Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Vision"
  1. Grötschel, M.: Elektronisches Publizieren, Open Access, Open Science und ähnliche Träume (2016) 0.08 
    0.075117156 = product of:
  0.15023431 = sum of:
    0.12516473 = weight(_text_:open in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12516473 = score(doc=3248,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.5970458 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
    0.02506958 = product of:
      0.05013916 = sum of:
        0.05013916 = weight(_text_:access in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05013916 = score(doc=3248,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.31775886 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Es mag etwas egomanisch anmuten, wenn ich beschreibe, wie ich mir nicht nur das wissenschaftliche Publizieren der Zukunft vorstelle, sondern auch weitergehende Überlegungen zu Open Access und Open Science skizziere, die über das eigentliche Anliegen des vorliegenden Sammelbandes (Taubert/Weingart 2016) hinausgehen. An dieser Stelle sollte man umfangreiche Datenanalysen zum Publikationsverhalten und daraus abgeleitete Prognosen erwarten. Aber dies geschieht bereits in anderen Beiträgen zu diesem Sammelband in ausführlicher Weise, und so nehme ich mir die Freiheit zu einer ganz subjektiven Meinungsäußerung, die auf langjähriger Beschäftigung mit dem Thema basiert. Ich werde Grundzüge aufzeigen und prinzipielle Überlegungen anstellen, nicht aber auf die genaue Rolle der Beteiligten, die konkrete Ausgestaltung der zugehörigen Informationstechnik oder auf Details der rechtlichen Rahmenwerke eingehen.
  2. Hildreth, C.R.: Preserving what we really want to access, the message, not the medium : challenges and opportunities in the digital age (1996) 0.05 
    0.054416955 = product of:
  0.10883391 = sum of:
    0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07301276 = score(doc=4946,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
    0.035821147 = product of:
      0.071642295 = sum of:
        0.071642295 = weight(_text_:access in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071642295 = score(doc=4946,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.45403582 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Digital image formats are now seen not only as feasible alternatives to print and microfilm formats for traditional preservation purposes, but also as the technology bearing the portential for unlimited access and distribution. Examines the requirements for browsing and exploration in the digital library of the future; and whether the open bookshelf model of a classified physical collection is suitable for the universal virtual library or whether new models of explanation are needed
    Source
    Electronic documents and information: from preservation to access; Festschrift in honor of Patricia Battin. 18th International Symposium, 23.-26.10.1995. Ed.: A.H. Helal et al
  3. Thiessen, P.: ¬Die Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrates "zur Weiterentwicklung der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastrukturen in Deutschland bis 2020" : Inhalt und kritische Bewertung im Hinblick auf das wissenschaftliche Bibliothekswesen (2013) 0.04 
    0.040154617 = product of:
  0.080309235 = sum of:
    0.062582366 = weight(_text_:open in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062582366 = score(doc=2456,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
    0.01772687 = product of:
      0.03545374 = sum of:
        0.03545374 = weight(_text_:access in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03545374 = score(doc=2456,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Von verschiedenen wissenschaftspolitischen Expertengremien sind in den letzten Jahren Analysen und Entwicklungsvorschläge zur Situation der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastrukturen in Deutschland vorgelegt worden. Der Wissenschaftsrat thematisierte 2012 mit seinen jüngsten "Empfehlungen zur Weiterentwicklung der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastrukturen in Deutschland bis 2020" vor allem Fragen der strukturellen Organisation und Koordination von Einrichtungen aus dem Bereich der Informationsinfrastrukturen. Inwieweit die Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrats dabei auf Belange des wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesens eingehen, soll im vorliegenden Beitrag betrachtet werden. Dazu werden die Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrats zunächst in den bibliothekspolitischen Kontext eingeordnet (Abschnitt 1.1 und 1.3) und in ihren relevanten Aspekten vorgestellt (Abschnitt 1.2). In einer kritischen Analyse werden daraufhin wesentliche Punkte des Papiers diskutiert (Abschnitt 2), die im Hinblick auf ihre Auswirkungen auf das wissenschaftliche Bibliothekswesen in Deutschland bewertet (Abschnitt 3) werden. Als tendenziell problematisch erweisen sich dabei u. a. die Aussagen des Wissenschaftsrat zum Thema Open Access sowie zu den Finanzierungsmodalitäten künftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen und ihrer vorgeschlagenen zentralen Steuerung.
  4. Batt, C.: ¬The libraries of the future : public libraries and the Internet (1996) 0.02 
    0.024432644 = product of:
  0.09773058 = sum of:
    0.09773058 = sum of:
      0.047271654 = weight(_text_:access in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047271654 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
      0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050458927 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Considers the possible potential for service development in public libraries offered by the Internet and describes the traditional models of network access and their lack of relevance to public libraries. Describes 2 current research projects currently being undertaken by public libraries to assess the value of the Internet to their services; ITPOINT, a project being conducted at Chelmsley Wood Library, Solihull, UK; and CLIP, the Croydon Libraries Internet peoject. Presents a range of new service paradigms and suggests that public libraries will become even more central to people's lives than they are today
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-30
  5. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.02 
    0.021378566 = product of:
  0.08551426 = sum of:
    0.08551426 = sum of:
      0.0413627 = weight(_text_:access in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0413627 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.04415156 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04415156 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.02 
    0.018324483 = product of:
  0.07329793 = sum of:
    0.07329793 = sum of:
      0.03545374 = weight(_text_:access in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03545374 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
      0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037844196 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
  7. Heinisch, C.: CyberLib - vision and economic analysis (1994) 0.02 
    0.01825319 = product of:
  0.07301276 = sum of:
    0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 1220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07301276 = score(doc=1220,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 1220, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1220)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    CyberLib is the vision of a library whose essential functions, objects and services are offered in an artificial created environment. Making available different work environments that meet the individual user's needs is a very special characteristic of the capacity of CyberLib. Every vision has to be checked for its economic feasibility. How can CyberLib charge its users for its services with the clear target of making a profit and thus enter an open and measurable competition with other CyberLib in order to create a calculable and transparent information market? The paper will discuss different possibilities, such as automomous profit centers, the coexistence of conventional information sources and CyberLib and other forms of financing, e.g. by means of advertising
  8. Ludwig, L.T.: Tomorrow's library : will it all be infrastructure? (1995) 0.02 
    0.01825319 = product of:
  0.07301276 = sum of:
    0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 3020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07301276 = score(doc=3020,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 3020, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3020)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The form in which knowledge is described and encapsulated has a major impact on the design of libraries and the functions performed within them. New technology and the logocentric, practicentric and democentric elements of the information infrastructure have created profound changes compelling the flexible design of libraries. The book of the 17th century, television in the 20th century, and perhaps the Internet in the 21st century, open the door to self education with little economic discrimination. New roles for libraries are emerging that require flexibility in building design for moving collections, services, functions, and equipment; restructuring staff organizations, introducing new services associated with new technology; eliminating unnecessary or unaffordable services; and housing other institutional departments within the structure of the 'new' library
  9. Venker, K.: Utopische Entwürfe zur Zukunft von IuD (2017) 0.02 
    0.01825319 = product of:
  0.07301276 = sum of:
    0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07301276 = score(doc=3735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3735)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Open Password. 2017, Nr.229 vom 24.07.2017 [http://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=300&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045]
  10. Barker, P.: Electronic libraries of the future (1997) 0.01 
    0.012614732 = product of:
  0.050458927 = sum of:
    0.050458927 = product of:
      0.10091785 = sum of:
        0.10091785 = weight(_text_:22 in 7201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10091785 = score(doc=7201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  11. Cassidy, V.: What's next? : An exploration of the next phase in access to electronic information (1998) 0.01 
    0.010340675 = product of:
  0.0413627 = sum of:
    0.0413627 = product of:
      0.0827254 = sum of:
        0.0827254 = weight(_text_:access in 2662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0827254 = score(doc=2662,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 2662, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2662)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Addresses the following question: what online features would users like to have in the next phase of access to electronic information, and what other content, besides journals, do users want to access online? Discusses features such as profiling, threading, and advanced search capabilities that will enhance online access for users
  12. Studwell, W.E.: Universal subject environment : aspiration for a multinational, multicultural, and multilingual subject access system (1999) 0.01 
    0.010340675 = product of:
  0.0413627 = sum of:
    0.0413627 = product of:
      0.0827254 = sum of:
        0.0827254 = weight(_text_:access in 6297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0827254 = score(doc=6297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 6297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6297)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  13. Information for a new age : redefining the librarian (1995) 0.01 
    0.009461049 = product of:
  0.037844196 = sum of:
    0.037844196 = product of:
      0.07568839 = sum of:
        0.07568839 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07568839 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.2, S.147 (A. Schultis)
  14. Rosemann, U.: Auf dem Weg zu dem Kompetenzzentrum für Literaturversorgung : TIB zum Start von GetInfo (2002) 0.01 
    0.009461049 = product of:
  0.037844196 = sum of:
    0.037844196 = product of:
      0.07568839 = sum of:
        0.07568839 = weight(_text_:22 in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07568839 = score(doc=4204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 12:25:38
  15. Veltman, K.H.: From Recorded World to Recording Worlds (2007) 0.01 
    0.009126595 = product of:
  0.03650638 = sum of:
    0.03650638 = weight(_text_:open in 512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03650638 = score(doc=512,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.17413835 = fieldWeight in 512, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=512)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The range, depths and limits of what we know depend on the media with which we attempt to record our knowledge. This essay begins with a brief review of developments in a) media: stone, manuscripts, books and digital media, to trace how collections of recorded knowledge expanded to 235,000 in 1837 and have expanded to over 100 million unique titles in a single database including over 1 billion individual listings in 2007. The advent of digital media has brought full text scanning and electronic networks, which enable us to consult digital books and images from our office, home or potentially even with our cell phones. These magnificent developments raise a number of concerns and new challenges. An historical survey of major projects that changed the world reveals that they have taken from one to eight centuries. This helps explain why commercial offerings, which offer useful, and even profitable short-term solutions often undermine a long-term vision. New technologies have the potential to transform our approach to knowledge, but require a vision of a systematic new approach to knowledge. This paper outlines four ingredients for such a vision in the European context. First, the scope of European observatories should be expanded to inform memory institutions of latest technological developments. Second, the quest for a European Digital Library should be expanded to include a distributed repository, a digital reference room and a virtual agora, whereby memory institutions will be linked with current research;. Third, there is need for an institute on Knowledge Organization that takes up anew Otlet's vision, and the pioneering efforts of the Mundaneum (Brussels) and the Bridge (Berlin). Fourth, we need to explore requirements for a Universal Digital Library, which works with countries around the world rather than simply imposing on them an external system. Here, the efforts of the proposed European University of Culture could be useful. Ultimately we need new systems, which open research into multiple ways of knowing, multiple "knowledges". In the past, we went to libraries to study the recorded world. In a world where cameras and sensors are omnipresent we have new recording worlds. In future, we may also use these recording worlds to study the riches of libraries.
  16. Gordon, T.J.; Helmer-Hirschberg, O.: Report on a long-range forecasting study (1964) 0.01 
    0.008919963 = product of:
  0.03567985 = sum of:
    0.03567985 = product of:
      0.0713597 = sum of:
        0.0713597 = weight(_text_:22 in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0713597 = score(doc=4204,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 6.2018 13:24:08
    22. 6.2018 13:54:52
  17. MacDonald, A.H.: ¬The survival of libraries in the electronic age (1994) 0.01 
    0.007884207 = product of:
  0.03153683 = sum of:
    0.03153683 = product of:
      0.06307366 = sum of:
        0.06307366 = weight(_text_:22 in 8645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06307366 = score(doc=8645,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 8645, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8645)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Feliciter. 40(1994) no.1, S.18-22
  18. Greenhalgh, L.; Worple, K.; Landry, C.: Libraries in a world of cultural change (1995) 0.01 
    0.007884207 = product of:
  0.03153683 = sum of:
    0.03153683 = product of:
      0.06307366 = sum of:
        0.06307366 = weight(_text_:22 in 2345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06307366 = score(doc=2345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2345)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26. 7.2002 14:35:22
  19. Towards a worldwide library : a ten year forecast. Proceedings of the 19th International Essen Symposium, 23-26 Sept 1996 (1996) 0.01 
    0.007884207 = product of:
  0.03153683 = sum of:
    0.03153683 = product of:
      0.06307366 = sum of:
        0.06307366 = weight(_text_:22 in 7885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06307366 = score(doc=7885,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7885, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7885)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Isbn
    3-922602-22-3
  20. Lee, F.R.: ¬The library, unbound and everywhere (2004) 0.01 
    0.007822796 = product of:
  0.031291183 = sum of:
    0.031291183 = weight(_text_:open in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031291183 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.14926144 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    "When Randall C. Jimerson, the president of the Society of American Archivists, heard of Google's plan to convert certain holdings at Oxford University and at some of the leading research libraries in the United States into digital files, searchable over the Web, he asked, "What are they thinking?" Mr. Jimerson had worries. Who would select the material? How would it be organized and identified to avoid mountains of excerpts taken out of context? Would Google users eventually forgo the experience of holding a book or looking at a historicaldocument? But in recent interviews, many scholars and librarians applauded the announcement by Google, the operator of the world's most popular Internet search service, to digitize some of the collections at Oxford, the University of Michigan, Stanford University, Harvard and the New York Public Library. The plan, in the words of Paul Duguid, information specialist at the University of California at Berkeley, will "blast wide open" the walls around the libraries of world-class institutions.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 33
  • d 13

Types

  • a 37
  • el 6
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications