Search (625 results, page 1 of 32)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  1. Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014) 0.09 
    0.085383125 = product of:
  0.22768833 = sum of:
    0.01486726 = weight(_text_:information in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01486726 = score(doc=1492,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
    0.20143567 = weight(_text_:modell in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20143567 = score(doc=1492,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.930136 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
    0.0113854 = product of:
      0.0341562 = sum of:
        0.0341562 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0341562 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Abstract
    Informationsdienste werden heutzutage von großen Teilen der Bevölkerung im Berufs- wie im Privatleben genutzt. Es ist ein wichtiges informationswissenschaftliches Thema, Informationsdienste adäquat zu beschreiben und ihre Qualität zu bewerten. Unser Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell führt unterschiedliche Traditionen der Evaluations- sowie der Technologieakzeptanzforschung zusammen und besteht aus fünf Dimensionen: Qualität des Informationsdienstes, Nutzer, Informationsakzeptanz, Informationsumfeld und Zeit. Der Überblicks­artikel erläutert diese Dimension und bietet einen Einblick in ein flexibel handhabbares und umfassendes holistisches Modell der Beschreibung und Bewertung von Informationsdiensten.
    Date
    22. 9.2014 18:56:46
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.4/5, S.239-246
  2. Mills, T.; Moody, K.; Rodden, K.: Providing world wide access to historical sources (1997) 0.03 
    0.026798662 = product of:
  0.0714631 = sum of:
    0.010404914 = weight(_text_:information in 2697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010404914 = score(doc=2697,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2697, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2697)
    0.021845357 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021845357 = score(doc=2697,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2697, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2697)
    0.03921283 = product of:
      0.05881924 = sum of:
        0.0295425 = weight(_text_:29 in 2697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0295425 = score(doc=2697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2697)
        0.029276744 = weight(_text_:22 in 2697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029276744 = score(doc=2697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2697)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Abstract
    A unique collection of historical material covering the lives and events of an English village between 1400 and 1750 has been made available via a WWW enabled information retrieval system. Since the expected readership of the documents ranges from school children to experienced researchers, providing this information in an easily accessible form has offered many challenges requiring tools to aid searching and browsing. The file structure of the document collection was replaced by an database, enabling query results to be presented on the fly. A Java interface displays each user's context in a form that allows for easy and intuitive relevance feedback
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1317-1325
  3. Bauer, P.: Information Retrieval in externen allgemeinbibliographischen Online-Datenbanken : eine Einführung in die Praxis des Information Retrieval sowie Materialiensammlung zur Nutzung der Zeitschriftendatenbank (Online-Version) und von BIBLIO-DATA (1989) 0.02 
    0.024091033 = product of:
  0.09636413 = sum of:
    0.024278132 = weight(_text_:information in 4405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024278132 = score(doc=4405,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4405, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4405)
    0.072086 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.072086 = score(doc=4405,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 4405, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4405)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
  4. Multimedia information resources (1997) 0.02 
    0.023285108 = product of:
  0.09314043 = sum of:
    0.014714771 = weight(_text_:information in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014714771 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
    0.07842566 = product of:
      0.11763848 = sum of:
        0.059085 = weight(_text_:29 in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059085 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
        0.058553487 = weight(_text_:22 in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058553487 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Date
    31.12.1998 22:05:21
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Australian academic and research libraries 29(1998) no.1, S.68 (B. Collins)
  5. MacCall, S.L.; Cleveland, A.D.; Gibson, I.E.: Outline and preliminary evaluation of the classical digital library model (1999) 0.02 
    0.022172147 = product of:
  0.059125725 = sum of:
    0.019388413 = weight(_text_:information in 6541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019388413 = score(doc=6541,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.30666938 = fieldWeight in 6541, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6541)
    0.03153106 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03153106 = score(doc=6541,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 6541, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6541)
    0.008206251 = product of:
      0.024618752 = sum of:
        0.024618752 = weight(_text_:29 in 6541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024618752 = score(doc=6541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 6541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6541)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Abstract
    The growing number of networked information resources and services offers unprecedented opportunities for delivering high quality information to the computer desktop of a wide range of individuals. However, currently there is a reliance on a database retrieval model, in which endusers use keywords to search large collections of automatically indexed resources in order to find needed information. As an alternative to the database retrieval model, this paper outlines the classical digital library model, which is derived from traditional practices of library and information science professionals. These practices include the selection and organization of information resources for local populations of users and the integration of advanced information retrieval tools, such as databases and the Internet into these collections. To evaluate this model, library and information professionals and endusers involved with primary care medicine were asked to respond to a series of questions comparing their experiences with a digital library developed for the primary care population to their experiences with general Internet use. Preliminary results are reported
    Date
    29. 9.2001 20:12:49
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  6. Bradley, P.: Going online, CD-ROM and the Internet (1997) 0.02 
    0.020047441 = product of:
  0.080189764 = sum of:
    0.021935485 = weight(_text_:information in 1726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021935485 = score(doc=1726,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 1726, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1726)
    0.058254283 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058254283 = score(doc=1726,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1726, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1726)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    COMPASS
    Information retrieval / Use of / Compact discs (Computers)
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Managing information 5(1998) nos.1/2, S.42 (M. Blake)
    Subject
    Information retrieval / Use of / Compact discs (Computers)
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
  7. Cooke, A.: ¬A guide to finding quality information on the Internet : selection and evaluation strategies (1999) 0.02 
    0.019727338 = product of:
  0.07890935 = sum of:
    0.027419355 = weight(_text_:information in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027419355 = score(doc=662,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
    0.051489998 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051489998 = score(doc=662,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    LCSH
    Information retrieval
    Library information networks
    Subject
    Information retrieval
    Library information networks
  8. Wissen, D.: Zukunft der Bibliographie - Bibliographie der Zukunft : eine Expertenbefragung mittels Delphi-Technik in Archiven und Bibliotheken in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz ; vom Schriftenverzeichnis zum Informationsraum ; die Entwicklung bibliographischer Informationen, hin zu mediographischen Daten für die germanistische Applikation bei Literaturportalen wie beispielsweise einer Mediographie bzw. Wikigraphie (2008) 0.02 
    0.017018817 = product of:
  0.045383513 = sum of:
    0.005309736 = weight(_text_:information in 2487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005309736 = score(doc=2487,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.083984874 = fieldWeight in 2487, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2487)
    0.035970654 = weight(_text_:modell in 2487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035970654 = score(doc=2487,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.16609572 = fieldWeight in 2487, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2487)
    0.0041031255 = product of:
      0.012309376 = sum of:
        0.012309376 = weight(_text_:29 in 2487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012309376 = score(doc=2487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.097163305 = fieldWeight in 2487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2487)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Abstract
    Für die hier vorliegende Studie wurden 40 Führungspersönlichkeiten bedeutender Archive und Bibliotheken nach der zukünftigen Entwicklung der Bibliographie befragt. Die Erhebung zu dieser Studie wurde innerhalb eines Jahres zwischen 2005 und 2006 in vier Runden nach der Delphi- Technik in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz durchgeführt. Durch ein Interview, das Fragen aus betrieblichen, gesellschaftlichen und wissenschaftlichen Bereichen beinhaltete, wurden Prognosen ermittelt, die in drei weiteren Befragungsrunden nochmals mittels dargestellter Szenarien hinterfragt wurden. Erkundet wurde durch diese fokussierende Untersuchung die Entwicklung der bibliographischen Information -- vom Schriftenverzeichnis zum Informationsraum -- für die germanistische Applikation. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, anhand der Prognosen von Experten zu klären, ob Bibliographien in Zeiten "Digitaler", "Elektronischer" bzw. "Virtueller Bibliotheken" auch zukünftig einem zeitgemäßen Anspruch in Hinblick auf Informationsbedarf, -nutzen und -wert genügen können und wie sich deren Zukunft gestalten wird. In Form eines Realisierungskonzepts wird im Anschluss an die Erhebungsanalyse beschrieben, wie sich den Experten zufolge bibliographische Daten in einem Prozess, hin zu mediographischen Informationen, befinden. Verdeutlicht wird die Zukunft der Bibliographien in Form von Literaturportalen bzw. Informationsräumen, die möglicherweise die Gestalt einer Mediographie oder Wikigraphie annehmen werden. Wie diese Verzeichnisse konzipiert sein sollten, wird auf Grund der Befragungsergebnisse analysiert und interpretiert und als Szenarienvarianten durch ein theoretisches Modell beschrieben.
    Date
    26.10.2008 18:29:48
    Footnote
    In dieser so genannten Delphi-Studie kristallisiert sich der Wunsch nach einem Web-Portal heraus, das Eigenschaften heutiger bibliographischer Datenbankangebote mit Eigenschaften des Web 2.0 ergänzt. Bis ungefähr 2015 soll den Befragungs-Ergebnissen zufolge ein von mehreren Einrichtungen als »Wikigraphie« oder »Mediographie« kooperativ betriebenes Literaturportal entstehen können. Die Betonung liegt dabei auf »können« - Wissen legt wert darauf, weder die Befragten über alternative Szenarien entscheiden zu lassen, noch eine Prognose zu treffen. Vielmehr habe sein Szenario einen >orientierendem Charakter. Das Szenario einer Mediographie stehe dabei für die Integration von bibliographischer Information und dem Vollzugriff auf die (textuellen und nicht-textuellen) Medieninhalte. Wikigraphie meint eine »Schicht« der Benutzerinteraktion eines Portals, das eine unter ökonomischen und qualitativen Aspekten wünschenswerte Anreicherung qualitätsgesicherter Stammdaten< durch Benutzer erlaubt. Nun weckt der Begriff »Portal« unweigerlich Assoziationen an Vorstellungen zentralisierter Informationsverzeichnisse im Web, wie sie in den 90er-Jahren verbreitet waren. Dem Autor der Studie kann man das nur bedingt zum Vorwurf machen. Er erfüllt lediglich die selbstgestellte Aufgabe, aus den Aussagen der deutschen Bibliotheks-Entscheiderderen Vorstellung von einer »Zukunft der Bibliographie« zu destillieren. Es überrascht kaum, dass sich diese Vorstellung vom in der Fachöffentlichkeit vorherrschenden Bild der Bibliothek 2.0 unterscheidet - denn dort wird die Bearbeitung dieses Themas gern einer ganz anderen Generation überlassen, sozusagen den »jungen Wilden« des Bibliothekswesens.
    Das ist deshalb bedauerlich, weil die für das Internet charakteristische Dezentralisierung der bibliographischen Informationsströme gerade durch Dienste wie CiteULike einen erheblichen Popularitäts- aber auch Forschungs- und Entwicklungsschub erfahren hat. Man betrachte nur die Flut der fachlichen Veröffentlichungen über bibliographische Social-Bookmarking-Dienste in den fachlichen Repositories DUST und E-LIS sowie in den anglophonen Fachzeitschriften seit etwa 2004. Einige mit diesen Diensten zusammenhängende Themen werden von Wissen durchaus berührt. Er findet zum Beispiel mit den Experten heraus, dass das Semantic Web Bestandteil des medio- bzw. wikigraphischen Portals sein müsse (S. 203). Aber die bloße Nennung des Semantic Web lässt nichts von den Spannungen ahnen, die es für das soziale Verhältnis von Zentrum und Peripherie der bibliographischen Information birgt, wenn die partizipativen Strukturen des Web 2.0 und das Semantic Web zusammenkommen. Web 2.0-typische Webservices kombiniert mit den Normdateien der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek würden etwa bedeuten, dass jeder, überall, auch in einem Dienst wie CiteULike, in Wikisource oder in einem eigenen Weblog, Verknüpfungen zu einem Schlagwort erzeugen kann. Ohne also abzuwarten, ob ihm im Jahr 2015 in einem zentralen Portal der traditionellen bibliographischen Diensteanbieter eine >Mitmach-Schicht< zugewiesen wird, in der er dann ein wenig miterschließen darf. Der Autor gibt in seinem Resümee zu erkennen, dass er durchaus um die Eigendynamik seines Gegenstands und die Eigenwilligkeit der Benutzer weiß (S.326f.). Ob das auch für die interviewten Sprecher dieses Delphi-Orakels der bibliographischen Zukunft gilt, muss nach der Lektüre des Buchs allerdings dahingestellt bleiben."
  9. Chi, Y.; He, D.; Jeng, W.: Laypeople's source selection in online health information-seeking process (2020) 0.02 
    0.016773883 = product of:
  0.044730358 = sum of:
    0.018393463 = weight(_text_:information in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018393463 = score(doc=34,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.2909321 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
    0.018204464 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018204464 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
    0.00813243 = product of:
      0.024397288 = sum of:
        0.024397288 = weight(_text_:22 in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024397288 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Abstract
    For laypeople, searching online health information resources can be challenging due to topic complexity and the large number of online sources with differing quality. The goal of this article is to examine, among all the available online sources, which online sources laypeople select to address their health-related information needs, and whether or how much the severity of a health condition influences their selection. Twenty-four participants were recruited individually, and each was asked (using a retrieval system called HIS) to search for information regarding a severe health condition and a mild health condition, respectively. The selected online health information sources were automatically captured by the HIS system and classified at both the website and webpage levels. Participants' selection behavior patterns were then plotted across the whole information-seeking process. Our results demonstrate that laypeople's source selection fluctuates during the health information-seeking process, and also varies by the severity of health conditions. This study reveals laypeople's real usage of different types of online health information sources, and engenders implications to the design of search engines, as well as the development of health literacy programs.
    Date
    12.11.2020 13:22:09
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.12, S.1484-1499
  10. Lin, Z.Y.: Classification practice and implications for subject directories of the Chinese language Web-based digital library (2000) 0.02 
    0.01584643 = product of:
  0.06338572 = sum of:
    0.043690715 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043690715 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
    0.019695 = product of:
      0.059085 = sum of:
        0.059085 = weight(_text_:29 in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059085 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 3(2000) no.4, S.29-50
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  11. Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Breuleux, A.: ¬A comparison of information retrieval from print and CD-ROM versions of an encyclopedia by elementary school students (1994) 0.02 
    0.015777892 = product of:
  0.063111566 = sum of:
    0.012139066 = weight(_text_:information in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012139066 = score(doc=1015,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
    0.0509725 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0509725 = score(doc=1015,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Describes an experiment using 48 sixth-grade students to compare retrieval techniques using the print and CD-ROM versions of Compton's Encyclopedia. Four queries of defferent complexity (measured by the numer of terms present) were searched by the students after a short training session. The searches were timed and the retrieval steps and search terms were noted. The searches were no faster on the CD-ROM than the print version, but in both cases time was related directly to the number of terms involved. The students coped well with the CD-ROM interface and its several retrieval paths
    Source
    Information processing and management. 30(1994) no.4, S.499-513
  12. Anderson, B.: Reference works from selected small alternative presses (1997) 0.02 
    0.015523406 = product of:
  0.062093623 = sum of:
    0.009809847 = weight(_text_:information in 3024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009809847 = score(doc=3024,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3024, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3024)
    0.052283775 = product of:
      0.07842566 = sum of:
        0.03939 = weight(_text_:29 in 3024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03939 = score(doc=3024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3024)
        0.03903566 = weight(_text_:22 in 3024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03903566 = score(doc=3024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3024)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Outlines why alternative press books fail to be recognised and failed to be included in traditional collection development aids or methods. Explains why they should be taken seriously. Introduces 44 titles from 26 presses, which are worthwhile reference works. The bibliography is arranged by press name with complete contact information
    Date
    22. 2.1999 14:29:57
  13. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.02 
    0.015523406 = product of:
  0.062093623 = sum of:
    0.009809847 = weight(_text_:information in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009809847 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
    0.052283775 = product of:
      0.07842566 = sum of:
        0.03939 = weight(_text_:29 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03939 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
        0.03903566 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03903566 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.6, S.419-429
  14. Information sources in engineering (2005) 0.01 
    0.014193308 = product of:
  0.05677323 = sum of:
    0.024278132 = weight(_text_:information in 5981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024278132 = score(doc=5981,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 5981, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5981)
    0.032495096 = product of:
      0.09748528 = sum of:
        0.09748528 = weight(_text_:29 in 5981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09748528 = score(doc=5981,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.7694941 = fieldWeight in 5981, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5981)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Date
    25.11.1995 12:29:09
    12. 2.2006 19:29:36
    Series
    Guides to information sources
  15. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.01 
    0.013968326 = product of:
  0.055873305 = sum of:
    0.047667053 = product of:
      0.14300115 = sum of:
        0.14300115 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14300115 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30533072 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.008206251 = product of:
      0.024618752 = sum of:
        0.024618752 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024618752 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  16. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Intellectual property information : A comparative analysis of main information providers (2006) 0.01 
    0.013241539 = product of:
  0.052966155 = sum of:
    0.022072155 = weight(_text_:information in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022072155 = score(doc=210,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
    0.030894 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030894 = score(doc=210,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    After modeling expert user needs with regard to intellectual property information, we analyze and compare the main providers in this specific information area (Thomson DIALOG, Esp@cenet by the European Patent Office, Questel-Orbit, and STN International) in terms of system content and system functionality. The key question is whether the main providers are able to satisfy these expert user needs. For patent information, some special retrieval features such as chemical structure search (including Markush search), patent family references and citations search, biosequence search, and basic informetric functionality such as ranking, mapping, and visualization of information flows are realized. Considering the results of information science research, the practice of patent information shows unexhausted improvement opportunities (e.g., the application of bibliographic patent coupling and co-patent-citation for mapping patents, patent assignees, and technology specialties). For trademark search, users need multiple truncated search (realized) as well as phonetic search and image retrieval (not realized yet).
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.13, S.1794-1803
  17. Potmesil, M.: Maps alive : viewing geospatial information on the WWW (1997) 0.01 
    0.012989049 = product of:
  0.051956195 = sum of:
    0.012743366 = weight(_text_:information in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012743366 = score(doc=2703,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
    0.03921283 = product of:
      0.05881924 = sum of:
        0.0295425 = weight(_text_:29 in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0295425 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
        0.029276744 = weight(_text_:22 in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029276744 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Describes a WWW based system which allows users to view, search and post geographically indexed information of the Earth. 2 geographic browsers have been developed: a 2D map browser capable of continuous scroll and zoom of an arbitrarily large sheet and a 3D flight-simulator browser capable of continuous flight around the Earth. On the server side, a geographical and geometrical server has been developed which contains large databases of images, elevations, lines, points and polygons stored in tiles structured into hierarchical pyramids or quadtrees. A metadata server has also been developed which contains URL pointers and geographical coordinates of various WWW documents, geographical information and geometrical models
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1327-1342
  18. Horstkemper, G.; Schäffler, H.: ¬Das Pay-per-Use-Modell als Instrument der überregionalen Bereitstellung von geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Fachdatenbanken (2006) 0.01 
    0.012589729 = product of:
  0.100717835 = sum of:
    0.100717835 = weight(_text_:modell in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.100717835 = score(doc=48,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.465068 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
  19. Martínez-Ávila, D.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Pinho, F.A.; Fox, M.J.: ¬The representation of ethics and knowledge organization in the WoS and LISTA databases (2015) 0.01 
    0.012404436 = product of:
  0.049617745 = sum of:
    0.010404914 = weight(_text_:information in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010404914 = score(doc=2358,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
    0.03921283 = product of:
      0.05881924 = sum of:
        0.0295425 = weight(_text_:29 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0295425 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
        0.029276744 = weight(_text_:22 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029276744 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    A naïve user seeking introductory information on a topic may perceive a domain as it is shown by the search results in a database; however, inconsistencies in indexing can misrepresent the full picture of the domain by including irrelevant documents or omitting relevant ones, sometimes inexplicably. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on the domain of ethics in knowledge organization in the World of Science (WoS) and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) databases to discern how it is being presented by search results in those databases and to attempt to determine why inconsistencies occurred.
    Content
    Beitrag anlässlich: Proceedings of the 3rd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Knowledge Organization, May 28-29, 2015, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_5.
    Date
    17. 2.2018 16:50:22
  20. Hill, L.L.; Zheng, Q.: Indirect geospatial referencing through place names in the digital library : Alexandra digital library experience with developing and implementing gazetteers (1999) 0.01 
    0.012224717 = product of:
  0.04889887 = sum of:
    0.01622151 = weight(_text_:information in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01622151 = score(doc=6543,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.256578 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
    0.03267736 = product of:
      0.04901604 = sum of:
        0.024618752 = weight(_text_:29 in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024618752 = score(doc=6543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
        0.024397288 = weight(_text_:22 in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024397288 = score(doc=6543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    All types of information can be referenced to a geographic place. Maps, aerial photographs, and remote sensing images are spatially georeferenced. Other forms of information such as books, articles, research papers, pieces of music, and art are often linked to a geographic location through place names (geographic names). A gazetteer (a dictionary of geographic names) that is spatially referenced itself provides the bridge between these two types of georeferencing. With a georeferenced gazetteer translation service, a user can start with a geographic name and find information that is described with either geographic names or with geospatial coordinates. Use of this powerful indirect geospatially referencing tool can be applied as a common approach to libraries, bibliographic files, data centers, web resources, and museum and specimen collections and can be particular useful across language barriers since latitude and longitude coordinates are universally understood. The Alexandria Digital Library has implemented a gazetteer component for its georeferenced digital library. This experience resulted in the creation of a Gazetteer Content Standard, a Feature Type Thesaurus, and an operational interactive gazetteer service. This paper describes the development of these components and illustrates the use of this tool in a georeferenced digital library. It also relates progress in working with Federal agencies and others toward developing shareable gazetteer data through Digital Gazetteer Information Exchange programs
    Date
    29. 9.2001 20:22:45
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 492
  • m 85
  • i 58
  • el 34
  • s 17
  • x 6
  • b 4
  • r 2
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications