Search (43 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1998) 0.00
    0.002277921 = product of:
      0.018223368 = sum of:
        0.018223368 = product of:
          0.0546701 = sum of:
            0.0546701 = weight(_text_:29 in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0546701 = score(doc=2818,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2002 10:34:23
  2. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.00
    0.0022574293 = product of:
      0.018059434 = sum of:
        0.018059434 = product of:
          0.0541783 = sum of:
            0.0541783 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0541783 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
  3. Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.00
    0.0022574293 = product of:
      0.018059434 = sum of:
        0.018059434 = product of:
          0.0541783 = sum of:
            0.0541783 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0541783 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
  4. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.00
    0.002128325 = product of:
      0.0170266 = sum of:
        0.0170266 = product of:
          0.051079795 = sum of:
            0.051079795 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051079795 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  5. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.00
    0.002128325 = product of:
      0.0170266 = sum of:
        0.0170266 = product of:
          0.051079795 = sum of:
            0.051079795 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051079795 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  6. Wheatley, A.: ¬A manual on printed subject indexes : report to the British Library Research and Development Department on Project SI/G/243 (1978) 0.00
    0.0018982673 = product of:
      0.015186138 = sum of:
        0.015186138 = product of:
          0.045558415 = sum of:
            0.045558415 = weight(_text_:29 in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045558415 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    28. 5.2007 19:29:37
  7. Clarke, M.: Retrieving information from scientific periodicals (1996) 0.00
    0.0018982673 = product of:
      0.015186138 = sum of:
        0.015186138 = product of:
          0.045558415 = sum of:
            0.045558415 = weight(_text_:29 in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045558415 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    25. 2.1997 10:29:16
  8. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.00
    0.0018811913 = product of:
      0.01504953 = sum of:
        0.01504953 = product of:
          0.04514859 = sum of:
            0.04514859 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04514859 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  9. Browne, G.: Professional liability of indexers (1996) 0.00
    0.0015186139 = product of:
      0.012148911 = sum of:
        0.012148911 = product of:
          0.03644673 = sum of:
            0.03644673 = weight(_text_:29 in 3643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03644673 = score(doc=3643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3643)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    16. 5.1999 19:29:09
  10. Read, S.: ¬The new guide to working from home (1995) 0.00
    0.0015186139 = product of:
      0.012148911 = sum of:
        0.012148911 = product of:
          0.03644673 = sum of:
            0.03644673 = weight(_text_:29 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03644673 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 14:29:45
  11. Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.00
    0.0015049529 = product of:
      0.012039623 = sum of:
        0.012039623 = product of:
          0.03611887 = sum of:
            0.03611887 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03611887 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
  12. Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998) 0.00
    0.0015049529 = product of:
      0.012039623 = sum of:
        0.012039623 = product of:
          0.03611887 = sum of:
            0.03611887 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03611887 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
  13. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.00
    0.0015049529 = product of:
      0.012039623 = sum of:
        0.012039623 = product of:
          0.03611887 = sum of:
            0.03611887 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03611887 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  14. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.00
    0.0013168338 = product of:
      0.01053467 = sum of:
        0.01053467 = product of:
          0.03160401 = sum of:
            0.03160401 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03160401 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  15. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.00
    0.0013168338 = product of:
      0.01053467 = sum of:
        0.01053467 = product of:
          0.03160401 = sum of:
            0.03160401 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03160401 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  16. Fugmann, R.: Book indexing : the classificatory approach (1994) 0.00
    0.0011389605 = product of:
      0.009111684 = sum of:
        0.009111684 = product of:
          0.02733505 = sum of:
            0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02733505 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 21(1994) no.1, S.29-31
  17. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.00
    0.0011389605 = product of:
      0.009111684 = sum of:
        0.009111684 = product of:
          0.02733505 = sum of:
            0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02733505 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  18. Fisher, J.: ¬An index to historical fiction for children and young people (1994) 0.00
    0.0011389605 = product of:
      0.009111684 = sum of:
        0.009111684 = product of:
          0.02733505 = sum of:
            0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02733505 = score(doc=1517,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 2.2008 19:32:09
  19. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.00
    9.4059564E-4 = product of:
      0.007524765 = sum of:
        0.007524765 = product of:
          0.022574294 = sum of:
            0.022574294 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022574294 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
  20. Fugmann, R.: ¬Das Buchregister : Methodische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung (2006) 0.00
    8.4504875E-4 = product of:
      0.00676039 = sum of:
        0.00676039 = product of:
          0.02704156 = sum of:
            0.02704156 = weight(_text_:recherche in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02704156 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18062086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033323385 = queryNorm
                0.14971448 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    6. In diesem Buch wird in den Kapiteln 2 bis 5 ein Grundkursus zur Theorie der Inhaltserschließung angeboten, wobei die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von natursprachiger und indexsprachiger Ausdrucksweise geklärt werden, sowie auch der Unterschied zwischen Ausdruck und Begriff, zwischen den Recherchetypen von Erinnerung und Entdeckung, zwischen den Indexierungstypen von Zuteilung und Extraktion und auch der Unterschied zwischen Register und Konkordanz. Auf einer solchen Grundlage kann der Indexer besser den Nutzen der einzelnen Indexierungswerkzeuge abschätzen, sowie auch die nachteiligen Folgen, welche durch den Verzicht auf das eine oder das andere dieser Werkzeuge zwangsläufig eintreten. In der Literatur ist zwar der Standpunkt anzutreffen, dass "allzu viel Theorie" zu vermeiden sei, weil sie doch so "grau" sei. Aber wir schließen uns lieber dem Standpunkt des Physikers Ludwig Boltzmann an: "Nichts ist praktischer als Theorie", wenn eine solche Theorie das Beobachtbare erklären und das Zukünftige voraussagen kann. 7. Im Kapitel 7 werden die Bestandteile des Schlagwort-Registers in Gestalt von Schlagwort und Fundstelle, Untereintrag und Verweisung abgehandelt und das Zusammenfügen dieser Komponenten zum Register der herkömmlichen indikativen Art. Dieser Registertyp ist gekennzeichnet durch seine Beschränkungen bezüglich der Inanspruchnahme von Platz für den Druck und durch seine Beschränkungen bezüglich des Aufwandes an Zeit und Geld zu seiner Erstellung. Es werden die hiermit zwangläufig verbundenen Mängel dargelegt. 8. Im Kapitel 8 wird die Überwindung dieser Mängel durch die Einführung von reichlichen und ausführlichen Untereinträgen gezeigt. Das Register nimmt hierdurch einen ausgesprochen informativen Charakter an. Zugleich werden auf diesem Weg auch Wesen und Nutzen eines systematischen Registers dargelegt, welches zusätzlich zum herkömmlichen alphabetischen Register vorgelegt wird. 9. Die Möglichkeit zu alledem eröffnet sich dadurch, dass eine hochentwickelte Software eingesetzt wird und dass ein außergewöhnlicher Arbeitsaufwand aufseiten des Indexers nicht gescheut wird, verbunden mit entsprechend hohen Kosten. Dieser Aufwand ist erforderlich für die Formulierung von zahlreichen und ausführlichen Untereinträgen, zum Aufbau eines systematischen, thesaurusgestützten Schlagwort-Vokabulars und für eine besonders sorgfältige Indexierung. 10. Dieses Modell eines kompletten informativen Registers ist als eine Art Werkzeugkasten zu verstehen, aus welchem man diejenigen gedanklichen und technischen Werkzeuge auswählen und miteinander kombinieren kann, welche der jeweils herrschenden Bedarfslage am besten angemessen sind. Man wird von diesen Werkzeugen besonders dann ausgiebig Gebrauch machen, wenn hohe Anforderungen an die Treffsicherheit und Leichtigkeit der Recherche gestellt werden, Anforderungen, welche mit einem Register der herkömmlichen indikativen Art nicht erfüllbar sind. Der hohe Aufwand für ein gutes Register ist natürlich nur dann gerechtfertigt, wenn aufseiten der Leser auch wirklich Bedarf zum Nachschlagen besteht. Man wird kein Register für ein Buch anlegen, welches nur zur Unterhaltung und Erbauung gelesen und dann für alle Zeiten beiseite gelegt wird.

Years

Languages

  • e 40
  • d 3
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 32
  • m 11