Search (1553 results, page 1 of 78)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.31
    0.3135475 = product of:
      0.41806334 = sum of:
        0.08626264 = product of:
          0.25878793 = sum of:
            0.25878793 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25878793 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.25878793 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25878793 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07301276 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  2. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.30
    0.29575762 = product of:
      0.59151524 = sum of:
        0.14787881 = product of:
          0.44363642 = sum of:
            0.44363642 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.44363642 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.44363642 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44363642 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  3. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.25
    0.2464647 = product of:
      0.4929294 = sum of:
        0.12323235 = product of:
          0.36969703 = sum of:
            0.36969703 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.36969703 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.36969703 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36969703 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  4. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.19
    0.19381887 = product of:
      0.38763773 = sum of:
        0.073939405 = product of:
          0.22181821 = sum of:
            0.22181821 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22181821 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.31369832 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31369832 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  5. Schaer, P.: Integration von Open-Access-Repositorien in Fachportale (2010) 0.16
    0.16215652 = product of:
      0.32431304 = sum of:
        0.178844 = weight(_text_:open in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.178844 = score(doc=2320,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.85310024 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
        0.14546905 = sum of:
          0.101317495 = weight(_text_:access in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.101317495 = score(doc=2320,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.64210355 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
          0.04415156 = weight(_text_:22 in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04415156 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Open Access Repositorien sind Online-Archive für frei im Internet zugängliche Publikationen im Volltext. Open Access Materialien oder die Open Access Repositorien selbst sind allerdings nur unzureichend in zentrale Fachportale (z.B. virtuelle Fachbibliotheken) eingebunden. Der Beitrag stellt SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository, einen disziplinären Open Access Volltextserver für die Sozialwissenschaften vor und zeigt wie dieser in das sozialwissenschaftliche Fachportal Sowiport integriert wird.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  6. Herb, U.: Open Science in der Soziologie : eine interdisziplinäre Bestandsaufnahme zur offenen Wissenschaft und eine Untersuchung ihrer Verbreitung in der Soziologie (2015) 0.15
    0.14843683 = product of:
      0.29687366 = sum of:
        0.24215594 = weight(_text_:open in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24215594 = score(doc=3136,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            1.1551032 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
        0.05471771 = product of:
          0.10943542 = sum of:
            0.10943542 = weight(_text_:access in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10943542 = score(doc=3136,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.6935512 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit basiert auf einer fachübergreifenden Bestandsaufnahme der Open-Science-Elemente 'Open Access zu Textpublikationen', 'Open Access zu Forschungsdaten', 'Open Access zu Forschungssoftware', 'Open Review' und 'Open Metrics', die allesamt typischerweise eher in den STM-Fächern (Science, Technology, Medicine) zu finden sind als in den Sozial- oder Geisteswissenschaften.
    RSWK
    Soziologie / Open Access
    Empirische Sozialforschung / Open Access / Bestandsaufnahme / Zukunft
    Subject
    Soziologie / Open Access
    Empirische Sozialforschung / Open Access / Bestandsaufnahme / Zukunft
  7. Herb, U.: Kostenpflichtiger Open Access : auch Open Access kann zu mehr Konzentration und höheren Kosten führen (2016) 0.15
    0.1481434 = product of:
      0.2962868 = sum of:
        0.23088662 = weight(_text_:open in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23088662 = score(doc=959,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            1.1013477 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
        0.06540017 = product of:
          0.13080034 = sum of:
            0.13080034 = weight(_text_:access in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13080034 = score(doc=959,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.8289522 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Open Access kennt verschiedene Spielarten. Der grüne Open Access ist in der Regel kostenfrei, denn hier werden Nutzern bereits in wissenschaftlichen Journalen publizierte Artikel in einer Art Zweitverwertung auf Open-Access-Servern entgeltfrei bereitgestellt. Im goldenen Open Access hingegen finden sich Journale, die Artikel ohne Publikationsgebühren im Open Access veröffentlichen, und solche, die für die Veröffentlichung der Texte eine sogenannte Article Processing Charge (APC) erheben. Daneben existiert noch der hybride Open Access: Dabei werden einzelne Artikel aus Journalen, die nicht im Open Access erscheinen, gegen entsprechende Zahlungen für die entgeltfreie Verfügbarkeit freigekauft.
    Source
    http://www.heise.de/tp/news/Kostenpflichtiger-Open-Access-3181483.html
  8. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.15
    0.14787881 = product of:
      0.29575762 = sum of:
        0.073939405 = product of:
          0.22181821 = sum of:
            0.22181821 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22181821 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22181821 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22181821 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  9. Bauer, B.; Stieg, K.: Open Access Publishing in Österreich 2010 (2010) 0.14
    0.14054115 = product of:
      0.2810823 = sum of:
        0.21903826 = weight(_text_:open in 3683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21903826 = score(doc=3683,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            1.0448301 = fieldWeight in 3683, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3683)
        0.06204404 = product of:
          0.12408808 = sum of:
            0.12408808 = weight(_text_:access in 3683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12408808 = score(doc=3683,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.786413 = fieldWeight in 3683, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Der folgende Beitrag bietet einen Überblick über die Situation von Open Access Publishing in Österreich im Jahr 2010. Zunächst werden die österreichische Beteiligung an Open-Access-Deklarationen sowie wichtige Open-Access-Veranstaltungen in Österreich dargestellt. Dann werden die Beiträge Österreichs für den Goldenen Weg zu Open Access (OA-Zeitschriften) und für den Grünen Weg zu Open Access (Repositorien) skizziert. Es folgt eine Darstellung der Open Access Policies der wichtigsten Forschungsförderungsorganisation, der größten Universität des Landes sowie der Österreichischen Universitätenkonferenz. Den Abschluss bilden die Frage nach der Finanzierung von Open Access und eine Beschreibung der geänderten gesetzlichen Rahmenbedingungen für Open Access in Österreich.
  10. Buschmann, K.; Kasberger, S.; Kraker, P.; Mayer, K.; Reckling, F.; Rieck, K.; Vignoli, M.: Open Science in Österreich : Ansätze und Status (2015) 0.13
    0.13480775 = product of:
      0.2696155 = sum of:
        0.23416175 = weight(_text_:open in 2083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23416175 = score(doc=2083,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            1.1169703 = fieldWeight in 2083, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2083)
        0.03545374 = product of:
          0.07090748 = sum of:
            0.07090748 = weight(_text_:access in 2083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07090748 = score(doc=2083,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 2083, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Beitrag innerhalb eines Schwerpunktes "Open Science".
    Content
    Insbesondere in den letzten zwei Jahren hat Österreich im Bereich Open Science, vor allem was Open Access und Open Data betrifft, nennenswerte Fortschritte gemacht. Die Gründung des Open Access Networks Austria (OANA) und das Anfang 2014 gestartete Projekt e-Infrastructures Austria können als wichtige Grundsteine für den Ausbau einer österreichischen Open-Science-Landschaft gesehen werden. Auch das österreichische Kapitel der Open Knowledge Foundation leistet in den Bereichen Open Science Praxis- und Bewusstseinsbildung grundlegende Arbeit. Unter anderem bilden diese Initiativen die Grundlage für den Aufbau einer nationalen Open-Access-Strategie sowie einer ganz Österreich abdeckenden Infrastruktur für Open Access und Open (Research) Data. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über diese und ähnliche nationale sowie lokale Open-Science-Projekte und -Initiativen und einen Ausblick in die mögliche Zukunft von Open Science in Österreich.
  11. Herb, U.: Open Access : Erfolg mit Schattenseiten (2018) 0.13
    0.13384873 = product of:
      0.26769745 = sum of:
        0.20860788 = weight(_text_:open in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20860788 = score(doc=2905,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.9950763 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
        0.059089568 = product of:
          0.118179135 = sum of:
            0.118179135 = weight(_text_:access in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.118179135 = score(doc=2905,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.74896485 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Welchen Beitrag leistet Open Access zur Steuerung und Ökonomisierung der Wissenschaft? Open Access wurde zu Beginn des Jahrtausends als wissenschaftliches Selbstverwaltungsmodell für eine schnellere und gerechtere Wissenschaftskommunikation porträtiert. Heute hingegen scheint er vorrangig ein Ökonomisierungsprojekt kommerzieller Akteure, das sich in Konzepte der Wissenschaftssteuerung einpasst.
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Open-Access-Erfolg-mit-Schattenseiten-4080065.html?view=print
  12. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.13
    0.12921259 = product of:
      0.25842518 = sum of:
        0.049292937 = product of:
          0.14787881 = sum of:
            0.14787881 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14787881 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.20913222 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20913222 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  13. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.12
    0.12323235 = product of:
      0.2464647 = sum of:
        0.061616175 = product of:
          0.18484852 = sum of:
            0.18484852 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18484852 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18484852 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18484852 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  14. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.12
    0.12323235 = product of:
      0.2464647 = sum of:
        0.061616175 = product of:
          0.18484852 = sum of:
            0.18484852 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18484852 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18484852 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18484852 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  15. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.12
    0.12323235 = product of:
      0.2464647 = sum of:
        0.061616175 = product of:
          0.18484852 = sum of:
            0.18484852 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18484852 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18484852 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18484852 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  16. Aspöck, E.: Moving towards an open archaeology : projects, opportunities and challenges (2019) 0.12
    0.12220284 = product of:
      0.24440569 = sum of:
        0.22076985 = weight(_text_:open in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22076985 = score(doc=5701,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            1.0530899 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
        0.023635827 = product of:
          0.047271654 = sum of:
            0.047271654 = weight(_text_:access in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047271654 = score(doc=5701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Generally, open science practices are only slowly having an impact on mainstream archaeological practice. An exception is the open access to publications, which, together with open data and open methodologies may represent those practices most relevant for archaeological researchers. This article introduces a selection of archaeology projects that embrace and facilitate open science practices. Finally there will be a discussion of some of the questions and challenges the discipline is facing in its move towards an Open Archaeology.
  17. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.12
    0.12037015 = product of:
      0.2407403 = sum of:
        0.22181821 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22181821 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.018922098 = product of:
          0.037844196 = sum of:
            0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037844196 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  18. Open initiatives : Offenheit in der digitalen Welt und Wissenschaft (2012) 0.12
    0.11567846 = product of:
      0.23135692 = sum of:
        0.20008966 = weight(_text_:open in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20008966 = score(doc=567,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.9544437 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
        0.03126726 = product of:
          0.06253452 = sum of:
            0.06253452 = weight(_text_:access in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06253452 = score(doc=567,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.39631495 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Initiativen, die Transparenz, offenen und möglichst einfachen Zugang zu Informationen, etwa in Wissenschaft und Verwaltung fordern und herstellen, gewinnen rasant an Bedeutung und beginnen sich immer weiter zu differenzieren. Die Forderungen reichen von freiem (im Sinne von kostenlosem) Zugang zu Informationen bis hin zu offenem Zugang analog den Prinzipien der Open Source Community. Manche Initiativen und Phänomene fokussieren stärker auf Transparenz als auf Offenheit, wie z.B. die Whistleblower-Plattform Wikileaks, während wiederum andere (z.B. Open Government oder Open Access zu Forschungsdaten) die Forderungen nach Transparenz und Offenheit kombinieren oder sich an der Bereitstellung nicht-proprietärer Informationen versuchen (wie das Geodaten-Projekt OpenStreetMap oder die Open Metrics Konzepte im Wissenschaftskontext). Zwölf Autorinnen und Autoren aus Open Data Projekten und aus den Bereichen Open Access, Open Science, Journalismus und Recht beschreiben und analysieren die besagten und andere Open Initiatives, diskutieren deren Gemeinsamkeiten und Grenzen sowie radikale Offenheitskonzepte wie WikiLeaks und Anonymous.
    Content
    Inhalt: Offenheit und wissenschaftliche Werke: Open Access, Open Review, Open Metrics, Open Science & Open Knowledge - Ulrich Herb Offener Zugang zu Forschungsdaten - Jens Klump Wissenschaft zum Mitmachen, Wissenschaft als Prozess: Offene Wissenschaft - Daniel Mietchen Open Access hinter verschlossenen Türen oder wie sich Open Access im und mit dem Entwicklungsdiskurs arrangiert - Jutta Haider The European sciences: How "open" are they for women? - Terje Tüür-Fröhlich Wie erwirbt der Mensch Wissen, wie wendet er es an und wie behandelt das Recht diesen Vorgang? - Eckhard Höjfner Collateral Copyright: Modularisierte Urheberrechtsfreigaben für die Wissenschaft - John Hendrik Weitzmann Open Data - Am Beispiel von Informationen des öffentlichen Sektors - Nils Barnickel, Jens Kiessmann Offene Geodäten durch OpenStreetMap - Roland Ramthun Wikileaks und das Ideal der Öffentlichkeit - Christiane Schulzki-Haddouti Open Collectivity - Carolin Wiedemann
    RSWK
    Open Archives Initiative
    Open Access
    Subject
    Open Archives Initiative
    Open Access
  19. Riehm, U.; Nentwich, M.: Open Science aus Perspektive der Technikfolgenabschätzung : zu Begriff, gesellschaftlicher Einbettung und möglichen Entwicklungen eines ubiquitären Konzepts (2017) 0.11
    0.11359632 = product of:
      0.22719264 = sum of:
        0.20651129 = weight(_text_:open in 3778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20651129 = score(doc=3778,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.98507535 = fieldWeight in 3778, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3778)
        0.02068135 = product of:
          0.0413627 = sum of:
            0.0413627 = weight(_text_:access in 3778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0413627 = score(doc=3778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 3778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag nähert sich dem Thema Open Science aus der Perspektive der konzeptionellen Vorbereitung einer umfassenden Technikfolgenabschätzungsstudie. Es werden vier Dimensionen des Konzepts der Offenheit von Wissenschaft unterschieden: freier Zugang, öffentliche Kommunikation, offene Kooperation und die Überwindung gesellschaftlicher Subsysteme. Es wird des Weiteren eine sinnvolle Abgrenzung des Untersuchungsgegenstandes Open Science vorgeschlagen, die bei einer TA-Studie berücksichtigt werden müsste. Nach einer kurzen Darstellung des Status Quo für drei typische Konkretisierungen von Open Science (Open Access, Open-Peer-Review, Wissenschaftsnetzwerke) werden vier Szenarien der zukünftigen Entwicklung von Open Science zur Diskussion gestellt.
    Footnote
    Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenheftes "Open Science - zwischen Hype und Disruption".
  20. Vogt, T.; Botz, G.W.: Open Access - schöne neue Welt? : Ein Interview mit Georg W. Botz, Koordinator der Open Access Poliy der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (2013) 0.11
    0.113574415 = product of:
      0.22714883 = sum of:
        0.17700967 = weight(_text_:open in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17700967 = score(doc=794,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.8443503 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
        0.05013916 = product of:
          0.10027832 = sum of:
            0.10027832 = weight(_text_:access in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10027832 = score(doc=794,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.6355177 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    

Languages

  • e 1151
  • d 377
  • i 4
  • a 2
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1314
  • el 223
  • m 133
  • s 48
  • x 20
  • r 14
  • b 5
  • n 4
  • i 3
  • ag 2
  • p 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications