Search (2448 results, page 1 of 123)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.24 
    0.23600978 = product of:
  0.3146797 = sum of:
    0.073939405 = product of:
      0.22181821 = sum of:
        0.22181821 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22181821 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22181821 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22181821 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.018922098 = product of:
      0.037844196 = sum of:
        0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037844196 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.20 
    0.19717175 = product of:
  0.3943435 = sum of:
    0.098585874 = product of:
      0.29575762 = sum of:
        0.29575762 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29575762 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.29575762 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29575762 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  3. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.17 
    0.17252529 = product of:
  0.34505057 = sum of:
    0.08626264 = product of:
      0.25878793 = sum of:
        0.25878793 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25878793 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.25878793 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25878793 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  4. Schirmbacher, P.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des elektronischen Publizierens auf der Basis der Open-Access-Prinzipien (2006) 0.15 
    0.14995143 = product of:
  0.29990286 = sum of:
    0.1632615 = weight(_text_:open in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1632615 = score(doc=26,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.77877045 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
    0.13664135 = sum of:
      0.092489794 = weight(_text_:access in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.092489794 = score(doc=26,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.5861577 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
      0.04415156 = weight(_text_:22 in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04415156 = score(doc=26,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von der Beschreibung des wissenschaftlichen Publikationsprozesses wird der Not-For-Profit-Bereich näher untersucht. Dabei wird insbesondere Wert auf die Einordnung der Open-Access-Philosophie gelegt und die unterschiedlichen Veröffentlichungsformen werden dargestellt. Beschrieben werden der "Golden Road to Open Access" und ebenso der "Green Road to Open Access". Den Abschluss des Beitrages bildet eine Diskussion der Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des" Green Road to Open Access" als einer alternativen Publikationsform.
    Date
    27.10.2006 14:21:22
  5. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.15 
    0.14787881 = product of:
  0.29575762 = sum of:
    0.073939405 = product of:
      0.22181821 = sum of:
        0.22181821 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22181821 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22181821 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22181821 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  6. Walters, W.H.: Institutional journal costs in an open access environment (2007) 0.13 
    0.1285298 = product of:
  0.2570596 = sum of:
    0.13993843 = weight(_text_:open in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13993843 = score(doc=89,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.66751754 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
    0.11712117 = sum of:
      0.07927697 = weight(_text_:access in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07927697 = score(doc=89,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.5024209 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
      0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037844196 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This study investigates the potential impact of open access pricing on institutional journal expenditures in four subject fields at nine American colleges and universities. Three pricing models are evaluated: the conventional model (the current subscription model), the PLoS open access model (based on the fees currently charged by the Public Library of Science), and the equal-revenue open access model (which maintains current levels of total aggregate spending within each subject field). Because institutional disparities in publishing productivity are far greater than institutional disparities in library holdings, the shift from a subscription-based model to either open access model would bring dramatic cost savings for most colleges and universities. At the same time, a small number of institutions-the top research universities-would pay a far higher proportion of the total aggregate cost.
    Date
    3. 3.2007 19:44:22
  7. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.12 
    0.12323235 = product of:
  0.2464647 = sum of:
    0.061616175 = product of:
      0.18484852 = sum of:
        0.18484852 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18484852 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18484852 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18484852 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  8. Wissenschaftler fordern 'Open Access' : Berliner Erklärung (2003) 0.12 
    0.117658794 = product of:
  0.23531759 = sum of:
    0.118006445 = weight(_text_:open in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.118006445 = score(doc=2013,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.5629002 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
    0.117311135 = sum of:
      0.06685221 = weight(_text_:access in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06685221 = score(doc=2013,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.4236785 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
      0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050458927 = score(doc=2013,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Gemeinsam mit den Repräsentanten der großen deutschen und internationalen Wissenschaftsorganisationen hat Prof. Peter Gruss, der Präsident der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, am 22. Oktober die folgende »Berliner Erklärung über offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen« (Berlin Declaration an Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities) unterzeichnet. Vorausgegangen war eine dreitägige Konferenz in Berlin. Dabei diskutierten international führende Experten über neue Zugangsmöglichkeiten zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen und kulturellem Erbe durch das Internet.
