-
Schimmel, A.: Morgenland und Abendland (2002)
0.00
0.00480465 = product of:
0.043241847 = sum of:
0.043241847 = product of:
0.086483695 = sum of:
0.086483695 = weight(_text_:seite in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.086483695 = score(doc=4431,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16469958 = queryWeight, product of:
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.52509964 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Content
- Darin (S.311): "Der Eidex ist ein liebes Tier, Der Index frißt sehr viel Papier. Der Eidex lebt vergnügt im Süden, Der Index tut mich sehr ermüden. Der Eidex liegt auf warmen Steinen, Der Index bringt mich fast zum Weinen. Der Eidex frißt gemütlich Mücken, Der Index krümmt mir meinen Rücken. Der Eidex sonnt sich still am Bach, Der Index läßt mich stöhnen - ach ... Der Eidex tanzt den Sonnentanz, Der Index hat 'nen langen Schwanz. Der Eidex hebt im Tanz die Pfoten, Der Index kämpft mit Fußfußnoten. Der Eidex legt jetzt rasch ein Ei, Der Index tut's in die Kartei. Der Eidex fängt nun an zu betteln, Der Index gräbt in seinen Zetteln. Der Eidex sagt: «Du bist so fleißig», Der Index sagt: «Oh ... Seite dreißig ...» Der Eidex hofft auf süßen Schlummer, Der Index doch wälzt sich vor Kummer. Der Eidex wird ins Bett gebracht, Der Index, ach, starrt in die Nacht: Die Frage steht vor ihm wie Rauch: Stimmt Seite 170 auch?"
-
Broccoli, K.; Ravenswaay, G.V.: Web indexing : anchors away! (2000)
0.00
0.0036473365 = product of:
0.03282603 = sum of:
0.03282603 = product of:
0.06565206 = sum of:
0.06565206 = weight(_text_:web in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06565206 = score(doc=219,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- In this chapter we turn to embedded indexing for the Internet, frequently called Web indexing. We will define Web indexes; describe the structure of entries for Web indexes; present some of the challenges that Web indexers face; and compare Web indexes to search engines. One of the difficulties in defining Web indexes is their relative newness. The first pages were placed on the World Wide Web in 1991 when Tim Berners Lee, its founder, uploaded four files. We are in a period of transition, moving from using well-established forms of writing and communications to others that are still in their infancy. Paramount among these is the Web. For indexers, this is an uncharted voyage where we must jettison firmly established ideas while developing new ones. Where the voyage will end is anyone's guess.
- Issue
- Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
-
Kaufmann, E.: ¬Das Indexieren von natürlichsprachlichen Dokumenten und die inverse Seitenhäufigkeit (2001)
0.00
0.003601181 = product of:
0.03241063 = sum of:
0.03241063 = product of:
0.06482126 = sum of:
0.06482126 = weight(_text_:bewertung in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06482126 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18575147 = queryWeight, product of:
6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.34896767 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Die Lizentiatsarbeit gibt im ersten theoretischen Teil einen Überblick über das Indexieren von Dokumenten. Sie zeigt die verschiedenen Typen von Indexen sowie die wichtigsten Aspekte bezüglich einer Indexsprache auf. Diverse manuelle und automatische Indexierungsverfahren werden präsentiert. Spezielle Aufmerksamkeit innerhalb des ersten Teils gilt den Schlagwortregistern, deren charakteristische Merkmale und Eigenheiten erörtert werden. Zusätzlich werden die gängigen Kriterien zur Bewertung von Indexen sowie die Masse zur Evaluation von Indexierungsverfahren und Indexierungsergebnissen vorgestellt. Im zweiten Teil der Arbeit werden fünf reale Bücher einer statistischen Untersuchung unterzogen. Zum einen werden die lexikalischen und syntaktischen Bestandteile der fünf Buchregister ermittelt, um den Inhalt von Schlagwortregistern zu erschliessen. Andererseits werden aus den Textausschnitten der Bücher Indexterme maschinell extrahiert und mit den Schlagworteinträgen in den Buchregistern verglichen. Das Hauptziel der Untersuchungen besteht darin, eine Indexierungsmethode, die auf linguistikorientierter Extraktion der Indexterme und Termhäufigkeitsgewichtung basiert, im Hinblick auf ihren Gebrauchswert für eine automatische Indexierung zu testen. Die Gewichtungsmethode ist die inverse Seitenhäufigkeit, eine Methode, welche von der inversen Dokumentfrequenz abgeleitet wurde, zur automatischen Erstellung von Schlagwortregistern für deutschsprachige Texte. Die Prüfung der Methode im statistischen Teil führte nicht zu zufriedenstellenden Resultaten.
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.00
0.0035413152 = product of:
0.031871837 = sum of:
0.031871837 = product of:
0.06374367 = sum of:
0.06374367 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06374367 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.00
0.0035413152 = product of:
0.031871837 = sum of:
0.031871837 = product of:
0.06374367 = sum of:
0.06374367 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06374367 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.00
0.0035413152 = product of:
0.031871837 = sum of:
0.031871837 = product of:
0.06374367 = sum of:
0.06374367 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06374367 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.00
0.0035413152 = product of:
0.031871837 = sum of:
0.031871837 = product of:
0.06374367 = sum of:
0.06374367 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06374367 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Rowland, M.J.: Plunging in : creating a Web site index for an online newsletter (2000)
0.00
0.0034655028 = product of:
0.031189525 = sum of:
0.031189525 = product of:
0.06237905 = sum of:
0.06237905 = weight(_text_:web in 221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06237905 = score(doc=221,freq=26.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.65002745 = fieldWeight in 221, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=221)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Creating an online index for a Web site is not a job for the timid. Those contemplating this form of Web indexing should already be accomplished indexers and should have strong experience in Web page creation. Knowledge of HTML is essential. In fact, depending on the nature of a Web indexing job, you may find that it requires more HTML knowledge than indexing skill. Like embedded indexing, Web site indexing is far more work than traditional indexing: the choice of terms is constrained, and the indexing process itself is slower and more challenging. Entries must be carefully chosen because the editing process can be tedious and time-consuming, sometimes more time-consuming than making the original entries. Hypertext links and anchors must be added, and the index itself must be tested to make sure that links work as intended. Adequate compensation for your project is imperative. Web indexing does have its rewards, though, especially for indexers who are intrigued by the Web and Web page design, for those who like a challenge, and, of course, for those who like to have their work online for all the world to see. This article provides a look at the process of creating a Web index for an online newsletter. It is also applicable to other forms of Web site indexing, and should give the beginning Web site indexer an idea of what to expect on that first job
- Issue
- Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
-
Walker, D.: Subject-oriented Web indexing (2000)
0.00
0.003262277 = product of:
0.029360492 = sum of:
0.029360492 = product of:
0.058720984 = sum of:
0.058720984 = weight(_text_:web in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058720984 = score(doc=218,freq=16.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.6119082 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- My goal in this short article is to bring you up to speed on Web indexing. I assume you are a person with good word skills and an inquisitive mind. Also, I assume you have good keyboard skills, access to the Internet, and have already created some HTML pages using, say, Netscape Composer. You may need help from your Internet Service Provider (ISP) to upload pages onto your Web site. This article is based on my experience teaching an online interactive course in Web indexing for my company, WWWalker Web Development, in 1998. We develop Web sites, support Linux and Windows NT, write technical articles, and specialize in Web indexing.
- Issue
- Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.00
0.0030986508 = product of:
0.027887857 = sum of:
0.027887857 = product of:
0.055775713 = sum of:
0.055775713 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055775713 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.00
0.0030986508 = product of:
0.027887857 = sum of:
0.027887857 = product of:
0.055775713 = sum of:
0.055775713 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055775713 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.00
0.0030986508 = product of:
0.027887857 = sum of:
0.027887857 = product of:
0.055775713 = sum of:
0.055775713 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055775713 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.00
0.0030986508 = product of:
0.027887857 = sum of:
0.027887857 = product of:
0.055775713 = sum of:
0.055775713 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055775713 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.00
0.0030986508 = product of:
0.027887857 = sum of:
0.027887857 = product of:
0.055775713 = sum of:
0.055775713 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055775713 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.00
0.0030986508 = product of:
0.027887857 = sum of:
0.027887857 = product of:
0.055775713 = sum of:
0.055775713 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055775713 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.00
0.0030986508 = product of:
0.027887857 = sum of:
0.027887857 = product of:
0.055775713 = sum of:
0.055775713 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055775713 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.00
0.0030986508 = product of:
0.027887857 = sum of:
0.027887857 = product of:
0.055775713 = sum of:
0.055775713 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055775713 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Connolly, D.A.: ¬The many uses of Email discussion lists (2000)
0.00
0.0028252148 = product of:
0.025426934 = sum of:
0.025426934 = product of:
0.050853867 = sum of:
0.050853867 = weight(_text_:web in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050853867 = score(doc=216,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- If you want to let other indexers know about a great new medical dictionary, discuss the pros and cons of using prepositions in subentries, find an indexer in Phoenix, or maybe share some marketing tips, then consider joining an email discussion list. Email discussion lists provide numerous tools and opportunities for indexers, especially for freelancers. Despite the rapid growth of Web- and graphical-based communication, email remains the linchpin of electronic communication. While the World Wide Web has become ubiquitous in our society, email remains the most reliable form of electronic communication. Email access is more prevalent than Web access, less cumbersome, and some would say, more egalitarian. Despite improvements over time, Web access is not available in equal quality or proportion to email access, especially in poorer or developing areas. Indeed, many users who have access to both restrict their use of the Web for important research efforts, and maintain nearconstant connection with their email servers for daily business
- Issue
- Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
-
Rowland, M.J.: <Meta> tags (2000)
0.00
0.0028252148 = product of:
0.025426934 = sum of:
0.025426934 = product of:
0.050853867 = sum of:
0.050853867 = weight(_text_:web in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050853867 = score(doc=222,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- <META> tags are used to create meta-information, or information about the information in a Web site. There are many types of <META> tags, but those most relevant to indexing are the description and keyword tags. Description tags provide a short summary of the site contents that are often displayed by search engines when they list search results. Keyword tags are used to define words or phrases that someone using a search engine might use to look for relevant sites. <META> tags are of interest to indexers for two reasons. They provide a means of making your indexing business Web site more visible to those searching the Web for indexing services, and they offer indexers a potential new source of work: writing keyword and description tags for Web site developers and companies with Web sites. <META> tag writing makes good use of an indexer's ability to choose relevant key terms, and the closely related skill of abstracting: conveying the essence of a document in a sentence or two.
- Issue
- Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
-
Rowland, M.J.: Web site design for indexers (2000)
0.00
0.0027185641 = product of:
0.024467077 = sum of:
0.024467077 = product of:
0.048934154 = sum of:
0.048934154 = weight(_text_:web in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048934154 = score(doc=225,freq=16.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Do indexers really need Web sites? No, they do not. Indexers do not need computers either. Indexes can be done on cards; networking can be done at conferences; and marketing can be done with cold calls. But, just as email has become indispensable to communication, and computers have become essential to indexing, so Web sites have become more and more necessary for all types of businesses, particularly small companies with small advertising budgets, like indexing businesses. The amount of business being conducted on the Web is increasing exponentially. Publishers, packagers, and other potential clients are beginning to search the Web for indexers. Why not participate in e-commerce, the newest way of doing business? A good Web site not only helps you obtain work, it increases your professional reputation and helps you influence the future of indexing. You can use your site as an online resume, to display a list of all the books you have indexed in the past year, to provide examples of your work, and to network with others. You can use it to express your philosophy of indexing, to teach others about indexing, and to make your voice heard on issues affecting the indexing profession. Not all indexers need Web sites, but active, involved, and far-sighted indexers, like you, do!
- Issue
- Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
