Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.52 
    0.5228 = product of:
  1.4190286 = sum of:
    0.20271838 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20271838 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21861556 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
    0.20271838 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20271838 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21861556 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
    0.20271838 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20271838 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21861556 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
    0.20271838 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20271838 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21861556 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
    0.20271838 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20271838 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21861556 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
    0.20271838 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20271838 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21861556 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
    0.20271838 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20271838 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21861556 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
  0.36842105 = coord(7/19)
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
  2. Stock, W.: Begriffe und semantische Relationen in der Wissensrepräsentation (2009) 0.01 
    0.013619031 = product of:
  0.08625387 = sum of:
    0.018205952 = weight(_text_:web in 3218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018205952 = score(doc=3218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3218)
    0.018205952 = weight(_text_:web in 3218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018205952 = score(doc=3218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3218)
    0.049841963 = weight(_text_:semantische in 3218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049841963 = score(doc=3218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.35795808 = fieldWeight in 3218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3218)
  0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    Abstract
    Begriffsorientiertes Information Retrieval bedarf einer informationswissenschaftlichen Theorie der Begriffe sowie der semantischen Relationen. Ein Begriff wird durch seine Intension und Extension sowie durch Definitionen bestimmt. Dem Problem der Vagheit begegnen wir durch die Einführung von Prototypen. Wichtige Definitionsarten sind die Begriffserklärung (nach Aristoteles) und die Definition über Familienähnlichkeiten (im Sinne Wittgensteins). Wir modellieren Begriffe als Frames (in der Version von Barsalou). Die zentrale paradigmatische Relation in Wissensordnungen ist die Hierarchie, die in verschiedene Arten zu gliedern ist: Hyponymie zerfällt in die Taxonomie und die einfache Hyponymie, Meronymie in eine ganze Reihe unterschiedlicher Teil-Ganzes-Beziehungen. Wichtig für praktische Anwendungen ist die Transitivität der jeweiligen Relation. Eine unspezifische Assoziationsrelation ist bei den angepeilten Anwendungen wenig hilfreich und wird durch ein Bündel von generalisierbaren und fachspezifischen Relationen ersetzt. Unser Ansatz fundiert neue Optionen der Anwendung von Wissensordnungen in der Informationspraxis neben ihrem "klassischen" Einsatz beim Information Retrieval: Erweiterung von Suchanfragen (Anwendung der semantischen Nähe), automatisches Schlussfolgern (Anwendung der terminologischen Logik in Vorbereitung eines semantischen Web) und automatische Berechnungen (bei Funktionalbegriffen mit numerischen Wertangaben).
  3. Rahmstorf, G.: Wege zur Ontologie (2006) 0.01 
    0.010585719 = product of:
  0.20112865 = sum of:
    0.20112865 = weight(_text_:ontologie in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20112865 = score(doc=5868,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.18041065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        1.114838 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Abstract
    Ontologie ist in der Philosophie die Auseinandersetzung mit der Frage, welche Arten von Gegenständen existieren und in welcher Weise sie existieren. Ein zentrales Thema ist z. B., ob es geistige Gegenstände, z. B. Gedanken, Ideen, Begriffe, Vorstellungen u. a. gibt und wie ihre Existenz begründet wird. Neuerdings wird mit dem Wort "Ontologie" eine andere, etwas konkretere Bedeutung verbunden. Unter einer Ontologie werden die allgemeinsten Begriffe eines Fachgebiets verstanden. So gehören zur Ontologie des Organischen u. a. "Pflanze", "Tier" und "Mensch". Wenn der Begriff "Tier" schon gegeben ist, lassen sich daraus andere Begriffe, z. B. "Wirbeltier", "Reptil", "Säugetier" usw. spezifizierend durch Angabe weiterer Merkmale bilden. Außerdem können Begriffsbeziehungen und andere formale Mittel zu Ontologien gehören. Ontologie ist danach die Methode, durch die die Begriffswelt eines Sachgebiets bestimmt wird, und insbesondere das Ergebnis dieser Methode: die Struktur aus Begriffen höchster Allgemeinheit, die mit dieser Methode erstellt wird. Das Wort "Ontologie" kann jedoch unterschiedlich verstanden wird. Es bezeichnet auch die Gesamtheit aller Begriffe, die zum Untersuchungsgegenstand gehören. Die Ontologie umfasst dann alles, was an Begriffen aus einer bestimmten Aufgabenstellung betrachtet bzw. erarbeitet wird. Zu einer Ontologie der Elektronik würden alle Begriffe dieses Gebietes gehören. Mit einem so weit gefassten Verständnis des Wortes "Ontologie" wird die Fokussierung auf die Kategorien größter Allgemeinheit der hierarchisch gegliederten Begriffswelt aufgegeben. Außerdem würde eine so verstandene Ontologie mit der Tatsache der Unabgrenzbarkeit des Wortschatzes belastet werden. Komposita können im Deutschen quasi unbegrenzt erweitert werden. Es gibt nicht nur den Kamin und den Kaminfeger, sondern auch die Kaminfegerarbeitskleidungsreinigungsfirma und dergleichen mehr. Komposita sind unverzichtbar. Ihre maximale Länge ist nicht festgelegt. Die Benennungen für Stoffe in der Chemie zeigen, dass man in dieser Fachsprache durchaus problemlos mit sehr langen Zusammensetzungen kommuniziert. Aber die Ontologen werden nicht daran interessiert sein, ihre Untersuchungen bis in die Tiefen aller Fachgebiete auszudehnen. Kurzum "Ontologie" sollte sich auf Begriffe höchster Allgemeinheit beziehen. Das entspricht der engeren Bedeutung des Wortes "Ontologie". Die Unterbegriffe dieser Top-Level-Begriffe können natürlich ebenfalls für Ontologen von Interesse sein, weil sie zeigen, welches Begriffsbildungspotenzial die verschiedenen Top-Level-Begriffe haben. Der Schwerpunkt des Interesses der Ontologen sollte aber auf den Begriffen liegen, die nicht weiter zurückführbar sind.
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01 
    0.008466383 = product of:
  0.08043064 = sum of:
    0.06645595 = weight(_text_:semantische in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06645595 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.47727743 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
    0.013974689 = product of:
      0.027949378 = sum of:
        0.027949378 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027949378 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  5. Schirn, M.: Identität und Synonymie : Logisch-semantische Untersuchungen unter Berücksichtigung der sprachlichen Verständigungspraxis (1975) 0.01 
    0.0069953636 = product of:
  0.1329119 = sum of:
    0.1329119 = weight(_text_:semantische in 2012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1329119 = score(doc=2012,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.95455486 = fieldWeight in 2012, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2012)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
  6. Ausgewählte Texte zur Terminologie (1993) 0.00 
    0.0036699376 = product of:
  0.069728814 = sum of:
    0.069728814 = weight(_text_:ontologie in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069728814 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18041065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.38650054 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: WÜSTER, E.: Terminologielehre; HAJUTIN, A.D.: Die verschiedenen Richtungen in der Terminologiearbeit; KOCOUREK, R.: Der Terminus und seine Definition; DROZD, L.: Zum Gegenstand und zur Methode der Terminologielehre; HORECKY, J.: Zu Bedeutungsbeziehungen zwischen den terminologischen Benennungen; FILIPEC, J.: Zur Spezifik des spezialsprachlichen Wortschatzes gegenüber dem allgemeinen Wortschatz; FILIPEC, J.: Zur Frage des Systems in der Terminologie; REFORMATSKIJ, A.A.: Was ist eine Benennung und was ist Terminologie?; SUPERANSKAJA, A.V.: Theoretische Terminologiearbeit; ZHURAVLEV, V.F. u. G.G. SAMBUROVA: Philosophisch-logische Aspekte der Terminologieregelung und -normung; ZHURAVLEV, V.F.: Einige logisch-methodologische Fragen der Regelung des Begriffsapparates und von Terminologien; NALEPIN, V.L.: Begriffsarten und Definitionsstruktur; WÜSTER, E.: Das Worten der Welt, schaubildlich und terminologisch dargestellt; WÜSTER, E.: Die Allgemeine Terminologielehre: ein Grenzgebiet zwischen Sprachwissenschaft, Logik, Ontologie, Informatik und den Sachwissenschaften; FELBER, H.: Einige Grundfragen der Terminologiewissenschaft aus der Sicht der Allgemeinen Terminologielehre; COLE, W.D.: Terminologie: Grundsätze und Methoden; SCHULZE, E.: Der Terminus: Eigenschaften und Wesen sowie seine Abgrenzung von anderen Lexemarten; PICHT, H.: Fachsprachliche Phraseologie; OESER, E.: Terminologie als Voraussetzung der Wissenstechnik; BUDIN, G., C. GALINSKI, W. NEDOBITY u. R. THALLER: Terminologie und die Wissensverarbeitung; PICHT, H. u. C. LAURÉN: Vergleich der terminologischen Schulen
  7. Sechser, O.: Modi der Bedeutung von Elementarausdrücken in Retrieval-Sprachen (1979) 0.00 
    0.0030604713 = product of:
  0.058148954 = sum of:
    0.058148954 = weight(_text_:semantische in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058148954 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.41761774 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Abstract
    Denotation und Intension sind die bevorzugten Bedeutungsmode für Sprachen mit fixem semantischem Universum und ohne Polysemie (formale Sprachen, terminologische Subsets von Fachsprachen). Je nach dem philosophischen Standpunkt und dem methodologischen Ansatz können diese Modi unterschiedlich, manchmal auch präziser definiert und unterteilt werden. Bei der Auswahl von Ausdrücken für thematische und informationsinhaltliche Beschreibung von Texten spielt der Modus der Konnotation eine besondere Rolle. Durch Untersuchung der relevanzvermittelten Konnotation wird Einblick in die innere semantische Struktur der untersuchten Retrieval-Sprache gewonnen
  8. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.00 
    0.002940521 = product of:
  0.02793495 = sum of:
    0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019200768 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
    0.008734181 = product of:
      0.017468361 = sum of:
        0.017468361 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017468361 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    Abstract
    The concept of concept has seldom been examined in its entirety, and the term very seldom defined. The rigidity, or lack thereof, and the homogeneity, or lack thereof, of concepts, are only two of their characteristics that have been debated. These issues are reviewed in this paper, namely: 1) does a concept represent its referent(s), or is it a free creation of the mind?; 2) can a concept be analyzed in parts or elements?; 3) must a concept be general, i.e., refer to a category or a type, or can it refer to a single object, physical or mental?; 4) are concepts as clearly delimited as terms are? Are concepts voiceless terms?; and, 5) what do terms contribute to an individual's and a community's conceptual richness? As regards the relationship of concepts with their referents in the stage of formation, it seems reasonable to conclude that said relationship may be close in some concepts, less close in others, and lacking altogether in some cases. The set of elements of a concept, which varies from individual to individual and across time inside the same individual, is called the intension of a concept. The set of referents of a concept is called the extension of that concept. Most concepts don't have a clearly delimited extension: their referents form a fuzzy set. The aspects of a concept's intension form a scale of generality. A concept is not equal to the term that describes it; rather, many terms are joined to concepts. Language, therefore, renders a gamut of services to the development, consolidation, and communication of conceptual richness.
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
  9. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.002940521 = product of:
  0.02793495 = sum of:
    0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019200768 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
    0.008734181 = product of:
      0.017468361 = sum of:
        0.017468361 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017468361 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'Gender Issues in Information Needs and Services'.
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22
  10. Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.00 
    0.002235819 = product of:
  0.02124028 = sum of:
    0.01062014 = weight(_text_:web in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01062014 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
    0.01062014 = weight(_text_:web in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01062014 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
  0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    Content
    Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
  11. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.00 
    0.0012871424 = product of:
  0.024455706 = sum of:
    0.024455706 = product of:
      0.04891141 = sum of:
        0.04891141 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04891141 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Pages
    S.9-22
  12. Garcia Marco, F.J.; Esteban Navarro, M.A.: On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification (1993) 0.00 
    0.0012126801 = product of:
  0.023040922 = sum of:
    0.023040922 = weight(_text_:services in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023040922 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Abstract
    Intended is first of all a preliminary review of the implications that the new approaches to the theory of classification, mainly from cognitive psychology and epistemology may have for information work and research. As a secondary topic the scientific relations existing among information science, epistemology and the cognitive sciences are discussed. Classification is seen as a central activity in all daily and scientific activities, and, of course, of knowledge organization in information services. There is a mutual implication between classification and conceptualization, as the former moves in a natural way to the latter and the best result elaborated for classification is the concept. Research in concept theory is a need for a theory of classification. In this direction it is of outstanding importance to integrate the achievements of 'natural concept formation theory' (NCFT) as an alternative approach to conceptualization different from the traditional one of logicians and problem solving researchers. In conclusion both approaches are seen as being complementary: the NCFT approach being closer to the user and the logical one being more suitable for experts, including 'expert systems'
  13. Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971) 0.00 
    0.001103265 = product of:
  0.020962033 = sum of:
    0.020962033 = product of:
      0.041924067 = sum of:
        0.041924067 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041924067 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
  14. ISO/DIS 5127: Information and documentation - foundation and vocabulary (2013) 0.00 
    0.0010105667 = product of:
  0.019200768 = sum of:
    0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019200768 = score(doc=6070,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Abstract
    This standard provides the basic terms and their definitions in the field of information and documentation for the purpose of promoting and facilitating knowledge sharing and information exchange. This International Standard presents terms and definitions of selected concepts relevant to the field of information and documentation. If a definition is from other standards, the priority of selection is TC46 technical standards, then technical standards in relevant field, and then terminology related standards. The scope of this International Standard corresponds to that of ISO/TC46, Standardization of practices relating to libraries, documentation and information centres, publishing, archives, records management, museum documentation, indexing and abstracting services, and information science. ISO 5127 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 46, Information and Documentation, WG4, Terminology of information and documentation. This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 5127:2001), which has been technically revised to overcome problems in the practical application of ISO 5127:2001 and to take account of the new developments in the field of information and documentation.
  15. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.00 
    6.435712E-4 = product of:
  0.012227853 = sum of:
    0.012227853 = product of:
      0.024455706 = sum of:
        0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024455706 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  16. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.00 
    6.435712E-4 = product of:
  0.012227853 = sum of:
    0.012227853 = product of:
      0.024455706 = sum of:
        0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024455706 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Pages
    S.22-33
  17. Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013) 0.00 
    5.516325E-4 = product of:
  0.010481017 = sum of:
    0.010481017 = product of:
      0.020962033 = sum of:
        0.020962033 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020962033 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
  18. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.00 
    4.5969372E-4 = product of:
  0.008734181 = sum of:
    0.008734181 = product of:
      0.017468361 = sum of:
        0.017468361 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017468361 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  19. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.00 
    4.5969372E-4 = product of:
  0.008734181 = sum of:
    0.008734181 = product of:
      0.017468361 = sum of:
        0.017468361 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017468361 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 11
  • e 8

Types

Themes