-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.3: Gecontroleerde informatietalen (1990)
0.10
0.09508854 = product of:
0.19017708 = sum of:
0.14602552 = weight(_text_:open in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14602552 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.6965534 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
0.04415156 = product of:
0.08830312 = sum of:
0.08830312 = weight(_text_:22 in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08830312 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Open. 22(1990) no.1, S.11-15
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.4: Onderwerpsontsluiting en on-line catalogi (1990)
0.10
0.09508854 = product of:
0.19017708 = sum of:
0.14602552 = weight(_text_:open in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14602552 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.6965534 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
0.04415156 = product of:
0.08830312 = sum of:
0.08830312 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08830312 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330
-
Ongering, H.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: ¬De ontsluiting in het ADION-systeem : precision en recall (1989)
0.04
0.041721575 = product of:
0.1668863 = sum of:
0.1668863 = weight(_text_:open in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1668863 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.79606104 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Open. 21(1989) nos.7/8, S.261-264
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.1: Inhoudsanalyse (1989)
0.04
0.03650638 = product of:
0.14602552 = sum of:
0.14602552 = weight(_text_:open in 1841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14602552 = score(doc=1841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.6965534 = fieldWeight in 1841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1841)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Open. 21(1989) no.6, S.214-219
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.2: Vrije terminologie versus gecontroleerd vocabulaire (1989)
0.04
0.03650638 = product of:
0.14602552 = sum of:
0.14602552 = weight(_text_:open in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14602552 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.6965534 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Open. 21(1989) no.10, S.348-352
-
Zumer, M.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Consequences of implementing FRBR : are we ready to open pandora's box? (2002)
0.02
0.015645592 = product of:
0.062582366 = sum of:
0.062582366 = weight(_text_:open in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062582366 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Some thoughts about the format of the Master Reference File database (2000)
0.01
0.0133799445 = product of:
0.053519778 = sum of:
0.053519778 = product of:
0.107039556 = sum of:
0.107039556 = weight(_text_:22 in 6405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107039556 = score(doc=6405,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 6405, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6405)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.15-22
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification as a CDS/ISIS database (1991)
0.01
0.010340675 = product of:
0.0413627 = sum of:
0.0413627 = product of:
0.0827254 = sum of:
0.0827254 = weight(_text_:access in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0827254 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- NISKO'91: International Conference on Knowledge Organization, Terminology & Information Access Management, Bratislava, 13.-16.5.1991
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Information languages and multilingual subject access (2003)
0.01
0.008863434 = product of:
0.035453737 = sum of:
0.035453737 = product of:
0.07090747 = sum of:
0.07090747 = weight(_text_:access in 3963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07090747 = score(doc=3963,freq=18.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.44937888 = fieldWeight in 3963, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3963)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- "1. Introduction Multilingual and crosslingual access to information is receiving more and more attention. Maybe the most important reason for this development is the Internet. There are estimations that about half of its users are people with a mother tongue other than English and that this proportion is growing. Crosslingual access in this context means the possibility to get free text access to information using another (natural) language than the language of the information itself. This type of access is important for users with a good passive knowledge of a language but with only a small active vocabulary of the same language, e.g. a Englishman who can read Russian, but has difficulties in formulating adequate search request in that language. Crosslingual access can also be valuable for monolingual users who can automatically or manually have translations of foreign language documents. The search requests will be translated or converted into the language of the information. Multilingual access assumes that the instruments used for access, the controlled information languages, are available in more than one language. An classic example is the Englishman who uses his English edition of the Universal Decimal Classification to search the catalogue of a library in China, although the classification of the library is done using a Chinese edition. In this case the searching and the classifying results in a notation that is the same irrespective which language edition was used for indexing. Another possibility is the use of a multilingual thesaurus or subject headings list, such the trilingual edition of the Library of Congress Subject Headings built at the Royal Library in Brussels (Belgium) or the Macrothesaurus of the OECD. Here, words are the access points - in one language into which each search request will be converted, or, alternatively, into all the languages involved. Multilingual information languages and guidelines an how to build them are the subject of this paper. Particular attention will be paid to multilingual thesauri."
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Colenbrander-Dijkman, A.-M.: Subject access to central catalogues : incompatibility issues of library classification systems and subject headings in subject cataloguing (1986)
0.01
0.008863435 = product of:
0.03545374 = sum of:
0.03545374 = product of:
0.07090748 = sum of:
0.07090748 = weight(_text_:access in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07090748 = score(doc=3926,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Traditional subject cataloguing hampers subject retrieval in central catalogues, because of the lack of a common indexing and retrieval language in these catalogues. This study investigates the possibilities to use the various individual subject access systems, present in the catalogues, for subject access. A search procedure based on 'citation pearl growing' and 'user relevance feedback', which can be applied in a public access interface to central data bases, has been developed. From an experiment it can be concluded, that automated expert assistance, provided with a search strategy, will improve search response for unexperienced searchers. It reduces the number of zero-hits and increases the number of relevant items retrieved
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Sociological aspects of classification (1995)
0.01
0.0059089568 = product of:
0.023635827 = sum of:
0.023635827 = product of:
0.047271654 = sum of:
0.047271654 = weight(_text_:access in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047271654 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Defines classification. Discusses bibliographic classifications; subject classifications; subjects monitored in classifications; the order of subjects in classifications and the use of classifications. Many library managers question whether controlled subject access is necessary when most searches are done by title words. Where classification is used, the choice of scheme is more often determined by sociological reasoning than by informations cience consideration
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Fiction in need of transcending traditional classification (1997)
0.01
0.0059089568 = product of:
0.023635827 = sum of:
0.023635827 = product of:
0.047271654 = sum of:
0.047271654 = weight(_text_:access in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047271654 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to papers read at the 1996 Electronic Access to Fiction research seminar at Copenhagen, Denmark
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004)
0.01
0.0059089568 = product of:
0.023635827 = sum of:
0.023635827 = product of:
0.047271654 = sum of:
0.047271654 = weight(_text_:access in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047271654 = score(doc=2646,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In the last decade a discussion has been going an in the Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) about the principles of cataloguing. This discussion was initiated by the widespread replacement of the card and list catalogues by Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) since 1980. In this paper we discuss the role of subject cataloguing in three important documents that are the results of this discussion. Our conclusion is that the interest in subject cataloguing has grown remarkably, but is still not an the level it deserves given the fact that a great part of all searches in OPACs are subject oriented.
- Content
- 1. Introduction In this paper we address two questions: 1. What is the position of subject indexing in the thinking of the library world after the publication of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998)? 2. Is this position in accordance with the requirements of the users searching for documents about a given subject? Research Shows that searching an a topic (i.e. subject access) is an important, even predominant type of end-user searching of library catalogues and even more so of other bibliographic databases. Between one third and two thirds of all OPAC searches are probably subject searches (Large & Beheshti, 199%). Taking into account different ways in which searching an a topic is implemented in library catalogues (subject headings, classification, keywords only) the percentage may be even higher. For example title word searching may be a substitute for subject searching if no better tools are available. In the light of this it is not surprising that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998) pays attention to subject searching, as well as the Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) (2003). Also the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles: Final draft of 19 December 2003, which is the result of the first First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code mentiong subject access as a function of cataloguing (Statement, 2003). In this paper we discuss the ways these three documents deal with subjects.
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: ¬The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and knowledge organization (2003)
0.01
0.0051703374 = product of:
0.02068135 = sum of:
0.02068135 = product of:
0.0413627 = sum of:
0.0413627 = weight(_text_:access in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0413627 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR, 1998), the study commissioned by IFLA, brings revolutionary changes in the way we see modern computer catalogues. The catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a copy of a card catalogue, but as an interconnected network of related information. Implications of the new model for the future development of catalogues are discussed. Special attention is given to access points and relationships between entities and the changes those will bring into both the formal and subject cataloguing, and authority files.
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Multilingual subject access and the Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri : an experimental study (2000)
0.00
0.0044317176 = product of:
0.01772687 = sum of:
0.01772687 = product of:
0.03545374 = sum of:
0.03545374 = weight(_text_:access in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03545374 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
