Search (1754 results, page 1 of 88)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.69
    0.68613327 = product of:
      1.0291998 = sum of:
        0.07783839 = product of:
          0.23351516 = sum of:
            0.23351516 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23351516 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.23351516 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23351516 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.017300837 = product of:
          0.034601673 = sum of:
            0.034601673 = weight(_text_:web in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034601673 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.23351516 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23351516 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.23351516 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23351516 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.23351516 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23351516 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.6666667 = coord(6/9)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.67
    0.67459935 = product of:
      1.2142788 = sum of:
        0.09340607 = product of:
          0.28021818 = sum of:
            0.28021818 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28021818 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.28021818 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28021818 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.28021818 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28021818 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.28021818 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28021818 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.28021818 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28021818 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.47
    0.46626657 = product of:
      0.8392798 = sum of:
        0.046703033 = product of:
          0.14010909 = sum of:
            0.14010909 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14010909 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19814417 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19814417 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19814417 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19814417 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.42
    0.42282733 = product of:
      0.76108915 = sum of:
        0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18681212 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.013840669 = product of:
          0.027681338 = sum of:
            0.027681338 = weight(_text_:web in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027681338 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18681212 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18681212 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18681212 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  5. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.40
    0.3954329 = product of:
      0.5931493 = sum of:
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.020761002 = product of:
          0.041522004 = sum of:
            0.041522004 = weight(_text_:web in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041522004 = score(doc=563,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.011951938 = product of:
          0.023903877 = sum of:
            0.023903877 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023903877 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(6/9)
    
    Abstract
    In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  6. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.39
    0.3935163 = product of:
      0.7083293 = sum of:
        0.05448687 = product of:
          0.16346061 = sum of:
            0.16346061 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16346061 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16346061 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16346061 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16346061 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16346061 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  7. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.35
    0.34728834 = product of:
      0.5209325 = sum of:
        0.038919196 = product of:
          0.11675758 = sum of:
            0.11675758 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11675758 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.014982964 = product of:
          0.029965928 = sum of:
            0.029965928 = weight(_text_:web in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029965928 = score(doc=4997,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.6666667 = coord(6/9)
    
    Abstract
    While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  8. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.34
    0.34306663 = product of:
      0.5145999 = sum of:
        0.038919196 = product of:
          0.11675758 = sum of:
            0.11675758 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11675758 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.008650418 = product of:
          0.017300837 = sum of:
            0.017300837 = weight(_text_:web in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017300837 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.6666667 = coord(6/9)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  9. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.34
    0.33729967 = product of:
      0.6071394 = sum of:
        0.046703033 = product of:
          0.14010909 = sum of:
            0.14010909 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  10. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.31
    0.31084433 = product of:
      0.55951977 = sum of:
        0.031135354 = product of:
          0.09340606 = sum of:
            0.09340606 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09340606 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.13209611 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13209611 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.13209611 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13209611 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.13209611 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13209611 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.13209611 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13209611 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  11. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.28
    0.28108308 = product of:
      0.5059495 = sum of:
        0.038919196 = product of:
          0.11675758 = sum of:
            0.11675758 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11675758 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11675758 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  12. Quirmbach, S.M.: Suchmaschinen : User Experience, Usability und nutzerzentrierte Website-Gestaltung (2012) 0.14
    0.1397598 = product of:
      0.41927937 = sum of:
        0.1280057 = sum of:
          0.041522004 = weight(_text_:web in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041522004 = score(doc=1705,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
          0.086483695 = weight(_text_:seite in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.086483695 = score(doc=1705,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16469958 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.52509964 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
        0.236271 = weight(_text_:benutzerfreundlichkeit in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.236271 = score(doc=1705,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2289144 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            1.0321369 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
        0.055002663 = product of:
          0.11000533 = sum of:
            0.11000533 = weight(_text_:bewertung in 1705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11000533 = score(doc=1705,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18575147 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.5922178 = fieldWeight in 1705, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1705)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    RSWK
    Suchmaschine / Web-Seite / Qualitätsmanagement / Benutzerfreundlichkeit / Bewertung
    Suchmaschine / Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle / Benutzerfreundlichkeit / Web Site
    Subject
    Suchmaschine / Web-Seite / Qualitätsmanagement / Benutzerfreundlichkeit / Bewertung
    Suchmaschine / Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle / Benutzerfreundlichkeit / Web Site
  13. Neunzert, H.: Mathematische Modellierung : ein "curriculum vitae" (2012) 0.02
    0.019415827 = product of:
      0.17474245 = sum of:
        0.17474245 = product of:
          0.5242273 = sum of:
            0.5242273 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.5242273 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28672808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                1.8283083 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Content
    Vortrag auf der Tagung "Geschichte und Modellierung", Jena, 3. Februar 2012. Vgl. unter: http://www.fmi.uni-jena.de/Fakult%C3%A4t/Institute+und+Abteilungen/Abteilung+f%C3%BCr+Didaktik/Kolloquien.html?highlight=neunzert.