  9. Strähle, M.: Open Access auf europäische Forschung : Der Open Access Pilot der Europäischen Kommission (2009) 0.11 
    0.10707898 = product of:
  0.21415795 = sum of:
    0.1668863 = weight(_text_:open in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1668863 = score(doc=2914,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.79606104 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
    0.047271654 = product of:
      0.09454331 = sum of:
        0.09454331 = weight(_text_:access in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09454331 = score(doc=2914,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5991719 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag beschreibt und analysiert die jüngsten Open-Access-Initiativen der Europäischen Kommission, indem er sie zu offiziellen Dokumenten der Kommission, Studien in ihrem Auftrag, öffentlichen Konsultationen sowie ähnlichen Initiativen und Erklärungen europäischer Organisationen in Beziehung setzt . Abschließend werden von einem Open-Access-freundlichen Standpunkt aus Schwachpunkte dieser Initiativen der Europäischen Kommission angeführt: die unzulängliche Berücksichtigung der Spezifika von Interdisziplinarität und die starke Orientierung an Naturwissenschaften und Medizin.
  10. Haider, J.: Of the rich and the poor and other curious minds : on open access and "development" (2007) 0.10 
    0.103350826 = product of:
  0.20670165 = sum of:
    0.16491902 = weight(_text_:open in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16491902 = score(doc=822,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.78667694 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
    0.041782632 = product of:
      0.083565265 = sum of:
        0.083565265 = weight(_text_:access in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083565265 = score(doc=822,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5295981 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper seeks to reconsider open access and its relation to issues of "development" by highlighting the ties the open access movement has with the hegemonic discourse of development and to question some of the assumptions about science and scientific communication upon which the open access debates are based. The paper also aims to bring out the conflict arising from the convergence of the hegemonic discourses of science and development with the contemporary discourse of openness. Design/methodology/approach - The paper takes the form of a critical reading of a range of published work on open access and the so-called "developing world" as well as of various open access declarations. The argument is supported by insights from post-development studies. Findings - Open access is presented as an issue of moral concern beyond the narrow scope of scholarly communication. Claims are made based on hegemonic discourses that are positioned as a priori and universal. The construction of open access as an issue of unquestionable moral necessity also impedes the problematisation of its own heritage. Originality/value - This paper is intended to open up the view for open access's less obvious alliances and conflicting discursive ties and thus to initiate a politisation, which is necessary in order to further the debate in a more fruitful way.
  11. Tsakonas, G.; Papatheodorou, C.: Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries (2008) 0.10 
    0.102951445 = product of:
  0.20590289 = sum of:
    0.103255644 = weight(_text_:open in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.103255644 = score(doc=2090,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.49253768 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
    0.102647245 = sum of:
      0.058495685 = weight(_text_:access in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058495685 = score(doc=2090,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
      0.04415156 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04415156 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Advances in the publishing world have emerged new models of digital library development. Open access publishing modes are expanding their presence and realize the digital library idea in various means. While user-centered evaluation of digital libraries has drawn considerable attention during the last years, these systems are currently viewed from the publishing, economic and scientometric perspectives. The present study explores the concepts of usefulness and usability in the evaluation of an e-print archive. The results demonstrate that several attributes of usefulness, such as the level and the relevance of information, and usability, such as easiness of use and learnability, as well as functionalities commonly met in these systems, affect user interaction and satisfaction.
