-
Beghtol, C.: ¬The facet concept as a universal principle of subdivision (2006)
0.02
0.024262117 = product of:
0.06469898 = sum of:
0.017167233 = weight(_text_:information in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017167233 = score(doc=1483,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
0.036043 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036043 = score(doc=1483,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
0.011488751 = product of:
0.03446625 = sum of:
0.03446625 = weight(_text_:29 in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03446625 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Facet analysis has been one of the foremost contenders as a design principle for information retrieval classifications, both manual and electronic in the last fifty years. Evidence is presented that the facet concept has a claim to be considered as a method of subdivision that is cognitively available to human beings, regardless of language, culture, or academic discipline. The possibility that faceting is a universal method of subdivision enhances the claim that facet analysis as an unusually useful design principle for information retrieval classifications in any field. This possibility needs further investigation in an age when information access across boundaries is both necessary and possible.
- Date
- 29. 2.2008 19:19:30
- Source
- Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
-
Shera, J.H.: Pattern, structure, and conceptualization in classification for information retrieval (1957)
0.02
0.020649457 = product of:
0.08259783 = sum of:
0.020809827 = weight(_text_:information in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020809827 = score(doc=1287,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
0.061788 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061788 = score(doc=1287,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval, held at Beatrice Webb House, Dorking, England, 13.-17.5.1957
-
Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996)
0.02
0.019525122 = product of:
0.05206699 = sum of:
0.009809847 = weight(_text_:information in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009809847 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.029127141 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029127141 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.013130001 = product of:
0.03939 = sum of:
0.03939 = weight(_text_:29 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03939 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- In relation to indexing, one of the chief implications of cognitive epistemology is the necessity for redefining knowledge representation concepts for information filing and retrieval purposes. Such a redefinition involves abandoning the traditional, hierarchical, closed-structure classification model. Considers the following in detail: a semiotic critique of classification principles; Ranganathan's classification theory; Ranganathan and cognitive epistemology; and some reflections on the DDC and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification
- Date
- 14. 7.1996 13:29:45
-
Maple, A.: Faceted access : a review of the literature (1995)
0.02
0.019525122 = product of:
0.05206699 = sum of:
0.009809847 = weight(_text_:information in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009809847 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
0.029127141 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029127141 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
0.013130001 = product of:
0.03939 = sum of:
0.03939 = weight(_text_:29 in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03939 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this paper is to define what is meant by facet analysis, and to review briefly the history of facet analysis within the context of other types of subject analysis in libraries and within the context of information retrieval research
- Date
- 20. 8.2006 12:29:16
-
Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004)
0.02
0.019179905 = product of:
0.051146414 = sum of:
0.010404914 = weight(_text_:information in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010404914 = score(doc=2651,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.030894 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030894 = score(doc=2651,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.0098475 = product of:
0.0295425 = sum of:
0.0295425 = weight(_text_:29 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0295425 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 14:20:40
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004)
0.02
0.017302401 = product of:
0.04613974 = sum of:
0.012262309 = weight(_text_:information in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012262309 = score(doc=3483,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.025744999 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025744999 = score(doc=3483,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.00813243 = product of:
0.024397288 = sum of:
0.024397288 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024397288 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Classification is an activity that transcends time and space and that bridges the divisions between different languages and cultures, including the divisions between academic disciplines. Classificatory activity, however, serves different purposes in different situations. Classifications for infonnation retrieval can be called "professional" classifications and classifications in other fields can be called "naïve" classifications because they are developed by people who have no particular interest in classificatory issues. The general purpose of naïve classification systems is to discover new knowledge. In contrast, the general purpose of information retrieval classifications is to classify pre-existing knowledge. Different classificatory purposes may thus inform systems that are intended to span the cultural specifics of the globalized information society. This paper builds an previous research into the purposes and characteristics of naïve classifications. It describes some of the relationships between the purpose and context of a naive classification, the units of analysis used in it, and the theory that the context and the units of analysis imply.
- Pages
- S.19-22
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Library classification as a discipline (1957)
0.02
0.017034933 = product of:
0.06813973 = sum of:
0.017167233 = weight(_text_:information in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017167233 = score(doc=564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
0.0509725 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0509725 = score(doc=564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval, held at Beatrice Webb House,Dorking, England, 13.-17.5.1957
-
Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010)
0.02
0.016630365 = product of:
0.04434764 = sum of:
0.012743366 = weight(_text_:information in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012743366 = score(doc=2945,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.021845357 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021845357 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.009758915 = product of:
0.029276744 = sum of:
0.029276744 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029276744 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
-
Frické, M.: Logic and the organization of information (2012)
0.02
0.015927536 = product of:
0.04247343 = sum of:
0.018707557 = weight(_text_:information in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018707557 = score(doc=1782,freq=38.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.29590017 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
0.0180215 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0180215 = score(doc=1782,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.16542503 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
0.0057443753 = product of:
0.017233126 = sum of:
0.017233126 = weight(_text_:29 in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017233126 = score(doc=1782,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Logic and the Organization of Information closely examines the historical and contemporary methodologies used to catalogue information objects-books, ebooks, journals, articles, web pages, images, emails, podcasts and more-in the digital era. This book provides an in-depth technical background for digital librarianship, and covers a broad range of theoretical and practical topics including: classification theory, topic annotation, automatic clustering, generalized synonymy and concept indexing, distributed libraries, semantic web ontologies and Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). It also analyzes the challenges facing today's information architects, and outlines a series of techniques for overcoming them. Logic and the Organization of Information is intended for practitioners and professionals working at a design level as a reference book for digital librarianship. Advanced-level students, researchers and academics studying information science, library science, digital libraries and computer science will also find this book invaluable.
- Date
- 16. 3.2012 11:26:29
- Footnote
- Rez. in: J. Doc. 70(2014) no.4: "Books on the organization of information and knowledge, aimed at a library/information audience, tend to fall into two clear categories. Most are practical and pragmatic, explaining the "how" as much or more than the "why". Some are theoretical, in part or in whole, showing how the practice of classification, indexing, resource description and the like relates to philosophy, logic, and other foundational bases; the books by Langridge (1992) and by Svenonious (2000) are well-known examples this latter kind. To this category certainly belongs a recent book by Martin Frické (2012). The author takes the reader for an extended tour through a variety of aspects of information organization, including classification and taxonomy, alphabetical vocabularies and indexing, cataloguing and FRBR, and aspects of the semantic web. The emphasis throughout is on showing how practice is, or should be, underpinned by formal structures; there is a particular emphasis on first order predicate calculus. The advantages of a greater, and more explicit, use of symbolic logic is a recurring theme of the book. There is a particularly commendable historical dimension, often omitted in texts on this subject. It cannot be said that this book is entirely an easy read, although it is well written with a helpful index, and its arguments are generally well supported by clear and relevant examples. It is thorough and detailed, but thereby seems better geared to the needs of advanced students and researchers than to the practitioners who are suggested as a main market. For graduate students in library/information science and related disciplines, in particular, this will be a valuable resource. I would place it alongside Svenonious' book as the best insight into the theoretical "why" of information organization. It has evoked a good deal of interest, including a set of essay commentaries in Journal of Information Science (Gilchrist et al., 2013). Introducing these, Alan Gilchrist rightly says that Frické deserves a salute for making explicit the fundamental relationship between the ancient discipline of logic and modern information organization. If information science is to continue to develop, and make a contribution to the organization of the information environments of the future, then this book sets the groundwork for the kind of studies which will be needed." (D. Bawden)
- LCSH
- Information Systems
Information storage and retrieval systems
- Subject
- Information Systems
Information storage and retrieval systems
-
Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004)
0.02
0.015786663 = product of:
0.04209777 = sum of:
0.010404914 = weight(_text_:information in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010404914 = score(doc=2663,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.021845357 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021845357 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.0098475 = product of:
0.0295425 = sum of:
0.0295425 = weight(_text_:29 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0295425 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 17:33:13
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.02
0.015153891 = product of:
0.060615566 = sum of:
0.01486726 = weight(_text_:information in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01486726 = score(doc=3494,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.045748305 = product of:
0.068622455 = sum of:
0.03446625 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03446625 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.0341562 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0341562 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Kublik, A.; Clevette, V.; Ward, D.; Olson, H.A.: Adapting dominant classifications to particular contexts (2003)
0.01
0.014643841 = product of:
0.039050244 = sum of:
0.0073573855 = weight(_text_:information in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073573855 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.021845357 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021845357 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.0098475 = product of:
0.0295425 = sum of:
0.0295425 = weight(_text_:29 in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0295425 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization and classification in international information retrieval"
- Date
- 30. 7.2006 16:38:29
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.01
0.014610621 = product of:
0.038961656 = sum of:
0.0073573855 = weight(_text_:information in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073573855 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.021845357 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021845357 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.009758915 = product of:
0.029276744 = sum of:
0.029276744 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029276744 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Vickery, B.C.: Relations between subject fields : problems of constructing a general classification (1957)
0.01
0.014601371 = product of:
0.058405485 = sum of:
0.014714771 = weight(_text_:information in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014714771 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.043690715 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043690715 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval, held at Beatrice Webb House, Dorking, England, 13.-17.5.1957
-
¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval : Memorandum of the Classification Research Group (1997)
0.01
0.014545789 = product of:
0.058183156 = sum of:
0.016991155 = weight(_text_:information in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016991155 = score(doc=562,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.041192 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041192 = score(doc=562,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Footnote
- Wiederabdruck aus: Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval, Dorking. London: Aslib 1957.
- Imprint
- The Hague : International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID)
-
Zhang, J.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬A new similarity measure for subject hierarchical structures (2014)
0.01
0.0144747 = product of:
0.0385992 = sum of:
0.012262309 = weight(_text_:information in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012262309 = score(doc=1778,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
0.018204464 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018204464 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
0.00813243 = product of:
0.024397288 = sum of:
0.024397288 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024397288 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new similarity method to gauge the differences between two subject hierarchical structures. Design/methodology/approach - In the proposed similarity measure, nodes on two hierarchical structures are projected onto a two-dimensional space, respectively, and both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes are considered in the similarity between the two hierarchical structures. The extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be controlled by adjusting a parameter. An experiment was conducted to evaluate soundness of the measure. Eight experts whose research interests were information retrieval and information organization participated in the study. Results from the new measure were compared with results from the experts. Findings - The evaluation shows strong correlations between the results from the new method and the results from the experts. It suggests that the similarity method achieved satisfactory results. Practical implications - Hierarchical structures that are found in subject directories, taxonomies, classification systems, and other classificatory structures play an extremely important role in information organization and information representation. Measuring the similarity between two subject hierarchical structures allows an accurate overarching understanding of the degree to which the two hierarchical structures are similar. Originality/value - Both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes were considered in the proposed similarity method, and the extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be adjusted. In addition, a new evaluation method for a hierarchical structure similarity was presented.
- Date
- 8. 4.2015 16:22:13
-
Karamuftuoglu, M.: Need for a systemic theory of classification in information science (2007)
0.01
0.014325771 = product of:
0.057303082 = sum of:
0.019465812 = weight(_text_:information in 615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019465812 = score(doc=615,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 615, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=615)
0.03783727 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03783727 = score(doc=615,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 615, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=615)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- In the article, the author aims to clarify some of the issues surrounding the discussion regarding the usefulness of a substantive classification theory in information science (IS) by means of a broad perspective. By utilizing a concrete example from the High Accuracy Retrieval from Documents (HARD) track of a Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), the author suggests that the bag of words approach to information retrieval (IR) and techniques such as relevance feedback have significant limitations in expressing and resolving complex user information needs. He argues that a comprehensive analysis of information needs involves explicating often-implicit assumptions made by the authors of scholarly documents, as well as everyday texts such as news articles. He also argues that progress in IS can be furthered by developing general theories that are applicable to multiple domains. The concrete example of application of the domain-analytic approach to subject analysis in IS to the aesthetic evaluation of works of information arts is used to support this argument.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.1977-1987
-
Broughton, V.: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (2006)
0.01
0.013931154 = product of:
0.055724617 = sum of:
0.0150182 = weight(_text_:information in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0150182 = score(doc=2874,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.04070642 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04070642 = score(doc=2874,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The aim of this article is to estimate the impact of faceted classification and the faceted analytical method on the development of various information retrieval tools over the latter part of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Design/methodology/approach - The article presents an examination of various subject access tools intended for retrieval of both print and digital materials to determine whether they exhibit features of faceted systems. Some attention is paid to use of the faceted approach as a means of structuring information on commercial web sites. The secondary and research literature is also surveyed for commentary on and evaluation of facet analysis as a basis for the building of vocabulary and conceptual tools. Findings - The study finds that faceted systems are now very common, with a major increase in their use over the last 15 years. Most LIS subject indexing tools (classifications, subject heading lists and thesauri) now demonstrate features of facet analysis to a greater or lesser degree. A faceted approach is frequently taken to the presentation of product information on commercial web sites, and there is an independent strand of theory and documentation related to this application. There is some significant research on semi-automatic indexing and retrieval (query expansion and query formulation) using facet analytical techniques. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important conceptual approach to information retrieval, and compares different understandings and applications of this methodology.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft: UK library & information schools: UCL SLAIS.
-
Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004)
0.01
0.013572222 = product of:
0.054288886 = sum of:
0.016451614 = weight(_text_:information in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016451614 = score(doc=831,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
0.03783727 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03783727 = score(doc=831,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Mai, J.E.: ¬The future of general classification (2003)
0.01
0.012750462 = product of:
0.051001847 = sum of:
0.009809847 = weight(_text_:information in 5478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009809847 = score(doc=5478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5478)
0.041192 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041192 = score(doc=5478,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036014426 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 5478, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5478)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Discusses problems related to accessing multiple collections using a single retrieval language. Surveys the concepts of interoperability and switching language. Finds that mapping between more indexing languages always will be an approximation. Surveys the issues related to general classification and contrasts that to special classifications. Argues for the use of general classifications to provide access to collections nationally and internationally.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization and classification in international information retrieval"
