Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Brembs, B.; Förstner, K.; Kraker, P.; Lauer, G.; Müller-Birn, C.; Schönbrodt, F.; Siems, R.: Auf einmal Laborratte (2021) 0.02 
    0.02250423 = product of:
  0.13502537 = sum of:
    0.13502537 = weight(_text_:forschung in 83) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13502537 = score(doc=83,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17763087 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036512498 = queryNorm
        0.76014584 = fieldWeight in 83, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=83)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Die großen Verlage haben ein neues Geschäftsfeld entdeckt: die Überwachung von Wissenschaftlern und den Verkauf ihrer Daten. Sie nehmen dadurch weitreichenden Einfluss auf die Forschung. Die Europäische Union muss dringend eingreifen.
    Series
    Forschung und Lehre
  2. Reuß, R.: ¬Der Geist gehört dem Staat : Open Access (2015) 0.02 
    0.015912894 = product of:
  0.09547736 = sum of:
    0.09547736 = weight(_text_:forschung in 2512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09547736 = score(doc=2512,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17763087 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036512498 = queryNorm
        0.5375043 = fieldWeight in 2512, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2512)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/forschung-und-lehre/baden-wuerttemberg-entrechtet-seine-wissenschaftlichen-autoren-13988149-p3.html?printPagedArticle=true#pageIndex_3
  3. Euler, E.: Open-Access-Strategie des Landes Brandenburg (2019) 0.01 
    0.013780969 = product of:
  0.08268581 = sum of:
    0.08268581 = weight(_text_:forschung in 5367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08268581 = score(doc=5367,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.17763087 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036512498 = queryNorm
        0.46549237 = fieldWeight in 5367, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5367)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Das vorliegende Papier ist das Ergebnis eines durch das MWFK Brandenburg geförderten Projektes, das seit November 2018 unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. jur. Ellen Euler, LL.M. an der Fachhochschule Potsdam angesiedelt ist. Ziel war und ist es, alle in das wissenschaftliche Publizieren involvierten Bereiche und Akteure aus ganz Brandenburg in ein transparentes, kollaboratives und integratives Multistakeholderprojekt einzubinden und an der Erarbeitung dieser Strategie zu beteiligen. Abschließend hat sich die Brandenburgische Landesrektorenkonferenz (BLRK), in der alle brandenburgischen Hochschulen vertreten sind, im Juli 2019 mit der vorliegenden Strategie befasst. Alle Institutionen, die aktiv am Prozess teilhaben wollten, insbesondere die Hochschuleinrichtungen im Land Brandenburg und deren Infrastruktureinrichtungen, haben Vertreterinnen und Vertreter benannt, welche die Interessen und Bedürfnisse des jeweiligen Bereiches wahrnahmen und in die Strategie eingebracht haben. Durch bilaterale Gespräche, Vernetzungstreffen, Intensivworkshops und einen abschließenden Book Sprint, bei dem Expertinnen und Experten aus Wissenschaft, Forschung, Kultur und Zivilgesellschaft wertvolle Ideen und Empfehlungen zur Formulierung einer gemeinsamen Strategie zu mehr Offenheit von Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kultur im Land Brandenburg ausgearbeitet haben, die teilweise in die vorliegende Strategie eingeflossen sind, ist ein festes Netzwerk entstanden, das den weiteren Prozess über die hier vorliegende Open-Access-Strategie für wissenschaftliche Publikationen hinaus begleiten wird. Open Access als Querschnittsaufgabe bedarf gemeinsamer und koordinierter Anstrengungen auf allen Ebenen. Die vorliegende Open-Access-Strategie definiert Ziele für das Land Brandenburg und die von den relevanten Akteuren (Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, Hochschulen, Infrastruktureinrichtungen und Landesregierung) umzusetzenden Maßnahmen, die zur Zielerreichung beitragen sollen, ebenso wie die notwendigen Maßnahmen zur Nachverfolgung der Zielerreichung. Das Wissen aus dem Land Brandenburg soll so verstärkt sichtbar, auffindbar, zugänglich und nutzbar gemacht werden. Der Wissenschaftsstandort Brandenburg wird damit attraktiver und die Innovationsfähigkeit der Region und der wissensbasierten Unternehmen des Landes Brandenburg wird gestärkt.
    Editor
    Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kultur des Landes Brandenburg (MWFK)
  4. Dellmann, S.: Studie "Wirkungen von Open Access" veröffentlicht (2022) 0.01 
    0.011139026 = product of:
  0.06683415 = sum of:
    0.06683415 = weight(_text_:forschung in 523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06683415 = score(doc=523,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17763087 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036512498 = queryNorm
        0.376253 = fieldWeight in 523, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=523)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    "Open Access bietet intuitiv viele Vorteile. Wie Umfragen zeigen, haben einige Wissenschaftler:innen dennoch Vorbehalte. Im letzten Jahrzehnt sind viele empirische Studien erschienen, welche fundierte Ergebnisse zu Hoffnungen und Befürchtungen liefern. Was bisher fehlte, war eine umfassende Übersicht zu empirischen Studienergebnissen zu den Wirkungen von Open Access. Um diese Lücke zu schließen, hat die Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) die Studie <https://doi.org/10.34657/7666> "Wirkungen von Open Access. Literaturstudie über empirische Arbeiten 2010-2021" durchgeführt. Wie wir zeigen konnten, sind viele positive Wirkungen durch die empirische Literatur bestätigt, viele Vorbehalte durch die empirische Literatur zurückgewiesen oder nicht bestätigt. Lesen Sie die Zusammenfassung im Blogpost: https://tib.eu/studie-open-access-wirkungen - oder gleich den gesamten Bericht: https://doi.org/10.34657/7666."
  5. Schönfelder, N.: Mittelbedarf für Open Access an ausgewählten deutschen Universitäten und Forschungseinrichtungen : Transformationsrechnung (2019) 0.01 
    0.007956447 = product of:
  0.04773868 = sum of:
    0.04773868 = weight(_text_:forschung in 5427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04773868 = score(doc=5427,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17763087 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036512498 = queryNorm
        0.26875216 = fieldWeight in 5427, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5427)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Für fünf deutsche Universitäten sowie ein Forschungsinstitut werden auf Basis der Publikationsdaten des Web of Science Abschätzungen zu den Gesamtausgaben für APCs erstellt und mit den derzeitigen Subskriptionsausgaben verglichen. Der Bericht zeigt, dass die Kostenübernahme auf Basis der projizierten Ausgaben für Publikationen aus nicht-Drittmittel-geförderter Forschung für alle hier betrachteten Einrichtungen ohne Probleme aus den derzeitigen bibliothekarischen Erwerbungsetats für Zeitschriften bestritten werden könnte. Dies setzt jedoch voraus, dass Drittmittelgeber neben der üblichen Forschungsförderung auch für die APCs der aus diesen Projekten resultierenden Publikationen aufkommen. Trifft dies nicht zu und die wissenschaftliche Einrichtung muss für sämtliche Publikationen die APCs selbst tragen, so hängen die budgetären Auswirkungen wesentlich von der zukünftigen Entwicklung der Artikelbearbeitungsgebühren ab.
  6. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.00 
    0.003886683 = product of:
  0.023320097 = sum of:
    0.023320097 = product of:
      0.06996029 = sum of:
        0.06996029 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06996029 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  7. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.00 
    0.0038427236 = product of:
  0.023056341 = sum of:
    0.023056341 = product of:
      0.06916902 = sum of:
        0.06916902 = weight(_text_:29 in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06916902 = score(doc=5624,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.5385337 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
    4. 8.2019 19:52:29
    Issue
    [29. Juli 2019].
  8. Moebius, R.: ¬Die Zitiercommunity (2019) 0.00 
    0.0033278964 = product of:
  0.019967377 = sum of:
    0.019967377 = product of:
      0.059902128 = sum of:
        0.059902128 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059902128 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    1. 4.2019 10:29:34
  9. Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017) 0.00 
    0.0021986398 = product of:
  0.013191838 = sum of:
    0.013191838 = product of:
      0.039575513 = sum of:
        0.039575513 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039575513 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    9.10.2017 15:48:22
  10. Gutknecht, C.: Zahlungen der ETH Zürich an Elsevier, Springer und Wiley nun öffentlich (2015) 0.00 
    0.0019412728 = product of:
  0.011647636 = sum of:
    0.011647636 = product of:
      0.034942906 = sum of:
        0.034942906 = weight(_text_:29 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034942906 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    http://wisspub.net/2015/08/29/zahlungen-der-eth-zuerich-an-elsevier-springer-und-wiley-nun-oeffentlich/
  11. Herb, U.: Sci-hub = Spy-Hub? (2020) 0.00 
    0.0019412728 = product of:
  0.011647636 = sum of:
    0.011647636 = product of:
      0.034942906 = sum of:
        0.034942906 = weight(_text_:29 in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034942906 = score(doc=5333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
  12. Krüger, N.; Pianos, T.: Lernmaterialien für junge Forschende in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften als Open Educational Resources (OER) (2021) 0.00 
    0.0019238098 = product of:
  0.011542859 = sum of:
    0.011542859 = product of:
      0.034628574 = sum of:
        0.034628574 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034628574 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  13. Lohnt sich der DEAL? 0.00 
    0.0016639482 = product of:
  0.009983689 = sum of:
    0.009983689 = product of:
      0.029951064 = sum of:
        0.029951064 = weight(_text_:29 in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029951064 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    5.10.2023 18:29:15
  14. Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019) 0.00 
    0.00164898 = product of:
  0.009893879 = sum of:
    0.009893879 = product of:
      0.029681636 = sum of:
        0.029681636 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029681636 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    1. 1.2020 13:22:34
  15. Taglinger, H.: Ausgevogelt, jetzt wird es ernst (2018) 0.00 
    0.00137415 = product of:
  0.0082449 = sum of:
    0.0082449 = product of:
      0.024734698 = sum of:
        0.024734698 = weight(_text_:22 in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024734698 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:38:55
  16. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.00 
    0.0010993199 = product of:
  0.006595919 = sum of:
    0.006595919 = product of:
      0.019787757 = sum of:
        0.019787757 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019787757 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  17. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.00 
    8.319741E-4 = product of:
  0.0049918443 = sum of:
    0.0049918443 = product of:
      0.014975532 = sum of:
        0.014975532 = weight(_text_:29 in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014975532 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 15
  • e 2

Types

  • a 14
  • r 1

Themes