Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Bilder"
  1. Fukumoto, T.: ¬An analysis of image retrieval behavior for metadata type image database (2006) 0.02
    0.01825319 = product of:
      0.07301276 = sum of:
        0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07301276 = score(doc=965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=965)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper was to analyze users' behavior during image retrieval exercises. Results revealed that users tend to follow a set search strategy: firstly they input one or two keyword search terms one after another and view the images generated by their initial search and after they navigate their way around the web by using the 'back to home' or 'previous page' buttons. These results are consistent with existing Web research. Many of the actions recorded revealed that subjects behavior differed depending on if the task set was presented as a closed or open task. In contrast no differences were found for the time subjects took to perform a single action or their use of the AND operator.
  2. Lepsky, K.; Müller, T.; Wille, J.: Metadata improvement for image information retrieval (2010) 0.02
    0.01825319 = product of:
      0.07301276 = sum of:
        0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 4995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07301276 = score(doc=4995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 4995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4995)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the goals and results of the research project Perseus-a as an attempt to improve information retrieval of digital images by automatically connecting them with text-based descriptions. The development uses the image collection of prometheus, the distributed digital image archive for research and studies, the articles of the digitized Reallexikon zur Deutschen Kunstgeschichte, art historical terminological resources and classification data, and an open source system for linguistic and statistic automatic indexing called lingo.
  3. Menard, E.: Image retrieval in multilingual environments : research issues (2006) 0.01
    0.0059089568 = product of:
      0.023635827 = sum of:
        0.023635827 = product of:
          0.047271654 = sum of:
            0.047271654 = weight(_text_:access in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047271654 = score(doc=240,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an overview of the nature and the characteristics of the numerous problems encountered when a user tries to access a collection of images in a multilingual environment. The authors identify major research questions to be investigated to improve image retrieval effectiveness in a multilingual environment.
  4. Maier, E.: Will online images prove to be a multimedia cornucopia for museums? (1999) 0.01
    0.0051703374 = product of:
      0.02068135 = sum of:
        0.02068135 = product of:
          0.0413627 = sum of:
            0.0413627 = weight(_text_:access in 709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0413627 = score(doc=709,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 709, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Faced with increasingly tight budgets many museums have come under pressure to explore new sources of income. The marketing of museum assets seems to offer one possibility especially since there is an apparently insatiable demand for content from the multimedia and 'edutainment' industries. Furthermore, providing access to the cultural heritage of Europe has come to be seen as a major aim of the EU and various programmes have been set up to encourage and facilitate this. Apart from the economic potential of digital museum content, the concomitant legal and security issues are investigated.
  5. Yee, K.-P.; Swearingen, K.; Li, K.; Hearst, M.: Faceted metadata for image search and browsing 0.00
    0.0044317176 = product of:
      0.01772687 = sum of:
        0.01772687 = product of:
          0.03545374 = sum of:
            0.03545374 = weight(_text_:access in 5944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03545374 = score(doc=5944,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 5944, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5944)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    There are currently two dominant interface types for searching and browsing large image collections: keywordbased search, and searching by overall similarity to sample images. We present an alternative based on enabling users to navigate along conceptual dimensions that describe the images. The interface makes use of hierarchical faceted metadata and dynamically generated query previews. A usability study, in which 32 art history students explored a collection of 35,000 fine arts images, compares this approach to a standard image search interface. Despite the unfamiliarity and power of the interface (attributes that often lead to rejection of new search interfaces), the study results show that 90% of the participants preferred the metadata approach overall, 97% said that it helped them learn more about the collection, 75% found it more flexible, and 72% found it easier to use than a standard baseline system. These results indicate that a category-based approach is a successful way to provide access to image collections.
  6. Rorissa, A.: Relationships between perceived features and similarity of images : a test of Tversky's contrast model (2007) 0.00
    0.003693098 = product of:
      0.014772392 = sum of:
        0.014772392 = product of:
          0.029544784 = sum of:
            0.029544784 = weight(_text_:access in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029544784 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The rapid growth of the numbers of images and their users as a result of the reduction in cost and increase in efficiency of the creation, storage, manipulation, and transmission of images poses challenges to those who organize and provide access to images. One of these challenges is similarity matching, a key component of current content-based image retrieval systems. Similarity matching often is implemented through similarity measures based on geometric models of similarity whose metric axioms are not satisfied by human similarity judgment data. This study is significant in that it is among the first known to test Tversky's contrast model, which equates the degree of similarity of two stimuli to a linear combination of their common and distinctive features, in the context of image representation and retrieval. Data were collected from 150 participants who performed an image description and a similarity judgment task. Structural equation modeling, correlation, and regression analyses confirmed the relationships between perceived features and similarity of objects hypothesized by Tversky. The results hold implications for future research that will attempt to further test the contrast model and assist designers of image organization and retrieval systems by pointing toward alternative document representations and similarity measures that more closely match human similarity judgments.
  7. Scalla, M.: Auf der Phantom-Spur : Georges Didi-Hubermans neues Standardwerk über Aby Warburg (2006) 0.00
    0.0023652622 = product of:
      0.009461049 = sum of:
        0.009461049 = product of:
          0.018922098 = sum of:
            0.018922098 = weight(_text_:22 in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018922098 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2011 11:22:12