-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.57
0.56524754 = product of:
0.9891832 = sum of:
0.09891832 = product of:
0.29675496 = sum of:
0.29675496 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29675496 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.29675496 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29675496 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.29675496 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29675496 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.29675496 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29675496 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.34
0.33914855 = product of:
0.5935099 = sum of:
0.059350993 = product of:
0.17805298 = sum of:
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.31
0.31391296 = product of:
0.54934764 = sum of:
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.015188723 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030377446 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Content
- A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.31
0.310387 = product of:
0.5431772 = sum of:
0.03956733 = product of:
0.11870199 = sum of:
0.11870199 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11870199 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16786996 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16786996 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.16786996 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16786996 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.16786996 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16786996 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.28
0.28262377 = product of:
0.4945916 = sum of:
0.04945916 = product of:
0.14837748 = sum of:
0.14837748 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14837748 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14837748 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14837748 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.14837748 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14837748 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.14837748 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14837748 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.03
0.027563075 = product of:
0.09647076 = sum of:
0.081282035 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081282035 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.37972826 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.015188723 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030377446 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study that explores mental associations made by novices viewing art images. In a controlled environment, 20 Taiwanese college students responded to the question "What does the painting remind you of?" after viewing each digitized image of 15 oil paintings by a famous Taiwanese artist. Rather than focusing on the representation or interpretation of art, the study attempted to solicit information about how non-experts are stimulated by art. This paper reports on the analysis of participant responses to three of the images, and describes a12-type taxonomy of association emerged from the analysis. While 9 of the types are derived and adapted from facets in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, three new types - Artistic Influence Association, Reactive Association, and Prototype Association - are discovered. The conclusion briefly discusses both the significance of the findings and the implications for future research.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Almeida, C.C. de: ¬The methodological influence of Peirce's pragmatism on knowledge organization (2012)
0.02
0.022969227 = product of:
0.08039229 = sum of:
0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067735024 = score(doc=142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=142)
0.01265727 = product of:
0.02531454 = sum of:
0.02531454 = weight(_text_:22 in 142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02531454 = score(doc=142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=142)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Information and knowledge organization in Brazil has been historically influenced by theoretical linguistics. However, some aspects related to language theory and its interface with philosophy need to be further investigated, particularly the semiotic interpretation of information and knowledge organization processes. In order to advance a dialogue with the philosophy and semiotics of Charles Peirce (1839-1914), a theoretical and bibliographical study was carried out so as to understand and evaluate the contributions of the Peircean thought to information organization. It was found that several aspects of Peirce's work, viewed as a whole and not just semiotic concepts, suggest fundamental points to explain issues in information and knowledge organization. Basing on the analysis of Thellefsen's studies, this research presents some arguments aimed at reframing Peirce's pragmatism, which should no longer be mistakenly considered as a doctrine of practical results, but as a useful methodological approach for professionals dealing with knowledge organization in the field of Information Science.
- Content
- Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_f.pdf.
-
Sosinska-Kalata, B.: Semantization and standardization : cooperative or conflicting trends in knowledge organization? (2014)
0.02
0.022969227 = product of:
0.08039229 = sum of:
0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067735024 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
0.01265727 = product of:
0.02531454 = sum of:
0.02531454 = weight(_text_:22 in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02531454 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- There are two most important trends observed in research on knowledge organization (KO) and in the development of knowledge organization systems (KOS) used in practice, i.e. semantization and standardization. These two trends determine current approaches to the development of methods and tools for organizing access to the digitally recorded knowledge in information systems and networks. Fundamental for the semantization of knowledge records is the creation and use of KOS with strong semantics which enable accurate representation of meanings in specified contexts. Standardization requires the unification of methods and tools for representing knowledge recorded in information resources. In practice it is often achieved by the use of universal KOS and implies generalization and homogenization of content representation that makes difficult to identify different interpretation of the phenomena and problems discussed in particular epistemological and cultural contexts. It is argued that the standardization of methods and tools for the representation of knowledge resources accessible in digital environment should not and does not have to imply this kind of generalization and simplification of the representation of their semantic content.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016)
0.02
0.022969227 = product of:
0.08039229 = sum of:
0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067735024 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
0.01265727 = product of:
0.02531454 = sum of:
0.02531454 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02531454 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this study was to examine user tags that describe digitized archival collections in the field of humanities. A collection of 8,310 tags from a digital portal (Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship, NINES) was analyzed to find out what attributes of primary historical resources users described with tags. Tags were categorized to identify which tags describe the content of the resource, the resource itself, and subjective aspects (e.g., usage or emotion). The study's findings revealed that over half were content-related; tags representing opinion, usage context, or self-reference, however, reflected only a small percentage. The study further found that terms related to genre or physical format of a resource were frequently used in describing primary archival resources. It was also learned that nontextual resources had lower numbers of content-related tags and higher numbers of document-related tags than textual resources and bibliographic materials; moreover, textual resources tended to have more user-context-related tags than other resources. These findings help explain users' tagging behavior and resource interpretation in primary resources in the humanities. Such information provided through tags helps information professionals decide to what extent indexing archival and cultural resources should be done for resource description and discovery, and understand users' terminology.
- Date
- 21. 4.2016 11:23:22
-
Hangel, N.; Schmidt-Pfister, D.: Why do you publish? : on the tensions between generating scientific knowledge and publication pressure (2017)
0.02
0.022969227 = product of:
0.08039229 = sum of:
0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067735024 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
0.01265727 = product of:
0.02531454 = sum of:
0.02531454 = weight(_text_:22 in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02531454 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine researchers' motivations to publish by comparing different career stages (PhD students; temporarily employed postdocs/new professors; scholars with permanent employment) with regard to epistemic, pragmatic, and personal motives. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative analysis is mainly based on semi-structured narrative interviews with 91 researchers in the humanities, social, and natural sciences, based at six renowned (anonymous) universities in Germany, the UK, and the USA. These narratives contain answers to the direct question "why do you publish?" as well as remarks on motivations to publish in relation to other questions and themes. The interdisciplinary interpretation is based on both sociological science studies and philosophy of science in practice. Findings At each career stage, epistemic, pragmatic, and personal motivations to publish are weighed differently. Confirming earlier studies, the authors find that PhD students and postdoctoral researchers in temporary positions mainly feel pressured to publish for career-related reasons. However, across status groups, researchers also want to publish in order to support collective knowledge generation. Research limitations/implications The sample of interviewees may be biased toward those interested in reflecting on their day-to-day work. Social implications Continuous and collective reflection is imperative for preventing uncritical internalization of pragmatic reasons to publish. Creating occasions for reflection is a task not only of researchers themselves, but also of administrators, funders, and other stakeholders. Originality/value Most studies have illuminated how researchers publish while adapting to or growing into the contemporary publish-or-perish culture. This paper addresses the rarely asked question why researchers publish at all.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Alkhodair, S.A.; Fung, B.C.M.; Patrick, O.R.; Hung, C.K.: Improving interpretations of topic modeling in microblogs (2018)
0.02
0.022969227 = product of:
0.08039229 = sum of:
0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 4181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067735024 = score(doc=4181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 4181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4181)
0.01265727 = product of:
0.02531454 = sum of:
0.02531454 = weight(_text_:22 in 4181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02531454 = score(doc=4181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Topic models were proposed to detect the underlying semantic structure of large collections of text documents to facilitate the process of browsing and accessing documents with similar ideas and topics. Applying topic models to short text documents to extract meaningful topics is challenging. The problem becomes even more complicated when dealing with short and noisy micro-posts in Twitter that are about one general topic. In such a case, the goal of applying topic models is to extract subtopics. This results in topics represented by similar sets of keywords, which in turn makes the process of topic interpretation more confusing. In this paper we propose a new method that incorporates Twitter-LDA, WordNet, and hashtags to enhance the keyword labels that represent each topic. We emphasize the importance of different keywords to different topics based on the semantic relationships and the co-occurrences of keywords in hashtags. We also propose a method to find the best number of topics to represent the text document collection. Experiments on two real-life Twitter datasets on fashion suggest that our method performs better than the original Twitter-LDA in terms of perplexity, topic coherence, and the quality of keywords for topic labeling.
- Date
- 22. 3.2018 18:05:56
-
Frâncu, V.; Popescu, T.: Twenty years after : scientific research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania (1993-2012) (2014)
0.02
0.022969227 = product of:
0.08039229 = sum of:
0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067735024 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
0.01265727 = product of:
0.02531454 = sum of:
0.02531454 = weight(_text_:22 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02531454 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The main point that we want to state in this study is that research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania over the last twenty years is unequally and unjustly distributed among different professional categories ranging from library and information science faculty members, library professionals, software tools developers and independent researchers. The special condition of library and information science functioning as a university department in Romania with an interruption of 20 years (1970-1990) affected the overall situation of scientific research in the specific fields associated with this discipline. Our study has three stages: data collection, data recording and data interpretation. The primary outcomes of the scientific research activities considered are publications (books, book chapters and journal articles). Given this, our interest will be directed towards analyzing to what extent research and writing for publication have an impact on the evolution of Romanian libraries over this twenty years span.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: Citation behavior : a large-scale test of the persuasion by name-dropping hypothesis (2017)
0.02
0.020112088 = product of:
0.1407846 = sum of:
0.1407846 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1407846 = score(doc=3601,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.65770864 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Citation frequencies are commonly interpreted as measures of quality or impact. Yet, the true nature of citations and their proper interpretation have been the center of a long, but still unresolved discussion in Bibliometrics. A comparison of 67,578 pairs of studies on the same healthcare topic, with the same publication age (1-15 years) reveals that when one of the studies is being selected for citation, it has on average received about three times as many citations as the other study. However, the average citation-gap between selected or deselected studies narrows slightly over time, which fits poorly with the name-dropping interpretation and better with the quality and impact-interpretation. The results demonstrate that authors in the field of Healthcare tend to cite highly cited documents when they have a choice. This is more likely caused by differences related to quality than differences related to status of the publications cited.
-
Svenonius, E.: Bibliographic entities and their uses (2018)
0.02
0.019352864 = product of:
0.13547005 = sum of:
0.13547005 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13547005 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.6328804 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This article provides an interpretation of the structure of classification theory literature, from the late 19th Century to the present, by dividing it into four orders, and then describes the relationship between that and manuals for classification design.
-
Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018)
0.02
0.016846253 = product of:
0.11792377 = sum of:
0.11792377 = sum of:
0.0774205 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0774205 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.040503263 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040503263 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 17. 1.2019 19:04:22
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Harej, V.; Zumer, M.: Analysis of FRBR user tasks (2013)
0.02
0.0154822925 = product of:
0.10837604 = sum of:
0.10837604 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10837604 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5063043 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD models propose user tasks as a way to address and categorize functions that a catalog should support. The user tasks are not harmonized among these models, but to do that, they should first be fully understood and analyzed, especially "select" and "identify." We decided to look at the FRBR user tasks from the perspective of interactive information retrieval (IIR). Several IIR models were reviewed and Ellis' and Belkin's models were chosen for further analysis and interpretation of FRBR "select" and "identify" tasks.
-
Rousseau, R.: Citation data as a proxy for quality or scientific influence are at best PAC (probably approximately correct) (2016)
0.02
0.0154822925 = product of:
0.10837604 = sum of:
0.10837604 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 3210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10837604 = score(doc=3210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5063043 = fieldWeight in 3210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3210)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- In this communication I give a brief introduction to Valiant's probably approximately correct (PAC) theory, provide an extension that goes beyond Valiant's ideas (and beyond the domain for which this theory was meant), and come to an interpretation in terms of research evaluation. As such, PAC provides a framework for a theory of research evaluation.
-
Christoforidis, A.; Heuwing, B.; Mandl, T.: Visualising topics in document collections : an analysis of the interpretation process of historians (2017)
0.02
0.0154822925 = product of:
0.10837604 = sum of:
0.10837604 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10837604 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5063043 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Zeng, M.L.; Chen, S.S.-J.: Derivative interpretation of biographical sketches (bios) supporting innovative information (2018)
0.02
0.0154822925 = product of:
0.10837604 = sum of:
0.10837604 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10837604 = score(doc=4797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5063043 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Tennis, J.T.: Four orders of classification theory and their implications (2018)
0.02
0.0154822925 = product of:
0.10837604 = sum of:
0.10837604 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 5264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10837604 = score(doc=5264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5063043 = fieldWeight in 5264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5264)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This article provides an interpretation of the structure of classification theory literature, from the late 19th Century to the present, by dividing it into four orders, and then describes the relationship between that and manuals for classification design.
