-
Zins, C.: Models for classifying Internet resources (2002)
0.04
0.04496892 = product of:
0.059958562 = sum of:
0.02721381 = product of:
0.05442762 = sum of:
0.05442762 = weight(_text_:media in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05442762 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.022511758 = product of:
0.045023516 = sum of:
0.045023516 = weight(_text_:28 in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045023516 = score(doc=1160,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.3358372 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0102329925 = product of:
0.030698977 = sum of:
0.030698977 = weight(_text_:29 in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030698977 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Designing systematic access to Internet resources is a major item an the agenda of researchers and practitioners in the field of information science, and is the focus of this study. A critical analysis of classification schemes used in major portals and Web classified directories exposes inconsistencies in the way they classify Internet resources. The inconsistencies indicate that the developers fall to differentiate the various classificatory models, and are unaware of their different rationales. The study establishes eight classificatory models for resources available to Internet users. Internet resources can be classified by subjects, objects, applications, users, locations, reference sources, media, and languages. The first five models are contentrelated; namely they characterize the content of the resource. The other three models are formst-related; namely they characterize the format of the resource or its technological infrastructure. The study identifies and formulates the eight classificatory models, analyzes their rationales, and discusses alternative ways to combine them in a faceted integrated classification scheme.
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.1, S.20-28
-
Tan, W.: Subject access on Internet : highlights of the metasearch engines (1998)
0.04
0.043687936 = product of:
0.08737587 = sum of:
0.06349889 = product of:
0.12699778 = sum of:
0.12699778 = weight(_text_:media in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12699778 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.7244994 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02387698 = product of:
0.07163094 = sum of:
0.07163094 = weight(_text_:29 in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07163094 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of educational media and library sciences. 36(1998) no.1, S.20-29
-
Perez, E.: dtSearch: the little search engine that could (2004)
0.03
0.03486828 = product of:
0.06973656 = sum of:
0.04244858 = product of:
0.08489716 = sum of:
0.08489716 = weight(_text_:28 in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08489716 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.63326067 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02728798 = product of:
0.08186394 = sum of:
0.08186394 = weight(_text_:29 in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08186394 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Online. 29(2005) no.1, S.28-
-
Frau-Meigs, D.: Minding the gatekeepers : search engines for young people, and the regulatory riddle of harmful content - an environmental cognition perspective (2007)
0.03
0.034438 = product of:
0.045917332 = sum of:
0.025657427 = product of:
0.051314853 = sum of:
0.051314853 = weight(_text_:media in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051314853 = score(doc=387,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.29274195 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.010612145 = product of:
0.02122429 = sum of:
0.02122429 = weight(_text_:28 in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02122429 = score(doc=387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009647759 = product of:
0.028943274 = sum of:
0.028943274 = weight(_text_:29 in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028943274 = score(doc=387,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.21985546 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Search engines have evolved with the internet as an organic tool to make sense of the chaos of sites accessible on the web. They started in the early 19906 as the Internet was becoming a commercial entity. They have gradually been converging and a few of them have a quasi monopoly on access to information, with three major actors left: Google, Yahoo! and MSN. This increased control in access to sources of internet content has triggered concerns among consumers, activists, family associations and governments. Issues of consumer manipulation, harmful content and freedom of speech have appeared that stress the key role of search engines but also call into question their functionality and their independence. Their use and appropriation by young people and parents also question their functionality and independence. According to a recent research on media appropriation, go per cent of young people between iz and 14 years in six European countries connect to internet mostly via search engines, with Google by far the favourite. But it is not to look for information. It is rather as a lazy way to get to the site they want and already know. It is more a portal than an information provider. Most young people don't seem to be aware that there are dedicated search engines for their own use. As for parents, they tend to use filters mostly to control the time and the expenses of their children. In both cases, search relevance is a kind of shortcut rather than a thorough quest for information. It follows an economic logic of saving time and money rather than curiosity or control of harmful content. And yet search engines for children are the outcome of calls for regulation by families and educators. So how to explain the gap between user behaviour and media competence? Between regulation and appropriation? Where does this leave protection of minors about unsuitable or harmful content? What does it tell us about the future of search? This chapter has three objectives, developed in three parts: to take stock of the existing search tools for parents and young people; to provide an analytical framework for assessing self-, co- and regulatory strategies for search engines in the context of harmful content; to place search engines for children in the wider perspective of the search for information, in an environmental cognition paradigm. This leads to consider alternative solutions to direct regulation in internet governance and to examine new criteria for the empowerment of children in the information society.
- Date
- 13. 5.2007 10:29:29
7. 6.2007 14:28:32
-
Finden, ohne zu suchen (2004)
0.03
0.03397178 = product of:
0.06794356 = sum of:
0.018571254 = product of:
0.037142508 = sum of:
0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 2979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037142508 = score(doc=2979,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 2979, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2979)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.049372308 = product of:
0.14811692 = sum of:
0.14811692 = weight(_text_:ermittelt in 2979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14811692 = score(doc=2979,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26771787 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 2979, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2979)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- NextLinks schlägt selbst ständig jeweils zehn weitere Webadressen vor, der User muss keinerlei Suchbegriffe eingeben. Möglich wird dies durch die Verwendung von Algorithmen zum Auffinden semantisch ähnlicher Strukturen. Wie bei einer "normalen" Suchmaschine werden zunächst viele Mio. Webseiten ausgewertet. Mittels statistischem Verfahren können daraus Ähnlichkeiten ermittelt und in einer aktuellen Datenbank gespeichert werden. Auf diese Informationsquelle greift NextLinks regelmäßig zurück. Das anonyme Surfverhalten oder persönliche Daten werden dabei nicht gespeichert. Die Software läuft ab Windows 98 und unterstützt alle aktuellen Versionen von Windows-Internet-Explorer, Netscape, Mozilla und Opera. NextLinks ist kostenlos und unter http://wortschatz.unileipziq.de/nextlinks erhältlich.
- Date
- 24. 1.2004 9:28:59
-
Couvering, E. van: ¬The economy of navigation : search engines, search optimisation and search results (2007)
0.03
0.033804826 = product of:
0.06760965 = sum of:
0.055549957 = product of:
0.11109991 = sum of:
0.11109991 = weight(_text_:media in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11109991 = score(doc=379,freq=12.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.6338049 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.012059698 = product of:
0.03617909 = sum of:
0.03617909 = weight(_text_:29 in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03617909 = score(doc=379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The political economy of communication focuses critically on what structural issues in mass media - ownership, labour practices, professional ethics, and so on - mean for products of those mass media and thus for society more generally. In the case of new media, recent political economic studies have looked at the technical infrastructure of the Internet and also at Internet usage. However, political economic studies of internet content are only beginning. Recent studies on the phenomenology of the Web, that is, the way the Web is experienced from an individual user's perspective, highlight the centrality of the search engine to most users' experiences of the Web, particularly when they venture beyond familiar Web sites. Search engines are therefore an obvi ous place to begin the analysis of Web content. An important assumption of this chapter is that internet search engines are media businesses and that the tools developed in media studies can be profitably brought to bear on them. This focus on search engine as industry comes from the critical tradition of the political economy of communications in rejecting the notion that the market alone should be the arbiter of the structure of the media industry, as might be appropriate for other types of products.
- Date
- 13. 5.2007 10:29:29
-
tw: Power-Sucher für Power-Surfer : Fireball (1997)
0.03
0.030509744 = product of:
0.061019488 = sum of:
0.037142508 = product of:
0.074285015 = sum of:
0.074285015 = weight(_text_:28 in 357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074285015 = score(doc=357,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 357, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=357)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02387698 = product of:
0.07163094 = sum of:
0.07163094 = weight(_text_:29 in 357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07163094 = score(doc=357,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 357, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=357)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.1997 14:03:29
- Source
- Com!. 1997, H.8, S.28
-
Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999)
0.03
0.030402351 = product of:
0.060804702 = sum of:
0.037142508 = product of:
0.074285015 = sum of:
0.074285015 = weight(_text_:28 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074285015 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.023662193 = product of:
0.07098658 = sum of:
0.07098658 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07098658 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
-
Höfer, W.: Detektive im Web (1999)
0.03
0.030259673 = product of:
0.060519345 = sum of:
0.031836435 = product of:
0.06367287 = sum of:
0.06367287 = weight(_text_:28 in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06367287 = score(doc=4007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02868291 = product of:
0.08604873 = sum of:
0.08604873 = weight(_text_:22 in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08604873 = score(doc=4007,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.1999 20:22:06
- Source
- Internet Professionell. 1999, H.9, S.28-36
-
Auletta, K: Googled : the end of the world as we know it (2009)
0.03
0.027411321 = product of:
0.054822642 = sum of:
0.04800065 = product of:
0.0960013 = sum of:
0.0960013 = weight(_text_:media in 1991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0960013 = score(doc=1991,freq=14.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.54767007 = fieldWeight in 1991, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1991)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.006821995 = product of:
0.020465985 = sum of:
0.020465985 = weight(_text_:29 in 1991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020465985 = score(doc=1991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1991)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- There are companies that create waves and those that ride or are drowned by them. This is a ride on the Google wave, and the fullest account of how it formed and crashed into traditional media businesses. With unprecedented access to Google's founders and executives, as well as to those in media who are struggling to keep their heads above water, Ken Auletta reveals how the industry is being disrupted and redefined. On one level Auletta uses Google as a stand-in for the digital revolution as a whole - and goes inside Google's closed door meetings, introducing Google's notoriously private founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, as well as those who work with - and against - them. In "Googled", the reader discovers the 'secret sauce' of the company's success and why the worlds of 'new' and 'old' media often communicate as if residents of different planets. It may send chills down traditionalists' spines, but it's a crucial roadmap to the future of media business: the Google story may well be the canary in the coal mine. "Googled" is candid, objective and authoritative - based on extensive research including in-house at Google HQ. Crucially, it's not just a history or reportage: it's forward-looking. This book is ahead of the curve and, unlike any other Google books, which tend to have been near-histories, somewhat starstruck, to be now out of date or which fail to look at the full synthesis of business and technology.
- Content
- Messing with the magic -- Starting in a garage -- Buzz but few $'s -- Prepping the Google rocket -- Innocence or arrogance? -- Google goes public -- The new evil empire? -- Chasing the fox -- War on multiple fronts -- Waking the government bear -- Google enters adolescence -- Is old media drowning? -- Compete or collaborate? -- Happy birthday -- Googled -- Where is the wave taking old media? -- Where is the wave taking Google? -- Media maxims.
- Date
- 11.12.2009 18:29:36
-
Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014)
0.02
0.024903167 = product of:
0.049806334 = sum of:
0.03628508 = product of:
0.07257016 = sum of:
0.07257016 = weight(_text_:media in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07257016 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013521253 = product of:
0.04056376 = sum of:
0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04056376 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 13. 9.2014 14:45:22
- Source
- http://www.searchmetrics.com/media/documents/knowledge-base/searchmetrics-ranking-faktoren-studie-2014.pdf
-
Dönhoff, P.; Bartels, C.: Online-Recherche bei NETZEITUNG.DE (2007)
0.02
0.02206574 = product of:
0.04413148 = sum of:
0.032071784 = product of:
0.06414357 = sum of:
0.06414357 = weight(_text_:media in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06414357 = score(doc=380,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.36592746 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.012059698 = product of:
0.03617909 = sum of:
0.03617909 = weight(_text_:29 in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03617909 = score(doc=380,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Die Netzeitung war die erste und ist bis heute die führende deutsche Tageszeitung mit Vollredaktion, die ausschließlich im internet erscheint. Seit ihrer Gründung im Frühjahr 2000 hat sie bewegte Zeiten hinter sich. Es gab verschiedene Besitzerwechsel: Von den norwegischen Gründern und Namensgebern, den online-Journalismus-Pionieren Nettavisen.no, ging sie in den Besitz von Bertelsmann über, bevor sie dann von ihrem Chefredakteur Dr. Michael Maier und seinem Partner Ralf Dieter Brunowski übernommen wurde und schließlich im Sommer 2005 wieder in norwegische Hände überging: zum in Oslo ansässige Medienunternehmen Orkla Media. Auch inhaltlich hat sich Netzeitung.de seit den Anfangsjahren stark weiterentwickelt. Die Website erhielt verschiedene Preise, wurde als meistzitiertes Onlinemedium ausgezeichnet und erhielt schließlich im Herbst 2006 den internationalen Global-Media-Award für die Kategorie >Online<. In dieser Kategorie hat sie auch renommierte Angebote, wie New York Times, Washington Post oder Spiegel Online hinter sich gelassen und damit ihre Relevanz unter Nachrichtenportalen erneut bestätigt. Neben der Website bestückt das Unternehmen inzwischen Medienangebote aller Art: Gesprochene Radio-Nachrichten und Berichte für zahlreiche Radiostationen gehören ebenso dazu wie die Teletextangebote für verschiedene TV-Sender oder Inhalte für online-Redaktionen, Infoterminals, Firmen-Intranets und mobile Geräte.
- Date
- 13. 5.2007 10:29:29
-
Sauer, D.: Alles schneller finden (2001)
0.02
0.02051048 = product of:
0.08204192 = sum of:
0.08204192 = product of:
0.12306288 = sum of:
0.07235818 = weight(_text_:29 in 6835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07235818 = score(doc=6835,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 6835, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6835)
0.0507047 = weight(_text_:22 in 6835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0507047 = score(doc=6835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6835)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.1997 14:03:29
11.11.2001 17:25:22
- Source
- Com!online. 2001, H.12, S.24-29
-
Advanced online media use (2023)
0.02
0.020283977 = product of:
0.08113591 = sum of:
0.08113591 = product of:
0.16227181 = sum of:
0.16227181 = weight(_text_:media in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16227181 = score(doc=954,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.92573136 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Ten recommendations for the advanced use of online media. Mit Links auf historische und weiterführende Beiträge.
- Content
- "1. Use a range of different media 2. Access paywalled media content 3. Use an advertising and tracking blocker 4. Use alternatives to Google Search 5. Use alternatives to YouTube 6. Use alternatives to Facebook and Twitter 7. Caution with Wikipedia 8. Web browser, email, and internet access 9. Access books and scientific papers 10. Access deleted web content"
- Source
- https://swprs.org/advanced-online-media-use/
-
Mostafa, J.: Bessere Suchmaschinen für das Web (2006)
0.02
0.020055551 = product of:
0.080222204 = sum of:
0.080222204 = sum of:
0.059848268 = weight(_text_:ermittelt in 4871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059848268 = score(doc=4871,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26771787 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.22354977 = fieldWeight in 4871, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4871)
0.0102329925 = weight(_text_:29 in 4871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0102329925 = score(doc=4871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 4871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4871)
0.01014094 = weight(_text_:22 in 4871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01014094 = score(doc=4871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 4871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4871)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- "Seit wenigen Jahren haben Suchmaschinen die Recherche im Internet revolutioniert. Statt in Büchereien zu gehen, um dort mühsam etwas nachzuschlagen, erhalten wir die gewünschten Dokumente heute mit ein paar Tastaturanschlägen und Mausklicks. »Googeln«, nach dem Namen der weltweit dominierenden Suchmaschine, ist zum Synonym für die Online-Recherche geworden. Künftig werden verbesserte Suchmaschinen die gewünschten Informationen sogar noch zielsicherer aufspüren. Die neuen Programme dringen dazu tiefer in die Online-Materie ein. Sie sortieren und präsentieren ihre Ergebnisse besser, und zur Optimierung der Suche merken sie sich die persönlichen Präferenzen der Nutzer, die sie in vorherigen Anfragen ermittelt haben. Zudem erweitern sie den inhaltlichen Horizont, da sie mehr leisten, als nur eingetippte Schlüsselwörter zu verarbeiten. Einige der neuen Systeme berücksichtigen automatisch, an welchem Ort die Anfrage gestellt wurde. Dadurch kann beispielsweise ein PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) über seine Funknetzverbindung das nächstgelegene Restaurant ausfindig machen. Auch Bilder spüren die neuen Suchmaschinen besser auf, indem sie Vorlagen mit ähnlichen, bereits abgespeicherten Mustern vergleichen. Sie können sogar den Namen eines Musikstücks herausfinden, wenn man ihnen nur ein paar Takte daraus vorsummt. Heutige Suchmaschinen basieren auf den Erkenntnissen aus dem Bereich des information retrieval (Wiederfinden von Information), mit dem sich Computerwissenschaftler schon seit über 50 Jahren befassen. Bereits 1966 schrieb Ben Ami Lipetz im Scientific American einen Artikel über das »Speichern und Wiederfinden von Information«. Damalige Systeme konnten freilich nur einfache Routine- und Büroanfragen bewältigen. Lipetz zog den hellsichtigen Schluss, dass größere Durchbrüche im information retrieval erst dann erreichbar sind, wenn Forscher die Informationsverarbeitung im menschlichen Gehirn besser verstanden haben und diese Erkenntnisse auf Computer übertragen. Zwar können Computer dabei auch heute noch nicht mit Menschen mithalten, aber sie berücksichtigen bereits weit besser die persönlichen Interessen, Gewohnheiten und Bedürfnisse ihrer Nutzer. Bevor wir uns neuen Entwicklungen bei den Suchmaschinen zuwenden, ist es hilfreich, sich ein Bild davon zu machen, wie die bisherigen funktionieren: Was genau ist passiert, wenn »Google« auf dem Bildschirm meldet, es habe in 0,32 Sekunden einige Milliarden Dokumente durchsucht? Es würde wesentlich länger dauern, wenn dabei die Schlüsselwörter der Anfrage nacheinander mit den Inhalten all dieser Webseiten verglichen werden müssten. Um lange Suchzeiten zu vermeiden, führen die Suchmaschinen viele ihrer Kernoperationen bereits lange vor dem Zeitpunkt der Nutzeranfrage aus.
Vorsortiert und radförmig präsentiert Statt einfach nur die gewichtete Ergebnisliste zu präsentieren (die relativ leicht durch Spoofing manipuliert werden kann), versuchen einige Suchmaschinen, unter denjenigen Webseiten, die am ehesten der Anfrage entsprechen, Ähnlichkeiten und Unterschiede zu finden und die Ergebnisse in Gruppen unterteilt darzustellen. Diese Muster können Wörter sein, Synonyme oder sogar übergeordnete Themenbereiche, die nach speziellen Regeln ermittelt werden. Solche Systeme ordnen jeder gefundenen Linkgruppe einen charakteristischen Begriff zu. Der Anwender kann die Suche dann weiter verfeinern, indem er eine Untergruppe von Ergebnissen auswählt. So liefern etwa die Suchmaschinen »Northern Light« (der Pionier auf diesem Gebiet) und »Clusty« nach Gruppen (Clustern) geordnete Ergebnisse. »Mooter«, eine innovative Suchmaschine, die ebenfalls diese Gruppiertechnik verwendet, stellt die Gruppen zudem grafisch dar (siehe Grafik links unten). Das System ordnet die UntergruppenButtons radförmig um einen zentralen Button an, der sämtliche Ergebnisse enthält. Ein Klick auf die UntergruppenButtons erzeugt Listen relevanter Links und zeigt neue, damit zusammenhängende Gruppen. Mooter erinnert sich daran, welche Untergruppen gewählt wurden. Noch genauere Ergebnisse erhält der Nutzer, wenn er die Verfeinerungsoption wählt: Sie kombiniert bei früheren Suchen ausgewählte Gruppen mit der aktuellen Anfrage. Ein ähnliches System, das ebenfalls visuelle Effekte nutzt, ist »Kartoo«. Es handelt sich dabei um eine so genannte Meta-Suchmaschine: Sie gibt die Nutzeranfragen an andere Suchmaschinen weiter und präsentiert die gesammelten Ergebnisse in grafischer Form. Kartoo liefert eine Liste von Schlüsselbegriffen von den unterschiedlichen Webseiten und generiert daraus eine »Landkarte«. Auf ihr werden wichtige Seiten als kons (Symbole) dargestellt und Bezüge zwischen den Seiten mit Labeln und Pfaden versehen. Jedes Label lässt sich zur weiteren Verfeinerung der Suche nutzen. Einige neue Computertools erweitern die Suche dadurch, dass sie nicht nur das Web durchforsten, sondern auch die Festplatte des eigenen Rechners. Zurzeit braucht man dafür noch eigenständige Programme. Aber Google hat beispielsweise kürzlich seine »Desktop Search« angekündigt, die zwei Funktionen kombiniert: Der Anwender kann angeben, ob das Internet, die Festplatte oder beides zusammen durchsucht werden soll. Die nächste Version von Microsoft Windows (Codename »Longhorn«) soll mit ähnlichen Fähigkeiten ausgestattet werden: Longhorn soll die implizite Suche beherrschen, bei der Anwender ohne Eingabe spezifischer Anfragen relevante Informationen auffinden können. (Dabei werden Techniken angewandt, die in einem anderen Microsoft-Projekt namens »Stuff I've seen« - »Sachen, die ich gesehen habe« - entwickelt wurden.) Bei der impliziten Suche werden Schlüsselwörter aus der Textinformation gewonnen, die der Anwender in jüngster Zeit auf dem Rechner verarbeitet oder verändert hat - etwa E-Mails oder Word-Dokumente -, um damit auf der Festplatte gespeicherte Informationen wiederzufinden. Möglicherweise wird Microsoft diese Suchfunktion auch auf Webseiten ausdehnen. Außerdem sollen Anwender auf dem Bildschirm gezeigte Textinhalte leichter in Suchanfragen umsetzen können." ...
- Date
- 31.12.1996 19:29:41
22. 1.2006 18:34:49
-
Kiefer, A.: ¬Die Googlewhacker (2002)
0.02
0.018888695 = product of:
0.03777739 = sum of:
0.010612145 = product of:
0.02122429 = sum of:
0.02122429 = weight(_text_:28 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02122429 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027165245 = product of:
0.040747866 = sum of:
0.020465985 = weight(_text_:29 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020465985 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.02028188 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02028188 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 3.2002 10:28:22
- Source
- Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.66 vom 19.3.2002, S.29
-
Schneider, N.: ¬Die Notwendigkeit der Suchmaschinenregulierung aus Sicht eines Regulierers (2007)
0.02
0.017727416 = product of:
0.035454832 = sum of:
0.018571254 = product of:
0.037142508 = sum of:
0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037142508 = score(doc=371,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 371, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=371)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.016883578 = product of:
0.05065073 = sum of:
0.05065073 = weight(_text_:29 in 371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05065073 = score(doc=371,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 371, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=371)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 13. 5.2007 10:29:29
5. 6.2007 11:28:03
-
Dasgupta, S.K.: Search engines : tooles for exploring the Internet (1998)
0.02
0.01743414 = product of:
0.03486828 = sum of:
0.02122429 = product of:
0.04244858 = sum of:
0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04244858 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01364399 = product of:
0.04093197 = sum of:
0.04093197 = weight(_text_:29 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04093197 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 8. 5.1999 19:28:29
-
Haring, M.; Rudaev, A.; Lewandowski, D.: Google & Co. : wie die "Search Studies" an der HAW Hamburg unserem Nutzungsverhalten auf den Zahn fühlen: Blickpunkt angewandte Forschung (2022)
0.02
0.01743414 = product of:
0.03486828 = sum of:
0.02122429 = product of:
0.04244858 = sum of:
0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04244858 = score(doc=630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01364399 = product of:
0.04093197 = sum of:
0.04093197 = weight(_text_:29 in 630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04093197 = score(doc=630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=630)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 28. 1.2022 11:05:29
-
Altmann, O.; Pöhl, S.: Information Retrieval im Internet : bekannte Suchdienste und ihre Eigenschaften (1997)
0.02
0.017372772 = product of:
0.034745544 = sum of:
0.02122429 = product of:
0.04244858 = sum of:
0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04244858 = score(doc=205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=205)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013521253 = product of:
0.04056376 = sum of:
0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04056376 = score(doc=205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=205)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 28. 7.1997 19:07:50
- Pages
- S.18-22
