-
Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007)
0.09
0.09149534 = product of:
0.36598137 = sum of:
0.36598137 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36598137 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
-
Felgner, U.: ¬Die Begriffe der Äquivalenz, der Gleichheit und der Identität (2020)
0.04
0.040154617 = product of:
0.080309235 = sum of:
0.062582366 = weight(_text_:open in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062582366 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.01772687 = product of:
0.03545374 = sum of:
0.03545374 = weight(_text_:access in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03545374 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl. die Ergänzung zur Verfügbarkeit unter Open access unter: Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 123(2021) H.3, S.217-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s13291-020-00214-0.
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.02
0.015270403 = product of:
0.06108161 = sum of:
0.06108161 = sum of:
0.029544784 = weight(_text_:access in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029544784 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.03153683 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03153683 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- To organize information, librarians create structures. These structures grow from a logic that goes back at least as far as Aristotle. It is the basis of classification as we practice it, and thesauri and subject headings have developed from it. Feminist critiques of logic suggest that logic is gendered in nature. This article will explore how these critiques play out in contemporary standards for the organization of information. Our widely used classification schemes embody principles such as hierarchical force that conform to traditional/Aristotelian logic. Our subject heading strings follow a linear path of subdivision. Our thesauri break down subjects into discrete concepts. In thesauri and subject heading lists we privilege hierarchical relationships, reflected in the syndetic structure of broader and narrower terms, over all other relationships. Are our classificatory and syndetic structures gendered? Are there other options? Carol Gilligan's In a Different Voice (1982), Women's Ways of Knowing (Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recent related research suggest a different type of structure for women's knowledge grounded in "connected knowing." This article explores current and potential elements of connected knowing in subject access with a focus on the relationships, both paradigmatic and syntagmatic, between concepts.
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.01
0.01103789 = product of:
0.04415156 = sum of:
0.04415156 = product of:
0.08830312 = sum of:
0.08830312 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08830312 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Pages
- S.9-22
-
Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971)
0.01
0.009461049 = product of:
0.037844196 = sum of:
0.037844196 = product of:
0.07568839 = sum of:
0.07568839 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07568839 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
-
Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.01
0.009126595 = product of:
0.03650638 = sum of:
0.03650638 = weight(_text_:open in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03650638 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.17413835 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.01
0.006307366 = product of:
0.025229463 = sum of:
0.025229463 = product of:
0.050458927 = sum of:
0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050458927 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994)
0.01
0.005518945 = product of:
0.02207578 = sum of:
0.02207578 = product of:
0.04415156 = sum of:
0.04415156 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04415156 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:17:40
-
Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006)
0.01
0.005518945 = product of:
0.02207578 = sum of:
0.02207578 = product of:
0.04415156 = sum of:
0.04415156 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04415156 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Pages
- S.22-33
-
Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013)
0.00
0.0047305245 = product of:
0.018922098 = sum of:
0.018922098 = product of:
0.037844196 = sum of:
0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037844196 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
-
Simoes, G.; Machado, L.; Gnoli, C.; Souza, R.: Can an ontologically-oriented KO do without concepts? (2020)
0.00
0.0044317176 = product of:
0.01772687 = sum of:
0.01772687 = product of:
0.03545374 = sum of:
0.03545374 = weight(_text_:access in 4964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03545374 = score(doc=4964,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 4964, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4964)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The ontological approach in the development of KOS is an attempt to overcome the limitations of the traditional epistemological approach. Questions raise about the representation and organization of ontologically-oriented KO units, such as BFO universals or ILC phenomena. The study aims to compare the ontological approaches of BFO and ILC using a hermeneutic approach. We found that the differences between the units of the two systems are primarily due to the formal level of abstraction of BFO and the different organizations, namely the grouping of phenomena into ILC classes that represent complex compounds of entities in the BFO approach. In both systems the use of concepts is considered instrumental, although in the ILC they constitute the intersubjective component of the phenomena whereas in BFO they serve to access the entities of reality but are not part of them.
-
Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002)
0.00
0.0039421036 = product of:
0.015768414 = sum of:
0.015768414 = product of:
0.03153683 = sum of:
0.03153683 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03153683 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1.12.2002 11:12:22
-
Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012)
0.00
0.0039421036 = product of:
0.015768414 = sum of:
0.015768414 = product of:
0.03153683 = sum of:
0.03153683 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03153683 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:11:25
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.00
0.0039421036 = product of:
0.015768414 = sum of:
0.015768414 = product of:
0.03153683 = sum of:
0.03153683 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03153683 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Gnoli, C.: Progress in synthetic classification : towards unique definition of concepts (2007)
0.00
0.003693098 = product of:
0.014772392 = sum of:
0.014772392 = product of:
0.029544784 = sum of:
0.029544784 = weight(_text_:access in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029544784 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Beitrag anlässlich: Proceedings of the International Seminar "Information access for the global community", 4-5 June 2007, The Hague. - Vgl.: http://www.udcc.org/seminar07/presentations/gnoli.pdf.
-
Szostak, R.: Complex concepts into basic concepts (2011)
0.00
0.003693098 = product of:
0.014772392 = sum of:
0.014772392 = product of:
0.029544784 = sum of:
0.029544784 = weight(_text_:access in 4926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029544784 = score(doc=4926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046553567 = queryNorm
0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 4926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4926)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Interdisciplinary communication, and thus the rate of progress in scholarly understanding, would be greatly enhanced if scholars had access to a universal classification of documents or ideas not grounded in particular disciplines or cultures. Such a classification is feasible if complex concepts can be understood as some combination of more basic concepts. There appear to be five main types of concept theory in the philosophical literature. Each provides some support for the idea of breaking complex into basic concepts that can be understood across disciplines or cultures, but each has detractors. None of these criticisms represents a substantive obstacle to breaking complex concepts into basic concepts within information science. Can we take the subject entries in existing universal but discipline-based classifications, and break these into a set of more basic concepts that can be applied across disciplinary classes? The author performs this sort of analysis for Dewey classes 300 to 339.9. This analysis will serve to identify the sort of 'basic concepts' that would lie at the heart of a truly universal classification. There are two key types of basic concept: the things we study (individuals, rocks, trees), and the relationships among these (talking, moving, paying).