    Date
    1. 8.2008 11:49:22
  12. Bargmann, M.; Katzmayr, M.; Putz, M.: E-LIS: Open-Access-Archiv für Literatur zum Informations- und Bibliothekswesen (2005) 0.10 
    0.100952454 = product of:
  0.20190491 = sum of:
    0.10430394 = weight(_text_:open in 3779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10430394 = score(doc=3779,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.49753815 = fieldWeight in 3779, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3779)
    0.09760097 = sum of:
      0.06606414 = weight(_text_:access in 3779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06606414 = score(doc=3779,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.41868407 = fieldWeight in 3779, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3779)
      0.03153683 = weight(_text_:22 in 3779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03153683 = score(doc=3779,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3779, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3779)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Vorbemerkung: zur aktuellen Problematik im Zeitschriftenwesen Derzeit kann auf einschlägigen Fachveranstaltungen und Expertlnnentagungen oftmals (großteils berechtigte) Kritik am Verlags- und Zeitschriftenwesen vernommen werden. Mitunter werden regelrechte Zeitschriftenkrisen oder gar Informationskrisen ausgerufen, um im Anschluss daran auch gleich passende Auswege aufzuzeigen. Solche Geschütze werden hier nicht aufgefahren, doch soll mit Rückgriff auf Harnad u.a. (2004) kurz ein Schlaglicht auf die existierende Problematik im Zeitschriftenwesen geworfen werden. Einerseits leiden Bibliotheken unter dem so genannten Preisproblem (journal-affordability problem), womit gemeint ist, dass es aufgrund der Preisentwicklung wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften für Bibliotheken zunehmend schwieriger wird, diese gedruckt oder elektronisch zu erwerben. Verbunden mit knapper werdenden Ressourcen sind hier Engpässe in der Informationsversorgung unvermeidlich. Daraus resultiert eine zweite Facette dieser Problemlage, nämlich dass - aus der Autorlnnensicht - viel an potentiellem Impact aufgrund der Nichtverfügbarkeit der Forschungsliteratur ungenutzt bleibt (article-access/impact problem). Als Impact wird dabei das Ausmaß der Rezeption der Forschungsergebnisse in der Scientific Community definiert. Viel spricht dafür, dass Open Access tatsächlich als möglicher Lösungsweg für diese beiden unterschiedlichen, aber zusammenhängenden Problemlagen gesehen werden kann. In diesem Artikel wird deshalb kurz aufgezeigt, was man unter Open Access versteht; anschließend wird das Volltextarchiv E-LIS: E-Prints in Library and Information Science etwas genauervorgestellt. Wir sind nämlich der Meinung, dass BibliothekarInnen und Informationsexpertinnen Open Access nicht nur bewerben und einfordern, sondern selbst mit gutem Beispiel vorangehen und deshalb möglichst alle ihre bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlichen Schriften entsprechend publizieren sollten.
    Date
    6.11.2005 12:33:22
  13. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.10 
    0.098585874 = product of:
  0.19717175 = sum of:
    0.049292937 = product of:
      0.14787881 = sum of:
        0.14787881 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14787881 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14787881 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14787881 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  14. Mittler, E.: Open Access zwischen E-Commerce und E-Science : Beobachtungen zu Entwicklung und Stand (2007) 0.10 
    0.098358326 = product of:
  0.19671665 = sum of:
    0.15329486 = weight(_text_:open in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15329486 = score(doc=691,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.73122877 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
    0.043421786 = product of:
      0.08684357 = sum of:
        0.08684357 = weight(_text_:access in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08684357 = score(doc=691,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5503745 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Der ungehinderte Zugang zur wissenschaftlichen Publikation ist eine entscheidende Voraussetzung für die Forschung. Auf dem Hintergrund der Konzentration des Verlagswesens und der Verteuerung insbesondere der Zeitschriftenliteratur setzt sich die Open-Access-Bewegung für den kostenfreien Zugang zu Publikationen aber auch zu Forschungsdaten, Software und Digitalisaten von Kulturgut ein. Unterschiedliche Businessmodelle (originäre oder Postprint-Bereitstellung auf Open-Access-Servern von Institutionen oder Fachgruppen; author pays statt oder (hybrid) verbunden mit Subskription) bieten einen breite Palette auch kommerzieller Open-Access-Publikationsmöglichkeiten. Dabei ist die Bereitschaft der Fördereinrichtungen, Publikationskosten als Teil der Forschungsmittel anzusehen von zukunftsweisender Bedeutung. Noch offen ist, ob der kostenfreie Open-Access-Zugang öffentlich geförderter Forschungsergebnisse durchgesetzt werden kann. Der ungehinderte Zugang ist eine wichtige Voraussetzung der zukünftigen E-Science-Forschungsumgebungen, die neue Formen der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit auf dem Hintergrund vernetzter Kommunikation und Datenbereitstellung anbieten. Gestützt wird Open Access auch durch kommerzielle Neuansätze wie die Google-Strategie, über die Bereitstellung von gescannter Literatur zusätzlichen Traffic auf seine Angebote zu lenken, um höhere Werbeeinnahmen zu erzielen.
  15. Mukherjee, B.: Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? : a bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar (2009) 0.10 
    0.09746517 = product of:
  0.19493034 = sum of:
    0.10430394 = weight(_text_:open in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10430394 = score(doc=2745,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.49753815 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
    0.090626396 = sum of:
      0.059089568 = weight(_text_:access in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059089568 = score(doc=2745,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.37448242 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
      0.03153683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03153683 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Using 17 fully open-access journals published uninterruptedly during 2000 to 2004 in the field of library and information science, the present study investigates the impact of these open-access journals in terms of quantity of articles published, subject distribution of the articles, synchronous and diachronous impact factor, immediacy index, and journals' and authors' self-citation. The results indicate that during this 5-year publication period, there are as many as 1,636 articles published by these journals. At the same time, the articles have received a total of 8,591 Web citations during a 7-year citation period. Eight of 17 journals have received more than 100 citations. First Monday received the highest number of citations; however, the average number of citations per article was the highest in D-Lib Magazine. The value of the synchronous impact factor varies from 0.6989 to 1.0014 during 2002 to 2005, and the diachronous impact factor varies from 1.472 to 2.487 during 2000 to 2004. The range of the immediacy index varies between 0.0714 and 1.395. D-Lib Magazine has an immediacy index value above 0.5 in all the years whereas the immediacy index value varies from year to year for the other journals. When the citations of sample articles were analyzed according to source, it was found that 40.32% of the citations came from full-text articles, followed by 33.35% from journal articles. The percentage of journals' self-citation was only 6.04%.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:54:59
  16. Dorman, D.: ¬The potential of metasearching as an "open" service (2008) 0.10 
    0.0972319 = product of:
  0.1944638 = sum of:
    0.16491902 = weight(_text_:open in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16491902 = score(doc=2599,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.78667694 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
    0.029544784 = product of:
      0.059089568 = sum of:
        0.059089568 = weight(_text_:access in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059089568 = score(doc=2599,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.37448242 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper has two objectives: to illustrate to non-technical librarians the elements that make up the process of metasearching and to discuss how the openness of each of those elements affects the quality and affordability of a metasearch service. Design/methodology/approach - The search flow is broken down into its primary component parts-user interface, interface software, metasearch middleware (search client and results processor), the various types of database connectors, database servers, metadata, and content. Diagrams and real world examples are used to illustrate the challenges faced by metasearch services and how those services could be improved by open source software, open standards and open access content. Findings - This paper finds that the lack of Z39.50/SRU-compliant database servers and rich metadata consistently encoded are the primary causes of the current functional problems of metasearch services; that wide use of open source metasearch software and widespread implementation of Z39.50/SRU-compliant database servers would significantly lower the cost of metasearch services. Practical implications - One practical implication of the findings of the paper is that widespread use of Z39.50/SRU by content providers is the best foundation on which to build improved metasearch services. Another is that libraries would save a great deal of money and be able to offer superior metasearch services if those services were based on open source software and provided access to open access content. Originality/value - The value of this paper will be realized to the extent that it promotes awareness of the importance of open standards, open source software and open access content for the continued advancement of cost-effective metasearch services.
  17. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.09 
    0.09387836 = product of:
  0.18775672 = sum of:
    0.088504836 = weight(_text_:open in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.088504836 = score(doc=3662,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.42217514 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
    0.09925188 = sum of:
      0.06140768 = weight(_text_:access in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06140768 = score(doc=3662,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.38917357 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
      0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037844196 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45
  18. Fournier, J.: Zur Bedeutung von Open Access für das Publikationsverhalten DFG-geförderter Wissenschaftler : Bericht über die Ergebnisse einer Umfrage im Auftrag der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (2005) 0.09 
    0.09369411 = product of:
  0.18738823 = sum of:
    0.14602552 = weight(_text_:open in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14602552 = score(doc=3204,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.6965534 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
    0.0413627 = product of:
      0.0827254 = sum of:
        0.0827254 = weight(_text_:access in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0827254 = score(doc=3204,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Mit der Unterzeichnung der »Berliner Erklärung über den offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen« im Oktober 2003 auch durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) war zu überlegen, ob und in welcher Weise die DFG die Bemühungen um Open Access stärker aktiv befördern solle. Jetzt hat sich die DfG mit einer Umfrage ein Bild davon verschafft, welche Faktoren das Publikations- und Rezeptionsverhalten der unterschiedlichen Disziplinen maßgeblich bestimmen und welcher Stellenwert entgeltfrei zugänglichen Onlinepublikationen bei den verschiedenen Fachdisziplinen und in deren Veröffentlichungsusancen zukommt. Die Umfrage zeigt eine noch geringe Nutzung der verschiedenen Formen des Open Access für die eigene Publikationstätigkeit und zugleich eine große Zustimmung der Befragten aller Wissenschaftsbereiche zu einer stärkeren Förderung von Open Access durch die DFG.
  19. Davis, P.M.: Author-choice open-access publishing in the biological and medical literature : a citation analysis (2009) 0.09 
    0.09369411 = product of:
  0.18738823 = sum of:
    0.14602552 = weight(_text_:open in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14602552 = score(doc=2622,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.6965534 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
    0.0413627 = product of:
      0.0827254 = sum of:
        0.0827254 = weight(_text_:access in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0827254 = score(doc=2622,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In this article, we analyze the citations to articles published in 11 biological and medical journals from 2003 to 2007 that employ author-choice open-access models. Controlling for known explanatory predictors of citations, only 2 of the 11 journals show positive and significant open-access effects. Analyzing all journals together, we report a small but significant increase in article citations of 17%. In addition, there is strong evidence to suggest that the open-access advantage is declining by about 7% per year, from 32% in 2004 to 11% in 2007.
  20. Papin-Ramcharan, J.; Dawe, R.A.: ¬The other side of the coin for open access publishing : a developing country view (2006) 0.09 
    0.08727265 = product of:
  0.1745453 = sum of:
    0.13193521 = weight(_text_:open in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13193521 = score(doc=5070,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.62934154 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
    0.04261009 = product of:
      0.08522018 = sum of:
        0.08522018 = weight(_text_:access in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08522018 = score(doc=5070,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5400862 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This article presents the Open Access publishing experience of researchers in an academic research institution, in a developing country, Trinidad and Tobago, namely at the University of the West Indies (UWI) St. Augustine Campus. It considers UWI researchers' knowledge of Open Access, their access to the scholarly literature, Open Access Archives/Repositories at UWI and related issues of Research and Library funding and Information Communication Technology (ICT) Infrastructure/Internet connectivity. The article concludes that whilst Open Access publishing yields some obvious and well-documented benefits for developing country researchers, including free access to research articles and increased impact and visibility of "published" Open Access articles, there are some disincentives that militate against developing country researchers fully contributing to the global body of knowledge via Open Access. It finds that Open Access Journals are beneficial for scholars who consume information but are of little benefit for developing country scholars wanting to publish in these journals because of the high cost of page charges. Inadequate and unreliable ICT infrastructure and Internet connectivity also often limit access to information. It concludes that because of technical, financial, human and infrastructural limitations, Open Access via the Green Road of self-archiving is also often not an option for developing country researchers. These researchers are therefore unable to reap the real benefits, of making their research Open Access, that of increased impact and visibility.This study is to develop and evaluate methods and instruments for assessing the usability of digital libraries. It discusses the dimensions of usability, what methods have been applied in evaluating usability of digital libraries, their applicability, and criteria. It is found in the study that there exists an interlocking relationship among effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. It provides operational criteria for effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability. It discovers users' criteria on "ease of use," "organization of information," "terminology and labeling," "visual attractiveness," and "mistake recovery." Common causes of "user lostness" were found. "Click cost" was examined.

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 2014
  • m 285
  • el 193
  • s 102
  • b 28
  • x 21
  • i 14
  • r 11
  • n 4
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications