-
Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004)
0.02
0.024788357 = product of:
0.08675925 = sum of:
0.07663343 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07663343 = score(doc=2647,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.35801122 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.010125816 = product of:
0.020251632 = sum of:
0.020251632 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020251632 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Despite the existence of a logical structural model for bibliographic records which integrates any record type, library catalogues persist in offering catalogue records at the level of 'items'. Such records however, do not clearly indicate which works they contain. Hence the search possibilities of the end user are unduly limited. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) present through a conceptual model, independent of any cataloguing code or implementation, a globalized view of the bibliographic universe. This model, a synthesis of the existing cataloguing rules, consists of clearly structured entities and well defined types of relationships among them. From a theoretical viewpoint, the model is likely to be a good knowledge organiser with great potential in identifying the author and the work represented by an item or publication and is able to link different works of the author with different editions, translations or adaptations of those works aiming at better answering the user needs. This paper is presenting an interpretation of the FRBR model opposing it to a traditional bibliographic record of a complex library material.
- Date
- 17. 6.2015 14:40:22
-
Frohmann, B.: Revisiting "what is a document?" (2009)
0.01
0.009676432 = product of:
0.067735024 = sum of:
0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067735024 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a reconsideration of Michael Buckland's important question, "What is a document?", analysing the point and purpose of definitions of "document" and "documentation". Design/methodology/approach - Two philosophical notions of the point of definitions are contrasted: John Stuart Mill's concept of a "real" definition, purporting to specify the nature of the definiendum; and a concept of definition based upon a foundationalist philosophy of language. Both conceptions assume that a general, philosophical justification for using words as we do is always in order. This assumption is criticized by deploying Hilary Putnam's arguments against the orthodox Wittgensteinian interpretation of criteria governing the use of language. The example of the cabinets of curiosities of the sixteenth-century English and European virtuosi is developed to show how one might productively think about what documents might be, but without a definition of a document. Findings - Other than for specific, instrumentalist purposes (often appropriate for specific case studies), there is no general philosophical reason for asking, what is a document? There are good reasons for pursuing studies of documentation without the impediments of definitions of "document" or "documentation". Originality/value - The paper makes an original contribution to the new interest in documentation studies by providing conceptual resources for multiplying, rather than restricting, the areas of application of the concepts of documents and documentation.
-
Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017)
0.01
0.009676432 = product of:
0.067735024 = sum of:
0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067735024 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This study presents preliminary themes surfaced from an ongoing ethnographic study. The research question is: how and where do cultures influence the cataloging practices of using U.S. standards to catalog Chinese materials? The author applies warrant as a lens for evaluating knowledge representation systems, and extends the application from examining classificatory decisions to cataloging decisions. Semantic warrant as a conceptual tool allows us to recognize and name the various rationales behind cataloging decisions, grants us explanatory power, and the language to "visualize" and reflect on the conflicting priorities in cataloging practices. Through participatory observation, the author recorded the cataloging practices of two Chinese catalogers working on the same cataloging project. One of the catalogers is U.S. trained, and another cataloger is a professor of Library and Information Science from China, who is also a subject expert and a cataloger of Chinese special collections. The study shows how the catalogers describe Chinese special collections using many U.S. cataloging and classification standards but from different approaches. The author presents particular cases derived from the fieldwork, with an emphasis on the many layers presented by cultures, principles, standards, and practices of different scope, each of which may represent conflicting warrants. From this, it is made clear that the conflicts of warrants influence cataloging practice. We may view the conflicting warrants as an interpretation of the tension between different semantic warrants and the globalization and localization of cataloging standards.
-
Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979)
0.01
0.005786181 = product of:
0.040503263 = sum of:
0.040503263 = product of:
0.08100653 = sum of:
0.08100653 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08100653 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 3.10.2000 20:48:22
-
Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998)
0.01
0.005786181 = product of:
0.040503263 = sum of:
0.040503263 = product of:
0.08100653 = sum of:
0.08100653 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08100653 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
-
Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982)
0.00
0.0043396354 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = product of:
0.06075489 = sum of:
0.06075489 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075489 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 14:49:22
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.00
0.0043396354 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = product of:
0.06075489 = sum of:
0.06075489 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075489 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.00
0.003616363 = product of:
0.02531454 = sum of:
0.02531454 = product of:
0.05062908 = sum of:
0.05062908 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05062908 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.00
0.0030685859 = product of:
0.0214801 = sum of:
0.0214801 = product of:
0.0429602 = sum of:
0.0429602 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0429602 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.00
0.0028930905 = product of:
0.020251632 = sum of:
0.020251632 = product of:
0.040503263 = sum of:
0.040503263 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040503263 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.00
0.0028930905 = product of:
0.020251632 = sum of:
0.020251632 = product of:
0.040503263 = sum of:
0.040503263 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040503263 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007)
0.00
0.0028930905 = product of:
0.020251632 = sum of:
0.020251632 = product of:
0.040503263 = sum of:
0.040503263 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040503263 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.00
0.0028930905 = product of:
0.020251632 = sum of:
0.020251632 = product of:
0.040503263 = sum of:
0.040503263 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040503263 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.00
0.002531454 = product of:
0.017720178 = sum of:
0.017720178 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.00
0.002531454 = product of:
0.017720178 = sum of:
0.017720178 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
-
Randall, N.B.: Spelling errors in the database : shadow or substance? (1999)
0.00
0.002531454 = product of:
0.017720178 = sum of:
0.017720178 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.00
0.002531454 = product of:
0.017720178 = sum of:
0.017720178 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996)
0.00
0.002531454 = product of:
0.017720178 = sum of:
0.017720178 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
-
McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996)
0.00
0.002531454 = product of:
0.017720178 = sum of:
0.017720178 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125
-
Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012)
0.00
0.002531454 = product of:
0.017720178 = sum of:
0.017720178 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 11:08:22
