
Linguists in the structuralist tradition (e.g., Lyons, 1977; Saussure, 1959) have asserted that concepts cannot be defined on their own but only in relation to other concepts. Semantic relations appear to reflect a logical structure in the fundamental nature of thought (Caplan & Herrmann, 1993). Green, Bean, and Myaeng (2002) noted that semantic relations play a critical role in how we represent knowledge psychologically, linguistically, and computationally, and that many systems of knowledge representation start with a basic distinction between entities and relations. Green (2001, p. 3) said that "relationships are involved as we combine simple entities to form more complex entities, as we compare entities, as we group entities, as one entity performs a process on another entity, and so forth. Indeed, many things that we might initially regard as basic and elemental are revealed upon further examination to involve internal structure, or in other words, internal relationships." Concepts and relations are often expressed in language and text. Language is used not just for communicating concepts and relations, but also for representing, storing, and reasoning with concepts and relations. We shall examine the nature of semantic relations from a linguistic and psychological perspective, with an emphasis on relations expressed in text. The usefulness of semantic relations in information science, especially in ontology construction, information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and text summarization is discussed. Research and development in information science have focused on concepts and terms, but the focus will increasingly shift to the identification, processing, and management of relations to achieve greater effectiveness and refinement in information science techniques. Previous chapters in ARIST on natural language processing (Chowdhury, 2003), text mining (Trybula, 1999), information retrieval and the philosophy of language (Blair, 2003), and query expansion (Efthimiadis, 1996) provide a background for this discussion, as semantic relations are an important part of these applications.
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.157-228
-
Miller, U.; Teitelbaum, R.: Pre-coordination and post-coordination : past and future (2002)
0.01
0.0059666866 = product of:
0.041766804 = sum of:
0.011694863 = weight(_text_:information in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011694863 = score(doc=1395,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
0.03007194 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03007194 = score(doc=1395,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This article deals with the meaningful processing of information in relation to two systems of Information processing: pre-coordination and post-coordination. The different approaches are discussed, with emphasis an the need for a controlled vocabulary in information retrieval. Assigned indexing, which employs a controlled vocabulary, is described in detail. Types of indexing language can be divided into two broad groups - those using pre-coordinated terms and those depending an post-coordination. They represent two different basic approaches in processing and Information retrieval. The historical development of these two approaches is described, as well as the two tools that apply to these approaches: thesauri and subject headings.
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Takeda, N.: Problems in hierarchical structures in thesauri : their influences on the results of information retrieval (1994)
0.01
0.0058643874 = product of:
0.04105071 = sum of:
0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006682779 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
0.03436793 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03436793 = score(doc=2642,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- In online retrieval search results do not always match the intent in spite of using correct keywords (descriptors). One of the causes of this problem is found in the hierarchical structures of the thesaurus, which often contains relations between broader and narrower concepts, the opposite of which is not necessarily true. Some examples are described from 2 thesauri, MeSH and JICST. In these cases searchers need to make an effort to increase precision
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Rolling, L.: ¬The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies (1985)
0.01
0.005443327 = product of:
0.025402194 = sum of:
0.010755588 = weight(_text_:system in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010755588 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
0.0047254385 = weight(_text_:information in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047254385 = score(doc=3646,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
0.009921167 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009921167 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The use of diagrams to express relationships in classification is not new. Many classificationists have used this approach, but usually in a minor display to make a point or for part of a difficult relational situation. Ranganathan, for example, used diagrams for some of his more elusive concepts. The thesaurus in particular and subject headings in general, with direct and indirect crossreferences or equivalents, need many more diagrams than normally are included to make relationships and even semantics clear. A picture very often is worth a thousand words. Rolling has used directed graphs (arrowgraphs) to join terms as a practical method for rendering relationships between indexing terms lucid. He has succeeded very weIl in this endeavor. Four diagrams in this selection are all that one needs to explain how to employ the system; from initial listing to completed arrowgraph. The samples of his work include illustration of off-page connectors between arrowgraphs. The great advantage to using diagrams like this is that they present relations between individual terms in a format that is easy to comprehend. But of even greater value is the fact that one can use his arrowgraphs as schematics for making three-dimensional wire-and-ball models, in which the relationships may be seen even more clearly. In fact, errors or gaps in relations are much easier to find with this methodology. One also can get across the notion of the threedimensionality of classification systems with such models. Pettee's "hand reaching up and over" (q.v.) is not a figment of the imagination. While the actual hand is a wire or stick, the concept visualized is helpful in illuminating the three-dimensional figure that is latent in all systems that have cross-references or "broader," "narrower," or, especially, "related" terms. Classification schedules, being hemmed in by the dimensions of the printed page, also benefit from such physical illustrations. Rolling, an engineer by conviction, was the developer of information systems for the Cobalt Institute, the European Atomic Energy Community, and European Coal and Steel Community. He also developed and promoted computer-aided translation at the Commission of the European Communities in Luxembourg. One of his objectives has always been to increase the efficiency of mono- and multilingual thesauri for use in multinational information systems.