  14. Sieglerschmidt, J.: Wissensordnungen im analogen und im digitalen Zeitalter (2017) 0.02
    0.018305417 = product of:
      0.16474876 = sum of:
        0.16474876 = product of:
          0.49424627 = sum of:
            0.49424627 = weight(_text_:c3 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.49424627 = score(doc=4026,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.28672808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                1.7237456 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=0rtGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA35&dq=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung+OR+sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&ots=5u0TwCbFqE&sig=GGw3Coc21CINkone-6Lx8LaSAjY#v=onepage&q=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung%20OR%20sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&f=false.
  15. Kaden, B.: Referenz, Netzwerk und Regelkreis : Herausforderungen digitaler Kommunikationsumgebungen für die Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft. Eine Positionierung im Nachgang zu einem Festvortrag für die Jubiläumsveranstaltung des Arbeitskreis Information Magdeburg im Oktober 2011 (2011) 0.02
    0.018010575 = product of:
      0.08104759 = sum of:
        0.035672702 = product of:
          0.071345404 = sum of:
            0.071345404 = weight(_text_:seite in 4896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071345404 = score(doc=4896,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16469958 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.4331851 = fieldWeight in 4896, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4896)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.045374885 = product of:
          0.09074977 = sum of:
            0.09074977 = weight(_text_:bewertung in 4896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09074977 = score(doc=4896,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18575147 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.48855478 = fieldWeight in 4896, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4896)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag unternimmt eine Annäherung an bestimmte grundlegende Auswirkungen digitaler Kommunikationsnetze auf die Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft sowie die Informationsvermittlung. Im Mittelpunkt stehen dabei der informationelle "Eigensinn" dieser Systeme sowie die Ablösung des Dokuments als fester Bezugsgröße. Die konkrete Einschreibbarkeit des Nutzungshandelns in das System der Informationsinhalte verändert beide Faktoren der Informationsarbeit. Die Frage, was ein Informationsobjekt ist und wie dieses verstanden werden kann, erfordert daher die Einbeziehung dieses Handelns in die bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftliche Analyse, Bewertung und Innovation. Als Beschreibungsmatrix wird eine "Vierheit" vorgeschlagen. Dem klassischen Retrieval müssen dafür dynamische Verfahren der Visualisierung sowie der Informationshermeneutik zur Seite gestellt werden.
  16. Göttker, S.: ¬Die Bibliothek als physischer Ort bleibt wichtig : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage zu künftigen Funktionen und Herausforderungen (2010) 0.02
    0.017926175 = product of:
      0.08066779 = sum of:
        0.061221406 = sum of:
          0.017979559 = weight(_text_:web in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017979559 = score(doc=3248,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.18735787 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
          0.043241847 = weight(_text_:seite in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043241847 = score(doc=3248,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16469958 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.26254982 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
        0.019446379 = product of:
          0.038892757 = sum of:
            0.038892757 = weight(_text_:bewertung in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038892757 = score(doc=3248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18575147 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.20938061 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Content
    Zudem sieht das geltende Urheberrecht vor, dass Bibliotheken digitalisierte Lehrbücher nur an ebenso vielen PCs anbieten dürfen, wie sie sie auch jeweils als gedruckte Exemplare erworben haben. Das verlagsseitige Angebot an elektronischen Lehrbüchern ist dabei noch relativ überschaubar. In vielen Fällen sind sie nahezu unerschwinglich und wenig benutzerfreundlich. Wie es angesichts dieser Situation zu einer solchen Bewertung der Lehrbuchsammlung kommt, wenn doch andererseits der Bibliothek als physischem Ort auch in Zukunft eine sehr hohe Relevanz beigemessen wird, könnte näher hinterfragt werden. Die »Beratungskompetenz der Mitarbeiter« wird bei der Frage nach sehr wichtigen Aspekten an oberster Stelle genannt. Es ist diese Kompetenz, die aus der Digitalen Bibliothek auf der einen Seite und der Bibliothek als physischem Ort auf der anderen Seite eine Hybride Bibliothek werden lässt. In den Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrats zur digitalen Informationsversorgung von 2001 wird die Hybride Bibliothek als das Modell genannt, zu dem sich die Bibliotheken »weiterentwickeln müssen«. - Experten diskutieren Dietmar Haubfleisch schrieb 2001 als Reaktion auf die Forderung des Wissenschaftsrates: »Es ist davon auszugehen, dass die künftigen Arbeitsbereiche deutlich komplexer und >verdichteter< werden, dass sie gleichzeitig immer weniger voneinander abgrenzbar sein werden und immer enger miteinander verschmelzen, dass von den Mitarbeitern erhöhte Flexibilitäten im Sinne permanenter Anpassungen an die sich ständig verändernden Medienangebote und Benutzerbedürfnisse in der sich rasch verändernden Medienlandschaft gefordert werden.«
    Ulrich Naumann meldete bereits 2004 Skepsis an, ob die neuen Herausforderungen bewältigt werden können: »Es ist unbestritten, dass die Versorgung mit digitalisierten Informationen eine zusätzliche Aufgabe der hybrid gestalteten Hochschulbibliotheken ist, die neben den >traditionellen papierorientierten> Aufgaben zu leisten ist [...1 Zusätzliche Aufgaben - das sagt schon der gesunde Menschenverstand - können nur dann erfüllt werden, wenn dafür auch zusätzliches Personal bereitgestellt werden kann. Genau das ist aber nicht der Fall. Trotz einer erkennbar höheren und qualitativ auch stärker fordernden Aufgabenvielfalt wird unverdrossen in den Bibliotheken weiter Personal abgebaut.« Wie stellen wir es also an, dass die Mitarbeiter in den Bibliotheken - fast immer unter Auslassung des Web 2.0 - nun fit für das Web 3.0, das semantische Web, gemacht werden? Wie schaffen wir es, dass alle mit im Boot bleiben und nicht Mitarbeiter erster und zweiter Klasse entstehen? Einen Vorschlag, wie eine Digitale Bibliothek der Zukunft aussehen kann, macht Steffen Wawra. Er fragt: »Warum rufen wir nicht Strukturen ins Leben, die in allen Unternehmen und Organisationen anzutreffen sind, welche ihre zukünftige Aufstellung nicht dem Zufall oder dem Spiel der Kräfte überlassen wollen? Abteilungen, die sich mit Ideen und Innovationen beschäftigen, Think-Tanks oder Innovationsteams?« Der Diskussionsbedarf bleibt also enorm. GeSIG - das Forum Fachinformation empfiehlt sich gern als Plattform für diesen fachlichen Austausch über die Zukunft der Bibliotheken.
  17. Averesch, D.: Googeln ohne Google : Mit alternativen Suchmaschinen gelingt ein neutraler Überblick (2010) 0.02
    0.015403711 = product of:
      0.0693167 = sum of:
        0.06334073 = sum of:
          0.010380501 = weight(_text_:web in 3374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010380501 = score(doc=3374,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 3374, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3374)
          0.052960232 = weight(_text_:seite in 3374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052960232 = score(doc=3374,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16469958 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.32155657 = fieldWeight in 3374, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3374)
        0.005975969 = product of:
          0.011951938 = sum of:
            0.011951938 = weight(_text_:22 in 3374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011951938 = score(doc=3374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Content
    Wer den großen Google-Konkurrenten erst einmal im Blindtest auf den Zahn fühlen will, kann das unter http://blindsearch.fejus.com tun. Die Suchergebnisse werden im gleichen Design in drei Spal- ten nebeneinander dargestellt. Erst, wenn der Nutzer sein Votum abgegeben hat, in welcher Spalte die seiner Meinung nach besten Ergebnisse stehen, lüftet die Seite das Geheimnis und zeigt die Logos von Bing, Yahoo und Google an. Der Verein Suma zieht das Fazit, dass "The Big Three" qualitativ gleichwertig seien. Am Tempo gibt es bei den großen Suchmaschinen nichts zu bemängeln. Alle drei spucken ihre Ergebnisse zügig aus. Google und Yahoo zeigen beim Tippen Suchvorschläge an und verfügen über einen Kinder- und Jugendschutzfilter. Letzterer lässt sich auch bei Bing einschalten. Auf die Booleschen Operatoren ("AND", "OR" etc.), die Suchbegriffe logisch verknüpfen, verstehen sich die meisten Suchmaschinen. Yahoo bietet zusätzlich die Suche mit haus- gemachten Abkürzungen an. Shortcuts für die fixe Suche nach Aktienkursen, Call-byCall-Vorwahlen, dem Wetter oder eine Taschenrechnerfunktion finden sich unter http://de.search.yahoo.com/info/shortcuts. Vergleichbar ist das Funktionsangebot von Google, das unter www.google.com/intl/de/help/features.html aufgelistet ist. Das Unternehmen bietet auch die Volltextsuche in Büchern, eine Suche in wissenschaftlichen Veröffentlichungen oder die Recherche nach öffentlich verfügbarem Programmiercodes an. Bei den großen Maschinen lassen sich in der erweiterten Suche auch Parameter wie Sprachraum, Region, Dateityp, Position des Suchbegriffs auf der Seite, Zeitraum der letzten Aktualisierung und Nutzungsrechte einbeziehen. Ganz so weit ist die deutsche Suche von Ask, die sich noch im Betastudium befindet, noch nicht (http://de.ask.com). Praktisch ist aber die Voran-sicht der Seiten in einem Popup-Fenster beim Mouseover über das Fernglas-Symbol vor den Suchbegriffen. Die globale Ask-Suche (www.ask.com) ist schon weiter und zeigt wie Google direkt auch Bilder zu den relevantesten Foto- und Video-Suchergebnissen an.
    Unzählige kleinere und Spezial-Suchmaschinen bieten Einblicke in Ecken des Netzes, zu denen man mit den Großen eher nicht gelangt wä- re. Nach wie vor gibt es auch Verzeichnisdienste. die Seiten in genau beschriebenen Kategorien auflisten. Dazu gehört www.dmoz.org. Um mehrere Maschinen und Verzeichnisdienste gleichzeitig abzufragen, empfehlen sich Metasuchmaschinen. Eine der bekanntesten ist MetaGer, ein Projekt der Universität Hannover. Eine weitere interessante Metasuchmaschine, deren Ergebnisse aber auf Nordamerika zugeschnitten sind, ist www.clusty.com. Wie der Name andeutet, bündelt sie die Suchergebnisse zu logischen Clustern. Auch praktisch: Beim Klick auf die Lupensymbole hinter den Suchergebnissen öffnen sich beliebig viele Vorschauen direkt in der Web- seite. Ob das Googeln ohne Google irgendwann nichts besonderes mehr ist, hängt maßgeblich von den Surfern ab - davon ist man beim Verein für freien Wissenszugang überzeugt: Änderungen seien ,;weniger durch neue Technologien, sondern vor allem durch verändertes Nutzerverhalten aufgrund steigender Informationskompetenz zu erwarten."
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  18. Ernst-Gerlach, A.; Korbar, D.; Awakian, A.: Entwicklung einer Benutzeroberfläche zur interaktiven Regelgenerierung für die Suche in historischen Dokumenten (2010) 0.02
    0.015313861 = product of:
      0.13782474 = sum of:
        0.13782474 = weight(_text_:benutzerfreundlichkeit in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13782474 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2289144 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.60207987 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Für Retrieval in historischen Dokumenten wird eine Abbildung der Suchbegriffe auf ihre historischen Varianten in den Dokumenten benötigt. Hierfür wurde ein regelbasierter Ansatz entwickelt. Mit dem RuleGenerator wurde dafür eine Benutzeroberfläche entworfen, die es dem Anwender selbst ermöglicht, automatisch Belege zu erstellen und daraus Regeln zu generieren und zu bearbeiten. Im Rahmen einer eyetrackergestützten Benutzerstudie wurde die Benutzerfreundlichkeit des Werkzeugs evaluiert.
  19. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.02
    0.015065095 = product of:
      0.13558586 = sum of:
        0.13558586 = sum of:
          0.10371402 = weight(_text_:bewertung in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10371402 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18575147 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.5583483 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.031871837 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031871837 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Dieses Whitepaper beschäftigt sich mit der Definition und Bewertung von Faktoren, die eine hohe Rangkorrelation-Koeffizienz mit organischen Suchergebnissen aufweisen und dient dem Zweck der tieferen Analyse von Suchmaschinen-Algorithmen. Die Datenerhebung samt Auswertung bezieht sich auf Ranking-Faktoren für Google-Deutschland im Jahr 2014. Zusätzlich wurden die Korrelationen und Faktoren unter anderem anhand von Durchschnitts- und Medianwerten sowie Entwicklungstendenzen zu den Vorjahren hinsichtlich ihrer Relevanz für vordere Suchergebnis-Positionen interpretiert.
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  20. Landwehr, A.: China schafft digitales Punktesystem für den "besseren" Menschen (2018) 0.02
    0.015065095 = product of:
      0.13558586 = sum of:
        0.13558586 = sum of:
          0.10371402 = weight(_text_:bewertung in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10371402 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18575147 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.5583483 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
          0.031871837 = weight(_text_:22 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031871837 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Ein digitales Punktekonto soll flächendeckend in China eingeführt werden und gute von schlechten Bürgern unterscheiden. Die soziale Bewertung des Einzelnen hat jedoch weitreichende Konsequenzen für sein Leben. Viele Chinesen finden es trotzdem gut.
    Date
    22. 6.2018 14:29:46

Languages

  • e 1282
  • d 452
  • f 3
  • i 2
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1463
  • el 205
  • m 157
  • s 63
  • x 43
  • r 16
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications